Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Breach of Data protection WHAT CAN I DO?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HSBC bank has this week sent a letter to my previous address, when I wrote on 23/4/07 giving my current address and personal circumstances asking them to consider writing off a debt that was defaulted in 2002 and passed to DCA in 2003. A CCJ went through in Jan 07 for £3,303.

 

Problem is the person at my old address is my brother and he opened the mail. To add insult to injury the letter that I now have in my possesion is also addressed to my late partner who died in Dec 06. I had held a joint account with him back in 2002. So you can imagine I was extremely upset, annoyed and embarresed by this. Does anyone have any idea on what I should do or how I should start making a complaint about the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Hi,

I have no idea about the rest of it, but your brother performed an illegal act by opening the letter.

Truely sorry about your partner, this must be a traumatic time for you which is not being helped by either the bank or your brother.

 

I hope someone will read what has happened and be able to help.

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards have been fantastic to me in the past! Well worth having a chat with your local officer IMHO.

 

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

littlesally is correct about your brother opening your mail, it comes under the Postal Services Act 2000. But I guess your brothers little indiscretion is the least of your worries at the moment.

 

Regards & good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Breaches of the DPA are handled by the ICO.

If the letter that went to your brother was addressed to you in your maiden

name, then it would be understandable that your brother assumed it was

meant for him.

The bank are guilty of the breach of failing to keep records accurate and up to date.-Principle 4. What punishments and compensation they may make

I couldn't say, but it would have been distressing for you at the time.

They have a section on their website to log complaints-it can be found on the

drop down menu, though it may take a couple of weeks for them to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks I have taken a look at the ICO site and have completed a complaints form, I am sending a letter back to HSBC Centre Manager who sent out the offending letter, and then will advise them of making a formal complaint when I find out who I should write to. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought and not trying to hi-jack the thread but a couple of questions here.

 

1, I assume that original summons and subsequent correspondance were sent to your old address. Did your brother return them as R.T.S?

If so, (question to the more knowledgable) would the court, if it received the summons back in such a manner, still go ahead and issue judgement anyway bearing in mind this is a valid reason for a set aside at a later date.

 

 

2,

Hi,

I have no idea about the rest of it, but your brother performed an illegal act by opening the letter.

I have had letters before with no return address on the back and no way of knowing who they are from. For the purpose of returning the mail, what is the positon on opening such letters and if it is illegal, what are you supposed to do with the mail if you cannot return it.?

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

No The matter was being dealt with by the DCA Intrum Justitia & Legal GPB Geoffrey Parker & Bourne Solicitors took the court action they wrote to me at my last address for 2006, which is not the same as the address from 2003. I am looking to have the CCJ set aside I was not able to defend my side as the case was heard on 10th Jan a matter of weeks after the death of my partner I could not face going to the court at that stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

 

 

2,

I have had letters before with no return address on the back and no way of knowing who they are from. For the purpose of returning the mail, what is the positon on opening such letters and if it is illegal, what are you supposed to do with the mail if you cannot return it.?

 

The unopened letter should be handed back to the post office, or the address crossed out and RTS (Return to sender) written on and put in a letter box.

Royal mail would then open and return it.

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

2,

I have had letters before with no return address on the back and no way of knowing who they are from. For the purpose of returning the mail, what is the positon on opening such letters and if it is illegal, what are you supposed to do with the mail if you cannot return it.?

 

 

 

 

It is a criminal offence to open or tamper with mail that is not addressed to you and any such mail received should be marked as either "not known at this address" or "return to sender" and handed in to the post office.

 

Staff in the post office and have been told that they are to report anyone to the police if they have opened mail not addressed to them and then handed it in. You will be supprised at the number of people who do this!!

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses

 

I have checked out various bits of advice and have found out that complaints should or can be made to

 

The organisation who caused the breach

 

The Information Commissioners Office - ICO – Information Commissioner's Office helpline 01625 545745

 

If not satisfied with outcome of your dispute / complaint you can take the matter to county court. The ICO provide a leaflet explaining the process this can be obtained from the web site. The leaflet also provides a letter template to write to the organisation involved, to let them know that you intend to issue proceedings if the matter is not setttled.

 

copy of letter :-

 

Your full address

The date

FAO Data Controller

Dear Sir or Madam

Complaint RE Breach of Data Protection Act 1998

I refer to our previous correspondence with regard to [ insert details of dispute together with reference to the provisions of the DPA alleged to have been breached]

Please take note that unless I hear from you within the next 14 days with your proposals to settle this matter, I shall be issuing proceedings against you in the county court for breach of section(s) [ ] of the data Protection Act 1998 (together with a claim for damages and distress under section 13 of the Data Protection act 1998 plus costs.)

I would appreciate a prompt reply to the correct address as given at the top of this letter.

Yours faithfully

signature

 

Golden Dragon

DPA letter before action.doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was not a customer at the bank my accounts were closed in 2003. I did not think I would need to inform the bank of a change of address. Would anyone send notification to all places where you previousely held accounts to let them you had moved - I don't think so.

 

A managed loan was written off by the bank and passed to DCA who wrote to me at my current address. I have spoken to ICO & they advise to make a complaint if I have no satisfactory reply from the complaint to the HSBC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...