Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA admitted no CCA, so I want to claim interest back.... Need help though!


standingupformyself
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have tweaked around with Mr Firewalkers letter slightly....I will print this one off first thing in the morning, unless anyone wants to add any constructive comments to amend it...

 

Thank you Dave for your help in this,

 

What does anyone think? Is this ready for posting.....? Which address should I use for this letter and is there anyone in particular that I should address it to?

 

Mrs Standingupformyself

addres**

Account number ***

 

9th July 2007

Dear Sirs

 

You have admitted that you cannot supply a regulated agreement that documents our alleged contract.

 

As such I believe that no contract exists or has existed.

 

Therefore I revoke any right that you might have or had to process my data, and to pass that data onto third parties. You do not have my permission to start to process any new data and any data already passed onto third parties must be withdrawn and destroyed.

 

As no contract exists you have had no right to charge interest on any money lent. I have not paid any interest to MBNA since September 2006, but now realize that I have been paying interest prior to this date, when I shouldn’t have done so. The capital that has been borrowed is not, and has never been in dispute. I am sure that I do not need to point out to you, that without a true, executed copy of my CCA we are now unable to ascertain any of the terms and conditions that constitute our alleged contract.

 

Therefore I am demanding the repayment of all such interest taken from 28th April 2001 plus I demand statutory interest at 8% from the date of each charge. I reserve the right to amend these amounts, as I have contacted MBNA, requesting that they send me details of this account back to when I first opened it.

 

This totals to £3316.18 + £843.16 (interest at 8% to today’s date, which is 9th July 2007) Total amount to date is £4159.24

 

I ask please that this money is returned to me by cheque.

I hope to hear from you positively within 14 days of the date of this letter, if not I will file a claim in the county court for non compliance with the consumer credit act, and I will also ask for the alleged agreement to be pronounced void. In which case I will ask the judge for the return of all monies paid to the account.

 

I expect a timely reply

 

Yours sincerely,

Mrs Standingupformyself

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sounds good to me :)

 

address should be

 

mbna

customer advocate office

chester

etc

 

it will be on here somewhere

 

good luck

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D:D Go for it Mrs Standing. I will be very interested to see how you get on with this one.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tweaked around with Mr Firewalkers letter slightly....I will print this one off first thing in the morning, unless anyone wants to add any constructive comments to amend it...

 

Thank you Dave for your help in this,

 

What does anyone think? Is this ready for posting.....? Which address should I use for this letter and is there anyone in particular that I should address it to?

 

Mrs Standingupformyself

addres**

 

Account number ***

 

 

 

9th July 2007

 

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

You have admitted that you cannot supply a regulated agreement that documents our alleged contract. Therefore no contract exists or has existed.

 

Therefore you have never had my permission to lawfully process my data, and to pass that data onto third parties. You do not have my permission to start to process any new data and any data already passed onto third parties must be withdrawn and destroyed.

 

As no contract exists you have had no right to charge interest on any money lent. I have not paid any interest to MBNA since September 2006, but now realize that I have been paying interest prior to this date, when I shouldn’t have done so. *

I am sure that I do not need to point out to you, that without a true, executed copy of my CCA we are now unable to ascertain any of the terms and conditions that constitute our alleged contract.

 

Therefore I require repayment of all such interest taken from 28th April 2001 . I also seek statutory interest at 8% from the date of each charge. I reserve the right to amend these amounts, as I have contacted MBNA, requesting that they send me details of this account back to when I first opened it.

 

This totals to £3316.18 + £843.16 (interest at 8% to today’s date, which is 9th July 2007) Total amount to date is £4159.24

 

Please forward payment by return by cheque.

 

I expect to receive a positive response to this letter within the next fourteen days. In the event of either no response or a negative response I put you on notice that I will file a claim in the county court for non compliance with the consumer credit act, and I that I will at the same time ask the court to make a declaration that the alleged agreement between us is void. I will also ask the judge to order the return of all monies I have paid to the account.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

Mrs Standingupformyself

 

 

I've made a few suggested changes to your letter for you to consider.

 

I'm sure MBNA are going to just love receiving this one............:p :p

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go get em standing :D All the best.

 

 

 

I still have a question about the level of interest, in the last 6 years youve paid £XXXX in interest and you are now asking for that back, but recently you received your charges back, which is right and you also received £YYYYY back as interest on the charges.

 

So do you need to take YYYY from XXXX for a total interest paid, otherwise they would be paying you twice?

 

Just want clarity as i had an account with MBNA and ill be doing the same, but want to make sure my numbers add up, before i go down this route ive already got charges and interest back, currently pursuing PPI and interest, so i doubt there wont be much interest left to claim :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi wednesday

 

I think you have it wrong... think of the interest what THEY put on the account as a charge for borrowing

 

Standing claimed the charges back which were taken unlawfully. she is allowed to add interest to them

 

The interest on the account is a completely different thing, this is money they have taken from her each month for the priveledge of using their money

 

I think its the term " interest " that you have got confused.

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its the term " interest " that you have got confused.

 

Dont doubt you for a minute :D

 

Me being a bit thickie here then :D

Say Standing has a £100 balance, she misses a payment, which adds £25, new total is £125.

Now interest is added to the balance of £125, to make it easier for me :) , say interest added is £10, so new balance is £135.

