Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPMAN v Nasty Vest Help Needed re Form N244


PPMAN159
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have issued a claim against Nat West for £4707 which has been served on them and they have written to say that they intend to defend.

 

On the back of the defence notification I sent to Northampton County Court the schedule of charges along with the interest calculation at 8%.I also sent a form N244(Application notice).

 

I have had the N244 returned with a note to day that I need to amend the particlulars of the claim in Part A(2) along with submitting a new N1 form detailing the new amounts in red.

 

I am probably missing something here but I need a bit of guidance in what to do next.

 

On the N244 under Part A section 1 I have entered my name.

 

Section 2 says 'state clearly what order you are seeking and if possible attach a draft-here I originally added 'as claiment in the case I may amend my claim' Is this correct?

 

Section 3 says 'Briefly set out why you are seeking the order.Include the material facts on which yiu rely, indentifying any rule or statuory provision.Do I need to enter any detail here?

 

I have then ticked the box in Part B that relates to the evidence in Part C in support of my application and have added comments in Part C to details taht I am attaching a scedule of the charges along with interest calculation.

 

Could someone let me know where I have gone wrong along with advising on the N1 form.

 

MAny thanks.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Tick c), without a hearing

 

Leave the rest blank

 

Part A:

 

I ***** (the claimant)

 

(that....) allows an amendment to particulars of claim in respect of total claim value

 

(because....) the claimant is now aware that an error was made in calculating the amount owed

 

Part B:

 

tick 'evidance in part C' box

 

Part C:

 

Something like;

 

"I respectfully request that the court allows an amendment to my particulars of claim in respect of the claims value only.

 

 

Please find attached to this application my proposed new particulars of claim, amended to represent the correct claims value, as well as an amended schedule of the amount claimed in respect of penalty charges levied by the defendant"

 

 

 

Fill in an N1 using the POC's here:

4. Particulars of claim - N1 - hard copy version

 

Take 3 copies of the N1 and 3 schedules with the N244 and £35 fee to the court. They will send 2 back to you, 1 of which you serve/send to Nat West's solicitors and confirm to the court you have done so.

  • Haha 1

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a call from the good lady to say that a letter has been received from Nasty Vest offering me £4587, which is the total amount that I claimed from them!!!!!!!!.

 

I have claimed via MCOL and this is due to expire next week so I am now in a quandry as to whether to send the new N244 and N1 or accept.

 

My temptation is to accept in order to keep the account open but would be interested to hear what others think prior to making my next step.

 

Many thanks

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good one!

 

If I'm reading this correctly, the amount of the amendment is £120. It's going to cost you £35.00 to put the N244 in (not recoverable) so in essence the difference is £85.

 

Obviously it's up to you but I would be asking myself whether it's worth jeopardising the current offer and delaying settlement when you could have a cheque in your hand in a few days.

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cobbett

 

I think I will accept the offer rather than run the risk of getting the account closed.

 

One final point-at what stage do I need to tell the court?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The offer letter will probably have a notice of discontinuance enclosed. You can send that to the court now as the offer is as good as hard cash. If they were to withdraw the offer after you had discontinued proceedings the court would crucify them.

Advice given is either my experience or my opinion and is given without liability. If in doubt, consult a qualified professional.

If you PM me for advice I will only reply in your own thread

 

Never under estimate your ability. I won over £17,000!

For the full story - look here

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/NatWest-bank/17630-thecobbettslayer-NatWest.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read through the letter and it has come from Stuart Higley in Borehamwood and not from Cobbetts.

 

It makes no mention of the impending court action so they have not given me the notice of discontinuance.

 

Also they are going to credit the money direct to my account.

 

Therefore:

 

1/

 

Can I ask for a cheque to be sent

 

2/

 

As I have paid £120 to MCOL can I get this back and

 

3/

 

Is there a set timeframe for them to send the money to me once they have received my acceptance of the offer

 

I think that I have read elsewhere that people are being advised to keep the case open just in case the banks do not cough up.

 

As always many thanks for your help

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Yes and Yes, but you can bet your bottom dollar they will say No, No and No

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/675-case-guidance-notes-making.html.Keep Keep us posted and good luck.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that I may go back to them and accept what they have offered as partial settlement and then proceed with the MCOL for charges and interest.

 

I have checked the claim on MCOL and it shows that Nasty Vest have entered a defence and that

 

'You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly'

 

Is this standard and should I panic or is it a case of left and right hand not talking to erach other?

