Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Financial


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3762 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had 2 letters from them in the post yesterday. God they're hopeless!

 

1)

 

I write with reference to the above account and our previous letter, to which, we have received no reply. Could you please conatct this office within 7 days of the date of this letter. Failure to do so will result in a Default Notice being issued against your account and possible further action being taken.

 

**Oooh, I'm scared** I did reply to their stupid letter with a CCA and £1 postal order.

 

2)

 

Is a statement telling me that I have made no payments ** actually I've paid the whopping sum of a pound last Friday** and I've accrued £24.11 in interest since their letter 2 weeks ago.

 

 

 

 

Should I reply or just ignore them until the 30 days are up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi MaddyRose you don't have to get your telephone number changed. If you write to these people or tell them on the telephone that you will no longer accept their calls and that EVERYTHING must be in writing they HAVE to conform. If they continue to call they are breaking the Wireless and Telegraphy Act and can get in serious trouble.

 

I know but some of them ignore the rules regardless so it's another way of never getting a nasty call again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot Are Plonkers..

 

Thank you for this pearly of Wisdom and legal mastery. Perhaps, for those of us less versed in the intricacies of legal arguments and the relevant legislation here, you could enlighten us by re-phrasing your point in clearer language?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies.

I should really get my a**e in gear.

I will get sending next week.

This wireless n telegraph what ever act, does it apply to all financial companies that you are in dispute with, such as banks, credit cards?

Cheers all.

I will start a new thread if n when I get some balls to send the letters.

:eek::confused: Totallylost :confused::eek:

I only want what's mine.

 

Cabot (Halifax CC) £3304.31 - trying to negotiate min payment.- Sept 09

They sent copy of original agreement (bad copy).Felt I had to comply to stall. :mad:

 

Halifax/BMidshires - Mortgage - £18000 - In process of beginning to sue for them selling the house (after REPO) below the market value. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies.

I should really get my a**e in gear.

I will get sending next week.

This wireless n telegraph what ever act, does it apply to all financial companies that you are in dispute with, such as banks, credit cards?

Cheers all.

I will start a new thread if n when I get some balls to send the letters.

 

The Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 applies to ANYONE WHO CALLS YOU. If you ask them to stop calling you and they do not, then they have committed an offence under this Act.

 

s.40 of The Administration of Justice Act states that someone trying to recover a debt from you may not harrass you... if they call when you have asked them to stop, then they have committed an offence under this Act.

 

The Protection from Harrassment Act 1997 states that if someone does something to you, and any normal person wouild think that it amounts to harrassment, then it was harrassment and that an offence has been committed. This includes repeated calling (however many times they SAY they can call you) and calling at your door to intimidate you etc.

 

So - you are protected every which way from DCA's who want to harrass you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See my thread here regarding Cabot.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/18141-cabot-financial-telephone-harassment.html#post141206

 

I wonder if the calls will stop now?

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

:?

Hi'

 

I have had dealings with Cabot in the past and am being bombarded with telephone calls.

 

Tried looking for the CCA template in the library but can't find it. Can anyone tell me what it would be listed under.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Afternoon all,

 

I have received an interesting letter from Citi. I have forgotten to bring it to work with me but they are offering to pay the difference between their old charge of £24 and the new one of £12. So, they are haven't tried to wriggle out of it altogther which is what I was suspecting.

 

Also, is it 12 wroking days or 12 consecutive days they have to provide you with the deed of aassignment. if it's the latter then their 12 days are up. Woo Hoo!

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what will you do ? Accept and feel morally better or go for the lot and feel

- h a p p y:D

 

I'm going for the whole lot of course! If they'll give me half, they'll give me all of it!

 

Does anyone know if it's 12 working working days or 12 consecutive days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's my girl !:D you might also like to remind them that just because the OFT said £12 is the max to card companies it is still unlawful cos it only costs them about 50p and as we all know it is unlawful to exceed liquidated loss or actual cost - so stuff em !!!!! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my CCA to Cabot by recorded delivery on 3.8.06 and according to Royal Mail tracking it still hasn't been delivered......!:eek:

 

What do I do now??

** Progress Report **

Capital One -

D.P.A. request sent R/D 3.7.06

Prelim letter claiming £900 sent R/D on 12.8.06.

Offered £345.60 25.8.06 - not accepting!

LBA sent r/d 1.9.06 = £1,249.51

Cap One refusal to increase offer rec'd 13.9.06

Lloyds TSB

D.P.A. letter sent by R/D 3.8.06

D.P.A. del'vrd 4.8.06 - 40 days=13.9.06

Statements that don't make sense rec'd 29.8.06

Cabot

CCA letter sent by R/D 3.8.06

CCA letter not yet del'vrd as at 15.8.06!!!!

Emailed Royal Mail 14.8.06 & await reply

Bank of Scotland

D.P.A. request sent by R/D 12.8.06

D.P.A. del'd 16.8.06

---------------------------

If you think I've helped please click on my scales - top right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Maddy, I'll try that.

** Progress Report **

Capital One -

D.P.A. request sent R/D 3.7.06

Prelim letter claiming £900 sent R/D on 12.8.06.

Offered £345.60 25.8.06 - not accepting!

