Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the scrappage scheme is nothing to do with the agreement ...sorry. it's an enticement to purchase a replacement vehicle. just the same as shop signs that say 50% off or whatever.  its a done and dusted deal done before you enter into the agreement for the remaining £sum. 
    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • This is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ripoffstopper - V - Natwest Now Going Back 20 Years!


ripoffstopper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just written to NatWest asking if they keep copies of statements twenty years old and if so, how much they'll charge to supply them up to September 1992.

 

I have some statements for 1988 - 1992 but would like earlier copies.

Does NWSM know how far back NatWest records go?

 

More importantly can anyone supply me with historical Natwest interest rates for between 1982 and 1992? I've got copies of the Bank of England base rates for this period. But typically how much over the base rate would NatWest have charged on a current account?

 

All help will be gratefully received.

ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Blimey mate........... you're going for it aren't you?????? Phew!!!!!!!!

 

One of our members is a current Nat West bank employee and his advice is pretty much second to none where Nat West are concerned. I personally couldn't even begin to advise you on this one!!

 

Hang on, and hopefully NATTIE'll be online at some point this evening. He'll deffo be able to advise you further on this one and let you know if it's worth pursuing.

 

Good luck - and welcome on board!!! Hedgey xxx :D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Hedgey, I've seen posts from Nattie and would hope that they may be able to assist with the interest question. It would also be useful to know how many years back in time that NatWest can go, to supply statements.

ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on for NATTIE - hopefully he'll be on soon. With the statements, I definitely remember Nattie saying something about 2002 - e.g., when RBS group took over Nat West. Think they changed computer systems or something. But hold on as NATTIE should be along on in a little while. Can't wait to see the outcome of this one............. looks like a really intriguing thread already ROS!!!!!! xx :D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my God :eek: ............. just had a quick look through and.......... oh my God :eek: !!!! What more can I say???? One tough cookie who stood her ground and took no cr*p from the banks!!!! Phew!!!!!

 

I'll definitely be watching your thread now ROS....... given that I reckon most of my charges occurred before 2001!!!!!!!! Fingers crossed for you on this one.......... best of luck!!!!!!!!!! xxxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on for NATTIE - hopefully he'll be on soon. With the statements, I definitely remember Nattie saying something about 2002 - e.g., when RBS group took over Nat West. Think they changed computer systems or something. But hold on as NATTIE should be along on in a little while. Can't wait to see the outcome of this one............. looks like a really intriguing thread already ROS!!!!!! xx :D

 

 

 

NatWest Charges since 1991

 

this might help

 

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a reply from NatWest today. In reply to this request:-

 

During the nineteen eighties and nineteen nineties up to September 1992 I held two accounts with The Bank.

Can you please tell me how much The Bank will charge me to supply copy bank statements from 1st January 1980 to 30th September 1992 in respect of both accounts?

I understand that I can make a request under the DPA for all electronic information that The Bank holds on me, though I wonder if this particular request is outside the scope of the relevant legislation.

They have asked me to provide a payment of £5 for a "complete list of transactions and charges applied to my accounts (2) under the DPA.

They have not said that they do not keep records as far back as January 1980 which was the specific date that I requested information from. So we will wait and see.....................

Regards

ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nattie will be able to help you with this one . Usually logs on early evening. Not sure ,but i think

Nat West records go back to the early nineties. Nattie will enlighten you no doubt.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

My understanding is that interview notes as part of the sar will have that info on them and in time i am sure i will be asked to explain them to people who receive them which should not be a problem. I think 1991/92 although i have a feeling that statements, per se may not be available as far back as the early nineties, but mid nineties. On this one i am happy to be proved wrong on this last point.

*****A note to everyone else, scott has been kind enough to have on the charges thread from 1991(thanks to Michael Browne) can i ask that if you have the info prior to that to add it to the thread which i may get the title changed or update it if necessary. I have posted this on thread as those claiming that far back may be able to help or maybe looking into it already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well two weeks since I sent my fiver and still waiting....................

 

Anyway, it will give me time to research compound interest, commercial interest etc. Is there a compound interest spreadsheet available anywhere please?

 

Can anyone suggest what sort of interest I should be claiming - particularly on a claim going back this far (1987/88)?? As the amount given the time elapsed will be enormous HEE HEE HEE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well two weeks since I sent my fiver and still waiting....................

 

Anyway, it will give me time to research compound interest, commercial interest etc. Is there a compound interest spreadsheet available anywhere please?

 

Can anyone suggest what sort of interest I should be claiming - particularly on a claim going back this far (1987/88)?? As the amount given the time elapsed will be enormous HEE HEE HEE.

