Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Autism awarded Low rate mobility and no blue badge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently received the award notice from the DLA (mobility componant) for my son who has ASD they have awarded him the lower rate on the basis that i have mentioned in the application form that at times he runs away from me. In the same form i said that often he refuses to walk due to a reaction to something he doesn't like.

 

I appreciate how this may sound to be contradictory to someone who doesn't know a lot about autism but that's how it is. Some advice from the NAS suggested making a point in the form about autism being an organic brain dysfunction simply because the person who assesses the form and awards the dla may not have a clue about autism.

 

Can any one advise if they are in receipt of high rate mobility for a child with autism?

 

He already received high rate care componant

 

Also we were refused the blue badge so any advice on that also would be helpful.

 

If we're not entitled to it then that's fine but i would hate to think we were refused these things as someone simply didn't 'get' what autism could mean to a child/adult suffering.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Amanda

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If your son is below a certain age then he can't be awarded higher rate mobility. Call the DWP and ask what basis they awarded lower mobility and what basis someone in your sons position would be awarded higher mobility. To be honest though I think that if your child can physically walk then they'll drag their heels about awarding higher rate which is shocking but that's the DWP for you.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for that my son is now six.

I understand what they're saying about the walking issue (which is the reason he got low rate) but at the end of the day his disability means that some times he is 'unable' to walk due to ecternal stimulae, i think it's ridiculous that these people can make these kinds of decision when they kow nothing about my son or autism for that matter - i even went to the extent of explaining briefly what autism was in the form!

 

Thanks

 

Amanda

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you get your consultant (or other) to write a letter explaining, have a dig around the web also, the last time I looked on the dwp guidance on disability sections they were saying the parent was the last person to ask about the problems!?!

 

DWP - Technical guidance - HB5 - Disability Living Allowance (DLA) - The mobility component

 

this any use.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here, only got lower rate for mobility for my AS son, and you can only get the Blue Badge if you get higher mobility rate, so you wouldn't get that. Ridiculous that there is no leeway, but there you go. :mad:

 

I don't know of anyone who has managed to get higher mobility rate on autistic kids, unless they have another problem directly linked to mobility issues. Apparently, stopping in the middle of the street to stare at leaves for 15 mns, or meltdowns, running away etc... doesn't count for anything... :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the basis that i have mentioned in the application form that at times he runs away from me. In the same form i said that often he refuses to walk due to a reaction to something he doesn't like.

 

Yes it does sound contradictory to someone who has zero understanding of ASD and the unpredictability of the disorder but it’s factual, depending on the sensory assault or the surroundings they find themselves in at any given moment.

 

I am passionate about getting what is right for people with autism and more help with mobility is paramount.

 

I would advise that you appeal mentioning the featuring sensory assault that a sufferer has to endure on a daily basis which leads to very unpredictable behaviour/actions and give the reasons why mobility is important.

Here is part of a short article I wrote some time ago, hopefully you’ll be able to put your own connotations on some of it that is relevant to you.

 

 

Autism ~ the misery of sensory assault.

 

Our senses play an important role in our day to day lives sights, smells, touch and sounds can evoke pleasurable memories.

Of course we take our senses for granted, they are just there, a part of us and we seldom think of them.

 

The sound of a lawn mower and the smell of freshly cut grass possibly evokes last years memories of Spring, you feel a tingle of excitement that Summer isn’t too far away.

Imagine if you can, you were unable to correctly process the information brought in by your senses?

 

You’re Autistic and your thoughts couldn’t be further away from warm sunny days and you are in no means excited about anything, you are feeling physical pain because your senses failed you.

All because you are unable to filter out the sound and you just want to run away from it but you can’t.

 

That is just one example of something that makes a noise, put everything together, stereo’s, hedge trimmers, cars, horns, barking dogs, lots of children, exhausts, clapping, screaming, supermarket announcements, crowds mechanical/interactive toys and all the sounds in our daily lives that we find perfectly acceptable is a war zone for people with autism who are often hyper sensitive.

Sadly there is no asylum and with very little awareness of this condition the misery is intense and extremely painful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Missal

you should be able to get a blue badge via your doctor i have Ankolosing Spondolitus i get mobility side of DLA but not DLA for care ( i Have been turned down 8 times since 2000 ) my doctor arranged a letter to hand in with my application for a blue badge.I also got him to register me disabled with the social services etc( seems a bit silly considering i had to use 2 crutches just to walk 10 feet into the local council office to get an application) any way good luck hope this is a help

regards

tc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, topCatDC, but that's not quite correct. You would have got your BB because of the physical aspect of your disability, eg the difficulty in walking.