LBA sent r/d 1.9.06 = £1,249.51

Cap One refusal to increase offer rec'd 13.9.06

Lloyds TSB

D.P.A. letter sent by R/D 3.8.06

D.P.A. del'vrd 4.8.06 - 40 days=13.9.06

Statements that don't make sense rec'd 29.8.06

Cabot

CCA letter sent by R/D 3.8.06

CCA letter not yet del'vrd as at 15.8.06!!!!

Emailed Royal Mail 14.8.06 & await reply

Bank of Scotland

D.P.A. request sent by R/D 12.8.06

D.P.A. del'd 16.8.06

---------------------------

If you think I've helped please click on my scales - top right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

This may be of some interest to those doing CCA requests.

 

HFC bank (marbles card), after failing to comply with the 12 working day deadline and expiry of the 30 days, have instructed their solicitors to take legal action. They filed their claim, we put in our defence and we have just received the allocation questionairre this morning and details that the case is being transferred to our local County Court!

 

They blatantly disregard the law, commit a criminal offence and have the audacity to take the matter to Court! I don't know whether to apply to the Court to get their case struck out or let the morons make complete idiots of themselves in front of a District Judge! Hard decision! Perhaps they think we are going to cave in at the last minute....not a chance! I'm not sure whether it's brinkmanship on their part or complete stupidity and ignorance of the law!

 

I'll keep you posted! Anyone else been in a similar situation and gone to Court?

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest everyone reads this thread on Defaults - it's a longish one but a revelation and well worth the read....http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/20118-default-hell.html . I think it puts a different perspective on how we treat the likes of Cabot and the banks and Credit reference agencies :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome stitcherbaker. Anything Cabot and you have certain members of the forum foaming at the mouth so bring it on :D

 

You should send in your CCA request with your £1 postal order. On past performance you'll probably get a letter thanking you for your payment towards your account and then you'll hear no more! You really need a copy of your original contract and the Deed of assignment from the card company to Cabot. I doubt you'll get them but you never know your luck. If they are not received withing 12 days then Cabot will require a court order to collect it. A further 30 days and the debt becomes uncollectable and they have committed a criminal offence and you dutifully report them to Trading Standards.

 

Many posters with Cabot accounts have experienced the same thing as so described above - they seem to be getting into a pickle over their obligations.

 

Also, check your credit file because they have always defaulted the account as soon as they take the debt over. They register under the name of KingsHill No1 Ltd just to confuse you. You should not then have a default from the card company, it should have been removed at the same time so get onto the card company to remove it and inform the CRA too. If Cabot do not provide the documentation after the stated time frame then write to them and ask for all the money back they have received from you and charge them interest at the rate they might be charging you ( Mine was @ 12%)

 

They have completely defaulted the time period on one of my accounts and I have just recently been informed that they have taken on a larger debt I had with a bank and they so far have not provided the documents for that either - about 2-3 weeks to go so fingers crossed.

 

Just apply for your documents, post back here and we'll party together :D good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

****Below is a message that posted on my own thread****

 

Hi

 

called CABOT today because I noticed the account information they sent me out started on the 21/01/03, but when I looked on my credit file there was a default which was posted a month earlier in their name.

 

Their explanation was that the default was posted by PROVIDIAN but because they bought the account the default was put into their name.

 

How can a default which has posted by one company onto your credit file in their name be changed because another company has bought the account.

 

Please explain

 

Something else just came to mind.

CABOT said that the default was changed to their name after the account was transferred to them, if this is the case should they not also be responsible for the account information prior to taking over the account?

 

For the record she also said that a lot of people have tried to remove defaults and fail, and that the banks have no legal requirement to keep any information on defaults.

 

 

****I will be sending my CCA Request off tomorrow but by the reply I received

above the question of documentation has been answered and the default should be history****

 

THE ABOVE SCENARIO WILL PROBABLY BE THE SAME FOR MOST PEOPLE SO KEEP THE PRESSURE ON 'EM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever owns the debt will register the default. Get the rest removed by the CRA's and the cards/bank/dca (Providian) Cabot will not remove theirs, but I believe the minute the debt is moved on the last default should be removed.

 

I had the debt registered as default by the card company and Cabot and I had the card one removed just by phoning Experian so it's simple enough ( sometimes!)

 

Then you use the Default Hell thread and subsequent link and get them all removed.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever owns the debt will register the default. Get the rest removed by the CRA's and the cards/bank/dca (Providian) Cabot will not remove theirs, but I believe the minute the debt is moved on the last default should be removed.

 

I had the debt registered as default by the card company and Cabot and I had the card one removed just by phoning Experian so it's simple enough ( sometimes!)

 

Then you use the Default Hell thread and subsequent link and get them all removed.:D

 

 

You say that you were defaulted by the card company, so I am assuming the default was in the card companies name and not Cabots.

 

The fact is I was told that it was placed by the card company and then sold to Cabot which is when the default was then changed to their name which does not make any sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's right. But there should only be one default. Once the card company sells the debt the default should be removed. Cabot put it on as soon as they buy it (Kingshill No1). Have a word with the Credit reference agencies and tell them what I have said - you should only have one - see what they say.

 

They told me they'd remove the card company one. Although I have written to the card company telling them to remove anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...