Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sold faulty car, please help.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

In March I bought a Renault Laguna 2002 1.9 DCI. When I picked it up it was impossible to put fuel in it as the locking mechanism on the fuel cap was broken (fixed under "warranty").

 

Two months after I bought it the engine stopped on an A road leaving me without steering or brakes and I had to be recovered back home after putting my heart back in my chest, I had my wife with me as well :(. Cost £120. The garage diagnosed 2 completely failed fuel injectors and 2 were about to go. Cost of refurbishing them, £700. The garage I purchased the car from didn't want to know and the warranty they included said they weren't covered.

 

Then the fuel guage stopped working. Renault diagnosed a faulty instrument cluster which they replaced at the same time as a faulty abs sensor, cost £550 plus £50 to change my insurance to a courtesy car.

 

Today I took the car in for it's 72000 mile service and cambelt change. It is now at the garage who tell me the woodruff key has split in two and I'm lucky the engine hasn't entirely imploded. Cost £25 + cambelt change and service - £370.

 

Also, I'm informed that the car has a huge diesel leak - problem is yet to be diagnosed.

 

Now, for a 5 year old car that I paid £4000 in good faith less than 4 months ago I'm more than a little upset at having paid £1400 on repairs, not including the service and cambelt change, obviously.

 

Does anyone have any advice for me, can I claim any of that money back legally or reject the car? Is it too late? The car was purchased on finance with my old car taken as deposit (oh, how I wish for that back now).

 

Anyway, appreciate any help.

 

Thanks

 

Hitby

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a 1.9 DCI renault laguna, and i had it in the garage 7 times in 3 months, the last time it was in the garage it was unusable from the beginning of December until i finally rejected the car on the 25th January 2007, it had several problems and the more i look into it the more i discover that lagunas are trouble prone, even the renault dealer has to put a 3 year warranty on them to et them out the door, if oyu dont mind could you send me a PM with a list of all the faults you have or have had and i will try and find out how common they are.

Long time ago in a galaxy FAR FAR AWAY, there lived an elf who shot banks for a living.........

Now through the power of the internet there is the CONSUMER ACTION GROUP,

 

Watch out they are getting crafty those pesky CRITTERS!

 

Banks will tell you their charges are transparent!

So is the invisible man but that does not mean he is fair or lawful.

 

DONT GIVE UP! FOLLOW THE CAG ADVICE AND RECLAIM YOUR CHARGES.

CAPITAL BANK! YOU ARE NEXT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do yep, although, my guess is I need to be chasing the dealer I bought the car from, not renault? How do you go about rejecting the car? If I did is it right that I won't see any of the money I've spent on repairs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think a lot of the things you have are pretty common to the laguna of that year, up until 2003 it was not the best car out there,

I rejected the car as mine was on HP and after 6-7 repairs taking the car off the road for 68 days out of 150 days ownership and some advice from the forum and trading standards i rejected it, but that was in January and it is still not sorted out, Capital Bank have even messed about with my solicitor so it is now going to court, although i am unsure when yet. the car you bought from a dealer should be covered by the sale of goods act and as such you may have a case for "not of reasonable quality" but be quick as you must try and get these kinds of things sorted out as soon as possible, write to the dealer if he is not interested then speak with a solicitor who i versed on consumer issuses.

Long time ago in a galaxy FAR FAR AWAY, there lived an elf who shot banks for a living.........

Now through the power of the internet there is the CONSUMER ACTION GROUP,

 

Watch out they are getting crafty those pesky CRITTERS!

 

Banks will tell you their charges are transparent!

So is the invisible man but that does not mean he is fair or lawful.

 

DONT GIVE UP! FOLLOW THE CAG ADVICE AND RECLAIM YOUR CHARGES.

CAPITAL BANK! YOU ARE NEXT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, thanks for your advice, mine is also on HP, I have emailed the dealer but don't really expect a reply, I will send the same email registered post in seven days if I haven't heard from them.

 

thanks again

Hitby

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on - as long as the person you bought the car from was acting as trader and not a private seller, and you've had the car for less than six months, throw the Sale of Goods Act (amendment 2003) at them, specifically the 'reversed burden of proof' - in essence, it means that any fault discovered within six months of purchase is deemed to have been present at the time of purchase; therefore, the dealer or trader is obliged to either repair, replace or refund entirely, as the goods are not fit for purpose. Look up 'Reversed burden of proof', and away you go!

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

News Update - Lincolnshire County Council

 

http://www.salford.gov.uk/fpnissue7.pdf

 

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

For a few examples - hope this helps. We've successfully used this as recently as last week to get a problem corrected on a new car.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to throw that at my HP company and they ignored me, they did not even answer my mail, just ignored me completly, so did the garage they reckoned i would never get it to court so tough! even now i have employed a solicitor and they have not even bothered to get back in touch with him, these garages and hP companies all know that it is too difficult to get people to court so they take the risk and ignore people, DEMON X is totaly correct about the reverse burden but if they wont take hte car back nor refund your money court will be your only option, one thing that may be in your favour is in England you can go small claims up to £5000 where as in scotland we can only go up to £1500

Good luck and dont let them get away with it

Long time ago in a galaxy FAR FAR AWAY, there lived an elf who shot banks for a living.........

Now through the power of the internet there is the CONSUMER ACTION GROUP,

 

Watch out they are getting crafty those pesky CRITTERS!

 

Banks will tell you their charges are transparent!

So is the invisible man but that does not mean he is fair or lawful.

 

DONT GIVE UP! FOLLOW THE CAG ADVICE AND RECLAIM YOUR CHARGES.

CAPITAL BANK! YOU ARE NEXT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what finance company did you use and is it Hire Purchase or what

Long time ago in a galaxy FAR FAR AWAY, there lived an elf who shot banks for a living.........

Now through the power of the internet there is the CONSUMER ACTION GROUP,

 

Watch out they are getting crafty those pesky CRITTERS!

 

Banks will tell you their charges are transparent!

So is the invisible man but that does not mean he is fair or lawful.

 

DONT GIVE UP! FOLLOW THE CAG ADVICE AND RECLAIM YOUR CHARGES.

CAPITAL BANK! YOU ARE NEXT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hitby,

Make sure you have a full written local engineers report either by an independent engineer or local Renault dealer, make sure who carries this out are themselves qualified with IAEA, IMI and so on, and make them aware it may end up in a court room.

You don’t want to be in a position where someone tries to bamboozle you with all the technicalities of a motor vehicle.

Be prepared in advance and let the fiancé company and garage know what your doing and for them to expect the bill for the inspection fee.

Good luck don’t let them get one over on you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...