Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jo x versus HSBC


jox74
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5956 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

Firstly, gutted I hadn't gotten wind of this site before I started my barny with HSBC - found loads of fantastic advice, and more importantly the interest calculator - doh - that's nearly 500 quid Ive missed out on!! I'll be passing along details of this site to my brother-in-law-to-be, to make sure he takes HSBC for the interest!!!

 

Basically, HSBC owe me £2995 in bank charges. I've written a number of times and got fobbed off with the eight week thing, as have lots of you from what I've read.

 

So - hacked off with being messed around I started an online claim, which was:

  • Issued 14 May
  • Acknowledged 17 May (so I assume deemed as served on that date too?!! Anyone know if that's right?)
  • If defendant has 28 days from date of service to file a defence, does that then mean some time around 14 June???

(Oh, and if it wasn't for this site I would never have know to send my statement of charges on to the courts after doing my online claim - so thanks for making that so clear!! Phew!)

 

I've seen lots of advice on various threads about writing to push the HSBC solictor bods into making an offer - I assume it is too early to do that now so should I sit tight and wait to see what they come back with defence-wise?

 

I'd be uber grateful if some of you knowledgeable souls out there would direct some of that HSBC-busting power my way.....

 

And I can't wait until that money is stuck in my account and I can make a donation to this site for its sterling work.....(geddit?!.....sterling.....sterling....I'll get my coat).

 

 

Jo x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Jeneil,

 

You're a star!!! Thanks for posting so quickly, and for the really helpful direction to that thread.

 

From the info there, it looks as though they've got until 18 June to file their defence, so I'll stop getting my knickers in a twist for the mo!!

 

Jo x

 

:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have received a notice of issue. this would then tell you when the date of deemed served is. Usually it is 5 days after the date you filed your claim. So if the date of issue is 14th May then the date of deemed served would be 19th May. DG then have 28 days from the 19th in which to put in their defence(16th June). As for nudging DG, I would wait until your claim has been transfered to your local court. You may in the meantime get an offer from DG, this will relate to your prelim letter or LBA.

  • Haha 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jowalshy,

 

You are spot on with the issue and deemed served dates...but I'd gone for 18 June (coz it's a Monday) rather than Sat 16th.

 

(I'd just gotten a little confused as the claim was acknowledged on 17 May...two days before it was deemed served, but I suspect that it doesn't really matter).

 

I'm grateful for the your help though, and should probably apologise in advance for some of the eejit questions I may fire out as this thing goes on!!

 

Jo x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the deadline date is on a weekend, I still think that they will have to defend by then as it is 28 calender days and not working days. Just keep an eye out on the MCOL site.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd picked it up from the MCOL thread Jeneil sent me...

 

Just out of interest though, given what seems like the huge amounts of these claims going through the courts at the moment are these deadlines slipping?

 

Jo x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes they do. If that happens to you, I would contact MCOL for advice.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Right,

 

Latest on my claim is that DG submitted a defence on 22 June, the claim has been transferred to to my local court, and the allocation questionnaire has been dispensed with.

 

I've had a look at a few other threads, and am I right in thinking that now is the time to start trying to nudge our friends in DG? Of course, I don't hold out much hope that they'll act on said nudge letter, but presumably it looks good that I've been trying to push them without taking up any more of the court's precious time (!)...

 

So, two questions. I've seen a few different nudge letters dotted about - is there a template about that someone might be able to direct me to?

 

Also I've been reading something about the additional stuff that can be claimed - s69 interest? Can someone direct me to some advice about this, so that I can decide whether I need to include a claim for that.

 

Actually, I lied, I've three questions - since my claim was submitted I've had another bank charge (first one in ages - really not v happy!). Can I add this to my claim, or shall I just let it go?

 

Grateful for any advice!!

 

Cheers

 

Jo x

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jo,

back to front - on the new charge - can't add it on - must wait and claim again but my advice would be hang on to it a little - if dg makes an offer and drops something off your claim (like one is a duplicate or one was refunded at some point - so they are taking off that amount) then you can come back with - well, i'd like to accept that offer if you would include this new charge from xx/xx/xx - then i would accept your offer - so keep it as a bargaining chip for now.

 

in my signature at the bottom of this post there are two threads with aq in the title - both have nudge help in post one - both are slightly different - but don't be afraid to tweak the letters to your situation.

 

now, the s.69 - i'm interested in where you got your particulars of claim and what they said. i'm thinking if you followed a template from somewhere - you may have already asked for the 8% interest (that is what the s.69 is about) so, have you kept a copy of your particulars or do you know where you got them from - maybe you could put them up here and we can check them - if you haven't asked for the s.69 - it may be that the court will sort of automatically give it - i'll check that out - if not - and you wanted to - you could file an amended poc for £35 (not reclaimable) and add the interest to your claim. it is a little involved but for that amount it would be well worth it.

 

so, get back with where you got your poc's and put them up here for us to look at if you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lateralus,

 

Thanks for your post - I suspected that was the case with the latest charge.

 

As for the particulars of my claim, I got them from the BBC website (which I now deeply regret!) and they go:

 

The claimant has held a current account [my details] with the defendant, conducted on their standard Terms and Conditions since 1999. The defendant, from 2003 to the present day has applied charges to the claimant account, totalling not more than £2995. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable. Penalty charges are irrecoverable at common law. The precedent for this was Dunlop Pneumatic v New Garage [1915]Ac 79 along with Murray v Leisure play [2005] EWCA Civ 963. The defendants charges are also contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 Para 8 and Sch 2(1)(e). The claimant has asked the bank to refund their charges, or offer proof that they are a true pre-estimate. The bank has, so far, failed to do so. The claimant claims no more than £2995, being the sum unlawfully debited.

