Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx, with link having multiple accounts for me, I didn’t want to be a pushover in the first one ideally.. hearing is 3rd June, WS’s to be exchanged by 6th may 
    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Case Scheduled, Please Help!


camsoft
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

After sending Lloyds TSB letters regarding my bank charges and gettting a standard letter back from them telling me they are lawful, I filed a claim for £1600 (including 8% intrest) via the small claims court.

 

Lloyds have decided to defend the claim, and the Small Claims online system tells me that it has been moved to the local court. I have heard nothing since.

 

I have a couple of questions:

 

  1. What happens next, will I end up in court?
  2. If yes what do I have to do, and can I get legal aid?
  3. Since I filed the claim via the small claims court I have probably been chraged another £600. Do I have to file another claim for this or can I somehow include this now?

Any help you could give me would be greatly appreciated.

 

Cameron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Camsoft - Hi,

Just go to the top of the forum and read (no study) the step by step guide. Make sure you use the templates there and read other peoples posts and you will all the answers you need.

 

Don't panic; study this site; double check all your paperwork; if you have a question just shout there are some very helpful and clever legal guys lurking here

 

And the best of luck

If you think this post has been of help, please click on my SCALES on the left - thanks :-) :-x

 

Peter Anderson

Me Vs Morgan Stanley - WON £490

Me V's LTSB - Private & Bus Acc - £18.8k (since Oct1997)

inc: S.69 Interest (and growing daily) -;)

Please remember to DONATE when you have WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi camsoft,

 

I will try to answer your questions.

 

1,you will hear something shortly from your local court. I asssume that lloyds have acknowledged your claim and filed a defence. You may end up in court but this is only a very small chance. Even if you do it is very very unlikely that lloyds will show up anyway. Even though you need to prepare as if it is going to go to court. As I said this is highly unlikely.

 

2, I'm not sure about legal aid but you dont need it. thosands and thousands have reclaimed their charges by themselves. Just follow the step by step guide and have a read through the FAQ's and you will be fine. If you have any questions post them here and you will get help but have a good read of the site 1st. Everybody is nervous to start with. Also read through other peoples threads so you know what to expect it really helps.

 

3,I beleive you can amend your claim but it will cost you £35 which is not reclaimable. I think alot of people have made 2nd claims or even 3rd claims, personally I think it would be best to make another claim.

 

hope that helps.

 

matt

Lloyds settled in full

£4010.02:D

 

Halifax CC settled

£417.00 :D

 

Lloyds PPI

£3672.15 Refunded off loan :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have over the last 3 months been proceeding in reclaiming my bank charges. Last month I filed a claim via the Small Claims Court, and Lloyds have decided to defend. SMC online now says that will be transfered to the local court.

 

I received a letter from Lloyds solictors in Brighton, saying they are fully defending the claim.

 

Now I have heard nothing for quite some time now. I have read on this forum someware the my local court Brighton, is overwelmed by people trying to claim bank charges.

 

Is there a way I can speed up the process, I know the bank dont have a leg to stand on and that its highly unlikely that it will go to court. Can I contact Lloyds's solicators directly (maybe send them the proposed court bundle) and ask them to considure setteling the claim, as in the end it will save everyone alot of time and money?

 

Also I really need to claim bank the charges I have been charges since filing this claim 3 months ago, can I goto streight to the claim court, or do I have to go though the entire bank statement/letters process again?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Cameron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can try but they have already told you they will defend which is not unusual. Sending them the court bundle wont do much, they will probably just bin it. Its a waiting game im afraid.

 

I dont think you can add any charges on to your existing claim, it may be possible if you complete an N244 amendment form costing £35 otherwise id guess you would have to raise a new claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:!: Help Required :!:

 

I have just received an letter though the post titled "Notice of Transfer of Proceedings"

 

It says that:

 

The defence to this claim has been filed.

The claim has been transfered to the court coverering the area where the claiment lives.

 

It also notes that the allocation questionnaire should be returned to the Brighton County Cort.

 

The on another sheet, it says:

 

It is ordered that:

 

1. The filing of an allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise.

 

What does this mean, this seems to be the opisit of what it says on the first sheet?

 

Then there are three photocopies of the banks defence, a 9-point defence.

 

What does all this mean?

What happends next?

What do I need to do?

 

Please help, Im now getting worried.

 

The 9 points the bank descibe sound good, it says that the charges are for a service and that Im not in breach of contract!

 

Any help you folks could give would be wonderful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The 9 point defence is the standard lloyds one, so that's good.

Have a read of this link:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/80091-your-court-dispensing-allocation.html?highlight=dispensed+AQ

 

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is inadvisable to have started a court claim against an organisation that has infinitely greater resources than you have without having done the correct preparation. You really do have to get everything correct or you claim may fail.

 

I would suggest that you have a GOOD read of many of the threads in this forum so that you have a good grasp of what to expect next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is inadvisable to have started a court claim against an organisation that has infinitely greater resources than you have without having done the correct preparation. You really do have to get everything correct or you claim may fail.

 

I would suggest that you have a GOOD read of many of the threads in this forum so that you have a good grasp of what to expect next.

