Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bus lane fine - please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick two questions about about these bus lane PCNs:

 

1) What time limit do they have to issue the PCN from the date of the contravention?

 

2) If the surname is spelled incorrectly, two letter swapped round - is the PCN still valid?

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other question for anyone that can help, the PCN states that to take advantage of TfL's bargain 50% discount :confused: I need to pay within 14 days of its receipt. Given that I have made a representation instead I'm not absolutely sure where that leaves me should I lose my appeal - since I assume I'm not likely to get a response before the 14 days are up. I would be livid if by doing this I run the risk of paying the full whack. The PCN suggests that so long as I make my representation within 14 days I should be OK, but is that definitely the case?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other question for anyone that can help, the PCN states that to take advantage of TfL's bargain 50% discount :confused: I need to pay within 14 days of its receipt. Given that I have made a representation instead I'm not absolutely sure where that leaves me should I lose my appeal - since I assume I'm not likely to get a response before the 14 days are up. I would be livid if by doing this I run the risk of paying the full whack. The PCN suggests that so long as I make my representation within 14 days I should be OK, but is that definitely the case?

 

Thanks

I think the normal thing is that if your informal representations they will give you a further 14 days to pay at the reduced rate starting from the date the rejection notice was served.

 

You have the choice of then paying up or making a formal appeal (and losing the discounted rate).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

ARGH! I'm so annoyed. I've just received a PCN for the exact same spot. The photo clearly shows me on a piece of road that says 'Bus Stop' just after zig zag lines.

 

I remember specifically not entering the bus lane earlier in the road because you weren't allowed to. Then I entered here because I thought I was allowed. It's very unclear.

 

Has anyone else successfully appealed or shall I just pay while it's £60 instead of £120? I would rather be spending the money on something else. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

ARGH! I'm so annoyed. I've just received a PCN for the exact same spot. The photo clearly shows me on a piece of road that says 'Bus Stop' just after zig zag lines.

 

I remember specifically not entering the bus lane earlier in the road because you weren't allowed to. Then I entered here because I thought I was allowed. It's very unclear.

 

Has anyone else successfully appealed or shall I just pay while it's £60 instead of £120? I would rather be spending the money on something else. :-(

 

There is no 'bus lane ends' sign so you cannot just assume that the Bus Stop is not a part of the bus lane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the TSRGD is not guidance. It is a Statutory Instrument.

 

check out davies v heatley

 

Because by s.64(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 traffic signs shall be of the size, colour and type prescribed by regulation, if a sign the contravention of which is an offence contrary to s.36 is not as prescribed by the regulation, no offence is committed if the sign is contravened, even if the sign is clearly recognisable to a reasonable man as a sign of that kind

 

councils hate that one for some reason

 

Parking News Archive: Davies v Heatley [1971] RTR 145 QBD 4th Feb 1971

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the TSRGD is not guidance. It is a Statutory Instrument.

 

check out davies v heatley

 

Because by s.64(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 traffic signs shall be of the size, colour and type prescribed by regulation, if a sign the contravention of which is an offence contrary to s.36 is not as prescribed by the regulation, no offence is committed if the sign is contravened, even if the sign is clearly recognisable to a reasonable man as a sign of that kind

 

councils hate that one for some reason

 

Parking News Archive: Davies v Heatley [1971] RTR 145 QBD 4th Feb 1971

:)

 

 

Exactly therefore the bus lane is valid the TSRGD states that the markings must cease prior to a zig zag and re-start after. This does not mean that bus stops and crossings are not part of the Bus Lane, I cannot see how anyone would think a Bus Stop would not be in a Bus Lane, why would anyone create a Bus Lane and then stop it immediately before a Bus Stop? If the Bus Lane markings continued thru the crossing it would be contary to the TRSGD which would be ilegal, as it is as you state THE LAW!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert on the law and most of the regulations seem like a foreign language. However, it seems to me that when experienced drivers who are trying to obey the rules are being caught out at the same spot, something isn't right there.

 

I've never received a speeding fine, PCN, had any points on my license or even (excluding my first months as a driver) had a parking ticket. I'm no saint but I try to avoid getting fined.

 

It seemed like a new bus lane with different rules. In future I'll look out for a 'bus lane ends' sign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bianca1771 (or anyone),

Just got caught 3 times by this camera the other week and have appealed, using some of the arguments posted above, so fingers crossed. Also I visited the site and was intrigued to discover that the bus lane ends just 20m from the traffic lights for the left turn into Brixton Road. I have read on the DfT website that bus lanes should end 30m ahead of a major left turn, so I believe it actually contravenes DfT regulations, which I have pointed out. I'd be very interested to know if you appealed to the adjudicators (assuming my first attempt is unsuccessful).

Thanks!