 

The BB parameters are government set (as recently seen with the new changes for under 2 yo), and they are as follows:

 

You are automatically eligible to apply for a badge if you are over two years old and either:

  • receive the Higher Rate of the Mobility Component of the Disability Living Allowance
  • are registered blind
  • receive a War Pensioner's Mobility Supplement

You may also be eligible for a badge if you are over two years old and either:

  • have a permanent and sustainable disability which means you cannot walk, or which makes walking very difficult
  • drive a motor vehicle regularly, have a severe disability in both arms, and are unable to operate all or some types of parking meter (or would find it very difficult to operate them)

If you are a parent of a child who is less than two years old, you may apply for a badge for your child if they have a specific medical condition which means that they either:

  • must always be accompanied by bulky medical equipment which cannot be carried around without great difficulty
  • need to be kept near a vehicle at all times, so that they can, if necessary, be treated in the vehicle, or quickly driven to a place where they can be treated, such as a hospital.

Despite the fact that autistic kids often present massive problems in getting them to move once they've gone into themselves, this is not treated as coming under any of the above criteria. It may be that certain councils are more flexible and therefore that OP may be able to get a BB that way, it's certainly worth a shot, but it will very much come down to the council where she lives. In mine (Croydon), it's not even worth trying, rules are rules are rules. :evil::rolleyes::mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The smaller councils can be more flexible, you can check on your own city councils web site, it might say "people in reciept of disabled living allowance higher rate or those who have a long term mobility problem". Even if your council does give these out don't get your hopes up too high as they are decidedly ageist and if they see that your child can walk and run unaided then it is quite likely they will decline as they only have so many permits to give out. I know this is a huge injustice to AS parents (my niece has AS and ADHD) but the councils are more likely to give their blue badges to elderly people with mobility difficulties.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not too sure about the blue badge as i believe they base it more on the ability of getting around physically. I have recently apllied for mobility allowance for my 2 year old son (3 in november) and have been awarded high rate mobility, i think the best thing if possible is to try and apply again, you need to think of the problems you face on a worst possible day whilst going out and write a life story to the dwp. When i applied i think i wrote a whole book as then they cannot deny you on any lack of information. I know people who have been turned down numerous times and then attended a tribunal and then had it awarded but as a previous post mentioned they look at everthing and you risk having previous awards revoked. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

my boy who has asd is nearly 10 and is very big built, when he has one of his moments while out and about it can take forever to calm him down, or catch him. i put all this in my dla application and got lower rate mobility and middle rate care. it is disgusting that the they are not assesssed individually.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

You are able to qualify for DLA for help with getting around at the higher rate on the basis of a mental health problem if:

 

1. You receive highest care component

2. You have severe behavioural problems

3. You have 'arrested development' of the brain

 

What does 'arrested development' mean - it means that you have a psychiatric or organic disorder affecting the brain that causes significant functional limitation and developed before the age of 35.

 

Your should be able to get DLA for help with getting around at the higher rate for your son on this basis.

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all autistic children have behavioural problems and not all of them have arrested brain development as defined in the judgment here: Decisions of the Commissioner

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all autistic children have behavioural problems and not all of them have arrested brain development as defined in the judgment you posted.

 

Was this directed to my post? :confused:

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sorry, i ammended while your post crossed. losing the plot slowly but surely.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jen

 

You seem to have the impression I was generalising - I wasn't saying all autistic people would be entitled, simply that I think the OP's child would be. (Sorry if I've got the wrong impression here)

 

The basis for my coming to this opinion was that, bearing in mind the criterion for an award being made on the basis of arrested development, the OP's child is six years old. An aware of highest care component at this age would unlikely be on the basis for a need with bodily functions such as bathing, dressing, using the toliet, since you would not expect a six year old to do these things unaided. The award would be made on the basis of a need for supervision, and most probably for help and encouragement for age-appropriate play. Supervision would likely be established because of a childs inability to recognise obvious dangers, and age appropriate play established because of the social difficulties that autistic people suffer.

 

The OP demonstrated behvioural problems - adverse reactions to external stimuli, and running away often. The latter I can accept is not all that unusual or a six year old, but combined with the difficulties in recognising danger would be a significant behavioural risk factor - for example if the child was approached by a stranger and did not withdraw.

 

I think that these conditions would likely establish entitlement. Now I've explained myself (I should have done this earlier, but anything to try and sneak to bed a little early ;) ) do you still think I might be a bit far of the mark?

