Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Harlands/CRS fees help needed - **WON VIA DD GUARANTEE**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am seeking some advice,

 

 

I signed up for a gym membership in January 2015 under a 12 month contract in GymEtc Preston, Lancashire.

 

 

In May 2015 I had to move back to Northern Ireland

I asked a receptionist at the gym if I could cancel my membership

but they told me I couldn't as it is a contract I took their word for it.

 

 

As I was moving and had no job to go to I had to cancel the direct debit.

I cancelled the direct debit in May 2015, my last payment was 1st May 2015.

 

 

Harlands/CRS act on behalf of the gym (which I wasn't aware of at the time of signing up)

they then started sending me letters chasing me for money - a total of £410.

 

 

I agreed to pay them £15 a month beginning October 2015 and because I was paying instalments

they charged £2.50 per installment which then added another £100 onto the balance making it £510.

 

 

It wasn't until recently I started looking into this more and reading reviews on Harlands/CRS, which aren't good as all.

I had already paid 4 installments of £25 to the gym before I cancelled the direct debit. If I had of stayed with the gym at £25 a month I would a paid a total annual cost of £300.

 

 

I then called Harlands/CRS to see why the amount was so high

to which they said there were 9 months of payments left on the contract totalling £225.

 

 

Also 2 x £25 for missed payments, a debt recovery fee of 36% which was £99

and £36 for tracing me to my new address.

 

 

The only terms and conditions of the gym mentioned on their website are;

- If you fail to pay any monies due under this agreement or if any Direct Debit is returned unpaid

or any cheque is returned unpaid or if any other form of payment is not honoured for whatever reason

, you shall pay us on demand an administration fee of £25

(which we require to cover our costs of seeking to pursue such payment from you).

 

 

- If you fail to pay any amount due under this agreement for a period of more than thirty days

, then we may pass the debt to a third party company for collection.

 

 

The reasonable and direct costs incurred in employing the third party company will be borne by you

including costs in tracing you if you have changed your address without telling us.

 

 

In the terms and conditions it states: CANCELLATION

•Relocation: This agreement can be cancelled in the event that your new permanent address I

s more than 15 miles away from the facility upon receipt of a copy utility bill or bank statement showing the new address.

 

 

I have since spoken to the gym and they have waived all their fees and said they would backdate any debt agency fees for my relocation to the month

 

 

I moved (May 2015). I have already paid Harlands/CRS £105 and they are still wanting £99 for their fees.

Are the fees they are charging enforcable by law from what is mentioned in the contract terms and conditions?

 

 

I contacted the FCA to see what they could do and it turns out that Harlands/CRS are no longer regulated by the FCA

so they can't do anything about it, however they were regulated by the FCA at the time I became a member of the gym.

 

 

They said any rules would only apply if the agreement with the gym was a consumer credit agreement,

which I emailed the gym and they have replied saying it is a consumer credit agreement.

 

 

I then complained to the Financial Ombudsman as stated in my terms and conditions that I could do so:

"CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 (”THE ACT”) You have a right to complain in relation to consumer credit

matters to The Financial Ombudsman Service.

CRS sent me a letter to confirm the receipt of the complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

 

They also added, Please be aware that the contract you entered into is not a credit agreement

and therefore outside of their jurisdiction to deal with.

We can confirm the administration fees of £25 are stated in your contract.

It is also stated you would be liable for our debt recovery costs and trace fees.

In view of this we maintain that all fees are valid and legal."

 

 

They have attached a copy of terms and conditions which are Harlands terms

and conditions and not the gyms, which is not what I signed up to originally.

 

 

Then they have also increased the balance from the agreed £99 to £212.50.

 

 

The issue is no longer regarding the gym as they have waived their fees from the month i moved back home to Northern Ireland.

 

 

The gym have told me it is a credit agreement, Harlands/CRS have told me it's not.

I have already paid them £105 and they are still wanting £99,

plus for paying that back by instalments another £2.50 per instalment charge would be added!!!

 

 

I don't want anything going on my credit file and definitely not a CCJ/DEFAULT.

 

 

What should I do?

 

 

***PLEASE NOTE: ANY PHONE CALLS I HAVE MADE TO HARLANDS/CRS HAVE BEEN RECORDED ON MY PHONE SO I HAVE PROOF OF CONVERSATIONS MENTIONED***

 

 

I would be so grateful of any help I can get.

