Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can A Dca Add Interest?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can they add interest.

 

Story so far: Credit card with Citi, defaulted, debt sold to cabot.

It was stated debt was £4500 approx, and stated cabot financial paid £890 for it.

 

Firstly CCA'd cabot. Agreement was late (3months late, and when it came was not signed.)

 

In a dispute with citi over charges, they sent cabot £225.

 

Rang cabot, and debt has now risen to £5500. Interest was added, they say they have a right to addinterest.

 

Cabot are not pestering me, but i wanna get the debt, sorted, settled etc, and default removed.

 

So what do i do?

Charges claim nearly sorted, now taking on anything thats left..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the DCA are not the owners of the debt they can not add interest to the debt, as there is no contractual liability for this, nor can they add their own administration fees to the debt. The only thing they can add to the debt is court costs.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are the owners of the debt.

 

However, the agreement was not signed by the original creditor.

Charges claim nearly sorted, now taking on anything thats left..

Link to post
Share on other sites

By agreement I asume you mean the copy of the consumer credit agreement? If this is the case the agreement has not been executed and is non enforceable. Perhaps you should be asking the DCA to write this debt off rather than worrying about them charging you interest.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you reported them to Trading Standards and the ICO?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to write to Cabot by recorded delivery, and keep a copy of your letter.

Point out that as they did not send the executed copy of the agreement as

required under section 77 and 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, they have

committed an offence. And until they can produce the correct copy under

the Act, the debt is unenforceable. In addition, from the time the default occurred, not only can you not be pursued for the debt, but they cannot

charge interest either.

Moreover, should they have added a default to your credit file then you should ask them to remove it since they have no mandate from you to process your data. Then threaten them them with a complaint to Trading Standards if they do not accede to the points in your letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

got reply today:

 

a) we purchased debt, & rights not duties, to collect debt

 

b)cabot is not creditor for purposes of cca, and therefore no obligation to supply copy ofagreement

 

c)they say only a creditor should provide executed agreement

 

d)sec 77 does not apply, as its a credit card, not loan

 

e)my 2 previous requests (almost 9 months ago) ie my £1x2 are to be refunded because they were processed in error?????

 

f)unfortunately cabot cannot remove any entries with the cra, as the entries are accurate and as we are required to do so for legitimate interests pursued by us..

 

g)furthermore under the terms of the original agreement, you consented to info being disclosed to cra's

 

Jane Rodemark

Customerassurance team leader..

Charges claim nearly sorted, now taking on anything thats left..

Link to post
Share on other sites

a) we purchased debt, & rights not duties, to collect debt

 

So it's not an absolute deed and is completely unenforceable.

 

b)cabot is not creditor for purposes of cca, and therefore no obligation to supply copy ofagreement

 

Actually it's a different part of Cabot that's the creditor, so they are technically correct.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write and give them a choice. They have not produced a copy of

the executed agreement. They have committed an offence. They have

given an undertaking to the Credit Reference Agencies that they have the

permission of the debtors before processing data via the CRAs.

As they cannot provide the original document, they have no proof that they

have your permission to process your data.

So they either remove your data with the CRAs and accept that the debt is

unenforceable and write it off, or you will complain to the CRAs that you

have misled them.

Tell Cabot that if you report them to the OFT, they will face receiving a

criminal record and a fine of up to £2500-they take a poor view of delays of

up to three months and still not complying with the Act. And you believe

that the contents of your last letter are grounds for believing that the OFT may well take the view that Cabot are not fit and proper persons to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

 

See if they are quite so cocky in their next letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they did produce the original agreement, but it was not signed by creditor.

 

Suppose this means its unexecuted?

 

therefore they have still not complied.

 

Spoke to trading standards before, but they said cabot don't have to comply.

 

Trading standards, belfast.

Charges claim nearly sorted, now taking on anything thats left..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dave, meant to only quote the first part of their statement. Agree with you that they need to provide the agreement and are just trying to sidestep their obligation. I think s175 covers it.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to trading standards before, but they said cabot don't have to comply.Trading standards, belfast.

 

Get in touch with the Trading Standards in the town/city that the DCA is writing to you from then. They may have a more educated view of matters, after all, if your TS's pulled their fingers out they would have passed it to their colleagues in the correct town in the first place.

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...