Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shared Tenancy Agreement - one party leaving


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have a shared tenancy agreement with my housemate. We both equally paided the deposit over 6 months ago, to the agency and have confirmation that the deposit is registered with the Dispite Service Ltd. My Housemate has now moved out giving plenty of notice at end of the 6mth SHT. She wrote to me and letting agency giving noitice to vacate the property. I am staying in the property.

 

The letting agency states that "they can only accept notice is both parties provide notice and vacate. If my house mate wished to leave the agency are unable to return the deposit to her and its is fine me to give my ex housemate her share of the deposit, she needs to confirm this in writing to the agency. Unless i am prepared to sign a new contract in my name then my ex house mate will still be liable.

 

1) Who should pay the deposit back to my ex housemate? Me or the letting agency?

 

I have a letter from her solisiter saying i she paid me the deposit and i have to pay her back.

 

2) In regards to the Tenancy agreement what happens to that now my houemate has moved out?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a shared tenancy agreement with my housemate. We both equally paided the deposit over 6 months ago, to the agency and have confirmation that the deposit is registered with the Dispite Service Ltd. My Housemate has now moved out giving plenty of notice at end of the 6mth SHT. She wrote to me and letting agency giving noitice to vacate the property. I am staying in the property.

 

The letting agency states that "they can only accept notice is both parties provide notice and vacate. If my house mate wished to leave the agency are unable to return the deposit to her and its is fine me to give my ex housemate her share of the deposit, she needs to confirm this in writing to the agency. Unless i am prepared to sign a new contract in my name then my ex house mate will still be liable.

 

1) Who should pay the deposit back to my ex housemate? Me or the letting agency?

 

I have a letter from her solisiter saying i she paid me the deposit and i have to pay her back.

 

2) In regards to the Tenancy agreement what happens to that now my houemate has moved out?

 

Cheers

 

Can you just clarify... did your housemate leave at the end of the fixed term (at the end of 6 months), before the pereiodic started?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then unfortunaltey the letting agents are spot on, your house mate couldnt end the tenancy on their own at the end of the fixed term, it would require both of you to have served notice. The earliest that your house mate could have left by serving an individual notice would be at the start of the periodic to leave after 7 months. If you wanted to you could require your house mate to pay for this additonal month if you where inclined to do so as they are still liable.

 

I think you need to speak directly to DPS and see what is going to happen, your ex-house mate is going to be in their rights to request the deposit bacck from DPS now. Either way you are going to be left with having to find a replacement 50% deposit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the agency today, and as i thought they would not go with another option i thought of which was to pay them half of deposit and them and they pay the ex housemate the half. As as you state the deposit is held with the DPS scheme so they refused to pay the ex housemate

 

The agency did say that she would have to confirm in writting that this has been done and she is happy that i am resposible for the full deposit.

 

1) my worry is i am relaying on her to send this letter and i end up paying her the half and then when i eventually leave i will only only get half deposit back?? I have no evidence that i have paid her.

 

2) there is also the matter of the outstanding utility bills that we have accounts with jointly. I am going to pay my half and have given the utility companies details of my housemates solistors for billing

Edited by Bushbabie
forget to put something on
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, definatley dont pay anything till you have proof that all the bills are paid up. To be honest i would sit tight for a minute and not do anything.

Are you on good terms with your ex housemate?

Please note, my advice is only my opinion.

If you have found my advice helpful, please tip my scales, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...