Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

im4347 Vs Barclays


im4347
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5907 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have 2 accounts with Barclays, one being a joint account with my wife.

The amounts to be claimed are:

 

ACC 1 - £1905

Interest - £108.87

 

Acc2 - £1750

Interest - £19.87

 

Total= £3783.74

 

I sent my first letter requesting the amounts above and I recieved a 'Full and Final' settlement letter back offering us the amount of £2235.00.

 

We obviously declined the offer and sent a second letter back stating that if the full amount is not received within the next 7 days we will be taking County Court Action against them.

 

We heard nothing back and decided to give them a call to ask if they had received my second letter. The Customer Relations Manager who I dealt with was so robotic, as if she was reading out of a book, and giving me all this 'goodwill gesture' jargon. I told her that you are giving me no choice but to take this matter to Court, to which she replyed, 'that's fine, take us to court'.

 

We have now prepared our spreadsheets with the 'Schedule of Charges' including the 8% daily interest to date, bringing the total amount to:

£4207.65

 

Could someone please advice us whether to take the MCOL Route or the N1 Route? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

both have their good and bad points

 

mcol has limited space for particulars of claim ... can sometimes cause problems later BUT has the advantage of being able to see exactly where your claim is upto You cant submit your schedule of charges with mcol and need to send it after filing

 

N1 has the advantage of a fuller particulars of claim you can attatch your schedule BUT you cant easily see where your claim is upto

 

It really boils down to personal preference

 

Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

My wife and I are only about 4 weeks ahead of you - we asked the same question within our group of friends who are reclaiming monies and the general concenous is that the MCOL route is easier and less time consuming - its also a lot easier to 'cut and paste' from the CAG template liberary (with the obvious minor adjustments). Also the MCOL website checks the defendants postal address to ensure action can be taken. The MCOL web site is very easy (surprisingly easy) to follow.

Hope this Helps and good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N1 can be done on the pc .. just not saved so as long as you print off the 3 copies required once you have dont it theres no problem ... N1 removes the need for the case to be transfered to your local court once Barclays defend the claim which they will do

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing to consider with MCOL is that it is clogged up and slow at the moment. Then you will have the delay of it being transferred to your local court.

 

I have read several threads lately advising N1 route

 

madeleine150x120.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to be about a 3 to 4 week delay in MCOL cases being transferred to local courts. If you go N1 route at least you are that time further up the waiting list for a court date. Only downside to N1 is that you physically have to take papers to court in the first place

 

madeleine150x120.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref N1 route, not only that there seems to be a LOT of judges who are dismissing the POC's as inadequate from MCOL because of the limited space you are allowed..

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that where it is easy enough to get into your local court, it can not only be time saving, but the court send the POC and SOC onto the bank; no more hold up with bank claiming weeks down the line that they didn't receive details of claim.

 

Also remember that anyone who is on low income and exempt from court fees, still has to intially pay out through MCOL however your local court can accept the claim without payment as long as you take along Exemption Form (downloadable from Court Services Website) plus documentary proof of income/benefits.

 

It also gives you the opportunity to familiarise yourself with the court building, nearby parking facilities etc plus you can ask direct questions to the court clerk regarding court procedure and timeframes.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yes you can . just make sure that details of both accounts and that you include both SOC' ...... also that you take 3 of each with you

 

1 for the court

1 for the court to stamp and issue to Barclays

1 for the court to stamp and return back to you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

We went to court today and filed the county court claim. We understand that we now have to wait to hear back from the court with a date by which Barclays should reply.

 

Do we need to send Barclays our Particulars of Claim and SOCs separately aswell? (I know the court are sending one copy to the bank)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi im

 

Since you went down the N1 route, you will have provided the court with 3 copies of the Application plus 3 accompanying Schedule of Charges. That's your part done.

 

THe court will send on everything Barclays require - if the court didn't stamp and give you back your copy, you'll have it through post soon (as will Barclays).

 

Just sit back, keep reading the forum and wait for the court to contact you with next stage :)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Just to update you on our progress so far:

 

A 'Notice of Issue' was served to Barclays on the 13th July 2007 and they had until the 27th July 2007 to reply. We received nothing from Barclays, but they faxed an 'Acknowledgement of Service' to the Court on the 27th July (typical).

 

Will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all

 

We received our 'Allocation Questionnaire' and the deadline is 31st August, yes today!!!

 

A quick question regarding Section G (further info), is there any latest templates or advice that I will need to complete this section?

 

I have also received a letter from Barclays stating that they will be applying for an order to stay from the court until the resolution of the Bank's proceedings with the OFT.

 

:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im,

 

Think this is the link you want - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html.

 

Ignore B's letter, stick to your own agenda.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Slick.

 

I found this on one of the threads regarding the bank asking for a stay order to be attached to the AQ;

 

"The Claimant is aware that the defendant is now routinely requesting a stay in proceedings in claims of this nature, by indicating an intention to negotiate a settlement in section A of their allocation questionnaire.

 

The claimant is strongly opposed to such a stay, upon the basis that the defendant, both during and prior to this litigation, has rebutted or ignored all prior attempts by the claimant to narrow the issues in dispute, or otherwise engage in meaningful dialogue which may have facilitated an amicable settlement to these matters.

 

It is submitted that the request by the defendant is highly likely to be an attempt to further frustrate and delay proceedings, and the pattern of settled cases so far would strongly suggest that the defendant does not intend to settle these matters until a hearing date is imminent.

 

Accordingly, the claimant respectfully requests that any such request by the defendant is turned aside."

Should I attach this to the Allocation Questionnaire?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

Had a letter from Wolverhampton County Court stating:

 

"IT IS ORDERED THAT

UPON the court considering the papers in this case and

 

UPON it appearing to the court that

(i) the issues to be determined in this case are the same or similar to those to be determined a test case ('the test case') being brought by the Office of Fair Trading against a representative number of clearing banks and

(ii) it would be appropriate and proportionate in the circumstances for this case to be stayed pending the conclusion of the test case

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

Each party shall by 4pm on the 18th October inform the court in writing why this case should not be stayed pending the conclusion of the test case."

Any advice would be really appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok they are asking you to submit an argument against a stay .. have a look here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/17065-application-removal-stay-updated.html#post1046820 amend the witness statement to suit :)

 

 

Hope that helps also have a look here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/111127-new-forum-stays.html

 

 

Saint :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...