Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Corgi Homecare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

After a court case now called Corgi Homeplan.

 

I think the whole Corgi thing stinks - they acquired the register from Corgi detailing those who had new condensing boilers fitted in the last few years and started contacting them, using the Corgi name to sell them "Homecare" plans, which is British Gas's maintenance plans name. It's very misleading because so many people see the name Corgi and trust it is CORGI the licensing body, who are now defunct and have been replaced by Gas Safe, however it is just a small company operating from Dumfries from memory, subcontracting all over the UK. The T&Cs of the policy isnt great either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

totally agree...

 

when customers call to book an appointment, details of the fault and a contact number is taken, then they call the customer back asap to advise when appt will be!

Link to post
Share on other sites

totally agree...

 

when customers call to book an appointment, details of the fault and a contact number is taken, then they call the customer back asap to advise when appt will be!

 

It's definitely not ideal. Companies like this are more than happy to take the money to pay for the agreements, but if we have another winter like last year then they don't stand a chance in hell actually getting to people in a reasonable length of time and completing repairs. I actually feel sorry for the customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am researching the CORGI HomeCare/HomePlan once again, as I have fresh guaranteed intelligence that CORGI are using stolen data (yes you may quote me personally) to target consumers. I was not aware that a court case had taken place (thank you for that) but following that up I researched trademarks and noted that British Gas owned a HomeCare trademark (one of the classes # 37) and CORGI are shown as having surrendered a trademark with one of their classes being # 37. I assume the court case has arisen from this and would most appreciate details of the court case please.

NB: It is ironic because in recent years I spearheaded the campaign to force British Gas to surrender the ‘powerflush’ trademark, registered at Alicante in spain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a totally unprofessional company..... run by someone who's knowledge is in the property market.

 

they have broke so many rules since their inception.

 

Corgi Homeplan is run by a company called Green Installer based in Scotland.... SOmehow they get this data, and used to send out the paperwork under Green Installer.... Obviously not hughe take up, as people never heard of them.....

 

Now for breach 1......

 

They amended their plan to Corgi Homecare, and started sending out paperwork. Registered Gas Men started complaining to Corgi, as they felt Corgi were directly targeting their business.

 

Corgi were informed who denied knowledge of this.... As a result and an invesitgation, Corgi Homecare's website was temporarily shut down ( i imagine an Injunction or threat of legal action). Corgi also released a statement.

 

During the next few months Corgi HomeCare reappearred, having secured a license from Corgi to use the Logo and the name...... highlighting this is the only association between the 2.

 

So here comes breach number 2..... HOMECARE is TM by British Gas...... British Gas obviously warned them, but they failed to comply, and subsequently went to court and won..... in this time, it seems this company weren't able to send letters out promoting the product.

 

Now how unprofessional is this wereby a company fragrantly abuses copyright on 2 fronts?????

 

make your own mind up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your input is much appreciated. I am off out soon as I spend a lot of time as a nature photographer (wildlife et al) and it is sunny here in Cheshire.

 

I am amongst many other things a Registered Gas Installer and have been fighting the CORGI waffle machine for years. They are hopelessly addicted to waffle, that being their principal asset. I could write a book on it and have now decided to. I have had enough. Key to that now is my ownership of rock-solid evidence which has just arrived.

 

I run a website and forum on the topic but will not post details here without admin permission. The site was set up almost a decade ago as an answer to CORGI and we have been spearheading the campaign to oust them.

 

Back later and thank you for responding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following between the dotted lines appeared in HVP (Heating Ventilating and Plumbing) Magazine Online Version and was a response by CORGI. The acronym CSL refers to CORGI Services Limited, one of endless names and URLs used by CORGI.

==========================================================================

Data misuse response

8 June 2011

Under a licensing agreement, licensees are able to use the CORGI brand name, and are given legal access to the CSL database. CSL data should not be confused with Gas Work Notification data, which was used by one of our licensees for a pilot marketing exercise in March of this year. I can state unequivocally that this Gas Work Notification data is no longer being used by our licensees.CSL would not knowingly allow its data to be used inappropriately and, as a precaution, we are currently in discussions with the ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office) for clarification.

