Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Norwich Union 4 years claim bonus removel


sharongina
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Can any one give me any advise, I had been with car insurance for years and paid for the 4 years protected claimed bonus which I assumed would be protected for life. In one year I had three claims and was told I now have 0%years claims bonus now which means my car insurance has shot up from £450 a year to over £1000 a year and I am limited to what car I can buy and had to change my car because of this.

 

I was never told at any point that if I have x amount of claims I would lose this, and if I knew the last claim was minor, I would have paid myself to protect my bonus, I thought it was protected for life, I have even been told by a different insurance to write into them, which I did and they didn't reply.

can anyone help me on this situation, as it was all done over the phone and they never sent me any information when I added the protected bonus on my insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also with Norwich union ( and have previously worked selling car insurance so I also know a little). To be fair to them, the details of the protection is included on your car insurance schedule. No claims for life is something that's relatively new and not all companys offer this. The majority of company I've being insured with offer similar cover ( ie 2 claims in a certain period and then lose your bonus)

 

One thing I would check is that they have calculated your Ncd correctly, if you've made 3 claims then 2 of these should be covered under your protection and the third claim dropping you down the scale i.e normally to 2 years ( if you made a prior claim before insuring with them than the 0 may be correct as you could have used one of your lives under the protection)

 

I think you may have to put this down to experience and remember to read the paperwork in detail next time. ( trust me after working for a few insurance companys I do this EVERY time)

 

With Norwich union you can only add PNCD at inception or renewal so you should have received a schedule/motor insurance cert etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks

I had actually been with norwich union for about 5 years before this, no accidents just a bad spell at once, I was told by a different insurance to write to them as it seemed incorrect to remove all my 4 years bonus, but no reply from them, should I write to the insurance ombudsman?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have you phoned and queried this already? it could just be advisor error,

 

I've just read one of Norwich union directs policy booklets and I was right in what I thought.

 

As you have made 3 claims the first 2 should be covered under your protection, the 3rd means your ncd is reduced on a scale, you should have 2 years ncd left. The only way you can be reduced to 0 is

 

if you/any other driver named have made a claim already in the last few years.

 

I'd call them first and query, use the tel no on your renewal documents, from my experiance the renewal advisors are well trained in sorting stuff like this out as they are targettted on retaining business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I agree with Cazz on this.

 

Generally PNCD will allow up to 2 claims to be made within a 2 or 3 year period without loss of NCD. However, some insurers may reduce to nil if 3 claims in one policy period. Depending upon the NU policy, they may have different variations.

 

A call to NU should clarify ( UK not Mumbai !!!! ).

 

One thought though, if the 3rd accident was minor, do you know the costs. It may be worthwhile repaying them the outlay to preserve your max NCD. I would only do this though providing no Third Party involved.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair it looks about right. The general rule for NCD stepback is 2 years per claim. So PNCD would have given her her "an extra life", therefore 1st fault claim, no stepback, 2nd fault claim stepback from 4 to 2 years, 3rd fault claim, stepback from 2 to zero. It should all be explained in your policy wording. There's usually also a clause where if you make 3 fault claims in one insurance year, you lose all your NCD.

You mentioned some of the claims were only minor, The only advice i can give you is to speak to claims and see how much they paid out for each claim, if its only a small ammount, you can re-emburse them this and that would then give you at least 2 years of your NCD back. Obviously you need to compare what they paid out to the price increase for your renewal, by the looks of your post its increased by around £800 so if any of the claims are for less than that, it might be worth it. Also it would take you less time to build your NCD back up again.

Anything else i can help with, feel free to ask.

 

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DarkAngel

 

Great Minds.....;)

 

 

lol! would appear so mate. ;)

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

NU Directs policy states the following

No Claims Discount will remain protected at the

maximum level, during any three-year period

from the date protection commences unless the

following occurs:

a. There are two claims. In this situation the No

Claims Discount will remain at the maximum

level but protection against further claims

during the period will be lost.

b. There are 3 claims. In this situation the

protection will be lost and No Claims

Discount will be reduced by 2 years on our

No Claims Discount scale.

c. There are more than 3 claims. In this

situation the protection and all No Claims

Discount will be lost.

 

Note – If you have made a claim with any

previous insurer during a 2 year period prior to

taking out this policy, (a claim for this purpose

is any which would have resulted in loss of your

No Claims Discount were it not protected), this

claim will be counted in points a, b and c

above.

 

Therefore if you have only had 3 (non-recoverable) claims in the last 3 years you are entitled to at least 2 years NCD.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...