Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How do I 'link' a letter without posting it publicly. Sorry for stupid question.
    • Rather than dsunaks lies, lets look at the reaL Data and real black holes in the UKs budget - all created by the poop Tories   Public sector finances, UK: April 2024   Main points Borrowing – the difference between public sector spending and income – was (a black hole of) £20.5 billion in JUST April 2024, the fourth highest April borrowing since monthly records began in 1993. Borrowing in April 2024 was £1.5 billion more than in April 2023 and £1.2 billion more than the £19.3 billion forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Public sector receipts grew by £1.6 billion compared with April 2023, however, this growth was outstripped by a £3.1 billion increase in spending over the same period. Since our March 2024 publication, we have increased our initial estimate of borrowing in the financial year ending March 2024 by £0.8 billion to £121.4 billion, now £7.3 billion more than the £114.1 billion forecast by the OBR. Public sector net debt excluding public sector banks (debt) at the end of April 2024 was provisionally estimated at 97.9% of gross domestic product (GDP); this was 2.5 percentage points more than at the end of April 2023, and remains at levels last seen in the early 1960s. Excluding the Bank of England, debt was 89.9% of GDP, 8.0 percentage points lower than the wider debt measure. Public sector net worth excluding public sector banks was in deficit by £703.4 billion at the end of April 2024, a £93.5 billion larger deficit than at the end of April 2023.     and the Tory legacy of financial mismanagement  to be passed on :   UK government debt 2023 | Statista WWW.STATISTA.COM Government debt in the United Kingdom reached over 2.25 trillion British pounds in 2022/23, compared with 1.83 trillion pounds in... - and graph does NOT show the increases as it should   click on this: https://www.statista.com/graphic/1/282647/government-debt-uk.jpg  
    • yep. if they send no paperwork by the time mediation comes to be able to make an informed decision upon mediation..you refuse it. keep reading up here dx  
    • uncle, why you think the last 2 years I did not not do this lol - 90% was keeping my partner sane... but after explaining everything and that we have a plan she is feeling a lot better about it.
    • That's very interesting to hear! I received a notification of a CC verification from Coles in Australia on the 12th May - also a Sunday evening. Not having been to Oz for about 30 years I was somewhat suspicious and so immediately cancelled the card. Guess what, it's the one I use to pay Lyca with........... If you've got any further information I'd be interested in hearing it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sent Application form instead of Agreement form?


Dowie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey again... This post is continued from the link below. I'm just not getting any replies, so hope this is ok. I'm being impatient, so sorry about that.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/79151-power2contact-credit-solution.html

 

My mum has recently received this copy from BarclayCard, theyre saying it's 'a copy of the original signed agreement'.

 

I really don't think it is though... can someone please confirm? We sent the CCA off on the 4th June... this letter was received on the 13th July. Are they in breech by now?

 

Thanks.

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g95/KC-2006/BCApplicationFormcopy.jpg

 

 

What is the next step now? Mum is really worrying that bailiffs are gonna come a knockin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same problem with Cabot supplying an application form.

 

You have definately been supplied with an application, it is unenforceable as an agreement as it does not contain the prescribed terms.

 

I was given some advice in my Cabot thread, but have not written a reply to Cabot yet, take a look.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/cabot/108414-grobbo24-cabot-monument.html

 

Once I have written a reply to them I will post it on the above link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same problem with Cabot supplying an application form.

 

You have definately been supplied with an application, it is unenforceable as an agreement as it does not contain the prescribed terms.

 

I was given some advice in my Cabot thread, but have not written a reply to Cabot yet, take a look.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/cabot/108414-grobbo24-cabot-monument.html

 

Once I have written a reply to them I will post it on the above link.

 

Thanks, Grobbo. I've just posted on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your link is broken.

 

Is this the corect one ?

 

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g95/KC-2006/BCApplicationFormcopy.jpg

 

If so it looks like an application to me.

 

Yeah, thats the one. I tried editing mine, but still not working.

 

Anyway, I've found the letter below, so I'm thinking I send that off? I'm just a little confused about dates... can someone please help with that? Cheers.

 

Re: My request under s78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me dated 13th July 2007 the contents of which are noted. However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter, dated 4th June 2007. Upon receipt of the original request the specified account legally entered into disputed status.

 

My request remains outstanding. An application form does not constitute a true copy of a credit agreement and that which you sent doesn't even contain all the prescribed terms and is not 'properly executed'. The statements sent do not correspond to the amount stated in your earliest correspondence and therefore they do not satisfy the requirement to supply me with a statement of account.

 

As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until LLLLLLLLLLLLLLDATELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request. Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agencies (or any third party).