We would also like to make it clear that CSL data is not given to us by boiler manufacturers or any other organisations operating within the plumbing and heating sector, and we would never allow CSL’s commercial activities to jeopardise installer businesses.

Caitriona Deakin.

CSL head of trading

Ms Deakin was responding to allegations suggesting that data was used inappropriately by one of its licensees to promote a CORGI HomeCare maintenance scheme.

==========================================================================

In fact CORGI are continuing to plunder stolen data because they are targeting consumers with letters bearing the new HomePlan name. I now have cast-iron proof and will be going right to the top now with this (HSC Commission and others).

If you would like me to put some flesh on the bones please say so, but I do not want to bore you to death.

It would be appreciated if you could get me nearer to the detail of the CORGI v BG case. Where it was heard and when.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I strongly suspect now that there was no court case involving British Gas and CORGI. Even CORGI or £ORGI as they were dubbed by many, would not be chump enough to go head to head with BG in a no win situation. BUT would I use a company who registered an obvious trademark without first checking if that trademark already existed. I don’t think so. You don’t need a PhD in business administration to figure that out. It beggars belief.

 

Obviously I am going after £ORGI now we have the evidence but I will also set up a site or sub-site to advise people who ask questions. Half simply seem puzzled but half can get quite angry because they don’t understand where £ORGI has got their details from. That is because the letters contain ‘personal’ information a typical junk email company would not have access to. I think it unnerves people.

 

When £ORGI was ‘in power’ they started to produce what they called a magazine (it was not) which was sent to the same people on the confidential list. The useless Information Commissioner could do nothing as £ORGI addressed their mail – a loophole – to The Occupier. That same magazine included advertising from a national contractor who had been well featured on a Rogue Traders type programme. In other words £ORGI were sending our customers, details of other contractors, as is happening now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have just had a run in with Corgi Homecare, my girlfriend took out a maintenance with them in May this year, our boiler broke down 4 weeks ago and they sent an engineer out he had a look at the boiler did absolutely nothing apart from turn it on and it fired back up, whilst he was looking at the boiler he disturbed the flue, he the told me that the flue was not running back at a steep enough angle and that was the fault i never said any thing as i was in a hurry to get out but all he did was twist the 45 degree bend so the flue was running level then show me and then twist it back to the same place it was originally and tell me he it would be okay now.

He then asked me who had i got to fit the boiler i told him that i had fitted it under supervision of a gas safe engineer as part of my portfolio for my own gas safe qualification.

On Saturday the boiler broke down again we phone Corgi home care and they have just came back to us today to tell us that they have cancelled our policy because we have

1 Two boilers fitted in our property ( we live in an old railway station with 13 rooms)

2 The boiler that we had covered by them had been fitted by myself

3 The flue was incorrectly fitted

 

The lady on the other end of the phone then told that the engineer (who she had just spoken too) had to refit the flue reset the boiler and do a full system check

I told her this was not the case that he had only put wright a problem he had caused himself.

I offered her the name and gas safe number of the guy who helped me to install the boilers but she wasn't interested she kept going on about the three points raised by there so called engineer.

 

Surely if the installation was unsafe the engineer has a duty of care to have isolated the boiler and inform the relevant authorities

 

Any help with this would be great

Edited by V70T5
missed a word out
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am happy to deal with this on this forum but the administrator may consider it to be off-topic. I have not done anything yet in re CORGI as I have been busy with a problem of my own with faulty cavity wall insulation and in doing so I may have opened a big can of worms. That is ongoing but I will deal with CORGI in due course as the evidence I hold is now a matter of record.

 

I do not fully understand the detail. The fact that you installed it yourself is not a problem at all if it was fitted under the one-to-one supervision of a Registered Gas Installer. Indeed that is the only way to build a portfolio now. The RGI legally takes legal responsibility in law (at that point in time).

