Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi If you have went via a Mutual Exchange and this is to do with Social Housing/Housing Association then both parties need to firstly be approved by each parties Housing Association and accepted by them. Once this is done the relevant Housing Association for each will then get each party to sign a New Tenancy Agreement with the relevant Housing Association. So what we really need to know is: Does the other party to this Mutual Exchange know you have changed your mind on exchanging properties? Have they just signed an Agreement in principle to exchange properties? or Have they actually signed a New Tenancy Agreement for that Property? If they have signed a New Tenancy Agreement then this will make not now wanting to continue the mutual exchange difficult due to the New Tenancy Agreement being Signed. We really need to know what stage this is at to give correct advice
    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mattee77 Vs HSBC


MATTEE77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have found all the information on this web-site so helpfull in trying to reclaim my charges, Thankyou. I am currently on the nudging stage i have been allocated a cout date and i have sent my first nudging letter. My actual court claim with MCOL is slightly higher than it should be because i calculated my interest wrong ....Claim is £766.91 inc fees. The correct amount with court fees is £671.56, I have emailed and wrote to Kate Eaves at DG to inform her of this and as you can guess i have recieved no contact whatsoever from HSBC or DG from day one. My case has been transferred to my local court , Do u think i need to amend my case to adjust figures. I read somewhere in a previous thread that it shouldnt matter. any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

On my notice of hearing it says will take place on 21st august at stoke-on-trent court etc... 10 mins have been allowed for hearing Please note. this case may be released to another judge or court AND THATS IT!

 

has anyone else had this. will i recieve another letter. stating when my papers have to be in (court bundle)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi matee, you should have been told on your notice of hearing when you needed to get your bundle in by. Ring the court and ask them if not. It is a bit late to be ammending your claim now but you could send an ammended schedule of charges to the court and dg. Have you checked with your court to see if the allocation fee is still payable? Some courts still charge even when it is dispensed with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would not believe how basic the letter is all its got on it is what court and what time on a scrappy bit of paper. I will take your advice and give the court a bell. I have sent an ammended schd to DG but not to the court....hoping i wouldnt need to. should i just put on the court letter - Dear Sirs, Please find attatched an amendment to my schedule of charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You had more on yours than I had on mine. All I had was a notice of a preliminary hearing at 10am on 25th July. Nothing about that it might be released to another judge.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi I have rang the courts as you asked, the fee has been dispensed with...Yipee! The court said it is only a preliminary hearing. She said i dont need a court bundle at this stage, but anything i wish to add to support my claim needs to be in 2 weeks before the hearing (21st August). Should i do one anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, So where do i go now, My hearing on the 21th august (nearly a month away) I have sent two nudging letters, Shall i put in a mini bundle now. i have heard alot of cases get resolved once the bundle is in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I would send your bundle to DG with an accompanying letter saying:-

 

I refer to our preliminary hearing in this matter which is scheduled for the xx.xx.xx at xxxxxxxxxxxx County Court.

 

Although this matter is listed for further directions and preliminary hearing and papers have not been requested at this stage, I am enclosing with this letter the papers that I will be presenting and evidence that I will be calling upon at this and any future hearing.

Get it to DG as soon as you can. Have you contacted the court to see if your hearing is still going ahead?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter this morning from D&G saying they are putting a Stay on the case, This letter is not from the court so am i right in thinking that i still go unless i get a letter from court

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must take all the information you can gather regarding to the facts of your claim. Take all your statements showing the charges. Take a copy of your particulars of claim. A copy of your schedule of charges. A copy of previously settled cases from the litigation section (just hsbc settled claims).

If you have not been asked for a full bundle then the judge will just want to see the nitty gritty of your claim and the way you have arrived at the final ammount.

A full bundle would have been better but it'sto late for that now unless you stay up all night printing.

Try and find a copy of the terms and conditions relating to the period you are claiming for and highlight section 7.13.

Also take a copy of the application for removal of stay.

 

I am sure you will get more help regarding what you need to take with you before the morning. I am sure pete will be around soon and give you some more help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...