Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
    • OK - I have rejected mediation and said I wish to proceed to a court hearing. I said 'Yes' to : Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing, i.e. by a judge reading and considering the case papers, witness statements and other documents filed by the parties, making a decision, and giving a note of reasons for that decision? since they appear to be relying solely on my failure to purchase their additional 'parcel protection coverage/insurance' which my submission of the PENCHEV and SMIRNOVS transcripts should kick firmly into touch.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SLC Cannot Supply The Original Agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if it's 30 calendar days-I have just wiped an £1100 loan with Lowell Financial,and as First Direct didn't supply me with the agreement till 32 days,£2300 with them....

 

am I correct with the First Direct case here?

 

First Direct have committed a criminal offence in relation to this debt. Do you really think, having done so, that they will take you in front of a court to enforce it? You're not quite in the position where you can ignore it; they HAVE sent the agreement. However you are in an almost unassailable negotiating position; and a complaint to Trading Standards would get them on the hop to accommodate you, trust me!!

 

Lowell Financial can kiss your proverbial mate; you owe them nothing. Complain to TS straight away, and when that's done, write to them demanding the removal of any defaults they may have placed. If none, then I believe you can simply sit back and wave fingers at them... ignore them completely. Be smug - you've earned it!! If there are no defaults though, don't bother writing to them; simply let TS deal with it. If you have paid them any money, write them an LBA requiring the money returned; there IS NO DEBT and therefore any money of yours they have was obtained under false pretences. If they don't send it back, take them to court for it. But I think they will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let’s see if i got this right posted cca request of to them on the 11 July had no reply from them the £1 payment was credit to my visa card on the 19th July so the 12 working days are up. Question is do i wait 30 days from the 11th when i sent the letter or when i know they got the money. They not even acknowledged the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let’s see if i got this right posted cca request of to them on the 11 July had no reply from them the £1 payment was credit to my visa card on the 19th July so the 12 working days are up. Question is do i wait 30 days from the 11th when i sent the letter or when i know they got the money. They not even acknowledged the letter.

 

Your letter (and therefore payment) is deemed received two days after you posted it. Therefore your 30 days begins on the 13th July. What they choose to do with your payment when they receive it, is utterly irrelevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your letter (and therefore payment) is deemed received two days after you posted it. Therefore your 30 days begins on the 13th July. What they choose to do with your payment when they receive it, is utterly irrelevant.

 

thanks Stonelaughter

 

Worked it out they got till the 11th August to comply with the request them they committed a criminal offence. Just out of interest how they get punished for not complying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted this letter to Lowell Financial-what do you think?

 

LOWELL FINANCIAL LTD

PO BOX 172

LEEDS

LS11 9WS

 

 

7 AUGUST 2006

 

 

Dear Sir/ Madam

 

Re agreement no. xxxxxxxxxx

 

I wrote to to you on June 30 via recorded delivery,requesting a true copy of the signed agreement under the terms of the secs. 77(1) and 78(1) of the CCA 1974,enclosing the statutory maximum fee of £1 in the form of a postal order.

 

I have not been provided with a signed agreement under the consumer credit act, I have not been provided with a statement of account, and I have not been provided with a true copy of the deed of assignment, despite my properly formatted and paid for request.

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to Lowell Financial Ltd/Lowell Portfolio Ltd.

 

I will no longer be making payments against this "debt" as it is unenforceable. Lowell Financial has committed a criminal offence under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act, and non compliance with the original request is therefore a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

This will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

I calculate that since 30th April 2005,you have taken £927.90 from my account.

I require repayment in full of this money within 14 days or I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

 

 

Sound ok?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LTWFB: Yes it's fine but don't forget the heading "LETTER BEFORE ACTION" and DO NOT state "you have now committed a criminal offence" - you are not a judge. State "I now believe that you may have committed a criminal offence".

 

pford: Trading Standards deal with it - they may well prosecute but I don't know what the punishment will be; possibly a removal of their CCA Licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LTWFB, this is gold!