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a very well "rehersed" 11 yr old that is autistic, has adhd, ocd and all the rest of the trimmings, he cant go out of the front door without first being "checked" (its not unsual to have several layers of clothing on, or two left shoes or odd shoes lol" ) he cant bath himself as tries to stay "underwater"he does have chronic lung disease too and chronic asthma so therefore his inabilities if you like make him elidgable

never the less we love him all the same (when he takes his tablets and doesnt feed them to the hamster ;) )

honey x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that these conditions would likely establish entitlement. Now I've explained myself (I should have done this earlier, but anything to try and sneak to bed a little early ;) ) do you still think I might be a bit far of the mark?
Sadly, yes. Not because your logic is wrong, it's spot on and all of us parents with the same issue would agree with you, but because regardless of the reality of it, DLA higher mobility rate will not get awarded in the above scenario. :-( Unless there is another physical impairment, children on the spectrum invariably only get the lower mobility rate.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, yes. Not because your logic is wrong, it's spot on and all of us parents with the same issue would agree with you, but because regardless of the reality of it, DLA higher mobility rate will not get awarded in the above scenario. :-( Unless there is another physical impairment, children on the spectrum invariably only get the lower mobility rate.

 

 

I'd advise the OP on this one to seek out a Welfare Benefits specialist in the real world - morally (and, imho, legally) your son ought to have entitlement. If the DWP are being unreasonably stubborn (not that its something they've ever been known to do ofc :p) then it needs taking further. it winds me up so much sometimes that the Department can be so skinflinting when it comes to trying to scrimp on payments of DLA to the needy - I wonder how they would respond if people withdrew their support on the basis of a non-award and thence their needs (and entitlement) increased...

 

( Incidentally Bookie, do you have the email address for submitting docs in to CAG? I tried PM'ing but computer said no :( )

Here to help!

 

Good with employment, disability and welfare/benefit questions :rolleyes:

Just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do agree but we are assuming that there are further problems with the OPs child. If there aren't (and none are mentioned) then going to a tribunal may be counter productive as, like bookworm mentioned earlier, the entire award is looked at and the care component may be reduced - it does happen.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi, just reading your interesting discussion here, I am currently 29 and have both Asperger's and ADHD. I too do not get high motability, only low, and no blue badge. Firstly there is one problem that the DLA seem overlook with me, I can only drive an automatic car as I by trying to drive a manual car with my ADHD causes me to loose concentration on other things (such as the road), and even if I could concentrate for long enough my hand-eye co-ordination causes me problems too. My car is my lifeline, without it I wouldn't be able to go out, before I passed my driving test I used to go on buses and coaches everywhere, I also have siderodromaphobia (fear of trains) so I'm very restricted to what I can travel on. When I get on a bus or coach though I always get very worked up, so worked up that I end up having to call someone to re-assure me, also sometimes on public transport I've been insulted by drivers (especially Warrington Borough Transport), who don't seem to understand the problems faced by someone with ADHD when they get upset and instead ban you from travelling so you end up having to walk home. My car though has to be modified specially so I can drive it (ok an automatic gearbox isn't really a major modification, but it still costs more than a normal car). On top of that with the hand-eye co-ordination issue I struggle to park the car in some places (mainly because I can't always get the car into the narrow parking spaces), also at times I struggle to understand signs and when I come back and find I've got a parking ticket for reading the sign wrong and then have the ticket warden sat there laughing at me that also sets my ADHD off and I end up giving the idiot a mouthful about how I'm disabled, and yet can't get a blue badge because it's not physical but mental. One thing I am really lucky with is the fact I've got a mum with arthiritis who can't drive so she lets me get a car on her motability and let's me use it as my main lifeline, she also has a blue badge however I'd rather continue to collect parking tickets than use her blue badge illegally. The most annoying thing about all of this is the fact that at school I was told I had ADHD but that I'd grow out of it, this information was not passed on to college or Uni (because apparently I'd grown out of it), I failed my degree, then after gaining a HND I finally found out that I have Asperger's and ADHD does continue after childhood. So now I'm 29 working in a really low paid job all because I never received the support I needed to complete my degree (oh and also the other problem I've got is now I'm aware of still having ADHD, I've run up massive credit card bills through impulsive spending during the time when I wasn't aware of ADHD), well thanks alot NHS for messing my life up. Maybe I should sue them! And also the NHS are still messing around as they can't give me medication (Ritalin) for the ADHD until they've fully re-assessed me for it (should be in about 3 weeks, yeah I heard that one before when I found out about Asperger's and I was still waiting 2 years later!). My other problem with driving is the amount of distractions there are on the road for people with ADHD, some areas where I live are getting very dangerous for me to attempt to drive around because there are signs, chicanes, speed bumps and even plants (YES I actually have found a street near where I live that has put plants apparently as a traffic calming measure???) in the middle of the road for me to drive round, obviously the person who puts all these in place doesn't bother for one second to stop to think about people who's attention might be taken away by all these distractions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...