 

You have two boilers but only one was registered with CORGI, that being the one they attended therefore no problem.

 

As CORGI Homeplan (not Homecare any more) only take on modern A rated (therefore condensing) boilers, I assume it is one of those. BUT, is it an open-flue model (hence the 45 degree bend) ? Please state make and model.

 

If the installation was faulty then there are three options open. The first is Not to current standards (NCS) which requires RGI to issue you with a notice. Second is At Risk (AR) which requires the RGI to request permission to switch off the boiler and issue a notice or finally Immediately Dangerous (ID) which requires the RGI to request permission to disconnect the boiler and issue a notice. If the customer says no to the last two then the RGI should phone TRANSCO who have powers of entry.

 

Need all facts before I can comment on whether they are in breach of contract (for example).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they come outa nd do a First Visit??? Was it passed for contract.

I would be demandin all the money back from them....

 

Stay well clear of these cowboys, the people in the office dont know these engineers, dont employ them, and dont know what they are up to.... its a wonder he didnt tell them he fittd anew heat xchanger.

 

As Les said, the fact you have 2 boilers shouldnt matter, end of the day, i bet it was them that marketed you, gave you the impression they were Corgi, when infact they are a company independant from Corgi, called GREEN INSTALLER LTD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would recommend we be guarded with comments (remember Godfrey v Demon Internet Service -2001). Green Installer Limited are licenced to use the CORGI brand. CORGI is and was a private company who once upon a time (not now) held the HSE mandate. I do however know that CORGI was and still is using confidential data which may have been supplied to Green Installer Limited OR CORGI may have sent out the mail themselves with punters replying directly to Green Installer Limited.

 

We need to establish the precise status of the 'contract' in all its aspects. If it is in any way dodgy I would be the first in the queue to scream out, but we need facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

facts are this:

 

Green Installer used the corgi logo's firstly without express permission - their website was closed very quickly, due to threat of legal action from corgi.... after several calls to corgi from RGI's, the following statement appeared on Corgi;s website:

 

CORGI Homecare retraction statement

 

Following several calls to CORGI regarding a warranty service; “CORGI Homecare”, CORGI would like to assure all that CORGI is not actively running a Warranty Scheme and would apologise that leaflets have been distributed suggesting that we are.

 

 

We are, of course, aware that this has happened and are currently investigating the issue and taking steps to retract things. As part of this we can confirm that the web site has been taken down and that no further mailings will be distributed.

 

More recently British Gas, took them to court as they were infringing on the HomeCare TM by using it in their name. While waiting for the case B Gas has an injunction placed on them preventing them from mailing their letters.

 

In court BG won, and i believe Green Installer were advised not to send misleading literature.

 

ie letters were going out, and under the address window, it said IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM CORGI.... hello, its form Green Installer.

 

The letters themself, have no mention of Green Installer, but hve the Big Corgi badge top left, and spount of about Corgi's experience, giving the customer the impression they are dealing with Corgi.

 

It will be interesting to see what happens next............ wew all await with bated breath.

 

Les can i ask, whats your interest against Corgi? are you an RGI or have your own gas business, or re you punter on a mission?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask anything you wish of me and the name you see here is my real name. I have never posted anywhere anonymously and I never will.

I am a highly qualified construction professional and also a qualified plumber, heating engineer and registered gas installer. My presence in the gas industry was later in life but I was in at the outset when mandatory registration was first introduced. I have never worked as an unregistered gas installer.

Having worked for many years with construction professionals enjoying mutual respect as a Building Surveyor, I was appalled by CORGI’s attitude to people, installers in particular. I never had a problem with the inspectors and I met a few but the controlling minds appeared to me to be a bunch of technically-illiterate morons. Classic administrative jobsworths where absolute power corrupts.

CORGI of course was spun off from the original British Gas when that was privatised by Margaret Thatcher and in those days there were more people working for British Gas in Manchester alone than there are now in the whole of the UK. CORGI was and still is a private company.

