Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reassurance needed.


black77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This is my first post so be gentle with me. I have followed all the procedures step by step in my case against Lloyds TSB. It has now got to the point where I have started a court case against them. Today I have received a "notice of acknowledgment" stating that Lloyds TSB's solicitor will be defending the case. (Sechiari Clark and Mitchell). First I need reassurance that I have done the right thing and am not now throwing more money away. Secondly any information I might need in the near future and any information that I need to send to Lloyds solicitor and I might need if I get a court date. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have just a N9B defence and counterclaim form from courts. What is my next course of action. I keep reading about an allocation questionaire sent by the courts or is it sent to the courts. All I have filled out so far is a N1 claim form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not start a new thread as it makes it harder to follow your progress. I will ask that this post be added to your existing thread and that his thread gets moved to the Lloyds forum.

 

Do you know why you have received a counterclaim? Do you owe Lloyds money and are there any payments overdue?

 

Look here for details on how to complete and N9B

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/ex303_0406.pdf

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry hagenuk, this is only my second thread. I do not owe Lloyds TSB any money. Everything is up to date.

 

PS Could you send me details on how to post correctly.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Clearly Lloyds believe that they have a claim, hence the reason for the N9B Defence and Counterclaim (specified amount) they have sent you - what does it say?

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hagenuk,

 

It is attached to a "Notice of Transfer of Proceedings" from Northampton to my local court in Cambridge. Also on the attached it states" It is ordered that :-

1. The filling of an allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case unless District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise.

 

Underneath is a note

Note: Any party affected by this Order may under Rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed. Such a party must apply under Rule 23.3 within 14 days of service of this order.

 

Then on the attached N9B form in the Defence box is the following

"1. The Defendant Lloyds TSB Bank plc (the Bank) is a Bank whose registered office is 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a customer of the Bank at all material times.

2. By opening an account with the Bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the Bank for the provision of banking services. The Bank is entitled, as part of that arrangement, to charge for those services. At account opening a customer is provided with details of the Banks charges, currently in a leaflet a guide to our banking charges. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract. For personal customers, a number of services are provide for free, notwithstanding that they are an expense to the Bank. Such services presently include, but are not limited to, providing; cheques, bank statments, the facility to make payments by direct debit and standing order, debit cards, ATM (cash machines).

3. By maintaining the account in credit, or within any limit agreed with the Bank, the customer may avoid most if not all charges. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for a payment to be made form the Banks own funds. If the Bank makes a payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract. On page 1 of the leaflet, the Bank explains that there are normally no charges for everyday banking at Lloyds TSB when your account is in credit. When you use an agreed overdraft, there is no monthly fee and we only charge interest on the amount you are overdrawn each day. Where you go overdrawn without an agreement or where you use special services, such as copy statements, we will make a charge. This guide explains how these charges work, and when they will apply. If you want to use a service that we haven't listed, we'll tell you the cost of that service before you give us the go-ahead.

4. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the Banks loss.

5. The customer is given advance warning of charges being imposed; statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the course of a month, and which will appear as debits on the following months statement. Customers are warned by letter when they go overedrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangement with the Bank. If the customer fails to remedy the position, and payments such as standing orders and direct debits are refused then again the customer is warned by letter.

6. The charges are fair and reasonable, and it is denied that they are unlawful.

7. The customer is notified of the charges in plain intelligible language at the conclusion of the contract, and on each monthly statment. The charges are terms which relate to the price payable by the customer for a service provided by the Bank, and pursuant to Regulation 6 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, are not subject to the assessment of fairness.

8. In the premises:

8.1 the charges are for banking services, and are not damages nor a penalty;

8.2 the Bank is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are fair and reasonable;

8.3 it is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravene any statue or regulation.

9 The Claimants claim is denied in its entirety. It is further denied taht the Claimant is entitled to the sum claimed or to any sum from the Bank.

 

Is just Lloyds TSB solictors putting pressure on me, or have I got something to be worried about ? what is my next course of action, is it just to wait for the court date ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As above, this is a perfectly standard response from Lloyds, nothing at all to worry about. You will hear from the court with a date in due course.

 

There is no mention above of what they are counterclaiming from you, have they sent you anything else?

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

No nothing this is the only item I have received from them. So the next step is the court date ? I have not filled in an allocation questionnaire, but I reading the front sheet of the paperwork I received it states that this is to be dispensed with. Is this strange ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received a "Notice of Pre Trial Review" to take place at Cambridge County Court on the 13th July. Do I have to send anything to the court beforehand? Do I need to take anything on the day? Is the unusual? Please put my mind at rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

Have you heard anymore about your case yet ?

 

We have a pre trial review on the 30th July at 2.00 PM in Cambridge.

 

I would be interested to hear how you get on and if they settle before court. Please keep me informed.

 

Jay

 

Teversham, Cambridge.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well done Black, congratulations!

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...