Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Having another go now. Here is my thoughts on approach with the defence while I edit the WS. Focused around proof of service of CCA required paperwork, referring to s136 and s196 Law of Property Act 1925, and this section (my highlights) "Any notice required or authorised by this Act to be served shall also be sufficiently served, if it is sent by post in a registered letter addressed to the lessee, lessor, mortgagee, mortgagor, or other person to be served, by name, at the aforesaid place of abode or business, office, or counting-house, and if that letter is not returned through the post-office undelivered; and that service shall be deemed to be made at the time at which the registered letter would in the ordinary course be delivered." Having a photocopied letter only in exhibits is not proof it was serviced. Strict proof? Proof of postage/receipt? Or, am I missing the point with the above please? And somehow arguing the agreement looks smelly.. like I could have typed it up myself. - not sure how this can be argued correctly, but it's just a piece of paper with my name on it, I think having a judge decide is a perfectly reasonable thing for a person to do if they don't think it's right. As it's my first court case and potentially many to come, I'm keen to experience it (or one of the first ones), I can afford to argue this one in court. I will also benefit from seeing this through for future decisions I will have to make.. rock and hard place With all of that said, and taking dx's advice, I'll TO if attractive and maybe do court on future ones that have a greater chance at success.
    • Back in 2019 this forum helped me to get free of Payplan and through some CCA letters dispense with a number of old debts. One related to a Barclays Overdraft from the early 00s, last payment through PayPlan was 04 June 2019. I have informed Drydens in both May 2019 and June 2023 of change of address. No letters beyond a confirmation of the change and a request for finanical details, which ive ignored. Today ive just received 2 letters from them that look like notice of assignment, or confirmation of appointment letters - along with the usual requests for payment and mild threats of further action. What i was wanting to know is do i just ignore these as per usual? I know that i cant CCA an overdraft debt but what is the usual "plan" for dealing with old overdraft debts? Am i trying to run the clock down until June 2025 when it becomes statue barred?
    • put selling and dca's and a very rare chance of a court claim out your mind. months/years if at all. but never ignore a letter of claim. as for the rest, to be frank you are now in the knowledge/research stage. a day.  
    • Upcoming changes to DRO rules The rules to qualify for are DRO are changing on 28 June 2024. From this date, the maximum level of debt you can have for a DRO will increase from £30,000 to £50,000. Another change on the same date will mean you may qualify for a DRO if you have a vehicle worth less than £4,000 (the current limit is £2,000).   Debt Relief Order Unit Insolvency Service Phone: 0300 678 0015 Email: [email protected] Individual Insolvency Register www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/eiir/ Insolvency Service www.gov.uk/government/organisations/insolvency-service   .   .  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

frenchvECI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, everyone.

wow what a help you all are!!

can anyone help?

I have a debt which I am currently paying off monthly to ECI (dca). this debt i tried to argue before that I had settled it previously in 2001 though I could not find any records.

A default appears on my credit reference file from Kings Hill (no1) limited, Cabot financial Europe ltd. 10/09/01 for £482.

file updated 24/12/06

I am paying off £780 to the DCA, i guess interest and charges.

Should I stop payments and request a copy of credit agreement etc and with hold any future payments until the dispute is settled.

I guess i have acknowledged the debt though in the beginning i tried to argue it saying that i had paid it, my dad can confirm this as he gave me the money.

I do not want to pay it twice how they they execpt me to keep copies of letters from 7 years ogo if they cant.

any advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming that the default and what you are paying is the same debt? If so CCA the DCA first before withholding any payment. The onus is on them to then prove the debt via original CA..if you withold payment now and the debt is legal and above board you will be defaulting again

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a little light on some details and time is running out under the six year rule.

Who was the original debt owed to-and when did you think you paid it off?

Send an sar to the original creditor to find out how much the debt was when

it was passed to Kingshill and you may even find out how much in unlawful

charges were added to your account by them. These charges are reclaimable

so the quicker you write, the more details you should receive.

 

Also send a CCA request to ECI as Shieldblaster correctly stated to find out

whether they have the right to collect the debt and to learn how much has

been added to it-and whether those added charges are legitimate.

 

Keep us updated on your progress and the responses you get. Though it is

possible that the main target will turn out to be Kingshill/Cabot as many on

this forum are only too familiar with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original debt was to Halifax for an overdraft that i had whilst working full time in 2000/2001.

I thought I had paid off the debt in feb2001. when i was living in guernsey the baliffs came around to my dads house and my dad then paid a settlement fee of £780 when we paid the fee we asked if they would confirm the debt was settled they said they did not do that.

 

I have written to halifax asking for my previous bank statements which I should receive by 14 May 2007.

 

do i also SAR request them as I sent payment for they statements.

 

I shall send CCA tomorrow to ECI recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When one says "settlement figure" it often implies that the creditor has agreed

to accept a smaller figure than the actual debt, but that amount is paid

quickly.

If that was the case, it sometimes happens that the creditor sells on the outstanding balance to a debt collector which is pretty underhand. That is

why it is important that you keep receipts and letters of confirmation of

full and final payments of debts to prevent collectors chasing you again for

money that you have already agreed was sorted some years before.

 

 

If Halifax have agreed to send your old statements going back that far then

fine-but I will be surprised if they will do it for nothing. As you are not

currently thinking of taking Halifax to Court, there is no need to send an sar

as well as your earlier request. However if it looks like you may need to go to

Court [to reclaim unlawful charges levied by them] then it will an advantage

to send them an sar then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent cca request to ECI 8th May. do i follow the same rules 12 day breach and 30 day criminal offence, when do i with hold payment if at all if they dont produce the requested docuements. I have been paying installments since january therefore acknowledged the debt, did not say that i did not acknowledge the debt do not want another default just saud that i was requetsing the docuements and stated under the legisaltion what i was entitled to.