Have you had any luck with this yet? I wrote to them about haw many PCN's have been issued from that one camera, 19731 in the last 12 months alone is the answer I got back there has to be inadequet markings etc to issue this number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had any luck with this yet? I wrote to them about haw many PCN's have been issued from that one camera, 19731 in the last 12 months alone is the answer I got back there has to be inadequet markings etc to issue this number.

 

Even if the Camera was only in force 12 hours a day thats only 4.5 vehicles an hour do NOT understand the signs, considering the road has a constant flow of traffic during the day the vast majority do realise its a Bus Lane.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello, I found this thread while searching for advice on getting a totally unexpected bus lane PCN on the (apparently infamous) Camberwell New Road.

I emailed the council asking them to send me documentary evidence of this, as I was convinced I had not gone into a bus lane.

I heard nothing back for several weeks, but got a letter this morning telling me that due to a 'processing error' my penalty charge had been cancelled.

I'd strongly reccommend everyone ask for evidence of their offence. I've no doubt I'd be £120 poorer if I hadn't sent that email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all.... I too had a PCN issued for this exact spot...

 

I emailed them this... and they cancelled it.

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I am writing to you to make representations against a Penalty Charge Notice that I received recently from TFL Croydon.

 

The Reference Number is GT27274933

 

The reason that I feel that this Penalty Charge Notice is unfair is simply because the road markings and signage are not comprehensive and clear enough in this instance.

 

All across London and indeed around the area that the alleged contravention took place a Bus Lane is divided from the normal traffic lane by a thick white line. As you can see from the CCTV pictures that you have of my vehicle, I changed lanes approaching a set of traffic lights where the thick white line had stopped.

 

The thick white line then continues for what can only be a few metres before the traffic lights, where if you are trying to be a competent and safe road user you should have selected the relevant and most suitable lane in which to continue your journey. As you are aware, the junction in question is filled with a large yellow boxed area and many people in this instance, and indeed the pictures, are filtering right causing a great deal of congestion.

 

There is a very small sign indicating the end of the bus lane which is not clearly readable from where I changed lanes and there is absolutely no question that I was deliberately flouting the Road Traffic Act or Highway Code.

 

In my observations the thick white line doesn't disappear at any other pedestrian crossing in the area, so why is this an exception ?

 

This is from the TFL appeals process pdf...

 

 

Other considerations for representations

We recognise that there are other reasons for you to challenge a

A representation made on this basis would be rejected by us unless

the vehicle drove in the bus lane for less than 20 metres prior to

making the left turn. We would confirm this by viewing the video

evidence available. It is important to note that there is an

exemption in the Traffic Management Order, which allows a vehicle

to enter a bus lane under these circumstances. This is taken into

consideration when enforcing all bus lanes.

 

 

I would like to know how long the bus lane is before the junction and would be more than happy to go and measure it myself if necessary as I am absolutely certain that it is less than 20 metres.

 

Is the Traffic Enforcement Officer in question aware of your guidelines as written on the TFL website ?

 

I have also found a website with a great deal of posts on it's forum about this very location and allegedly you have received over £2 million in fines and caught over 20,000 motorists with this camera. It is also said to be the highest earning camera in London, a coincidence ? I don't think so.

 

One such case is absolutely identical to mine and the pictures are posted there with only the vehicle being different to my case. They appealed to yourselves and the PCN was cancelled as it was adjudged, as I indeed also feel, to be inadequately signed.

 

I hope that this email finds you well and trust that I have eloquently and clearly stated my grounds for appeal and the PCN is cancelled.

 

Should these representations be rejected then please treat this as a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for the following documents:

 

a) A copy of the bus lane order or regulation giving effect to the Bus Lane.

 

b) A copy of the Safety Audit for this road layout.

 

c) A copy of the engineer’s scale diagrams showing the layout of this Bus Lane, the road markings and the signage (including warnings of camera enforcement).

 

d) Copies of any approvals of deviations of signage from TSRGD.

 

e) Logs of maintenance visits verifying existence and condition of the signs.

 

f) Certification of type approval of the CCTV device.

 

g) Details of the number of times that the videotape used has been degaussed and reused.

 

h) A copy of the Camera Enforcement logbook recording the alleged contravention.

 

i) Copies of the still images showing all the required information in the correct order.

 

j) The number of PCNs issued by TfL in respect of this location.

 

k) The number of PCNs issued by TfL in respect of this location and cancelled by them following informal challenges.

 

l) The number of PCNs issued by TfL in respect of this location and cancelled by them following formal appeal to them.

 

m) The number of PCNs issued by TfL in respect of this location and cancelled following appeal to a PATAS adjudicator.

 

n) The number of PCNs issued by TfL in respect of this location and not pursued by them for any other reason.

 

I will then pass them to my legal team for further appeal.

