Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Received HMRC letter about tax credits. What do I tell them?


caly1967
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3820 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Can someone please help or advise!!!!!!, I have been claiming Tax credits for years as a single parent with my partner actually living with me, God I know how stupid this has been we both work anc claim nothing else.I received a letter from HMRC on Friday regarding my award for 2011 - 2012 and have stated they know my partner is at the address and why we have not made a joint claim.Im sick with worry and its making me ill I have not slept since receiving the leter, basically my partner ownes the house we live in he pays the mortgage, council tax, water, house insurances, tv license and I pay the gas, electric, phone, food.Im not sure how after all these years they have finally caught up with us but they have so im going to tell them that me and my partner have had a stormy relationship and he has not been living with me for years although he has paid the above mentioned bills for the sake of the kids and he has basically been living at his mothers on and off. Im going to tell them he moved back in last September as we have decided to give it a go although this is all not quite true but I dont know what else to do as the amout we could end up paying back could kill us if they go back that far.Im going to the CAB tomorrow to see if they can help all we want to do now is get off this system pay back something and get on with our lives.Please can someone help do you know how far back they go and what would be their next move if I submit this side of the story.I know I have done wrong and god im so sorry for that Please please please help or advise the best course of action as I dont want to pay 60 or 70k back and I would rather die than go to prison

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

Although no one is here to be judge and jury,the CAG does not support fraud,dishonesty,or attempts to undermine investigations by giving untrue accounts.

There are people here who can give you some good advice and inform of procedures,but would expect to see that for your part,you are going to be upfront and open about the issues.

Up to you at the end of the day of course.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's done is done and it's how to deal with it going forward. A friend of mine had an interview under caution for very different reasons, and they went back about 4 years. I daresay they could go back further.

 

Bear in mind that if HMRC find you are not telling the truth you will make it worse for yourself. Also by saying your partner was with his mother, depending if she is claiming anything, eg 25% council tax benefit for living alone (if she does), that could lead to her being investigated too when she's done nothing wrong. Would she back you up if it meant getting into trouble herself?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Although my situation was different to yours, I had no proof that my husband didn't live with me as the person he lived with claimed benefits and wouldn't allow him to say he lived there. Anyway, my husband did come back to live with me in 2010 but we were not reunited as a couple. I had many personal and health issues that i needed him to help me with and he was very depressed following personal circumstances of his own. Anyway, i also got the dreaded letter for the years 2010 - 2011 and 2011 and 2012 and to cut a very long and stressful story short, I wrote to them (with the help of CAB) and outlined my circumstances. to be honest, i don't think they really care what your circumstances have been and if they can link you and your partner/husband financially then as far as they are concerned you aren't entitled to claim as a single parent. I also waited weeks and weeks on a reply and finally received a letter asking me to pay back £13,000. I have recently contacted them and they want £100 a month off me for the next 10 years (or something) and i am due to ring them back with a list of my expenditures so i can haggle with them about reducing the amount I'm expected to pay. I was also concerned that they'd go back over years and years but they didn't. they just stuck to the years on the letter. try not to worry as soon you'll see light at the end of the tunnel. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

so scared going to prison as what will happen to my kids.

 

This is precisely why you are unlikely to go to prison, although you may need to pay the money back over time.

 

Maybe this is a good time to take stock and see what you can do to sort out your debt problems so that you can cope better going forward, especially as it is likely that you'd have to pay the money back, even if it is over a long period of time like gildo.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going talk to cab tommrow morning. But what I'm really scared now is shall I just tell them of the year they asked me about Or admit never using childcare. I was paying friend mine look after them who is not a registered childminder and who no longer lives in the country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you gildo. I hope you get things back on track and your feeling better. It's just a hole that kids bigger and I can't see no light. I feel like bad mum can't give them what they need. They go with out shoes cloths sometimes as I just don't have money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Although my situation was different to yours, I had no proof that my husband didn't live with me as the person he lived with claimed benefits and wouldn't allow him to say he lived there. Anyway, my husband did come back to live with me in 2010 but we were not reunited as a couple. I had many personal and health issues that i needed him to help me with and he was very depressed following personal circumstances of his own. Anyway, i also got the dreaded letter for the years 2010 - 2011 and 2011 and 2012 and to cut a very long and stressful story short, I wrote to them (with the help of CAB) and outlined my circumstances. to be honest, i don't think they really care what your circumstances have been and if they can link you and your partner/husband financially then as far as they are concerned you aren't entitled to claim as a single parent. I also waited weeks and weeks on a reply and finally received a letter asking me to pay back £13,000. I have recently contacted them and they want £100 a month off me for the next 10 years (or something) and i am due to ring them back with a list of my expenditures so i can haggle with them about reducing the amount I'm expected to pay. I was also concerned that they'd go back over years and years but they didn't. they just stuck to the years on the letter. try not to worry as soon you'll see light at the end of the tunnel. :-)