 

 

Thank you in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

bottom line is you are being had blind.

stop paying them

you owe no-one anything.

time to ignore everyone now

 

the fees are unlawful

no gym contract is gov't by the CCA nor the FCA

and the FOS wont get involved.

and they don't show on your credit file.

 

just because something is in someones T&C's it

dos not make penalty fees enforceable.

 

go enjoy your life

they've spoofed you out of their pound of flesh already

they are NOT BAILIFFS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fightright and welcome to CAG

 

I've had to skim through your first post as it's so long but the bottom line is, you've been HAD !!

 

Stop making any payments to them immediately.

 

Good news - this will NOT affect your credit records at all as gym m/ships arrears data is not reported by CRA's.

 

If you'd come here when you first wanted to leave the gym, we'd have told you to pay one final fee after giving a month's notice. We'd have then told you to ignore demands from Harlands/CRS.

 

In theory, you could sue Harlands for the return of moneys paid to them in excess of what you owed. However, I think you should maybe just see this as a lesson learned.

 

Once you've stopped paying, Harlands/CRS will whinge, moan and tell you to restore payments or they'll do all sorts of scary things. But you'll see from all the other threads here that very little is likely to happen when you stop paying.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply guys :)

 

 

What I was going to do is make a direct debit indemnity claim

under my direct debit guarantee that I am entitled to,

in order to get all the direct debits back that I had paid totalling £105 to CRS.

 

 

Would this be okayto do?

 

 

It is mentioned in my terms and conditions that I would have to pay a tracing fee for them finding me at my new address

and £25 admin fee for a missed direct debit,

 

 

once I get my funds that I have paid them from my indemnity claim should I pay them these 2 fees

since it was in the original T&Cs?

 

 

CRS told me the tracing fee was £36.

What I don't understand is the gym have told them they have accepted

my confirmation of moving more than 15 miles away from the gym

but yet I still have to pay CRS fees,

 

 

even the guy at the gym knew there would still be their fees to pay.

 

 

Thanks for any further help :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

get them back and ignore them

they rarely do court.

 

 

no fees are lawful end of!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx! I wish someone could do something about this and get them done for what they are doing. From the amount of things I have read about them for what they are doing to so many people is wrong, they need to be stopped!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just following on from what every DCA does on any debt they fleece people on

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FR,

 

Can you just confirm, did you set up a new DD to start paying "arrears" to Harlands/CRS from October 2015.

 

Personally, I do NOT think you should reclaim the £15 monthly payments, paid from October 2015, under the DDGS. You agreed to make those payments in the belief you owed arrears.

 

Harlands did not take incorrect amounts, or use the DD mandate to take payments you had not agreed to.

 

On a different note, you do not need to worry about paying Harlands/CRS "tracing fees" or anything else mentioned in the m/ship Terms and Conditions.

 

Don't call Harlands/CRS for any reason and, if they call you, just hang up !! You have no need to speak to them at all.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, Yes I set up a DD as I thought through the letter that I received from the back in October that this would go against me on my credit rating and I didn't want that so that is why I started paying them. I didn't realise until about March 2016 what kind of company that they were and that I shouldn't have paid them. If I had of known back in October what I know now I wouldn't have paid them a penny. Do you not advise me to get the DD's back that I have paid CRS already? I think as the gym have accepted my cancellation for moving more than 15 miles away as of June 2015 why have Harlands/CRS not accepted that? Also why should they be entitled to any of the money I have already paid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FR,

 

I'm just saying what I think is right, objectively.

 

However, I can also see there's also a decent argument for reclaiming the DD's paid from October 2015 onwards, on the basis that :-

 

1. The gym advised you wrongly that you couldn't cancel, despite moving away more than the required distance.

 

2. You were told incorrectly by Harlands/CRS that you owed them money and should pay "arrears" by the new DD.

 

So I'm now happy to agree with the advice from DX on this occasion - contact your bank immediately and tell them you require the DD's paid to Harlands/CRS from (I'm guessing) October 2015 to January 2016 inclusive because you now realise the payments were not payable and you paid them due to being misinformed and threatened.

 

The bank should refund without question and let us know when this is done.

 

Then we'll help you deal with the repercussions that will no doubt come from Harlands/CRS.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, thanks for your reply again...youre a star :)

 

Well I don't see why I shouldn't do an indemnity claim for the money I have paid so far, the gym have accepted my cancellation so why can't Harlands/CRS as the gym are the ones I had a contract with and not them.