 

Waiting with baited breath to see how this goes, im proceeding down the same lines with Egg/CSL (DCA)

 

If I get this right, CSL and EGG will be forced to remove a default AND pay me back about 6k!

 

:D

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just sat and read the entirity of this thread and at the end confused with regard to my situation.

 

To clarify...

Do you need to be behind with payments/have your debt sold on or can you follow the procedure with an existing debt on which you are paying?

 

I could really do with wiping out several of my credit cards and loans, but even one would help. I do however make payments to them currently.

 

Could someone shed some light on this?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just sat and read the entirity of this thread and at the end confused with regard to my situation.

 

To clarify...

Do you need to be behind with payments/have your debt sold on or can you follow the procedure with an existing debt on which you are paying?

 

I could really do with wiping out several of my credit cards and loans, but even one would help. I do however make payments to them currently.

 

Could someone shed some light on this?

Thanks

 

 

Do you need to be behind with payments/have your debt sold on -no

 

or can you follow the procedure with an existing debt on which you are paying?-yes

 

Could someone shed some light on this?-go for it-it only costs a quid a letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

Every quid counts when there are several letters to send :p

 

Still, better a quid spent and a thousand wiped out... than none spent and a thousand incur interest.. (probably a future english proverb)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, I reckon there are a lot of people with loans/credit cards where the loan company does not have a signed agreement. Especially if it was a few years ago.

REFUNDED

Hubbys - HSBC £4,165 paid 18/8 after MCOL issued :)

HSBC - £651 paid 18/8 after MCOL issued :)

HSBC - £147 Prel 7/8, LBA 21/8, MCOL 6/9 £241

Hubby Halifax - Prel 29/7 £215, LBA 21/8, Offer rec. £110 22/8, MCOL 6/9 £298

Abbey - £2758 - Prel 26/6, LBA 10/7 - MCOL 26/7 £3,391, offer 25/8 £1,755.94, paid £3567.32 after Case manag hearing

Barclays - £675 Prel7/8, LBA 21/8, offer received £300 MCOL 6/9 £998 - Paid £1,012 before going to Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on a minute... the CCA1974 says in s.77(1) (same wording in 78(1)):

 

... shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it ...

 

What is the meaning of "if any"? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This gets more interesting. Please tell me I'm wrong!! A credit card is, within the CCA1974, a "credit-token" agreement.

 

When they send you a new credit card:

 

85 Duty on issue of new credit-tokens

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

 

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

 

(3) This section does not apply to a small agreement. [Less than £50]

 

 

I don't ever get a copy of the signed agreement with my new credit cards. So my lenders have committed offences (more than a month since the last new one)? Really??

 

What have I missed!?

 

Edit: new thread on this question started here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure where to post this but can someone give me some clarification.

 

I presently have a loan with the student loans company (scotland), if i were to request a copy of the original signed document and they cant provide it would this mean that the loan is unenforceable and could therefore be wiped? I am presently paying this off and have never defaulted but i would like to try and be free of it asap.

 

I also have a Citicard which im in the process of filling in forms for the small claims. I have had this card for nearly 10 years and this was previously with peoples bank prior to it switching to a citi card. Again if i ask for a copy of the original document and they cant provide it am i able to do the same as what i would like to do with the student loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With SLC, no, as they are exempt from the Consumer Credit Act.

 

With Citicard, yes - you can make a request. :-)

 

With Citicard, does it matter that i am already trying to claim back from them? I have already had partial payment but they refuse to pay what they owe. I would rather put my small claim (the form has yet to be taken to court) on hold and try and get the debt made unenforceable and perhaps reclaim all i've paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter but as you say if they default on the CCA request then the whole debt becomes unenforceable anyway.

 

I'm not too convinced about recovering amounts paid. The Consumer Credit Act says it's unenforceable from when they default, not before.

 

But I'm awaiting clarification on the s85(1) argument above; as you've had the account 10 years they will definitely have sent you a new card in that time so as far as I can tell they are in default anyway from then (unless they enclosed a signed copy of the agreement with the card, but I've never seen this done).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...