 

Hi david

 

U should have sent £10 as reading through other threads they mess about sending back the fiver the SAR fee is £10 (i believe nat west will tell you its £5 if u ask how much etc),Anyway regarding the interest u can get the amounts from YOUR statements.....

 

Spread sheet as requested

 

Scott

 

Download v1.9

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the spreadsheet Scott. i saw the Ripoffstopper had sent Natwest a fiver so I did the same. Maybe thats why I'm still waiting for a reply.

 

I would still like to know if I can claim Compound or commercial or simple interest. If anyone can help?

 

regards dp

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the spreadsheet Scott. i saw the Ripoffstopper had sent NatWest a fiver so I did the same. Maybe thats why I'm still waiting for a reply.

 

I would still like to know if I can claim Compound or commercial or simple interest. If anyone can help?

 

regards dp

 

u CAN CLAIM EITHER

 

Its up to u what u claim the spread sheet works out everything for u

 

have a play with the SS and read some CI threads then make a decision

 

hope this helps

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well folks, three weeks after writing to NatWest to see if they could supply information going back twenty years. I received a letter saying send us your fiver and the info is yours!:)

 

So I did along with my name and address and bank account numbers (2).

 

I received a reply yesterday saying that due to insufficient information they could not help me. They require open and close dates for each account, sort code and account numbers.:(

 

How pathetic, they had my name and address and account number and surely that is enough to trace an account.

 

Anyway sent another letter with the missing information. They won't get rid of me that easily.:p

 

On another point, I'm a bit concerned about how the claim is ramping up when I use contractual interest rather than statutory 8%. When I've calculated the size of the claim including CI I'll post again and seek further advice as I would not wish to jeopardise the claim if the monetary figure seems too high as it's way beyond the six years statute of limitations8-)

 

I'll be back.......... ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

The info should exist under the SAR as a minimum form 1991/92 to 2002 notes relating to charges does exist(is that ok to post that info?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On another point, I'm a bit concerned about how the claim is ramping up when I use contractual interest rather than statutory 8%. When I've calculated the size of the claim including CI I'll post again and seek further advice as I would not wish to jeopardise the claim if the monetary figure seems too high as it's way beyond the six years statute of limitations

 

 

are u saying that if the claim is to big they might not pay out???

 

Do u think they will risk disclosure of costs even if your case was for £500k.......i think not

 

I would go for as much as u can as the claim size makes NO difference whether its £150 or £150k you are reclaiming your money and you are charging the bank the same rate that they were charging you..........................

 

Max the nat west claim

 

Go 4 it, at the last resort you could accept the 8% but as u have seen there is ahuge difference in the payouts

 

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Scott, you've convinced me that I should go for the higher rate and be damned - well THEY will be damned.

Watch this space for the size of the claim once I get my info from them.

On a totally different matter can you assist noomill060 ? I had a Citicard credit card that I settled over a year ago. They are refusing under CCA 1974 section 77(1)/78(1) to supply a copy of the executed agreement. I have requested a copy under the DPA offering to pay my £10 and their response is the account is now closed and they no longer have an obligation to supply a copy of the executed document. They have though sent me what they claim is an electronic version of my application which is a lot of numbers and letters which means nothing to me. So noomill060 is this legal, or do they have to supply a copy of the agreement to me? They obviously know why I'm requesting it.

Regards ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

:o :o :o :o :o :o

WELL ARE YOU ALL SITTING DOWN?

 

I DECIDED NOT TO WAIT FOR NatWest TO REPLY TO MY S.A.R. I HAVE GONE THROUGH SOME OF MY OLD STATEMENTS FROM AUGUST 1989 TO AUGUST 1992 AND THE TOTAL IN PENALTY CHARGES AMOUNTS TO £2,928

 

USING CI AND THE SPREADSHEET DOWNLOADED FROM THIS SITE (V1.9)

 

THE TOTAL CLAIM AMOUNTS TO £160,000 !!!!!!!

 

WHAT ARE COBBETTS GOING TO MAKE OF MY CLAIM? OUTSIDE THE 6 YEARS STATUTE AND IN EXCESS OF £150,000.

 

I THINK I NEED SOME ADVICE WITH THIS CLAIM IN ORDER TO KEEP IT IN A COURT SYSTEM THAT WILL NOT INCUR HORRENDOUS LEGAL FEES. YOUR ADVICE WOULD BE MOST WELCOME.

THANKS ROS

RiPoFfStOpPeR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...