[According to the Stockport Express newspaper online BG are about to cull 850 manager jobs (as they have bled the engineers dry). My ear in BG informs me all S&R manager jobs are on notice with only 66% being re-employed following interviews].

Determined to counter CORGI excess I set up a website and forum almost a decade ago and that still stands but is almost lifeless because my main aim to see CORGI dead and buried has been almost realised. They are no longer a threat to the industry.

Quite separately I have for years been helping people pro-bono who are having trouble with consumer matters in which I have some knowledge. Mainly dealing with corporate bullying which is endemic of course. I have also worked with BBC Rogue Traders.

I will shortly – busy at the moment – be setting up a corgi-homeplan.anything website so I can intercept people who email me to ask about corgihomeplan (and homecare). Some are confused and some are angry about personal information having been disclosed by someone. I will be explaining the truth.

Your perception of the background is still incorrect but I understand how you have arrived at that perception. You need to remember that CORGI are hopelessly addicted to bull**** and seemingly cannot be cured. That is why they lost the (Gas Safe) contract to Capita plc.

That statement of theirs, which we in the industry are familiar with, is designed to deflect criticism and obviously it has worked. This is what PR is all about. The black-arts as it is known in media circles. The statement originally aimed at installers, not punters.

CORGI has surrendered the Homecare trademark but I still have no evidence of a court case. Stealing the BG trademark must surely demonstrate how inept they are. They are still mailing out letters (October 2011) but using the Homeplan name. I have one such in my possession. That will be going to the HSC, IC and many others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CORGI had a notion called CSI or their Complete Safety Initiative. The black-arts again. More PR waffle and ironically CORGI themselves were soon to provide the proof that it was 22 carat waffle.

 

They launched first GWN or Gas Work Notification. That was in August 2004. Everyone and his (or her) dog would be required (by law) to notify CORGI of every boiler they installed. They claimed that records showed boilers were the most dangerous threat to humanity, which of course we all know is not true.

 

[ironically at about the same time a learned academic completed and published a research exercise proving it was not true]

 

Having got the data, CORGI’s idea was that they would select jobs at random for inspection. Most professionals, including myself regarded that as a bit of common sense, so we supported that in principle, in favour of consumers and good standards.

 

CORGI promised in their August 2004 letter not to exploit the data commercially which of course they soon did as there was no one to stop them. The HSE did not give a 4X and the Information Commissioner was toothless. All useless.

 

Shortly after I arrived at a trade show and was quickly intercepted by a tall, attractive and intelligent young lady who whisked me off to the executive suite for an expensive coffee and a nosebag if I had wished. She was charged with promoting CSI and was anxious to secure my support. I kept my eye on the ball fortunately (the show was at a football ground) and others from CORGI at the show were to quickly confirm my suspicions.

 

The following January CORGI suddenly and unilaterally decided to extend GWN to most gas appliances. No one to stop them. Trade and professional associations largely useless dinosaurs. The APHC sought a judicial review (asking the wrong question) and lost.

 

Separately but at the same time, John Prescott launched the useless competent persons schemes (CPS). Notifying certain works to the local authority was to become mandatory. It still is. That was rolled out and soon to link up with HIP. The HIP has now gone but CPS has not. The real reason for CPS and HIP was to try to force punters to use registered contractors and not the black economy. It did not work and never will. CORGI became a CPS for gas and managed that database as well. 1+1 = 2 databases.

 

The CORGI waffle mill was then working double-shifts and abuse of the database (one or two) then started big style and that is what the are using now. Battles raged and I was constantly on their tail writing well researched articles which cost me a lot of time and sometimes money.

 

CORGI then promptly lost out to Capita plc leaving CORGI hierarchy with their only real home-grown assets; pure waffle and databases that marketing people would kill for. Green Installer could only have got their data from CORGI and no where else. Everyone in the industry knows that.