 

The £2995 is solely charges, so there isn't 8% added anywhere.

 

Also, another couple of points I'm a little nervous on...couldn't remember exactly when the account was opened, but now suspect it could have been as far back as 96 - will this have a bearing?!

 

I'll have a look at those nudge letters in the meantime...

 

Thanks again!

 

Jo x

Link to post
Share on other sites

won't matter when the acct. was opened.

as for the interest - i've asked hagenuk and will let you know when i know for sure.

if you did mcol - did you tick the including interest box.

this is from michael browne's getting mcol right thread:

 

(5) Claim Details: Type in your Particulars of Claim. See here:

5. Money Claim On-Line (MCOL) Particulars of Claim

 

Click No to Human Rights and Yes to claiming interest.

 

If you have already included the s69 paragraph in your POC’s, you can ignore the pop-up. Otherwise enter this now and fill in the first and last dates of your charges and the s69 8% interest total.

 

 

does any of that ring a bell - do you remember what you did?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Distinctly remember not ticking the interest box.

 

I had ummed and ahhed about this when doing my claim, but as I didn't have the first clue how to claim the interest (before finding this site), and as I really wanted to get my claim going I thought it would just be easier not to.

 

I've since done the excel calculation sheet - although it was a little while after my claim, and I know it calculation works from the day it is opened, so assume the version I've got (with the 8% added) wouldn't tally with the claim anyway!

 

Hey ho, while frustrating, I guess there is nothing that can be done on that now - I'll just make sure that other people I know who are looking to claim know about this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning!!

 

The sunshine, and a letter from the court woke me today. Lovely!

 

Having been reading the court bundles for dummies thread I thought I'd set out details in the letter, as suggested.

 

 

GENERAL FORM OF JUDGEMENT OR ORDER

Upon reading the court file

 

it is ordered that

 

1 claimant do by 4.00pm on 24 July2007 file and serve a schedule specifying each and every item in dispute

 

2 defendant do by 1 august 2007 file and serve a schedule showing how each item in dispute is calculated and the legal basis for the charge

 

I got a little excited, in the hope that this was a direction for my court bundle, but on second reading think I jumped the gun....aren't they just asking for another copy of my schedule of charges?!

 

btw this is from Luton County Court - anyone else have any experience of doing this in Luton?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's very good news and i'll tell you why - since we are a tad worried about the 8% interest - this gives us the opening we need to make sure you get it.

(as for the particulars - i asked hagenuk - and here's what he said - just so you know: i asked:if a claimant doesn't specify s.69 or mention interest in the poc's would the court give them anyway and would they still go after them through the bank's solicitor or would the poc's need to be amended.... he responded: strictly the claimant should fully particularise their claim, the right to interest is not absolute nor automatic, however, I would suspect that if this is a bank claim then interest will be awarded "as a matter of course" but only at the statutory rate, 8%.

At the point the bank (or their solicitors) settle then the claimant should raise the matter of the amount claimed, plus interest. Just out of curiosity, why did the PoC not include interest? and i told him it was from following bbc format.

so, that should set your mind at rest on that.

 

now, back to those directions -

take a look at your schedule of charges -

you want to make sure that you have all the charges listed - oldest first through to newest - (still none you didn't claim originally) and EACH charge must have the date, the name of the charge (as it appears on the statements - i.e. "charges" would be incorrect but "Total Charges" is fine) and the amount of each charge.

 

then at the botton i would put:

 

THE TOTAL OF THE CLAIM IS:

£XXXX.XX CHARGES

£ XXX.XX 8% INTEREST

£ XXX.XX COURT FILING FEE

TOTAL £xxxx.xx

 

 

that didn't line up right - but you get the idea.

so get it done - looking lovely, including interest and any costs

and send it to both the court and to dg. include a cover note telling them you are responding to court directions. and turn your one to dg into nudge by adding the stuff from the nudge letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent.

 

So, I've done as you suggested and worked out the 8% interest (as of my date of claim - which means I worked out how to change the date on my computer!). The interest (£438.76), plus my filing fee (£120), added to the original claim of £2,995 in charges, comes to £3,553.76.

 

Ok, so having taken that very sound advice, I've drafted the attached letter to DG (using the higher figure) ....do you think it's ok?

 

 

For your records I enclose a copy of my letter, dated 14 July 07, to Luton County Court, in response to their ‘General Form of Judgment or Order’ letter, dated 10 July 07, requesting a full schedule of the items disputed in my claim. Enclosed with this letter is a copy of my schedule of charges.

Additionally, it has come to my attention in my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings letter dated 22 June 07, an Allocation Questionnaire may not be required in this case.

 

However, the Court has confirmed that the allocation fee of £100 remains payable. As this will form part of my costs, should I win this case, this cost would then be transferred to you. So as to avoid this additional cost, it would be beneficial to both sides to speedily resolve this case.

 

I am also mindful of the vast number of claims with which you are currently dealing, and so in order to resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £3,553. I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention.

 

 

Cheers!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd make one change to it - i'd put where you say how much you will accept - i'd say I am willing to accept the sum of £2,995 for the charges and £438.76 for the 8% interest, plus £120. for the court filing fee bringing the total of my claim and the total I would accept in settlement: £3,553.

other than that one change - it's brill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS. I hope you are having a more fun filled Saturday night than I am - sitting in front of my computer!!

 

 

That said, I'm off for a nice, chilled glass of Reisling, of which I'll raise a glass to you two! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i never even saw this til this morning - i was doing my usual saturday night in the pub! except we paid £3 each for a very crap queen tribute band which turned out to be a very aged freddy m. (probably just about what he would look like today) doing queen songs on karoake! not a pretty sight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...