Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA - Can I appeal against decision and is it worth it?


Shadowmaru
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I put in a claim for DLA on the 8th of May this year due to the fact that I have several problems that restrict my mobility and balance. All of which came on since around November last year.

 

I received a letter dated the 29th of July, today saying I am not eligable for any of the components of DLA.

 

I have two dessicated discs in my lumbar region and facet joint disease in the same area which was diagnosed when I had a MRI scan of my back after the Back Specialist I see up the local hospital was examining my back when I was sent up there for physio by my GP and I nearly went through the roof with how much it hurt.

 

I have a copy of the MRI report which states this problem.

 

I also see a Neurologist about poly neuropathy which the cause of at this time is unknown but I have had several tests to find out the cause including, MRIs, Blood Test, Nerve Conductivity Tests repeatedly, all which havent shown the cause yet except for the blood tests showing a lack of B12 in my body which now means every 3 months I get an injections of the vitamin from the nurse at my GPs.

 

I've also had a Lumbar Puncture and a sural nerve biopsy to try and figure out what the cause of the neuropathy is. I haven't received the results of these tests yet but I told the DLA that they were coming but apparently they couldn't wait on them.

 

I also have alot of trouble with my right hand now. I can't write for more than 5 minutes without my hand seizing up which means cooking a meal is fun as is cleaning and washing up.

 

I have a diagnosis for my hand not including the neuropathy which doesn't help matters. I've been told by the Orthapaedic Consultant who I see who specialises in hand/arm problems that it is DeQurvains Syndrome. I have tried everything to get this treated, I've worn splits, had a cortisone injection which made no difference except for my hand/wrist to hurt for 7 days non stop.

 

Apparently the decision maker made the decision that I can get up and down the stairs fine in my own time. Which is wrong I have to use either the stairlift if I am at home or if I'm out and there is a lift avaliable use that. If no lift is avaliable I am unable to get to where I am supposed to go.

 

Walking is a task an a half since my back hurts when I walk and I cant walk for long because of the neuropathy in my legs which makes them feel numb and my balance is affected.

 

I used to be able to walk to the bus stop to get into town. Now I have to get a taxi since walking to the bus stop which is a 5 minute walk for healthy people takes me about 25 to 35 minutes now.

 

Apparently they contacted my neurologist and my GP yet they didn't seem to be bothered to contact the Back Specialist I see up the same hospital. I only know this since they had me nag the both of them to get the letter to them faster when my Neurologist took a month to reply to their letter.

 

I also have asthma and my right kneecap likes to wander off in it's own direction at times (aka Patellofemoral Maltracking) which means it swells up and hurts some days worse than others. I mentioned all this in my claim yet I was still turned down.

 

I should mention I never once saw a DLA doctor to talk about this.

I also use a stick to help me walk now as I can't walk far without it as I look like a drunk when I do. My balance is messed up since I can't feel my feet properly.

 

Can I appeal against the decision or is it not worth the trouble.

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You certainly should have had ahome visit from their Doctor although it does depend what you put on the application. When filling it in you have to concentrate on your worst days.I you say that youhave good and bad days it will not help. Try and get a local Social Services rep to go through the form with you before you appeal but it sounds like you need to. Good luck!

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

I've also now got an ESA Medical tomorrow with ATOS (Yey isn't that going to be fun.... Especially since they've cancelled on me once when I had already been in the waiting room half an hour already.)

 

Anyway, can/will they take the ATOS medical into consideration if I put an appeal to DLA. Even though it's not nothing to do with DLA and it's ESA it's all still part of the DWP...when they get the report that is. Can they use this?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a home medical at home for my DLA and got high rate mobility low care. I then applied for ESA and have to travel 15 miles to have a medical assessment. I questioned this and bought up the subject but they don`t seem able to liase with each other. I also supplied them with a 28 page Harley Street Consultants report confirming my condition and inability to work (he came down to a local hospital to see me) but I still have to go!!

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way I`ve been cancelled twice,once as my friend who had taken time off to take me was getting me in the car!!

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA is turning down more claims than ever before these days. The light at the end of the tunnel is that a large proportion of these refusals are overturned (in the claimants favour) at appeal.

 

So yes, it IS worth appealing, however I'd get representation if you are finding it difficult. You can enlist the help of CAB or your Local Welfare Rights representation unit for free. You can find these services through your local council.

 

It is worth bearing in mind that DLA isn't paid on the basis of your diagnosis, as it is awarded based on the level of assistance a person requires with care or mobility rather than what the diagnosis is.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Sadly, yours is a common story with DLA applications. I had a similar experience with a claim for my daughter. Fortunately, I am a writer and researcher by trade and I took it upon myself to do my research and write a compelling appeal letter. 12 weeks later she was granted DLA at the highest rate and payments were backdated to the date of the original claim.

 

Since then I have been helping others with their appeal letters through my business. We have been very successful with the appeals (6 out of 8 have had the decision changed) but unfortunately, I am not able to provide this service free of charge yet because it is a very lengthy process and takes time away from my other work, but I hope to do so in the not too distant future.

 

You are absolutely entitled to DLA mobility and I recommend you stick with it and appeal. Research the Decision Makers Guide (this is the guide used to determine claims) and write a concise and detailed appeal letter providing any documentary evidence (doctors reports etc) to evidence that you meet the criteria from the DMG.

Edited by the_shadow
URL removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I would appeal, my son is currently appealing his refusal at the moment, and I would strongly reccommend that you contact your local Welfare Benefits officer and they can help you put the appeal together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...