Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
    • If you are helping a family member you are going to need their Government Gateway details in order to Log in to MCOL .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reclaiming bank charges..bank want £5astatement


sandeeeee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Can anyone help? I wrote a letter to my bank as instructed to claim my bank charges back, they say that they can only give me one year, and if i want anymore I have to pay £5 a statement!!!!! Is this true and if so can I claim it back?

 

regards

sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the letter you sent the Bankfodder's DPA letter as found here?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=516

 

because if so you do not pay £5 per statement!

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Can anyone help? I wrote a letter to my bank as instructed to claim my bank charges back, they say that they can only give me one year, and if i want anymore I have to pay £5 a statement!!!!! Is this true and if so can I claim it back?

 

regards

sandy

 

Which bank was it?

If my reply or advice was helpful, please click the scales!

-------

DISCLAIMER: My opinions are strictly personal, and should not be taken as a substitute for individual professional legal advice on your own particular situation.

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to provide all information they have at a mximum cost of £10 if it is a request under the data protection act. If they refues tell them you will lodge a complaint with the Information Commissioner.

 

You're only interested in the last 6 years (if you've had the account that long) because you can't legally claim past that point. Well, in certain cases you can but that's a very complicated legal argument so I'd stick to the standard limit.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I used the standard letter and it was the clydesdale bank in scotland

 

regard

sandy

 

What a silly thing for them to do.. as thecornflake said write back to them and say that as you've paid the statuatory maximum of £10 under the Data Protection Act 1988 they are now obliged to provide *all* information requested within 40 days of the date of your letter, and failure to do so will result in action being taken to remedy that breach. Whether that information means they have to send you statements is their problem, not yours.

 

HSBC said they'd do mine for free, although quite what they did with the DPA money remains a mystery :)

If my reply or advice was helpful, please click the scales!

-------

DISCLAIMER: My opinions are strictly personal, and should not be taken as a substitute for individual professional legal advice on your own particular situation.

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a silly thing for them to do.. as thecornflake said write back to them and say that as you've paid the statuatory maximum of £10 under the Data Protection Act 1988 they are now obliged to provide *all* information requested within 40 days of the date of your letter, and failure to do so will result in action being taken to remedy that breach. Whether that information means they have to send you statements is their problem, not yours.

 

HSBC said they'd do mine for free, although quite what they did with the DPA money remains a mystery :)

 

A lot of people forget to mention the DPA and incur ridiculous charges for 6 years worth of statements, even though the banks have had enough of these requestds to know what they mean.

 

However, when you call them and explain it seems they refund the statement charges for you without too much bother.

 

I would call them and explain it is a DPA request. If you haven't already sent a £10 cheque then do so now.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Just got off the phone to clydesdale....the manager spoke to the legal department and they say they are only obliged to go back one year under the act........and I have to pay the £5 a statement......they seem very adamant.

 

regards

sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Just got off the phone to clydesdale....the manager spoke to the legal department and they say they are only obliged to go back one year under the act........and I have to pay the £5 a statement......they seem very adamant.

 

regards

sandy

 

Oh dear me. OK, letter time it is then! Make sure you send it at least recorded delivery.. you could also put in there details of your phone conversation, naming and shaming, and suggesting that maybe they could train their staff better too as he obviously does not understand the DPA and has now put the bank in a rather messy legal situation now.

If my reply or advice was helpful, please click the scales!

-------

DISCLAIMER: My opinions are strictly personal, and should not be taken as a substitute for individual professional legal advice on your own particular situation.

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

 

Just to let you know i got a letter from the clydesdale...guess they are responding to my request and there will be no payment necessary other that the obligatory £10..

 

thanks for all the info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

 

Just to let you know i got a letter from the clydesdale...guess they are responding to my request and there will be no payment necessary other that the obligatory £10..

 

thanks for all the info

 

Good to hear they've finally seen sense. When did you first make your request for the information? I'd start counting the 40 days from then, rather than this latest letter.

If my reply or advice was helpful, please click the scales!

-------

DISCLAIMER: My opinions are strictly personal, and should not be taken as a substitute for individual professional legal advice on your own particular situation.

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Just got off the phone to clydesdale....the manager spoke to the legal department and they say they are only obliged to go back one year under the act........and I have to pay the £5 a statement......they seem very adamant.

 

regards

sandy

 

I know you are probably now sorted but thought it worth mentioning that Clydesdale's legal department aren't worth their salaries if they don't know the DPA. It is quite clear that you have a right to request a copy of ALL personal information held on file relating to you. Bank statements going back to when you opened your account (not just 12 months) are personal to you, so you have a legal right to ask for it, and they have a legal obligation to provide it. They can only not provide it if they no longer have that info on file, which would be ridiculous for a bank.

MBNA - Full statements received (Looking for more than £406)

Nationwide BS - Statements received (More than £900)

Nationwide Credit Card - Awaiting statement (More than £400)

Accucard - Awaiting statement (More then £300)

Halifax Card - LBA £450

Shell Visa - Awaiting statement (More than £300)

Cahoot - Statement arrived - calculating total (More than £350)

GE Money - LBA (More than £400)

Ikano - Awaiting statement (More than £300)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hy All,

 

Thanks for the replys I took the letter to the bank wednesday morning in the afternoon got the phone call to say only give me a years free statements that afternoon got a letter off this forum stating they HAD BY LAW to give me the info that i requested...saturday got the letter from the clydesdale saying that yep by law they had to give me the statements. I wonder how many other people are put off by the thought of shelling out £300 for statements that are rightfully yours...

 

regard

sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...