 

What the CORGI waffle machine called a ‘pilot’ was actually a suck-it-and-see [problem] to see if anyone would notice. By jove they did and they still do. I will soon set up corgi-homeplan.something or other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you set up an organisation like Homeplan you have two imperatives which have to be in place before you can launch:

 

1. Contractors who are to some degree known.

2. Customers

 

In the case of Green Installer, CORGI supplied both, otherwise they could not have got off the ground as they did. I probably still have the original waffle employed by CORGI, stored in a hangar with all the other waffle. That will be unzipped when I write CORGI’s unofficial but probably more accurate biography.

 

That does not stop Green Installer recruiting new customers once the word gets around. I suspect you will find that the links (form mail used) from Green Installer go back to CORGI. All done with mirrors.

 

CORGI maintained a register of competent businesses (and their staff) for the HSE until they were sacked in favour of Capita plc. I of course was on that list. I opted to exclude myself from the public database to avoid unwanted enquiries (but on sight of my card you could still check I was registered).

 

Over the course of time when CORGI ordinarily referred to Installers (on the website etc) as Installers, that quietly metamorphosed into Member. I am not, never have been and never will be a Member of CORGI. Following CORGI’s replacement my name suddenly reappeared on their list of ‘Members’ without my permission. I instructed them to remove my name and they did. I went public with that. Whether others did I do not know.

 

To get some measure of the take-up, try searching for a gas installer on the current corgi-membership website and compare it with the Gas-Safe database for the same postcode. You will see that CORGI are struggling.

 

In a quick check it would appear that all roads lead back to CORGI. The 0800 number on both the

Green Installer website and the CORGI Homeplan website are one and the same. Green Installer is CORGI in other words and always has been. We know that CORGI say they have licenced their trademark but that is only on paper. Their past list of tradenames and website URL’s is staggering. I have them all. Homecare URL of course is still showing at NIC if you check.

 

The CORGI-GROUP Ltd company was showing as ‘proposal to strike off’ at Companies House but that status has now altered to non-trading company with accounts overdue. The companycheck website reveals their financial status.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify:

[CORGI Homecare retraction statement

Following several calls to CORGI regarding a warranty service; “CORGI Homecare”, CORGI would like to assure all that CORGI is not actively running a Warranty Scheme and would apologise that leaflets have been distributed suggesting that we are.

We are, of course, aware that this has happened and are currently investigating the issue and taking steps to retract things. As part of this we can confirm that the web site has been taken down and that no further mailings will be distributed.]

The above is what you quoted and of course you are 100% correct. That IS what was written (and still may be for all I know). How could you possibly be expected to believe it was CORGI when that plainly claims it was not.

But there are obvious clues in that damage-limitation waffle, which I suspect now, was mainly (at that time) addressed to British Gas rather than the rest of the industry (who could do nothing about it anyway).

Everyone in the industry was baffled by that bizarre nonsense. Everyone knew it could not be anyone else. Everyone in the industry had a leaflet by then. No one (except CORGI) would be stupid enough to steal a well established trademark.

As I well remember saying when that gibberish was first published, how can they be so certain that no more mailings would be distributed if someone else was doing it and they were not in control.

What I can say is that I was not aware then of the theft of BG trademark. I saw nothing about that in the trade media and I get all trade media including HVP, HPM, PHAM News and H&V News. They are the biggies. That is what suggests to me that there was no court case. One letter from Centrica plc lawyers would have scared the daylights (being polite) out of CORGI.

This of course a perfect example of classic CORGI waffle. Thank you for reminding me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just contacted corgi to arrange an annual service -not available until registered 12 months, a problem with a water hammer in shower supply pipes-not covered, a leak to my hot water cylinder- only covered if it's a certain type of cylinder (i.e. vented or unvented ?). I then asked who had given them my name ,they claim it was the person who installed my new system, I asked if they would use him to carry out the service -no.