 

Thank you for your time, I hope to hear from you soon

 

Warmest Regards

 

 

 

BTW... my 'legal team' consists of advice from my Dad who is a lawyer.... :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite the numerous posts and victims in this thread it still isn't clearly defined whether or not the Bus Lane is correctly signed. Pics seem unavailable now? what about the two 'commencement' signs? are they there?

Strada, well done. I think you actually got 'em by frightening them off with the request for stats! rather than any technicality. Useful ploy and I just loved the "warmest regards". LOL.

-

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Guys, I'm so sorry it has taken this long for me to put up any update regarding my case with TFL for the PCN's received on Camberwell Road J\W Brixton road, I know a lot of people have been left with a hole in there pocket and some cynics on this forum, have been against some who try and get leverage on their time and busy life by driving.

 

Also some have simply said yes! I won my case, however they refused to show integrity by helping others. In my case, I had the confidence to fight back against my initial 4 PCN's on this stretch of the within 2 days and I lost out on 2, having had to pay the discounted price on the first one, the second & 3rd I paid the full price.

 

Then a 6 month afterwards I was sent a further 8 for the same period with the first 4 which made me furious, as I knew it was now becoming expensive to travel on the Camberwell road and I completely avoided the road and I knew something had to be done, due to not being able to convince the ADJUDICATOR initially, so I kept fighting till the ADJUDICATOR decided to put a hold on the further 8 PCN'S and visited the ** STRETCH OF ROAD ** with the markings himself.

 

This took me 1 year and after all the finding the ADJUDICATOR told TFL they were in the wrong for a few reasons and ordered them to cancel the all the 12 PCN'S they gave me and refund all my money totalling £180.00, what upset me a bit was that if the money had been in a bank account they will at least have given me interest.

 

Finally, I want you all to know that you can claim all your money back, using the single cases used a s a precedent and the new precedent I had set, making it 2 defence that this will make anyone’s case valid, as that was my saving Grace, so "with God on your side who can be against you".

 

I will be uploading necessary documentation required to help you appeal to the ADJUDICATOR to have all your cases re-opened and reviewed.

 

In the meantime, you might want to look up the case "salt coy v TFL "

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh! lest I forget, they have now changed the direction of the camera now to face Kenilworth road and the one on Kenilworth road, overlooks the park now, due to the evidence I got in form of photographs from this site and the one's I went around collecting from different borough's that had the required signage and display to help motorist complete there journey's safely

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Finally, I want you all to know that you can claim all your money back, using the single cases used a s a precedent and the new precedent I had set, making it 2 defence that this will make anyone’s case valid, as that was my saving Grace, so "with God on your side who can be against you".

 

I will be uploading necessary documentation required to help you appeal to the ADJUDICATOR to have all your cases re-opened and reviewed.

 

Hi there, are these docs uploaded anywhere yet?

 

( and... how/where can I look up Salt Coy vs TFL? )

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I have received a letter today saying I was seen in a Bus lane by one of these cameras. Is the law the same as it is when you get a speeding fine? For example a notice of intended prosecution has to be served within 14 days of the offence? The date of the offence was 28th Aug and the notice was sent out on 15th sept.

 

Any feedback on this would be welcome. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter today saying I was seen in a Bus lane by one of these cameras. Is the law the same as it is when you get a speeding fine? For example a notice of intended prosecution has to be served within 14 days of the offence? The date of the offence was 28th Aug and the notice was sent out on 15th sept.

 

Any feedback on this would be welcome. Many thanks

they have 28 days to send out postal tickets from the date the incident occured.

 

there are expemtions for being in a bus lane mate, what happened here??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was like everyone else in a town I was nt famililar with, had to make a delivery, could nt turn left as it was Buses only, but the right turn was blocked, by a delivery truck and a bus. behind me I had taxis and buses sounding their horns for me to get out the way but I had no where to go, therefore my only option was to use the bus lane by turning left!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was like everyone else in a town I was nt famililar with, had to make a delivery, could nt turn left as it was Buses only, but the right turn was blocked, by a delivery truck and a bus. behind me I had taxis and buses sounding their horns for me to get out the way but I had no where to go, therefore my only option was to use the bus lane by turning left!

was there a vehicle broken down, blocking the way forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there was an obstruction, and I could nt turn right, other wise I was holding up the traffic behind me, which was mainly buses and taxis, which had the authority to turn left, therefore I was forced to turn left. I am going to appeal but I dont know how I will fair!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

This site is v close to me. It appears the camera is facing up the Camberwell New Rd towards the bus lane once again, i.e. pointing south away from Oval station. Obviously, the money this one makes is too good to miss. I'm all for it catching people deliberately hogging the bus lane but as we can see it is catching those who have no idea they are committing and offence and who would never deliberately do so. OTH, to get caught twice would be stupid and repeatedly would be moronic, regardless of where or how.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...