Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Selling a car on finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I wounder if anyone could give me some legal advice on selling a car with outstanding finance.

 

A friend of mine obtained a car on finance @ about 44%apr. he now wants to get rid of the car and has been told by somebody that if he gets a signed declaration from the buyer that he(the buyer) will continue to pay the finance i.e assume respinsibility for all outstanding monies on the car, then my friend would be covered against the finance company. Therefore the finance company would not be able to take County Court proceeding or even record a default on my friends credit profile.

 

Is there anybody on here who is familiar with the legalities on this subject.

 

Please help

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the best of my knowledge selling goods which are the subject of a finance agreement (i.e. hire purchase) is against the law. Basically it's not the "hirer's" property to sell until all payments (including any "option to purchase fee") have been paid and written confirmation is received from the finance company that this has been done.

 

A "declaration" such as you suggest isn't, I think, worth the paper it's written on. If the "purchaser" defaults it's the original hirer the finance company will be chasing. I doubt any finance company would consent to the "transfer of lability" to an unknown (to them) third party. I would suspect that a contingency such as this will be covered in the agreement's "small print" too.

 

 

Jimbo44

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with the above - but you can usually sell it to someone if they pay the finance company what you agree for it - say there is 4K owing and car is worth 2K you can ask the finance co if you can sell it so long as funds go to them - you advertise it for 2K and sell it getting the buyer to pay the finance co directly and then you owe the reminder for soemthing you no longer have...i know of freinds who have done this but to me its worse to be paying for it and not having it!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Selling a vehicle on which HP is still owed is against the law. The way an HP agreement works is that the car dealer invoices the finance company for the car. The finance company then pays the dealer for the car and the customer hires the car from the finance company until the very end of the agreement. At this point the customer pays the finance company an 'option to purchase fee' which actually transfers ownership to the customer. It would be exactly the same as selling a rented t.v., house etc. i.e. it's not yours to sell in the first place. You wouldn't dream of selling a dvd you rented from blockbuster so why would you do it with an item worth 500 times as much. In my job I use experian car data checks every day and this can tell you whether a finance company has an interest in any car. There has however been a tendency in recent years for finance companies to sell personal loans rather than HP. In this case most of the rights given to the customer under the CCA 1974 are taken away - chiefly the right to voluntarily terminate the agreement upon paying half the total payable. Many people who have taken these loans have no idea they have a loan instead of HP as the forms they sign look very similar. If you have one of these loans you do have a right to sell the car and the finance company has no right to register an interest on experian/HPI. Many of them do register an interest but if they have you can have it removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to Hijack but I'd be interested on how to get them to remove it as Black Horse have done this to me and they wont reply to my letters asking them to remove it from teh HP register - any help would be great!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Likewise - any information would be great!

 

Sorry to Hijack but I'd be interested on how to get them to remove it as Black Horse have done this to me and they wont reply to my letters asking them to remove it from teh HP register - any help would be great!
Link to post
Share on other sites

I will take it that the agreement has now been paid off and you are wanting them to remove it so you can sell the car on. If they won't remove it i beleive the best way to do is contact the people that run the HP register requesting them to remove it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the point - its not a secured loan, nor a HP agreement, so they shouldnt be able register their interest in it!

 

 

Depends what type of laon it is as far as i am aware. If it is a secured car loan them i am sure they would be within there rights to add their interest.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done so - and this is their reply:

I have spoken to one of our finance team and they have confirmed that Black Horse will not remove the financial interest against the vehicle, even if it is a personal loan. All we can recommend is that you get a letter from Black Horse confirming that the personal loan will not cause a problem with the sale of the vehicle.

I dont think this is an acceptable reponse and have replied reaffirming the fact that what they are doing is a misuse of the register - watch this space!

 

Then i agree they can't add interest and as such i would speak to HPI to have it removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

The reply to the reply to the above email was as follows:

 

Dear Mr Hosgood

 

We are unable to comment further in reference to your email, we can only advise you contact the finance company as previously mentioned in the email.

 

Regards

Barbara

 

So a letter has been sent to Black Horse, it will be interesting to see the reponse!

 

Richard

 

I would agree with you if it is a personal loan then they have no right to register any interest in the car as they don't have it. I would recommend writing to Blackhorse requesting them to remove it
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, if you really want to get the finance company to scratch their corporate head you could ask them under which statute they they alledge they have the authority to register the car!

 

I have a kind of hunch the answer, (if they give a direct one), could be interesting.

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, if you really want to get the finance company to scratch their corporate head you could ask them under which statute they they alledge they have the authority to register the car!

 

I have a kind of hunch the answer, (if they give a direct one), could be interesting.

 

and what would your hunch be lol.

 

 

this is exactly the question i will be asking when i post them my next letter this weekend!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and what would your hunch be lol.

 

 

this is exactly the question i will be asking when i post them my next letter this weekend!

 

My 'hunch'? I don't know of any legislation giving anyone the right to register their interest in unsecured goods. Secured goods, (as in subject to a Hire Purchase Agreement, Secured Loan, Mortgage etc.), maybe, but not unsecured (as in financed by a Personal Loan such as those used for car purchase).

 

I could well be wrong though!!! Anyone know for sure????

 

If you do ask the question though, I would love to see the answer, please.

Jimbo 44 - always happy to help, but always willing to learn from being corrected too!!! Whilst any advice given may be based upon personal experience, please always be sure you seek guidance from a professional in the particular field.

 

Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark, but a large group of professionals built the Titanic.

 

A 'click' on the scales is always appreciated if I have helped. Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a copy of the letter which has been sent by me and received by Black Horse (recorded delivery)

 

To Sir or Madam:

 

Agreement number – XXXXXXXXX

Vehicle Registration – XXXXXXX

After recently obtaining a HPI check for the above vehicle (copy attached) I am concerned as to why there is an outstanding finance file shown against it.

