Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice for council tax in scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We have been paying the council tax every month as normal we were told to to pay £86.50 so we paid £90 just because it was easier, We also asked the council for a statment to see where we stood regarding it.

 

So the other day we recieve a letter from scott and co debt collectors asking for £508 or we would be taken to court etc......

 

My partner went to the local council to pay the normal £90 which they accepted no problems but then said we had to deal with scott and co from now on.

 

When my partner got home she called scott and co and they said she had to pay £100 per month to start on the 25th of this month she said she just paid £90 but they said she had to pay that £100 per month or be taken to court being threatened by that she reluctantly agreed.

 

So we are haven to pay out £190 in the space of 2 weeks which is way out of our budget.

 

Can anyone advise on where we stand on this issue because we really cant afford this amount every month.

 

Thanks for any advice

 

Keith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the site,

When you say you have been paying £90.00 a month, was this for a debt you owed, or is that your bill that you are presently paying, and if so, where does the £508.00 that you owe come from ?

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the site,

When you say you have been paying £90.00 a month, was this for a debt you owed, or is that your bill that you are presently paying, and if so, where does the £508.00 that you owe come from ?

 

 

The £90 is the monthly amount we pay toward the council tax to the council.

 

We missed 1 payment so the £508 is the full amount for the remainder of the council tax year that is amont scott and co are asking for.

 

Thanks for your reply

 

Keith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

the following is from the CAB in Scotland...

 

In Scotland

 

 

 

When you have not paid an instalment of council tax on the date it is due, your local authority must issue a reminder, asking for payment within seven days. If you fail to pay within this period, you lose the right to pay by instalments and a full year's council tax becomes payable.

 

 

When you have not paid an instalment of council tax within 28 days of the date it is due, the local authority may apply to the sheriff court for a summary warrant to show that you are liable to pay the arrears. It must offer you time to pay the debt. If you cannot reach an agreement with the authority to pay off the arrears, or you can't keep to the payments under the time to pay order, the authority can enforce the summary warrant by making deductions from your income support, jobseeker’s allowance or wages or having sheriff officers seize a person’s goods to the value of the amount owed. Many of your possessions will be exempt from seizure.

 

 

If you are in arrears of council tax, you should consult an experienced adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

Also, are you in receipt of benefit, because you can claim housing and council tax benefit.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

the following is from the CAB in Scotland...

 

In Scotland

 

 

 

When you have not paid an instalment of council tax on the date it is due, your local authority must issue a reminder, asking for payment within seven days. If you fail to pay within this period, you lose the right to pay by instalments and a full year's council tax becomes payable.

 

 

When you have not paid an instalment of council tax within 28 days of the date it is due, the local authority may apply to the sheriff court for a summary warrant to show that you are liable to pay the arrears. It must offer you time to pay the debt. If you cannot reach an agreement with the authority to pay off the arrears, or you can't keep to the payments under the time to pay order, the authority can enforce the summary warrant by making deductions from your income support, jobseeker’s allowance or wages or having sheriff officers seize a person’s goods to the value of the amount owed. Many of your possessions will be exempt from seizure.

 

 

If you are in arrears of council tax, you should consult an experienced adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

Also, are you in receipt of benefit, because you can claim housing and council tax benefit.

 

We never recieved a reminder for the month of September we paid a installment at the end of August but it was due again at the end of sptember but I forgot all about it and on the 9th of October thats when we recived the letter from scott and co, So no reminder or even the 28 days you mention I dont mind paying it but we just paid £90 last week and they are wanting £100 next week, we both work so n benifits here.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have stated that you have to pay £100 every month, then surely you dont have to pay the £90 as well, so in theory you're only paying the extra £10. It looks like you may need to write the extra payment off that you have already paid, and just pay the £100. every month but please ensure that you try not to miss any further payments.

My calculations work out to you now owing £318. ( £ 508.00 -£90.00 - £100 ) = £318.00 which really works out to you paying this debt for just over 3 months.

I know it's not really the answer you wanted to read and i'm sorry but it looks like you just need to grin and bear it until the debt is clear, and then try your utmost to pay it on time next year because you now know you will have the same trouble again.

Good luck

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...