Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, relenting on my above irritated post ... It's worth defending it.  At the very least they are likely to offer a deal. Plus  PE have added two completely invented amounts.  The £100 charge has morphed into £125.  Then they've added £50 legal representative's costs although they have no legal representative.  Even if it went all the way to court and you lost, the  judge would likely disallow the made up £25 + £50. Please fill in the sticky as dx asked. Then dx will be on with details of how to defend.
    • Quite interesting that the Conservative East Midlands  Mayor candidate doesnt mention conservative on his promotion LOL   but he does claim that he, a Conservative politician, is the man to fix the 14 years of Conservative devastation of the region - inc 'fixing' problems inc the utter devastation of the roads, bus and train services that his party have  imposed   Must all rotate around the meaning of fixing he actually means .. fixing noun dishonest activity to make certain that a competition, race, or election is won by a particular person:   .. or perhaps he just means 'fixing' - preventing change
    • Yes, absolutely normal for them to waste everybody's time and money by asking for more time – which they are entitled to do, of course – but it is simply a waste of time. They use prepared template defences. They know they are in the wrong but they simply want to make your life tough because they don't care about you. However do keep an eye out. You never know there is just a 1% chance that they could miss the deadline in which case you should apply for judgement immediately.
    • Will check back in when the SAR from MCB is back and get advice on how to raise the formal complaint and what to say x
    • With the best will in the world stop being an idiot.   Feeling bad because of a soulless entity that couldn't give a **** about you.   Life happens, it's how we move on.   SAR to MCB. Once info is back, raise a formal complaint.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

their robbery is obscene!!!


viv stuart
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1883 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What a coincidence! The same day I discovered this site, I also found out that the Abbey have bounced a cheque today for £40 despite the fact that funds of £500 that I paid in 2 days ago will clear tomorrow, meaning I will get charged £35! I have applied on line for back statements, and I am staggered to find that on the statements I do have going back to Sept 2003, they have taken £4139 in charges! Like another member I too had a time when I had to go in branch and take over the counter what they deemed fit for me to have from my salary, and yes because I felt ashamed and at fault i accepted the daylight robbery. Only now that i am almost debt free, I have found the confidence to try and get my money back, so....................watch this space!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, whilst i wait for my back statements, I reckon that the past 6 years my claim will give a total of well over £5000 especially if interest is added, seeing as I know it to be over £4000 just from Sept 2003 to date. So........from what I have read, do I need to keep my claim below £5000 for small claims court if it goes that far?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, think i sent this to new topic in error.............sorry!

Just to say had a letter from Bradford cust services, thanking me for my request for old statements. said i will recive shortly as in archives.

Is this the sort of letter you want for your records?

Also, now do i give them 40 days to supply, and failing that do i then claim.?

if the answer to this is in FAQS, I'm sorry

V

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the offer of the letter. No it won't help us.

 

Yes the answers are in the FAQs and in the forum material.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

As I'm not totally used to "forums" it's probably my fault I can't pick up my thred from The bank Action group site. i can log in ok, but thats it, so iv'e decided to post a new thread.

Just to re cap I applied on line for back statemnets at the beginning of March and they wrote to say my request was being dealt with. I got that reply a month ago and have heard nothing since..............so i guess i need to go DPA route now, yes?

Also I have been trying to open another account elsewhere in anticipation of Abbey closing me down, and No One will accept me! My credit history must be in such a mess from years ago, so I think I will have to play things abit conservative with all this..........any ideas? They have had over £4000 in charges off me in the past 3 years, so it may be double when i get the older statements to look at. I can see I may have to accept some sort of payoff rather than take them to court, and run the risk of them closing my account.

 

editsign.gifTHREADS JOINED.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, it's worth re-reading the FAQ but if they have ignored your request for statements then you have to go down the formal DPA route.

 

The forums on moneysavingexpert.com are a good place to get help finding a new account.

 

Why settle for less than the full amount? It is your money that they have illegally taken from you. You deserve it back, every penny.

 

If you are worrying about going over the £5000 limit for small claims and opening yourself up to costs then think of ways of splitting into chunks (i.e an account at a time, a year at a time or a type of charge at a time).

You may find with the 2nd claim they might play ball quicker (or they might not!).

 

It is worth finding out exactly what they owe you and decide from there.

Abbey (Charges on 3 accounts and default on my credit record) - DPA letter sent 30/03/06 - 40 days limit is 9th May - Recieved DPA printouts 05/04/06 with microfiche "fob off" letter. <p>Barclaycard (Charges on 1 account and default on my credit record) - DPA letter sent 03/04/06 - 40 days limit is 13th May - Recieved some statements 08/04/06 along with DPA printout and a microfiche "fob off" letter. Claim for £340 sent 11/04/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the total of my claim against Abbey will be, but I'm thinking of submitting a claim for charges deducted in 2006, a claim for 2005, a claim for 2004 etc etc. if it looks like they'll go over £5k. That way, Abbey have to pay 5 lots of court costs too - that'll make them grimmace!

Abbey

Data Protection Act Request 14th March

Chaser sent 3rd April giving 20 days to respond

Request for Payment and Data Protection Act Failure letter sent 23/05/06

Full statements recieved end of May

Letter Before Action sent 13/06/06.

Claim amount - £1938 plus £288.79 interest

Claim submitted 28/06/06

Ref: 6QZ42158

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be better to work oldest first if any are near the six year limit.

Abbey (Charges on 3 accounts and default on my credit record) - DPA letter sent 30/03/06 - 40 days limit is 9th May - Recieved DPA printouts 05/04/06 with microfiche "fob off" letter. <p>Barclaycard (Charges on 1 account and default on my credit record) - DPA letter sent 03/04/06 - 40 days limit is 13th May - Recieved some statements 08/04/06 along with DPA printout and a microfiche "fob off" letter. Claim for £340 sent 11/04/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I guess so. Saying that, I didn't open my Abbey account until around September 2000, so every charge on my account can be claimed back anyway!

Abbey

Data Protection Act Request 14th March

Chaser sent 3rd April giving 20 days to respond

Request for Payment and Data Protection Act Failure letter sent 23/05/06

Full statements recieved end of May

Letter Before Action sent 13/06/06.

Claim amount - £1938 plus £288.79 interest

Claim submitted 28/06/06

Ref: 6QZ42158

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT put the claims in at the same time - sever them, by all means.

 

If you put them in at the same time the bank will apply to the court to have them put together and this could push you into the fast track rather than the small claims track.

 

You are still protected from costs up to a max of £750 - if you lose.

 

I still think you'd win, but to be on the safe side - win one at a time.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1883 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...