The letter I recieved from Corgi states"we can offer you full cover with unlimited call outs for your entire central heating,plumbing and electrical systems for only 12.99 per month,or 16.99 per month with an annual boiler service", I have been paying the latter since May.

have since spoken to the plummer who installed my new boiler, he denies referring me on, why would he when he previously serviced my boiler.I have cancelled my direct debit and count myself lucky to have discovered the shortfalls of this contract before it really matters i.e. in severe bad weather. My concern is for vunerable customers who could find themselves with a large bill after an "unlimited call out" if they don't know their type of tank etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just contacted corgi to arrange an annual service -not available until registered 12 months, a problem with a water hammer in shower supply pipes-not covered, a leak to my hot water cylinder- only covered if it's a certain type of cylinder (i.e. vented or unvented ?). I then asked who had given them my name ,they claim it was the person who installed my new system, I asked if they would use him to carry out the service -no.

The letter I recieved from Corgi states"we can offer you full cover with unlimited call outs for your entire central heating,plumbing and electrical systems for only 12.99 per month,or 16.99 per month with an annual boiler service", I have been paying the latter since May.

have since spoken to the plummer who installed my new boiler, he denies referring me on, why would he when he previously serviced my boiler.I have cancelled my direct debit and count myself lucky to have discovered the shortfalls of this contract before it really matters i.e. in severe bad weather. My concern is for vunerable customers who could find themselves with a large bill after an "unlimited call out" if they don't know their type of tank etc

 

There are suspicions the list they have they shouldn't......

 

The local fitter, would never give your details to Corgi Homeplan, as he is hoping for repeat business from you ie servicing and repairs. if he gives your info to them he gets nothing from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this i didn't expect we had a phone call today the woman on the other end said she was sorry about the confusion and we will be getting a full refund of all our payments made to them, and we haven't even phoned them yet or emailed them to ask for a refund

I have just had a run in with Corgi Homecare, my girlfriend took out a maintenance with them in May this year, our boiler broke down 4 weeks ago and they sent an engineer out he had a look at the boiler did absolutely nothing apart from turn it on and it fired back up, whilst he was looking at the boiler he disturbed the flue, he the told me that the flue was not running back at a steep enough angle and that was the fault i never said any thing as i was in a hurry to get out but all he did was twist the 45 degree bend so the flue was running level then show me and then twist it back to the same place it was originally and tell me he it would be okay now.

He then asked me who had i got to fit the boiler i told him that i had fitted it under supervision of a gas safe engineer as part of my portfolio for my own gas safe qualification.

On Saturday the boiler broke down again we phone Corgi home care and they have just came back to us today to tell us that they have cancelled our policy because we have

1 Two boilers fitted in our property ( we live in an old railway station with 13 rooms)

2 The boiler that we had covered by them had been fitted by myself

3 The flue was incorrectly fitted

 

The lady on the other end of the phone then told that the engineer (who she had just spoken too) had to refit the flue reset the boiler and do a full system check

I told her this was not the case that he had only put wright a problem he had caused himself.

I offered her the name and gas safe number of the guy who helped me to install the boilers but she wasn't interested she kept going on about the three points raised by there so called engineer.

 

Surely if the installation was unsafe the engineer has a duty of care to have isolated the boiler and inform the relevant authorities

 

Any help with this would be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for delay as I have been busy persecuting another biggy.

Could really do with people like you as witnesses if we ever get a Leveson enquiry in re £ORGI Homeplan.

Talking of direct debits I cancelled one giving 8 days notice in a signed letter but the bank ignored it as you can cancel online. I always bank online but did not know that. My brain is still stuck in the groove that you have to send in a signed missive. Served notice on the bank and they refunded within 24 hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

You must have had better luck that me contacted them on 9 occassions over 11 days and never once did they phone me back worse that useless

 

totally agree...

 

when customers call to book an appointment, details of the fault and a contact number is taken, then they call the customer back asap to advise when appt will be!

Link to post
Share on other sites

after reading this thread I am completely confused I took one of these plans out after offer was posted to me, I've paid three months and my boiler is playing up have I been ripped off..............?

 

 

let us know how your experience was.

did they give an appointment straight away? if not, how long til they contacted you?

was problem fixed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...