Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I just found a couple abandoned traffic cones locally by some bins.   A bit squished but free!  So have placed them on the land.  Will wait to see if the cones get moved and signs ignored again this week before I consider rocks/ boulders.
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays defend claim


jackiew
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HELP!!! Anyone know the answers to the following;

 

1.Barclays have defended my claim, not sure that I filled in the particulars info very well, only found this site afterwards..outlined my claim as being due to excessive bank charges etc...amounts to £5,900 including interest etc. Not found out what it is they are putting up as their defence, but could do with some tips. Is this fast track or small claims, as almost £900 is the interest over the years?

 

2.What happens if they don't pay up, am i liable for their costs as well as my own?

 

3.I asked my local court about the AQ and they said that the District Judge has directed that these be dismissed as the banks aren't going to court in the end..what does this mean in the long run?

 

4.When do i send in my information to support my claim etc and where do i get a copy of terms and conditions?

 

5.Do i do my own spreadsheet or do i get this from the bank?

 

Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou for anyone who bothers to reply. xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP!!! Anyone know the answers to the following;

 

1.Barclays have defended my claim, not sure that I filled in the particulars info very well, only found this site afterwards..outlined my claim as being due to excessive bank charges etc...amounts to £5,900 including interest etc. Not found out what it is they are putting up as their defence, but could do with some tips. Is this fast track or small claims, as almost £900 is the interest over the years?

could stay as small claims .... Dont panic lets see what B's put on their defence first

2.What happens if they don't pay up, am i liable for their costs as well as my own?

They will settle out of court so dont worry about costs

3.I asked my local court about the AQ and they said that the District Judge has directed that these be dismissed as the banks aren't going to court in the end..what does this mean in the long run?

Exactly what says . No AQ because the banks are settling before court

4.When do i send in my information to support my claim etc and where do i get a copy of terms and conditions?

 

Wait till you get the defence then send copies of SOC -- spreadsheets to both the court and the bank

5.Do i do my own spreadsheet or do i get this from the bank?

spreadsheets from here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html i used the simple

 

 

Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou for anyone who bothers to reply. xx

 

 

Hope all that helps

Saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

She'll take you up on that because you will win lol :)

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just been doing the schedule thing...i must have gone wrong with my adding up..this way it adds up to about £4,250...i got it to £5900 inc court costs...oops, does this disqualify me..should i write to them and explain that i am stupid/tired/single mother of three who can't add up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just been doing the schedule thing...i must have gone wrong with my adding up..this way it adds up to about £4,250...i got it to £5900 inc court costs...oops, does this disqualify me..should i write to them and explain that i am stupid/tired/single mother of three who can't add up?

Is you figure calculated by using the spreadsheets?

 

In the Barclays defence #1 does it say anything about you not providing evidence?

 

This is the problem we have when people start posting threads when theyre already at the court stage.. we have no idea of what they have / havent done.

 

best thing for you to do is post a diary of what you have done right back to the SAR

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, not sure what you mean about doing a diary in the SAR? A brief outline of what I've done;

 

1.Asked for 6 years of statements.

2.highlighted the charges and wrote asking for a refund of them, however, only added up 3 years worth, which totalled £2,700.

3.Was offered £990 as only and final settelemnt offer, but i declined this.

4.Spoke with local court who suggested i use MCOL.

5.I added up all the charges again , but mistakenly added up the account fee and interest for the overdraft aswell, so the total came to around £5,200. With interest and the £250 court costs, this came to £5,900, which i asked for via MCOL.

6.Claim was issued in April, defended, but no information received as of yet as to what it Barclays defence.

7.Found CAG and noted that my application to the court, with my POC was very brief.I din't use a template, as I hadn't found CAG yet, but noted that the information indicted that my POC was very scant and 'vague', I merely stated that I had been charged £5,900 and would like it back with interest, as I believd that the chrages did not refelect the administrative costs and quoted the relevant act. Also asked for interest as suggested by MCOL at 8%, and stated that act aswell.

8.Then managed to work out how to send messages and asked about charges and court costs etc and was advised to do a spreadsheet by saintly1, which i did and worked out that my maths was not very good and i'd added the interst twice, so the actual figure is just over £4,250.

 

Hope this helps, (please don't shout dar$n I realise that i've messed up!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks saintly 1, he obviously knows lots and i know very little (obviously), although I can quieten three rowdy boys and get them to sleep in a camper van x

Link to post
Share on other sites

3.Was offered £990 as only and final settelemnt offer, but i declined this.

did you use a template similar to one from here, accepting as part payment but continuing for the full amount?

 

my POC was very scant and 'vague', I merely stated that I had been charged £5,900 and would like it back with interest,

I think this will be a major part in their defence.

 

the actual figure is just over £4,250.
This will have to be amended

 

Okay, You need to speak to the guys at the court,preferably in person, so they can explain it to you better face to face , tell them your errors and you wish to amend the claim, [this may cost you £65]

 

Take with you your new POC's and your updated SOC's

Once sorted send a copy to Barclays [recorded delivery]

 

dont worry about the court they are friendly and understand that you are not trained in the legalities etc.

  • Haha 1

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, didn't accept the £990 as interim payemnt.

 

I have contacted the court but the info is still with northamton and when i phned them they said they haven't logged it yet and don't know what the defence is.

 

Northampton advised me that it was too late to do an amendment as barclays have defended the claim and to wait until i get their defnce and submit everything to the court..they said that AQ's are generally being done away with, but i might get one and can put everything on that?

 

as the amount is under £5,000 now, is the charge i've paid for costs £250 enough to cover the amendment, or do i have to pay this in addition as the court said that the payment should be £125 if my claim was under £5,00 which it wasn't but now it is?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, didn't accept the £990 as interim payemnt.
did you flatly refuse the offer?

Northampton advised me that it was too late to do an amendment as barclays have defended the claim and to wait until i get their defnce and submit everything to the court..they said that AQ's are generally being done away with, but i might get one and can put everything on that?

lets hope you get an AQ then

 

as the amount is under £5,000 now, is the charge i've paid for costs £250 enough to cover the amendment, or do i have to pay this in addition as the court said that the payment should be £125 if my claim was under £5,00 which it wasn't but now it is?

County Court Fees

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Dar£n, sorry used a dollar sign before. I was offered £990 as a final offer, I said no, that I would pursue matters through the court if they couldn't increase it, they said they couldn't.

 

Was told by the court that I could send in my information to them once I've had barclays defence in writing. I think that it might be worth me sending my schedule to the bank and suggesting they reconsider, do you think this would be a good idea, or should I wait for the court date, as it seems from what saintly1 was saying, they generally pay then.

 

Thanks for all your help. Jackie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dar£n I've just read your case posting re barclays and looked at the barclays one where you say you won, did you end up getting your claim defended, as your posts only go up to the bit where they decline to increase their offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Dar£n, sorry used a dollar sign before. I was offered £990 as a final offer, I said no, that I would pursue matters through the court if they couldn't increase it, they said they couldn't.

 

Was told by the court that I could send in my information to them once I've had barclays defence in writing. I think that it might be worth me sending my schedule to the bank and suggesting they reconsider, do you think this would be a good idea, or should I wait for the court date, as it seems from what saintly1 was saying, they generally pay then.

 

Thanks for all your help. Jackie

Hi Jax, Hmmm dont know what the court is advising you like that for, when you file with them to start proceedings you are supposed to submit your SOC's to both parties, if you dont Barclays will accuse you of not providing enough information and in fact use it in their defence, usually in statement #1, something like

The claimaint has not provided any information in connection with the charges.......

To be safe, I would send both a copy [by recorded delivery of course.]

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...