 

Sorry to keep asking questions but I seem to get confused

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abosolutely bog standard. Your case will have been transfered to your nearest court. Have Cobblers not sent you a copy of their defence? The court will send you a copy of their defense shortly. So chill bill and relax. Good luck.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing from Cobblers apart from the acknowledgement of servcie that I received about two weeks ago.

 

Has the offer from Nasty Vest just been sent to placate me and save them money?

 

As they have given me 8 weeks to reply to the offer, I will ignore it for the time being and wait for the court defence

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not send this:

 

Thankyou for your letter dated XXth April 2007.

 

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest and court fees, which together with the daily rate of £0.XX now total £xxxx as of XXth April 2007.

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentiality clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

 

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deller

 

I will send this letter along with a new schedule of interest charges, calculated to todays date, to Cobblers along with a copy to Mr Higley.

 

Many thanks.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help-I think that I may have f'd up my MCOL claim

 

I have just opened the defence letter from Cobbetts and it reads as follows:-

 

1/

 

This Defence is filed and served without prejudice to the right of the Defendant to apply for summary judgement in respect of and/or to strike out the Particulars of claim

 

2/

 

The Defendant is embarassed by the lack of particularity pleaded in the Particulars of claim to the extent that the Particulars of Claim fail to disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim against the Defendant.In particular the Particulars of Claim do not disclose any legally recognisable claim against the Defendant.

 

3/

 

The Defendant invites the Claimant to remedy the above.In the event

that the claimant fails to do so within 14 days of the service of the Defence then the Defendant will apply to the Court for an order striking out the Particular of Claim.

 

4/

 

The Defendant reserves the right to plead further to the Particulars of Claim once and if the Claimant properly particularises the same.In the event meantime,it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief whether as pleaded or at all.

 

Are they saying that I did not give enough detail on the MCOL application?

 

If so is there a standard wording that I should use?

 

Thanks as always for your continued help

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you put on your particulars of claim ? Did you send your charge spreadsheet to the court and cobblers.?

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically on the original claim submitted I said the following:-

 

'I have written to Nat West in order to reclaim from them the charges that have been levied by them against my current account over the past 6 years, which amount to £4587.

 

To date I have not received any concrete replies from them on this issue and as such I feel that I have no other option but to pursue them for the repayment of these through the Small Claims Court'

 

Copies of the interest schedule were sent to the Court on 2nd April and to Cobbetts on 3rd April.

 

At the end of last week I received from the court a letter stating that I need to amend the Particulars of the Claim in Part A(2) of the NI244 form along with submitting a new N1 form detailing the new amounts in red.THis should be sent back to them today along with my cheque for £35.

 

When I submit the New NI form should I alter the original wording and,if so, is there a set format that I should be using?

 

Thanks

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

The N1 form does not allow me to add the claim No-can I write this in?

 

I have added the defendants name and address on the form-do I need to also add this in the box at the bottom of page 1?

 

Also when I send this do I also need to send the N244 form to the court?

 

So for so many questions but I do not want to give Nasty Vest any ammo at this late stage that might let them throw the claim out.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain but could someone let me have a reply on the above as I would like to get the forms produced today,if possible.

 

I have also read the details on MCOL and they state that:-

 

'You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly'.

 

Many thanks

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone let me have a reply to the above posts as I am now totalling confused by this whole issue.

 

Would it be easier for me to open up a new thread and list all of the points and questions there?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

The N1 form does not allow me to add the claim No-can I write this in?

YES? If u r amending your original N1 why are u filling in a new N1

I have added the defendants name and address on the form-do I need to also add this in the box at the bottom of page 1?YES

 

Also when I send this do I also need to send the N244 form to the court?

N244 is a form that ammends your original N1 MCOL

So for so many questions but I do not want to give Nasty Vest any ammo at this late stage that might let them throw the claim out.

All amended parts have to be in RED ink by the way

Im not 100% sure what u are trying to do so if my answers leave u confused please explain what u r doing

SCOTT

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPman

 

I amended MY N1 all i did was complete the N244 and attached the new POC (Seperate sheet of paper 3 copies all in RED INK)

 

The changes on the original N1 you cross through with a Black pen

3 Copies also required

 

I did not have to complete another N1

 

Hope this clarifies things

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...