 

Thank you so much although my mind is not at rest you have made me feel a little better did they ask to interview you? thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's done is done and it's how to deal with it going forward. A friend of mine had an interview under caution for very different reasons, and they went back about 4 years. I daresay they could go back further.

 

Bear in mind that if HMRC find you are not telling the truth you will make it worse for yourself. Also by saying your partner was with his mother, depending if she is claiming anything, eg 25% council tax benefit for living alone (if she does), that could lead to her being investigated too when she's done nothing wrong. Would she back you up if it meant getting into trouble herself?

 

Thank you for your advice it is so much appreciated, we have spoken to his mother this weekend and she does already pay full council tax as his brother lives there and she is still working and would confirm on his behalf if it came to that I just hope it doesn't im at my witts end and have never felt so ashamed and lost with not knowing which way to turn in my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much although my mind is not at rest you have made me feel a little better did they ask to interview you? thank you

 

Nope not asked imiterview just received review letter wanting proof of child care cost

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice it is so much appreciated, we have spoken to his mother this weekend and she does already pay full council tax as his brother lives there and she is still working and would confirm on his behalf if it came to that I just hope it doesn't im at my witts end and have never felt so ashamed and lost with not knowing which way to turn in my life.

 

I would still try and keep it honest. You just don't know what information they may have, and it just takes one wrong word to throw doubt on all that you say. Even if your OH's mother backs you up, you aren't going to be able to provide proof of child care payments so that's not really going to help.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Im in the same boat , i sent letter admitting i was stupid and i couldnt prove to their satisfaction my partner was not living with me as its his house . Its been nearlly 2 weeks so im nervous as hell . If i go to court i will lose my job and could not face anyone in my family again . I totally deserve it to be fair . I do feel better reading peoples accounts of just being made to pay it back im praying im not the one they use to make a example of :( . Good luck to u all and ill update u if i hear anything .

P.s CAB advised me to write to them as i can get my point across without feeling under pressure .

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be that his mother pays full council tax, but they know who lives at that address. Your partner won't likely be on the electoral roll at his parents for all the years involved and this is one of the main points of a Compliance investigation's evidence.

 

I would be as honest as possible because the following : - he went back to his mums, he works away - are two of the most common statements made during fraud investigations by claimants during the initial stages or at IUC for an investigation into a single claim. The fact his parents or extended family have agreed to lie for you is perverting the course of justice. If this goes to down a non-civil route (which it will if you lie to them), then they will be involved. Don't forget, they don't just send these letters out randomly, these cases are picked up months, sometimes years before they attempt to give you a chance to confess. They have contacted you now because they believe they have enough evidence.

 

It seems to have been missed on all the forums but it was agreed last week that there is going to be a minimum penalty - an on the spot fine for any benefit fraud and they are going to start moving away from the "non-civil" routes. This is due to the changes coming in with UC and to prevent benefit fraud. Considering the fines go up into the thousands, it will work.

 

As mentioned, they have the power to go back many years. To be completely frank with you and to give you as honest an answer as possible; your planned response would ring bells for me due to it's similarity to other stories given and because the evidence they will have is that he paid the bills. To claim as a single person you must prove that you are not financially linked, which by him paying your bills you are. This is the reason the claims are all being stopped and people have these overpayments. Not because the partner was living with the claimant but because he was paying for them. A single person gets more precisely for this reason - they are supposed to be paying alone.

