Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CL Finance Claimform - old halifax credit card **WON+Charges back fron the OC**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You could give the court a call Kia, and ask the court manager for an update. .

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 404
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

right got some news on my case got this today from the court

 

Before Judge .......................... sitting at southport county court,The Dukes House 34 Houghton Street,Southport,Merseyside

 

Upon the Courts own motion.The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing.If you object to the order,you must make an application to have it set aside,varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

Unless the Claimant comlies with the order of 2nd April 2008 by 16th June 2008 the Claim be Struck out,and Judgement be entered for the Defendant in the Counter Claim.

 

Dated 21 May 2008

 

 

 

so me thinks this is very good news and that halifax had better shift their ..... cos they got till next monday so im crossing everything till then :)thanks uk for all your help with this couldnt have done it without u ill let u know what happens next week :Dowe u one think i owe u more than one me thinks u and bluey and of course my good mate tricia whos help has been invaluable xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is good news Kia. Let's see what happens in 6 days time. The counter claim has put them in a very difficult position, they have to pay up.

 

The judge will award your Compound interest as well, if they fail to comply. Great news, 6 days to go.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

right just rang the court and they said i have to write in to the court requesting the case be thrown out as they have made no sort of communication so gonna do me letter now and send it cos there time was up on monday u would have thought the woman on the phone would have been able to tell me whether they had made any sort of communication uk should i ask for the compound interest or should that be in further communication let me now cos im gonna do letter now ??:)xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kia

 

Your whole claim amount is what they have to pay. Compound interest was asked for in the counter claim. The judge has ordered that if they do not comply to his order, then you get the counterclaim judgment for your full amount, which includes compound interest.

 

Your letter should ask the court for judgment, and ask them to send out a Warrant of execution form to get your money.

Edited by ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if u remember i owed them money so i dont think theyll owe me anything but i stand to be corrected i asked the judge to politley make judgement sent it this afternoon hope its ok :)xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

right ive got some more news just when i thought i had it won seems ive not they sent aload of stuff through the post right ill try and tell u what

its from their solicitors its says please find enclosed by way of service upon u the claimants defence to your counter claim now this is late in arriving cos they were supposed to file before monday so where do i stand now cos i posted my letter yesterday to the court so what do i do now the stuff is a reply to the defence not sure whether u want me to type all this out uk cos its long winded they make reference to the phone call i made and the copy of the cca they sent which was not a cca but an application form im panicking now cos i know there fighting me plus they have finally sent me the statements although again these are not originals again but copies and they only just sent these so im not sure where i go from here need your help again uk let me know what i do now please today is not the best of days either for this as i should have been in luton now :(xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi kia

it depends on the court and if they allow it

i know in my claim welcome finance they were three days late with there defence. i tried to get judgement by default but the court allowed it, but won in the end

just hope the court dont allow it and give you judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be an idea to type out the defence they have sent to see what it says. There isn't much you can do today as the court is closed until Monday. Maybe a call to the court on Monday to see if the judge will allow it.

 

I really don't know why they are playing up this late in the day, they will have trouble going into court to fight Credit Card charges, it must be the Application form or contractual interest they are fighting.

 

Let us know what is in their defence Kia, you don't have to do this now.

 

Are you off to Luton for the weekend?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope im not uk :(thats the problem 'sighs '

 

here goes

 

REPLY TO DEFENCE AND DEFENCE TO COUNTER CLAIM

 

 

1. I,Victoria Anne Terry,litigation assistant,of Messers Howard Cohen & Co,Solicitors for the claimant,am authorised by the claimant to make this statement on its behalf.

 

2. On February 2003,the Defendant entered into a regulated credit agreement for the provision of a Halifax Credit Card with Halifax plc (Now known as HBOS plc)Agreement number ..........................There is annexed hereto marked "VAT 1" a copy of the said agreement.

 

3. From time to time, the Defendant made use of the credit facilities provided under the agreement. There is now annexed hereto marked "VAT 2" copies of the statements for the account. There was a balance of £2027.00 outstanding under the agreement upon the issue of these proceedings.