 

Thanks for your reply, I have done some research. But there is SO much information at so many levels that I dont know where to start.

 

It would be helpful, if yo could tell me what to expect next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

I have just received a letter from Brighton County Court, see below:

 

Take Notice that the Hearing will take place on 21st Aug 2007.

10 Minutes have been allowed for the hearing.

...

The Claim be allocated to the Small Claims Track.

 

I did not have any chance in the process to send any documents or AQ and now my hearing date is set.

 

So what happens next I turn up in court, not knowing anything about the legal system, and get my case thown out?

 

Please can people help me as I dont have long before the hearing, and am very nevous, what did I need to do or what can I do?

 

Also attached:

 

1) This Claim is allocated to the Small Claims Track and the parties are referred to Part 27 of the Civil Procedures Rules and Pratice Direction of that Part for guidance on how the hering of the claim will be conducted.

 

2) The claim will be heard at William Street Brighton on a date and at a time

which is set out on a notice attached to this Order, or which will be sent to you later. The Court reserves the right to change the place and/or time of hearing.

 

3) From the available papers, it is estimted that the hearing will take ten minutes. If a party is aware of a reason why this estimate might be substantially inaccurate, that party must notify the court immediatley.

 

4) The parties are encouraged always to try and settly the case by negotiation. The parties are encouraged to contact each other with a very to trying to settle the case or narrow the issues. The court must be informed immediatley if the case is settled.

 

5) The following parargraphs set out the Judge's directions for preperation for the hearing. Failure to comply with the directions may result in the case having to be adjourned and the party at fault having to pay costs.

 

The following Directions apply to this Claim:

 

6) Disclosure of documents shall be dealt with as follows:

 

a) Both parties shall give each other standard discolsure by list, the lists to be served by 4pm fourteen days before the hearing.

 

b) Any request for a copy, or inspection, of any document shall be complied with by 4pm seven days before the hearing.

 

7) The orignal documents must be bought to the hearing.

 

8) The judge may refuse to considure a document or take it into account if a copy of it has not been sent to all parties as required by this Order.

 

9) The documents to be sent to the parties and court must include the statements of al withnesses (including the parties themselves)

 

10) Witness statement must:

 

a) Start with the name of the case number;

b) State the full name and address of the witness;

c) Set out the witness's evidence clearly in the numbered paragraphs

d) End with this paragraph: 'I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true,' and

e) be signed by the witness and dated.

 

11) The judge may refuse to hear the evidence, or consider and statement, of any witness whose statement has not been prepared and copied to all parties and court in accordance with the paragraphs above.

 

12) Neither party may rely on any report from an expert at the hearing unless permission has been granted by the court beforehand. Anyone wishing to reply of an expert must write to the court immediatley on recept of this Order seek permission, giving an explanation why the assistance of an expert is necessary.

 

13) Because this Order has been made by the Court without considering representations from the partites, the partites have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied, or stayed. A party wishing to make an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of the service of this Order.

 

Thanks inadvance,

 

Cameron

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get an AQ to complete or was it dispensed with?

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate look at this

 

Lloyds TSB - Answers to questions on bank charges

 

In particular

 

Q: Can I make a court claim for a refund during the test case?

A: Yes, but we will apply to the court to put your case on hold while the test case is running. This is because the issues being raised in customer complaints on unauthorised overdraft charges are being considered in the test case

 

So Lloyds will ask the court to freeze your claim until the test case.

Settled:

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED IN FULL £2094

MBNA/Abbey Credit Card - SETTLED IN FULL - £460

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card - SETTLED IN FULL - £50

Ongoing:

3 credit cards,

EGG - £220 - With FOS

MINT - £20 - With FOS

Captial One - £340 - With FOS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mate look at this

 

Lloyds TSB - Answers to questions on bank charges

 

In particular

 

Q: Can I make a court claim for a refund during the test case?

A: Yes, but we will apply to the court to put your case on hold while the test case is running. This is because the issues being raised in customer complaints on unauthorised overdraft charges are being considered in the test case

 

So Lloyds will ask the court to freeze your claim until the test case.

 

Sorry can you explain what this means? Are you saying that my hearing is only a preliminary one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So thats it, I've spent the last 6 months trying to reclaim my bank charges, and now my court case is going to be frozen (for a year)?

 

Do I have anyway of forcing this to go through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So thats it, I've spent the last 6 months trying to reclaim my bank charges, and now my court case is going to be frozen (for a year)?

 

Do I have anyway of forcing this to go through?

 

 

You have a court hearing on the 21st August....you need to get your court bundle together, sent to SCM and the court 14 days prior to your hearing, and get yourself to court on that day.

 

There are links to the bundle somewhere, rushing out so cannot look for you.

 

In light of the recent announcement, the court may decide to stay the decision pending the ruling of the test case. If so, you are in the same boat as many of us (my hearing is on the 22nd) and you will probably wait at least 12mths for any money.

 

Lloyds may pay out beforehand as they have been doing......no-one knows yet.

 

Get your bundle done and sent. In all honesty, you should have been well prepared when you first set out doing all this. There was always every possibility that you would end up before a judge so you really need to get reading up big-style now. If you are ill prepared, chances are a judge may well throw out your case.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...