Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Checking hi-tech with low tech - Wales leading the way Growing Mid Wales, an organisation set up to bring together the private and public sectors alongside the Welsh Government, has launched a mobile mapping project to track areas of poor mobile phone signal Powys and Ceredigion. They will be using bin lorries which have signal detection equipment installed, and thus able to create a comprehensive map of mobile 'not-spots' in the area, since those vehicles will be visiting just about every property in the area on their usual rounds. Just a moment... WWW.THINKBROADBAND.COM  
    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
    • Please read the following thread very carefully. It is extremely relevant where you are suing Evri on the basis of a contract which you originally made with Packlink who are domiciled in Spain. A judgement has been obtained and we have applied for transcript and it will be put up on this thread as soon as we receive it probably about the end of July. In the meanwhile, read this thread, see what has been discovered about the Packlink/Evri/customer relationship and look at the witness statement very carefully. It's a long thread but don't give up. Once you have the transcript of the judgement, then I will do a more careful and explanatory post here   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/459707-evri-lost-my-ebay-parcel-£844-court-claim-issued-judgment/
    • So if the breach occurred say Dec 2017 (first missed payment) and the default notice was issued Sept 2018 and the claim was issued 7th June 24 the claimant will of course be arguing it is within the limitation period (by 3 months)
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can anyone advise on overpayment of wages please?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5992 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Asking the question on behalf of my son.

My son lost his job in November 2004. He would have been sacked as he had left a duty unfinished which was against the rules and instead of owning up he tried to cover his tracks as he was embarassed about it. At his disciplinary hearing he resigened rather than being sacked. He got a wage paid into the bank each week for the next 4 weeks. He was unsure as to if it was pay in leiu of notice or holiday backpay. he was also paid a week in arrears so for the first couple of weeks he didnt think it was odd. When they paid him for the 4th week he rang them to query the payment. They told him that he had been overpaid and that he would recieve a letter telling him by how much. He never had a letter and so never bothered about it again. He has now recieved a letter saying that they wrote to him in November 2005 (which was a full year later) saying that he had been overpaid by over £1000 and that they had not recieved a reply. They now say he has 14 days to repay the money and that if he cannot afford to pay it all at once he can pay back £50 per week. He is out of work at the moment and so cannot afford payments. He hasnt got the payslips and so cant remember what hours he was paid for or what holiday pay was on them so has no proof as to how much he was paid. When he rang them to query the letter he was told that they paid him because HE failed to notify the wages office that he had resigned, surely that should have been up to the personel departmente. Is it right that after two and a half years they can now demand money back?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like they're way out of line!

 

Contact ACAS (early morning is best!), explain the whole situation including the ex-employers bad attitude and neglect of duty! If anyone can give you a one way or the other answer here it's ACAS.

 

Acas - Home

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Cant seem to get anywhere with this. ACAS said to talk to his ex employer and explain circumstances. They dont want to know and sat they have written frequently regarding the overpaymant. This is not so, we have been in the same house for years and O/H is our postie. He now has got a letter from a solicitor saying he must pay within 7 days. we have written back to them explaining the situation but are really worried about it.

Can they relly reclaim after two and a half years.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they relly reclaim after two and a half years.?

 

Yes.

 

Your son is probably best writing to them comitting to how much he can realistically afford to repay - even if it is just £5 a week. Also if he disputes the amount he should ask for evidence of the overpayment e.g. copy wage slips.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ArthurP

Yes, the former employers can claim this money back. It is standard for most any business to include overpayment correction in a contract.

 

Also, I beleive it is the law that wage payment records are kept for, (I think!), three years at least.

 

No doubt the firm were pretty useless with administration but your son will have to pay back unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Further to this story the case went to court and he had to pay the money back as expected but he made them an offer of weekly payments which were accepted. However the final sting in the tail ------ He got a letter from the court at the end of August telling him that the payments started on a date in mid October. He has since started a part time job which causes him to be away half the week. Whilst he was away he realised that the payment date was close but he did not have the paperwork with him and could not remember the actual date it had to be paid or the details to pay it to so was worried that he may miss the date. He called me at 11 pm and told me that he was panicking in case he missed the payment date. (His own fault for forgetting about it!) Anyway the following morning I rang the company concerned after finding one of thier old letters and explained the situation. The lady I spoke to obviously could not discuss the matter with me or give me the details to go and make the payment but said she would put a note on the account and I told her that may son would son would be home the following evening and would make the payment first thing the following morning which he did. 2 days later we got a call from a bailiff who left us a letter from the High Sherrif saying he would be coming back in 48/72 hours to collect. My son explained the situation and showed his payment reciept, BUT - they have now added just over 1,300 pound to the debt. I know its his own fault but the have more than doubled the debt. I just dont know how they can be allowed to do what mounts to legalised robbery!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Now need to add to this thread as I desperately need some more advice. My son has been paying the £5 a week as agreed by the court, but, because he missed the first payment date it is now in the hands of the High Court Enforcement office. A baliff came to see him and agreed the £5 a week payments (he is on job seekers allowance at the moment) so cant afford more. He has been paying that by DDebit. However they now say that they wont accept £20 a month and want £50. He cant afford this. Today a baliff came again to say they would take goods. He wasnt in at the time but he has since rung the guy and spoken to him. They are adamant they want £50. I spoke to him and explained that my son has no car or valuable possesions and that at the moment he is living with me rent free as he cant afford payments. He also has a credit card debt he is paying off weekly. They dont want to know and say they will make him bankrupt if he dosnt come up with the money. He has rung the court where the agreement was made but apparently because he missed the first payment date the court now have no durisdiction over it. The High Court enforecement overrides them.

 

What can we do, he dosnt have the money. He has also just applied for a job he is hoping to get but if they make him bankrupt he wont be allowed to stay in the job.

 

Can anyone advise please, Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

There is some case law out there with regard to salary overpayment, though I'm not completely sure whether it may apply to you.

 

IIRC there was a precedent whereby if an employer was told of the error but neglected to act promptly he was liable.

 

Please forgive my vagueness and feel free to undertake a bit of research to validate (or otherwise).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your son will get £187.40 a month on benefits and most courts/baliifs know this.

 

The problem you have is that you have admitted that he lives rent free with you so they have instantly assumed that he has enough money to cover his debt to them.

 

I would advise that you do a I/E sheet saying what he has to pay out and who to and send this to the bailiffs with the first reasonable payment.

 

How much does he owe and to who?

 

As the less he has to pay out the more they will expect him to pay.

 

If that fails you can ask them to take him to court to have the payments set. The courts will not make him pay more than he can afford so that is good but the bailiffs will try it no with you.

 

Continue to make payments he can afford as that makes him look willing to pay the debt.

 

They may say the payment he has offered is not enough but the catch is if they accept the payment, Buy cashing the PO/Cheque, then a court may ask why they are accepting the payments.

 

One of the things the court will ask is why he missed the first payment and why he did not ask you to make the payment on his behalf/ pay buy other means as in send a cheque/ PO in advance or pay buy DD before hand.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...