 

Also should I reply to the letter that they sent me which I mentioned in my original post? It is the reply to the complaint I made with the Financial Ombudsman which they said it is out of their jurisdiction (although its mentioned under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section in my T&Cs that I have the right to complain to them) as the balance they quoted me before my complaint was £99 now they want £212?!?!

 

Also the T&Cs they have sent me are Harlands and not the gyms. They are quite similar but not the exact same. I signed up for the gyms terms and not theirs!!

 

If you think I should reply what should I say? Or could you kindly draft me up something please? Thanks again :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FR,

 

You have no need to contact Harlands/CRS at all and doing so is a waste of time - they won't agree with anything you say.

 

The FOS has no jurisdiction with gym m/ships. There is no Credit Agreement so forget this line of complaint.

 

All you need to do just now is tell the bank you require the refund of DD as per the DDGS.

 

Let us know when the money is refunded.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again. Havent posted for a while as havent been in the country, also havent had a chance to do the indemnity claim yet.

 

However CRS have still been hounding me with letters, phone calls and texts to which I havent responded. I received a letter from them yesterday dated 28th June in which I have 10 days (8th July) to contact them or they are going to pass the matter to Zinc... Any advice now would be appreciated :) thanks guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get that indemnity claim using the DDGS asap.

 

Ignore the latest from CRS and the same treatment for Zinc if they write.

 

Keep us posted.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses :D. I think I would like to write a letter to them to get them to stop making contact with me as I am sick of it. Is there anyone I can threaten them with if they forward my details on to Zinc or any of their associated companies and if they keep contacting me? I take it Zinc have no legal powers? I just don't want anything on my credit file or CCJs or whatever else, I don't care about anything else. Thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FR,

 

Do things in the right order and get the DD's reclaimed via your bank.

 

Let us know when this is done.

 

Harlands won't be pleased about the refund and will go through their normal collections procedure - Harlands/CRS, Zinc the Spratt Endicott. The more you ignore their demands, the quicker they'll give up.

 

If you want to take action to stop their harassment, take them to Small Claims Court seeking damages at the court's discretion. A claim can be started for just £25 plus a further £25 if the case goes to a hearing, which would be at a court local to you.

 

Harlands/CRS, Zinc and Spratt Endicott have no legal powers and we've said before that this will not appear on your CRA files. The chance of a CCJ is minute and, even if they took you to court and won, you have 20 days to settle the judgement amount and avoid the judgement going on to the public register.

 

Of course, if you're now back in N Ireland, that may affect your ability to take Harlands to court but we can look into that in more detail if necessary.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone :) I just phoned the bank today and within an hour I have had the imdemnity claim put back into my account. Behold the letters from CRS or whoever, havent heard from them since the last letter but will keep this updated anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FR,

 

Good to hear you got the DD back.

 

Just sit back and wait now, until Harlands/CRS start whining about the refund.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again,

 

Got a 3 page letter from CRS after my indemnity claim,

saying that I entered into a legally binding contract with agreement of 12 months

and also telling me I had only made three payments (I made 4 payments)

before I cancelled my direct debit.

 

I cancelled the direct debit as I was moving more than 15 miles away

and the gym receptionist said I couldn't cancel the contract.

 

They also mentioned about clauses in the contract which incurred

2 x £25 missed DD payments, £99 recovery fees and £36 in tracing me to my new address.

The total balance was £510 including their monthly direct debit handling fee.

 

After I had been stupidly paying CRS since October 2015 and only found out in April 2016

that me moving address could have in fact cancelled the membership

I contacted the gym and they backdated my cancellation request to June 2015.

CRS are only saying this is valid from the date in April 2016 when the gym cancelled everything.

 

They want a response/payment within 7 days - which is Friday 29th July or they will take further action.

 

What can I do with this one?

Is there anyone I can report this company to?

Thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tough on them.

you got your money back

they got months that they shouldn't have as well.

safe to ignore them now me thinks

 

 

there is stuff all they can do to you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FR,

 

Harlands have no right to demand a response/payment by any date, so don't worry about that.

 

You need only write to Harlands saying what I said in post #10. No need to say any more really.

 

Get a free Certificate of Posting at the PO when you send the letter.

 

If you want to draft the letter and put it here first, I'll look in later to comment.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi again, Low and behold, CRS have now passed this on to Zinc Group, with a balance of over £350.... What is the process when it is passed to Zinc? Any advice on what I do now? All help will be appreciated as always :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...