 

I brought this vehicle with a Black Horse personal loan agreement, which is confirmed at the top of the signed agreement (copy attached).

 

As this is not a Hire Purchase Agreement, I respectfully request that you remove the file held against it on the HPI register and provide me with an explanation in writing as to why a file was placed as such.

I have been advised that unless the finance agreement is Hire Purchase, or a "secured agreement", no file should be placed on the HPI register and to do so is a serious misuse of it.

The signed agreement cannot be both a Personal Loan Agreement and a Hire Purchase Agreement – please confirm in writing which you deem the contract to be. If you deem the contract to be a Hire Purchase Agreement, then I request documentation detailing it as such.

Unless I receive a satisfactory response from Black Horse Ltd, replying to my above requests and giving written confirmation of the removal of, or the intention to remove, the file on the HPI register, I will report the misuse to the Finance and Leasing Association and proceed to take further legal action.

I would request that this letter is replied to within the next 14 days.

 

So we'll await the reply!

Richard

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats almost what i wrote first second and third (the third threatened legal action if they didnt reply!!)

 

their responce (in writing) was it IS a PERSONAL LOAN and that they are not removing thier interest unless i pay in full or the agreements ends in 3 years as planned....

 

i have no responded yet as unsure on wording!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah we arent disputing its a personnal loan, but that doesnt give them the right to register an interest in the item that was bought with it on the HPI register - to do that they need a HP agreement or a secured loan, which this isnt.

 

Its no different than going to the bank to borrow £3000 and spending it on double glazing for example - the loan isnt secured on the windows so they cant take them away nor can they register an interest in it so they get all the money back if you move house, so why do the same for a car?

 

BTW - Ive PM'ed you seeing as we are in the same boat I thought we may be able to assist each other on this bumpy road along which we tread - lol! :D

 

Richard

 

thats almost what i wrote first second and third (the third threatened legal action if they didnt reply!!)

 

their responce (in writing) was it IS a PERSONAL LOAN and that they are not removing thier interest unless i pay in full or the agreements ends in 3 years as planned....

 

i have no responded yet as unsure on wording!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Blackhorse are being total ar#es and ignoring every letter that Ive sent, and I know they have been delivered as I have proof of delivery - I am going to complain to the FSA and see what they say about it.

 

As for selling the car..................;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

hi guys just picked this thread up on google i know its quite an old topiic but i am in exactly the same possition with my car bought on finance (not hp) and i wondered how it all panned out did they take it of the hpi register or not (my guess is not they always seem to get round things like that).

 

any reply would be most grateful

 

regards Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Black Horse Finance have caused me nothing but headaches.

 

I purchased a new vehicle with a previous girlfriend from a Kia showroom. After agreeing a price we arranged finance (Personal Loan) through our joint bank (Barclays) for the £22,000 it would be costing us.

 

As we arrived at the showroom to collect the vehicle the salesman who we had been dealing with suggested we took their finance as the rate was cheaper than what we were paying at Barclays. Before agreeing my partner and I asked for assurance that the loan would indeed be a PERSONAL LOAN. Meaning, that when it came to selling the car we would not have any problems selling it. I had personally been the victim of buying a car which had finance remaining on it back during the late 1980's, so I was aware of the potential issues involved in these matters.

 

After signing the finance agreement, which clearly stated PERSONAL LOAN at the top of the form we drove the vehicle away.

 

Two years later and my girlfriend and I went our separate ways, so we agreed that we would sell the car. This is where the grief began! After placing an advertisement a buyer viewed the vehicle and we arranged for him to collect it the following Friday. He would be paying by bank transfer and I assured him that there was no finance remaining on the vehicle.

 

However, on the morning when I was expecting the money to arrive into my bank account I received a call from the buyer stating that the HPi check he has initiated stated that there was finance remaining on the vehicle!

 

I immediately contacted the finance company who informed me that I would have to clear the remaining finance (approximately £7,000, which I did NOT have) before the car was legally owned by the new owner (who would not of course pay me until I had done this!)

 

Again, when I took out the loan I was assured that it was indeed a personal loan, meaning that the money could have been used for a holiday, new breasts, or indeed ANYTHING.

 

Had I ignored the Kia Salesman the matter would have been addressed by now. I would simply be paying off the outstanding amount each month without any problems.

 

The matter has now gone on for 10 MONTHS and the vehicle has depreciated further (meaning, the longer the matter goes on, the more money I lose)

 

I urge ANYONE considering taking a 'personal loan' through Kia/Black Horse Finance to THINK before doing so. It may be more expensive dealing with your personal bankers, but should you be considering selling the vehicle before the conclusion of the agreement and you do not have any spare cash, you will be SCREWED, and stuck with a vehicle you no longer need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hello ppl

well here goes i privatly bought a car on the "hpi" with black horse so before i completed the sale i called them give the details as i got from hpi .

 

 

 

they told me everything i asked the mans name address dob amount per month an that the car was on "personal loan" but do not worrie they would remove the intrest in car.

 

 

so needless to say i bought the car

 

 

1 year on i have been in car crash (man in 4x4 run into me)

 

 

settled with my insurance sitting by letterbox for my 9000 kite (slang for cheque but i would have been better flying one)

 

 

no cheque but letter saying they had transfered the money to bh all i had to do as settle the further 3650

 

i called black h why do they have intrest they had reapplied it to hpi after i bought the car

 

so needless to say i am 9000 out of bed an no car for someone elses personal loan

 

if you ever see black horse stay well away they are not to be trusted with your details either but thanks to them i have the man who has benifited details

 

i will be colecting my money from him once his new loan comes through but not everyone is this lucky

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...