Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

N55 Notice of application for attachment of earnings order, Help Pretty Please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

Cliff notes version leading to my question

I received a CCJ for a credit card debt which had been sold to a firm called FV-1, INC, The Corporation Trust Company. these are the claimant's who acquired the CCJ against me a year ago. I didn't defend it as I new nothing then and hadn't discovered CAG.

 

The claim, CCJ was for only a small part of the debt £315.00 which they sated on the claim form was for part of a debt assigned to them.

I have since found out from CAG that this is actually unlawful for them to do so,this is set out in section35 of the County Courts Act 1984 which can be found here. County Courts Act 1984 (c. 2:cool: - Statute Law Database

 

I sent I & E to them as soon as I received the claim with an offer to pay sent it to FV-1 as that is who it said to send it to on the claim form. I heard nothing from them, but then received the CCJ and it was to pay forthwith.

I wrote to the court explaining every thing as soon as I received the CCJ and enclosed my I & E along with wage slip. The court replied saying I had to pay a fee to get the CCJ amount set to installments, I had been told that if I responded with in 14 days there was no fee. Any way obviously this info was wrong.

I never paid fee for redetermination.

I never heard a thing for a whole year until last Thurs. when I received a N55

This leads me to my main question..............

I have read loads of times on here that a spouse is not liable for the others consumer debt. This debt is soley mine and has nothing to do with my husband.

I would like to get this debt set to an affordable installment and to ask that they suspend the order and give me a chance to pay rather than taking it from my wages, there is a tiny space on the form to do this.

This is what i am unsure of.................

I have to get this form posted to court this Monday to be on the safe side.

It asks for my I & E and a recent wage slip.

I only work part time and my hubby works full time, we have two children,

If my hubby is not liable to pay my debt then do I just write down what I pay for and what I earn and make an offer of payment, and then write that my hubby pays for all the other expenses or do I have to include his income along with his outgoings and send a wage slip of his too.

ON THE FORM IT ASKS FOR " MY HUSBAND OR WIFES USUAL TAKE HOME PAY"

 

I hope I have explained OK, I really don't know what way to fill this in as I have tried to explain above.

Any thoughts, help would be really appreciated.

cheers Q., x

Edited by questioning
Added text at the beginning.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think (and I'm happy to be corrected) that if the credit card was applied for solely in your name and issued based solely on your income then I would say that only your income and expenditure should be considered when asking for payment terms.

 

It could be viewed that the part of the form asking for husband or wife's income should only be completed where there is a joint debt.

 

As you say, there is only a small box on the form to put your reason for asking for suspension - however, if you need to explain in more detail (i.e. it would be detrimental to your employment status, or that you had already offered a an installment offer but was ignored) then you should write in the box "please see affixed sheet" then you need to write the claim number and your name at the top of the sheet and affix it to the form. Don't forget to keep a copy of everything and send by recorded or special delivery.

 

There is of course the possibility of having the CCJ set aside due to the fact that the claim was issued for only part of the claim - this would involve a fee of £75.00 and is applied for on a different form. However, the other way of looking at it is this - if you pay the £315 then no-one can come back to you for the remainder as the claim will have been satisfied. How much is the whole debt?

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly Ellen you are so kind to reply sp speedily, many many thanks.

 

I actually was givren the card years back when I didn't even work and it was only in my name my hubby didn't know I was applying for it. I applied in bank as I kept going in to pay an argos card balance and the cashiers kept saying take our card and tranfer balance it will be cheeper. so hubby certainly wasn't aware until I told him I had one.

I suppose they linked me with my hubby and he was working and still is.

 

I did think perhaps the part which says husbands or wifes income could just be for joint claims.

 

I wondered weather it would be best to include hubbies income and expenses but send no wage slip of his and write that this is where our money goes and as this debt is just mine my husband did not want me sending his wage slip but out of our combined surplus I will offer part of it, as my hubby isn't liable for my debt, OR to just do as previously stated and not include hubby for same reason and say this is where my income goes and offer £ 10.00 a month, I don't earn much, it all goes on living exspenses any way. If I did include hubbies wage then it would probably end up as a $10 :wink: a month offer any way, and that is us being generous.