Now what i meant is, if she reclaims the £25 plus interest, the interest would be say £3, new balance of £107. £100 + £7 interest on the £100 balance.

So with no CCA i thought as £3 of the £10 interest applied to the account as already been refunded, she would now only be able to reclaim £7.

Its not that simple is it?

 

How lost am i :cool:

Think i should just go back to staring at the wall :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi wednesday

 

I can see the point you are trying to make

 

but

 

She can claim the £25 back. she is then allowed to add interest to that.

 

All she has claimed back is the £25

 

She has in fact leant them £25 so SHE can charge THEM for the priveledge.

 

Look at it another way

 

1. If she claimed all the interest ever paid back eg £nnnn.00

 

2. then claimed all the charges back as wel £nnnn.00

 

she could claim interest on the amount she leant them as interest (1)

she could also claim interest on the charges (2) as well

 

hmmmmm

 

I'm not explaining this well at all am I :)

 

anyone ?

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

youv'e got

 

by jove she's got it

 

:)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi wednesday

 

I can see the point you are trying to make

 

but

 

She can claim the £25 back. she is then allowed to add interest to that.

 

All she has claimed back is the £25

 

She has in fact leant them £25 so SHE can charge THEM for the priveledge.

 

Look at it another way

 

1. If she claimed all the interest ever paid back eg £nnnn.00

 

2. then claimed all the charges back as wel £nnnn.00

 

she could claim interest on the amount she leant them as interest (1)

she could also claim interest on the charges (2) as well

 

hmmmmm

 

I'm not explaining this well at all am I :)

 

anyone ?

 

Dave

 

Hi dave do you mean

 

refund charge + interest applied then charge the bank interest on that total

 

all the best dpick:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes by jove she's got it

 

(Gruff Voice) Ahem....................;)

 

I edited it out :D

 

I still dont think ive got it lol

 

Its just im thinking im in the middle of reclaiming PPI back plus interest. So with the interest from the PPI and charges, obviously if im succesful in the PPI claim, im claiming back around £3000 in interest alone and from what i now understand i can go back to MBNA as they dont have my agreement and try to reclaim a few thousand pounds more?

 

Is MBNA my own personal cash cow :D

 

 

Dpick your as bad as me:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES they are your personal cash cow go get them

 

get all the interest back (and then charge them interest for the priveledge of having YOUR money)

 

in reclaiming the charges all you are claiming back is the charges.

 

you can if you wish add interest to this

 

what standing is trying to achieve is the repayment of the Interest THEY have charged each month.

 

She is considering each amount of interest as a loan to them, and can charge her own interest on that if she wishes

 

ow....my head hurts

 

Dave

  • Haha 1

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ow....my head hurts

 

 

Now i do understand that ;):D

 

Cheers Dave :)

 

 

Standing i might send this letter tomorrow as well then, 2 pronged attack, we could just take the keys of Chester Towers and lease them back to MBNA what do ya reckon :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This totals to £3316.18 + £843.16 (interest at 8% to today’s date, which is 9th July 2007) Total amount to date is £4159.24

 

Just done a spreadsheet in anticiaption of me doing this and i would be reclaiming £4166.60 including interest, thats £7.36 difference :o :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you go for it :D

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you go for it

 

 

Theyve only just refunded £3000 to my account.

 

I sent a pre lim for £2500 other day for PPI taken without my authority.

 

And you want me to send a letter for £4000 more :o :o :cool:

 

In for a penny in for a pound i spose :D

 

They surely arent gonna pay all that to me tho are they :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also proposing to follow this approach, with the interest repaid it would essentially bring the account to zero. My CCC can only produce the T&C's for one card and an application for the other. They seem to be in a panic.

 

The issue of the default notice and credit reference agency issue is confusing though, since there seems to be an opinion that by using the card you have agreed implicitly for them to process your data. I agree with Dave that with no CCA you have not given consent as such but I am not sure about this area. Any experts on the Data Protection Act and their implicit rights to process data? Has it been tested or are we in new territory here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of this is new terrirtory......we're making it up as we go along :)

 

but they are using contract law to process data and to charge interest.

 

If the contract cant be proved then all terms are void.

 

(I would think)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theyve only just refunded £3000 to my account.

 

I sent a pre lim for £2500 other day for PPI taken without my authority.

 

And you want me to send a letter for £4000 more :o :o :cool:

 

In for a penny in for a pound i spose :D

 

They surely arent gonna pay all that to me tho are they :confused:

 

 

jeeeez they are becoming a cash cow arent they :)

 

 

WHY NOT

 

do they have a contract that will allow them to charge interest?

 

if so where is it ?

 

think about it

 

If you really wanted to (but it would be a brave choice) you could ask them for every penny youve ever paid them EVER !!

 

no contract.... any money they have taken would be unlawfull.....

any money given to you would be frozen by virtue of an unenforceable or void contact

 

but as I said that would be a BRAVE choice

 

Dave

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry standing we seem to have hijacked your thread.....

 

It can happen really easily

 

Sorry

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO!!!! You are welcome. I wasnt online last night, and am really pleased to see the questions and answers that you have all raised.... It makes things clearer for me, and others too I would hope.....

 

Thanks everyone xx

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...