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. Any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

The time limits, which are laid down in the Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 are clear. You must supply an executed credit agreement within 12 working days of a proper CCA request. If you fail to comply with a legitimate request the account enters a default situation and if you fail to comply after a further 30 days you commit an offence. You entered into a default on 25th May 2007 and subsequently committed a criminal offence on 25th June 2007.

 

Therefore you have 7 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint; otherwise your conduct will be reported to the Office of Fair Trading, the Financial Ombudsman and Trading Standards. Any investigation undertaken by them may affect your ability to offer credit in the future.

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dowie,

 

Do you know if the CCA was singed for when the CCA arrived at there office? if it was they have 12 + 2 days from that date to reply with your CCAor it goes into default;It's another 30 calender days after that time before they have committed a criminal offense

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Yes it does.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account.

No it doesn't.

 

An application form does not constitute a true copy of a credit agreement and that which you sent doesn't even contain all the prescribed terms and is not 'properly executed'.

Why are you not accepting it as a copy of the credit agreement as they would then need to rely on this in court? Why are you disputing it and asking them to find the properly executed enforceable agreement?

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

You need to serve them with a section 10 notice under the Data Protection Act.

 

Any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

The ICO will do nothing.

 

You must supply an executed credit agreement within 12 working days of a proper CCA request.

Again incorrect. The copy of the agreement does not need to be executed.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dowie,

 

Do you know if the CCA was singed for when the CCA arrived at there office? if it was they have 12 + 2 days from that date to reply with your CCAor it goes into default;It's another 30 calender days after that time before they have committed a criminal offense

 

Thanks for that, BigBearUk. I'm not sure though as my mum can't find her RD slips!

 

I'll get on at her to try and find them. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does.

 

 

No it doesn't.

 

 

Why are you not accepting it as a copy of the credit agreement as they would then need to rely on this in court? Why are you disputing it and asking them to find the properly executed enforceable agreement?

 

 

You need to serve them with a section 10 notice under the Data Protection Act.

 

 

The Information Commissioners Office will do nothing.

 

 

Again incorrect. The copy of the agreement does not need to be executed.

 

 

Thanks for the reply, Rory, however, I haven't a clue. It's just a letter I found on here with regards to replying to them. Can you please tell me what I should write in a letter?

 

Thanks very much.

 

KC

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are prepared to state that this is a copy of the agreement then you should accept it as such, as it's unenforceable. Something short and sweet is all that's required.

 

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by ourselves on the (date).

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

As this is the case I will of course be making no further payments on this agreement, any further action on your part to enforce will be vigorously contested.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

I shall also be considering further action to recover unlawfully applied interest and charges that have been levied on the “Agreement”.

 

NOTE: You won't actually be doing the last bit, you are just stating that you are considering it.

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should do, they will be committing an offence under Section 40 of the Criminal Justice Act if they try to collect money on an unenforceable debt.

 

Is there any way my mum can get confirmation that BC would have dropped it?

 

Thank for the reply BTW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that's about as good as my knowledge gets at the moment.

 

I think Rory had a good letter advising them that they are committing an offence by trying to collect. They normally back off at that stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that's about as good as my knowledge gets at the moment.

 

I think Rory had a good letter advising them that they are committing an offence by trying to collect. They normally back off at that stage.

 

Excellent. Thanks very much. I shall get that letter posted off today at some point. I'm just wondering if it would be worth sending a letter off to the DCA also? Not a clue really what to write though.

 

Thanks again, Timsta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs and Debt Collectors are not the same thing at all. DCA's have no legal powers, bailiffs can only act with a court order.

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are prepared to state that this is a copy of the agreement then you should accept it as such, as it's unenforceable. Something short and sweet is all that's required.

 

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by ourselves on the (date).

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

As this is the case I will of course be making no further payments on this agreement, any further action on your part to enforce will be vigorously contested.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

I shall also be considering further action to recover unlawfully applied interest and charges that have been levied on the “Agreement”.

 

NOTE: You won't actually be doing the last bit, you are just stating that you are considering it.

 

Good letter Rory - I'm going to blag it if you don't mind

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feel free conar. That's what the forum's for ;)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dowie I have received a similarly basic application form from Barclaycard today - they have stuck a bar code over what presumably was the bit about them checking with cra's - they have not countersigned, and the card number has not been filled in on the form - in fact the letter and the barcode sticker have actually got the wrong account number on.

 

Is this enough to send them one of your letters Rory before the DCA start on me again?

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without actually seeing the document, it certainly sounds like it is completely unenforceable.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PMSL - Need to resort to chemicals W.A.Y.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...