 

You have all the utilities, TV license, insurances in his name. Then you add the childcare into it. I would get down to the CAB and discuss making savings and planning control of any debts you have, because you are going to need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I said i had recieved the letter and when . I explained he owns the house and although i pay every bill i can not prove to their satisfaction that we are not a couple because its his home . I admitted he had moved in 5 weeks ago as he wants his home back and im on council list . I excepted i was stupid and naive for not telling them and i would like to resolve the matter asap.I also explained he helps with his son who has ADHD so has been at the home . Also he owns house i cant stop him getting credit from this address . I also said i didnt want a joint claim as we ARE NOT a couple . Rubbish i know,CAB told me to be honest . I called monday to see if they had letter but they said it takes 2 weeks for them to get it ... more waiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be that his mother pays full council tax, but they know who lives at that address. Your partner won't likely be on the electoral roll at his parents for all the years involved and this is one of the main points of a Compliance investigation's evidence.

 

I would be as honest as possible because the following : - he went back to his mums, he works away - are two of the most common statements made during fraud investigations by claimants during the initial stages or at IUC for an investigation into a single claim. The fact his parents or extended family have agreed to lie for you is perverting the course of justice. If this goes to down a non-civil route (which it will if you lie to them), then they will be involved. Don't forget, they don't just send these letters out randomly, these cases are picked up months, sometimes years before they attempt to give you a chance to confess. They have contacted you now because they believe they have enough evidence.

 

It seems to have been missed on all the forums but it was agreed last week that there is going to be a minimum penalty - an on the spot fine for any benefit fraud and they are going to start moving away from the "non-civil" routes. This is due to the changes coming in with UC and to prevent benefit fraud. Considering the fines go up into the thousands, it will work.

 

As mentioned, they have the power to go back many years. To be completely frank with you and to give you as honest an answer as possible; your planned response would ring bells for me due to it's similarity to other stories given and because the evidence they will have is that he paid the bills. To claim as a single person you must prove that you are not financially linked, which by him paying your bills you are. This is the reason the claims are all being stopped and people have these overpayments. Not because the partner was living with the claimant but because he was paying for them. A single person gets more precisely for this reason - they are supposed to be paying alone.

 

You have all the utilities, TV license, insurances in his name. Then you add the childcare into it. I would get down to the CAB and discuss making savings and planning control of any debts you have, because you are going to need it.

 

Thank you for you note it has given me some food for thought Im terrified and know this is going to destroy us

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caly it doesn't have to destroy you, ony will if you let it.

 

Just co-operate with the questions they ask and answer as honestly as possible. If you do this they will treat you more favourably than if you cover something up.

 

When they decide what action they will take, they will likely set up a repayment arrangement. It is still proceeding by non civil routes for these cases, only cases where the claimants have been difficult or evasive are prosecutions or high value cases.

 

You need to start planning a budget so that when your tax credits are changed you can adapt as best as possible, the CAB can help you to do this.

 

Thousands of people have been and are currently in this situation. If you speak to the majority who have overpayments on forums (because no-one admits it in real life) they will tell you that being caught turned out to be the best thing because the weight and burden was lifted. Although they had less money, they were glad to finally have things out in the open. I am sure once your case is dealt with, you will be the same, whatever outcome.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Caly it doesn't have to destroy you, ony will if you let it.

 

Just co-operate with the questions they ask and answer as honestly as possible. If you do this they will treat you more favourably than if you cover something up.

 

When they decide what action they will take, they will likely set up a repayment arrangement. It is still proceeding by non civil routes for these cases, only cases where the claimants have been difficult or evasive are prosecutions or high value cases.

 

Thank you Susi so much I really appreciate the time you have taken to explain it is most appreciated, I know I have been stupid and I totally agree with what you say about getting out of this system as I have deep down wanted to get off it. Do you know the average sorts of time they look back as my letter stated the claim for 2011 - 2012 and I was told that this is all they are interested in. All i want is for them to tell me what I owe and the penalty so I can work something out and get on with my life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is different for everyone Caly. With some it is only a small portion of time, others they want to go back. But as I said and I cannot stress this enough to you - how you act and behave towards them can be the deciding factor.

 

Get any information you think you might need and answer the questions they put to you. That's all you have to do. Give honest and truthful answers to what is aked of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So many others appear to be in a similar position.Best to start your own threads so it does not get confusing,of course nothing to stop continuing to share info or questions.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Could you tell me what happened to you in the end as I am going through the same thing now, Im so scared of what will happen. I hope you dont mind me asking. Im just about to post a letter to them as i cant get through on the phone,(thank god as i feel sick when i ring)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jayne10,

 

The original poster on this thread has not been back on the site since November last year, it's doubtful they will reply to your post.

Best thing to do would be to start a new thread of your own explaining your situation and I'm sure you'll get help and advice.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...