Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • as another of farages faragit reformatory boy shows his true colours Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle claimed * ' the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two. err tell that to the russians - who did .. * said people should  “exorcise the cult of Churchill and recognize that in both policy and military strategy, he was abysmal”. * Praised Russian president Vladimir Putin as he: "understands the bonds that create more stable societies; the hypocrisy of the West is preposterous as we stare in the face daily the enormous economic equalities created by our deluded neo liberal ideas" and "if only the West had politicians of his class".   * 'women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care". * "Men pay 80% of tax – women spend 80% of tax revenue. On aggregate as a group you only take from society. Less complaining please from the 'sponging gender'." - Wonder what his momma thinks of that?   On being caught out, cribbin initially refused to comment before belatedly and weakly 'apologising' A Reform spokesman said the comments were “written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths”. Chairman Tice said “We’re really pleased with all candidates." Leader Farage seemed to think the greens vetting OUT and suspending 20 unsuitable candidates was a 'bigger problem' than reform not only leaving **** the unsuitable in abut also being apologists for them     Reform candidate says UK should have ‘taken Hitler’s neutrality offer’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK He also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin and described Winston Churchill as ‘abysmal’   Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments WWW.BBC.CO.UK Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.  
    • do you ultimately want to keep the car?
    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
    • Hi. Welcome to CAG. How was the car purchased?  
    • Absolutely for the agreement they are referring to.... puts them on notice that this is going to be a uphill fight.   Andy 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dee1954 v HSBC


dee1954
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I submitted my claim on line and HSBC acknowledged service 27th March. The 28 days is up week today. I have sent Kate Eaves (DG solicitors) a copy of my spreadsheet by post and fax but heard nothing. Is there anything else I should be doing?

 

Also, I am paying my various debts (including HSBC)through CCCS via a debt management plan. My employer's sent my expenses payment to my old HSBC account (now closed) by mistake. I phoned HSBC and was told that i had to visit my local brach to get it back. When I visited the branch they told me that they could not tell me if they had received it or if they had where it would have gone! They say I should contact the DMC dealing with my payments but CCCS pay HSBC!

 

When I pointed this out she told me to write a letter and bring it back and ask for her and she would sort it out. I asked for a pad and paper and i would do it there and then and she said she needed the BACS details. I had a payslip with me with said details on but she then said this was no good she needed the actual payslip in question. It might only be £129 but that's a lot of money to me (more than my total DMP payment per month).

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted my claim on line and HSBC acknowledged service 27th March. The 28 days is up week today. I have sent Kate Eaves (DG solicitors) a copy of my spreadsheet by post and fax but heard nothing. Is there anything else I should be doing?

 

Also, I am paying my various debts (including HSBC)through CCCS via a debt management plan. My employer's sent my expenses payment to my old HSBC account (now closed) by mistake. I phoned HSBC and was told that i had to visit my local brach to get it back. When I visited the branch they told me that they could not tell me if they had received it or if they had where it would have gone! They say I should contact the DMC dealing with my payments but CCCS pay HSBC!

 

When I pointed this out she told me to write a letter and bring it back and ask for her and she would sort it out. I asked for a pad and paper and i would do it there and then and she said she needed the BACS details. I had a payslip with me with said details on but she then said this was no good she needed the actual payslip in question. It might only be £129 but that's a lot of money to me (more than my total DMP payment per month).

 

Any advice?

 

 

you just have to wait to see if they defend your claim before you can do anything else.

 

On the expenses issue I would actually contact my employer and tell them to chase the cash, I would have thought they can recall the payment particulary as it cant have gone into an account that is closed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say they have to wait for it to 'bounce back'. I will take the said letter to the bank but due to work commitments am not able to for the next week and want to take it personally and not post it.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did your employer have the correct details? If so its as far as I can see their mistake so by my reckoning they should do all the chasing. How about them paying you again then when the cash does bounce back they just keep it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HSBC submitted a defence last Wednesday - 2 days before deadline so I now wait for contact from the court I guess. One question, apart from one letter in response to 'prelim approach' where they suggested I complain to ombudsman if I was not happy, I have not had any response from any of the letters. Most if not all threads I've read have had offers or at least some sort of response. Should I be worried??

I've checked and re-checked and pretty sure I've done everything right but can't help thinking . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

some people get letters - others dont. seems abit erratic but nothing to worry about. Anyway now that you've filed your claim you'll be dealing with dg direct.

 

you should receive transfer papers to your local court anytime now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings to Pontypool Court today - 'filing of AQ be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had another Notice of Transfer of Proceedings today - 'It is ordered that the case be transferred to Cardiff Civil Justice Centre.'

 

No mention of AQ. Should I contact the Court to check that they don't want one?

 

Sent nudging letter to DG but still no contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dee, I had notice of transfer on 12th April. I have sent 2 nudge letters to DG and heard nothing from them. I called the courts today and was told that a date for hearing has been set for 25th July and a letter has been sent to me. Wait a few days and then call the court to see what is happening. In the meantime send DG another nudge letter 10 days from the date you sent the first one.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dee

 

You're just a few days behind me I had my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings on 2/05/07 so we should be getting offers around the same time.

 

It's so frustrating doing this waiting game. I've sent the nudge letters too. My bank account could really do with the dosh. Fingers crossed, it won't be too long now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

General Form of Judgement or Order received today

 

It is ordered that

 

1. Directions will be given in this case by the Designated Civil Judge, His Honour Judge G Hickinbottom, on the 14th August 2007 at 10.30 am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, 2 Park St, Cardiff CF10 1ET

 

2. The parties may appear in person or make representations as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representations is sent to the court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dee, nice to see that you've had your form of judgement today. I still haven't recieved anything. Called the couts today and they're really behind. Hopefully DG give us an offer soon!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Dee

 

My court case has been set for 10.00am 14th August at Cardiff Court With Judge Hickinbottom, so im half an hour before you LOL.

 

Will keep a check on your thread and see who gets an offer first

 

 

Cityguy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've nudged by letter, e-mail and left phone messsages but no reply. Even a polite 'bog off' would be something!

Should I now send the Draft Order for Directions as given in 'New---after 28 days' thread or wait until nearer the court date of 14th August?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dee, Just keep nudging for now. Use the nudges in the No AQ thread. Just don't hassle them. Nudge every 10 days or so. I am on my 3rd nudge letter now and will probably send a 4th and 5th as my court date is not until the end of July. I haven't even had a reply as yet. Just keep calm. As they say "All good things come to those who wait".:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have a directions hearing in Cardiff 10.30 on 14th August. I have recently moved house and have not had internet access for a month. Other serious personal stuff going on (long story) so taken my eye off the ball to be honest.

I have nudged D & G via letter, 2 e-mails and 1 telephone call to answer machine. No reply to any!

Should I now be suggesting draft directions?

Anyone else in Cardiff same day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dee. I have directions hearing in Cardiff on same day. I don't think we will hear anything else from courts until the date of the Directions Hearing. My notification said that "the parties may appear in person or make written representations as to how the case should proceeed, provided a copy of the representations is sent to the Court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing" - so I will be sending something off along the lines of Lattie's suggestion (see Parian's link) in good time.

 

To date HSBC have not filed their AQ - 7 days late. When I phoned the court to ask what happens in this case I was told that the Hearing will continue and that the Bank will be put in a bad light for their lateness or failure to submit. Meantime another nudge letter is on way with a copy of my AQ and Draft Order for Directions

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...