 

How best to deal with these DCAs ?

 

also dealing with Ruthbridge, differnt debt.

 

both on behalf of Cabot financial europe ltd, SAR request sent 8th May.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

received reply from ECI today stating:

We have today received a reply back from our clients and they have asked us to advise you that they are unable to obtain copy applications or statements from the Halifax. We hope this clarifies the position.

I have been paying this debt for the last few months and have paid £300+.

 

Should I with hold payments? as they are unable to produce the required docuements.

 

Can I reclaim the money I have already paid?

 

There is a defualt on my Credit File can I get this removed?

 

help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is an extremely quick response. But by admitting that they cannot

produce the original executed agreement, it follows that they cannot prove

the debt in a Court of Law.

As they are not yet in default, it may be better to write to EC1 saying that

the t have indeed clarified the position. So much so that you are aware that without the executed agreement. they cannot prove the debt. Therefore,

you are serving notice that you will not be making further payments until

the documents are produced. In addition, you are asking them to remove the

default from your credit record as it is clear they have no mandate from you

to process your data.

 

Reclaiming monies paid i, I believe more problematic. If there is a debt, and by

you paying them, it would appear implicit that you thought there was a debt,

then it would be hard to justify repayment. However, I note that you have

sent an sar to Cabot. I suggest that you also send one to the Halifax and

check both of their responsesto see if there have been any overpayments, or unlawful charges applied, and reclaim those.

 

Send Ruthbridge a CCA request and see how they react.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have cca Ruthbridge. they broke 12+2 day rule on 10 May and therefore criminal offence on 10 June. They have tried to speak to me but i have refused to discuss the matter on the telephone, they then informed me that they would send someone around in 14 days to discuss the matter and would be advising their client (Cabot financial Europe LTD) to pettition me for bankruptcy.

 

No supprise this is who ECI client is.

 

Have SAR Cabot, they have cashed the cheque by not yet sent my docuements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to initiate formal complaints against all concerned, via the FOS scheme, when the time limit expires.

 

From experience, ECI will fail to acknowledge the complaint within the time allowed (5 working days), and won't send you a copy of their complaints procedure (required), all of which simply eats into the 8 weeks allowed for them to resolve the complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that Ruthbridge made the bankruptcy threat over the phone?

If that is the case write to them confirming the gist of their phone call.

 

Dear Sirs,

I am writing in response to your phone call of .....May. During the conversation your agent informed me that your company would send someone round in fourteen days to discuss the matter and would advise your client

Cabot to institute bankruptcy proceedings against me.

 

You will surely be aware that you have yet to comply with my CCA request. As your company is in default, no proceedings can be undertaken

until the request has been complied with. I would like your assurance that

no such proceedings will commence until you have provided the required

documentation. Failure on your part to confirm that none of these measures will be taken to pursue me until I have received the executed agreement etc will result in a serious complaint to my local Trading Standards Office in order

to prevent you from your attempts to harass me.

You have fourteen days in which to reply, before I make my complaint. I

would also advise you that should you send anyone round to speak to me

they would not be welcome and you would consider their presence on your

land as trespass.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

Frenchgg123

 

Let us know when you receive theri reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter form ECI stating that my account is on hold and will look into my complaint and respond within 5 days.

 

please tell me what is the next step?

I have requested that the default be removed and that they stop all processing of my data etc, etc what time limit do they have?. If they fail to reply to me when and who should I complain to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ECI have acknowledged your complaint, so that's in line with the FOS rules. Did they provide you with a copy of their complaints procedure, as they are required to do?

 

Anyway, wait until they come back to you again, and see what they say. Ultimately they have 8 weeks, unless they provide a 'final response' prior to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait and see if they respond within the next week.

 

You have them where you want them. Unless they can locate the executed

agreement, they are dead in the water.

If they don't respond, give them one more chance. Demand that they remove

the default pointing out that when they get tothe stage where they have committed an offence, and they still have not removed the default, you

will then complain to Trading Standards for breaching the Act.

You may also take them to Court where they will face a criminal record and

a fine of up to £2500. Their choice.

 

Shame it wasn't Ruthbridge as you could threaten them with bankruptcy just

for the sheer hell of it.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

received a letter from Cabot today asking me to confirm details, the only one I have actual details for is the Halifax that ECI are collecting, when I telephoned them they informed me that the original debt was for £475 on a previous statement of account ECI have increased it up to £750.72 an extra £275.

When I was on the telephone the lady was really nice and helpfull and said she would look into it for me and send me my SAR. she also said she only has one record of me at a previous address.

The account is now on hold with ECI whilist they look into my complaint! any extra advice on the next step will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not deal with any of these DCAs by phone. You need to restrict them to

dealing with you in writing only.

 

I must confess it is getting a bit confusing with three separate DCAs involved

with two debts. I know it is easy for you since you have been more closely involved with them for months perhaps years, but it is much more difficult

keeping track when one is also trying to help others on the forum too.

 

As I understand it EC1 have said that they cannot comply with your CCA request. EC1 are therefore not on hold. They either remove the default or

face prosecution. Their choice.

 

Ruthbridge are in default and so cannot pursue you for any money until they

produce the required documents.

 

Whatever Cabot send you will perhaps be wasted unless Ruthbridge can

supply the executed agreement etc by the 10th June.

The reason being that if the original contracts for both debts cannot be produced, then it is difficult for you to reclaim any charges when you are in

the position of not accepting that the debts exist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...