 

The debt on the card was a couple of thousand so yes, if I get this paid then the CCJ will be satisfied, so if they came back for more it would be a case of "res judicata". Bryan carter did the same with a debt of my hubbies, we paid this to bailiffs as we again couldn't affortd the £50 a month set by court, then received confirmation that the CCj was Satisfied, Carter then asked for the balance remaining, We said the CCJ has been paid, You are not getting any more and never heard another thing. that was over a year ago now.

This company seem to run in a similar way to Bryan Carter sols.

Edited by questioning
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, if you would only end up with £10 surplus to offer by taking joint income into consideration then you will be at no disadvantage by doing that. You should only send in your wage slip - after all it's only your debt.

Keep the information on the sheet you are attaching concise and to the point, no need to mention that your husband doesn't want his wage slip sent in.

 

When you fill in the income and expenditure part of the form, make sure the £10 per month you are offering is what is all that is left over after everything else has been paid. Take a photocopy of all of it before sending in to court.

 

Ell

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Ell_en,

I think that would be the best as if I left out my hubbies wages it would look like I was trying to hide something. I really just want this payment accepted and to pay it.

I will keep the info to the point, they don't want my life story i know.

Do you have any idea if these forms once completed are successful?

 

 

i cannot find any cases the same as mine where any one has just sent off there income and not included there spouses. I've searched this forum but can't find any account of this.

 

Cheers Q.x.

 

Thanks for your message Ell-enn. you are a star.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, thanks

My main concern is to get this CCj paid off by installments, as they have only sued for part of the debt, once this is satisfied I could then fight them off hopefully if they tried to get the rest.

Edited by questioning
added some text.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Noticed this N55 form says In the Expenses column Do not include any payments made by other members of the household out of their own income.

I understand this to mean only include what expenses I pay from my income.

I think I'll have to ring the court about this.

I'll post back what the court says as it may help others who are in the same boat as me.

It would certainly be easier for me if I did only have to include my income and outgoings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can some one have a look at this post please and tell me what they think?

 

I phoned the court the girl didn't have a clue.

She read the form and then said do as it says on the form, which is .........

Include the spouses income as it asks you to and money anyone else contributes to the household, if applicable,

then in the expenses part only put my expenses down and then I could just write that all other expenses that I don't pay for are paid by my husband out of his income.

 

I do not include hubbies wage slip.

I must admit my OH does not want his details recorded on this form as it is not his debt.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about electricity and gas? Typically these would be around £100 per month.

Also what about children's school trips etc.

What about TV licence?

What about car expenses, MOT, Insurance, Tax?

If no car then what about transport expenses?

Edited by palomino

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also look at this http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/pdf/personal-budget-sheet/pbs-monthly.pdf.

 

This gives you a template to complete which ensures you don't miss anything.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Palomino,

Yes I have looked at the link, thanks

These are my expenses from my wages, child benifit and child tax credit, these two benefits I collect and pay out as our living expenses.

My husbands expenses are not included as this CCJ debt is mine, It is not my husbands debt.

They want me to list my expenses from my income.

The things you mention are what my husband pays which are why they are not included.

I have heard the court is strict, which is why i would love comments from others before sending this form off.

Thanks

CAN ANYONE COMMENT ON MY POST #9 PLEASE, THAnks

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just to update. might be helpful to someone wondering the same things as i was.........

I did fill the N56 out correctly.

It did mean my hubbys wage my wage & benifits, (if any)

BUT I only had to list expenses what I paid out for, I sent a covering note saying this is where my money goes and all other household expenses that I haven't listed is because my hubby pays them.

I asked for order to be suspended and it came back as 'agreed to suspend the AOE's' and I am 'ordered to pay £5. a month'.

Great result and all I have to do now is contact the DCA so i can set up a standing order so that they can't turn round and say they haven't received my posted payment.

They could appeal against this order within 16 days but I can't see the point as I only work 14 hrs a week, so earn a small wage and you "can't get the knickers of a bare arse" :wink::lol: :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ARE ther any charges on the credit card that you can reclaim?

 

Probably not many, I'm not really bothered about trying to re claim charges as they have sued for only a minute part of the debt. It will take me a few years to pay this CCJ at £5. a month, even if they applied to raise the monthly payments at a later stage they won't get much of a result. After this has been satisfied they will have to sue me again, in which case it will be defended as outlined in my first post.

I will be sending a CCA request to them though....;) it might prove to be fruitful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...