 

4. By a deed of assignment,dated 13th July 2007, HBOS plc assigned the account absolutley to CL Finance Limited, notice of such assignment being sent to the Defendant on 10 August 2007. A copy of said notice of assignment is annexed hereto marked "VAT3"

 

5. The Defendant states in her Defence that she made requests for proper bank statements and a copy of the agreement.I can confirm that copies of the Agreement was sent to (EDIT) on the 15th January 2008. On 3rd March 2008 telephoned to advise that she believed the balance should be £500.00 and that she would check her records.To date we have not heard any further from her.

 

6. The defendant is claiming £1,456.65 for unalwful credit card charges. The Claimant puts the Defendant to strict proof of her allegations.

 

7. Further,the Claimant contends that this matter is a small claim in any event.therefore,the Defendant is not entitled to any costs in any event.

 

8. The Claimant denies that the Defendant is entitled to counterclaim for the sum claimed or at all.

 

9. I therfore respectfully submit that the Defendant application be struck out. I further submit that the judgement in favour of the Claimnant for the sum of £2027.00 claimed in these proceedings and request that there be judgement in favour of CL Finance Limited in that sum,together with the sum of £190.00 being the costs incurred upon the issue of the claim in this action, and £35.00 allocation questionairre fee,along with any sum that the court deems just.

 

 

dated this 19th of June 2008

 

I believe that the facts stated in this document are true

 

 

then its signed

 

 

there u go thats all of it uk what u think then xxkia

Edited by ukaviator
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Kia, thanks for the information.

 

It's not much of a defence from a solicitor. The strict proof of the allegations there would be your spreadsheet with the listed charges and your statements. There are also the laws.

 

If i remember rightly, we didn't ask for costs.

 

The solicitor denies that you are entitled to counterclaim, what a cheek.

 

I think this is a knee jerk reaction Kia, but it may go onto a court date if the judge allows it.

 

The solicitor and the Halifax have not followed the judges directions as required, they didn't supply the information requested at all.

 

I think the defence we put together to defend their claim was about 10 pages, the Application form you filled in for a credit card is unenforcable, if they go to court with this the judge can't enforce it anyway. No credit agreement, no debt to pay.

 

All you can do now is see what the court comes back with, but looking at the flimsy defence, i don't think a judge will accept it. Best be prepared though, don't let it spoil your weekend Kia.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't shouted at you Kia, what made you say that?, and it hasn't been CAGBOTTED. I edited your name out for your protection, you left Mrs ...... in the text.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The system probably tells you that the post has been edited. You having done wrong, so don't worry.

 

You're welcome.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. . .

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

right i got a pack from the court saying its the halifaxs defence so dont look good do it let u know if theres anything else was nothing else in letter just another copy of their defence :(xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have sent you another copy of the defence, exactly the same?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes uk exactly the same as first with a note saying a copy of the defence sorry i posted this this morning and it never posted dont think plus im not getting email notification so ill try keep checking it so what now uk ?xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you spoken to the court yet?... I would object to the latest communication from the Halifax, they had long enough to comply with the judge's directions.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

right ive got the best news ill print letter as it reads

 

Before Deputy Judge Leigh at Southport County Court,The Dukes House,34 Houghton Street

UPON READING THE COURT FILE AND WITH REFERENCE TO ORDER DATED 21 MAY 2008

 

DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE LEIGH HAS ORDERED that judgement be entered for the Defendant (me ) in the sum of £1456.65 and that the claimant do pay the sum of £75 for the Defendants costs.

 

DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE LEIGH Has ordered that the claimant pays the defendant the said sum by the 17th July 2008

 

Dated 24th June 2008

 

 

 

yipeeeeeeeeeeeeee i won breathes sigh of relief he must have got my letter before there defence mustnt he thank god i sent it when i did otherwise they migh have pulled it off so what happens now uk cos obvioulsy i owed them the money so do they knock it off what i owe and will i still have to pay the remainder ??xxkia

 

ps thanks for all your help Queen T and UK been stars both of u ill phone T later to tell her its early yet ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...