Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

parian v HSBC


parian
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI all

This morning received my notice of acknowledgment stating HSBC is going to defend the whole claim.

The defending solicitor is Kate Eaves, I have not seen her name mentioned in the forums, has anyone delt with this lady.

some of you say sit tight and some say be a little proactive.

I intend to send send a copy of my spreadsheet to Ms Eaves with the following letter which was used by Kazzy77

 

Dear Ms Eaves

Please find enclosed a copy of the breakdown of charges unlawfully taken by HSBC to date.

With the interest bumping up daily, the new total owed is XXXX. This includes £120 court costs.

If you wish to make an offer of refund I will expect to be refunded with a cheque made payable to xxxx.

If you wish court proceedings to be halted I will do so once the check has cleared into an account of my choice. It would therefore be in the interest of your client for this money to be paid as quickly as possible.

If you wish court proceedings to take place, I shall also be claiming £100 for filing the AQ. At court I shall be asking for your client to give a full breakdown of each individual charge and look forward to your client explianing to the judge how each automated service costs between £10 and £100

 

Yours sincerely

 

Ian

 

Any comments are and help are more than welcome

 

Rgds

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Courtesy of Lateralus;

 

Once you have filed your claim, you need to send 2 copies of your schedule of charges, clearly marked with your claim no. + a brief covering letter asking for them to be filed with your claim to:

 

 

 

The Court Manager,

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

Wait until you receive the Notice of Acknowledgement (not the Notice of Issue) from the court and then send a copy to the bank’s solicitors, since they are the ones who will now be dealing with your claim

DG's details will be on page 2 of the acknowl.

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

 

(If, and only if, you are claiming overdraft interest on your penalties, also include this paragraph)

 

 

I understand you have a policy of initially rejecting claims for overdraft interest. However, should this be the case after you have reviewed my claim, you should be aware that my claim for overdraft interest has been meticulously calculated and double checked. It only ever relates to the cumulative charges within the overdrawn balance of the account at the point that the overdraft interest was debited

 

If it is that in your view the interest is not claimable, I am prepared to discuss this with yourseves and the judge in court.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering whether to use martin lewis' spreadsheet (which I used for my original letters to HSBC) or should I use the more informative spreadsheet to send details of charges to DG and MCOL

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't use the Martin Lewes one. He is a good guy but his process and spreadsheets are too simplistic. It is much easier for everyone on this site to help if we know that you are using the material from this site alone it avoids confusion. Thanks :)

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

I'll go through everything in the morning and put onto one of this sites templates I think having a full explenation of the charge as well as the amount will be better in the long run, don't want to give DG any ammunition or cause for delay

 

thanks

 

Rgds

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right there I am sure I have seen posts from others with letters from DG saying that the schedule of charges is incomplete. Get it right first time and it is less stressful and there is no chance for doubt to set in! :D

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i agree with giveme, the spreadsheet on mse is very simple enough to use but doesn't give enough detail. the one's here are simple to use too and have everything you need to show a full schedule of charges.

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just finished rewriting my spreadsheet using the CAG template (much,much easier) and I've only now realised how inconsistant HSBC are, my reversal charges range from £10 to £60, surely there's something wrong here, if they're going to rip us off at least be consistant in doing so. I've even got a notified fees charge £46, whats that about.

have you noticed that all their charges are complete £s, now the law of averages would tell us there are bound to be some pennies in there somewhere, do they round these charges up and rip us off even more or are they nice to us and round them down. I think I will ask DG why all my charges from 2001 are in complete £

 

Rgds

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

With referance to my last post HSBC are consistant, They consistantly rip me off:mad: :mad:

 

That is true!!! With the reversal charge they sometimes bundle multiple charges into one which is why the amounts vary. The notified fees are basically the fee they charge you for going over your authorised limit. Often these account for the majority of the charges you want to claim back. :)

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

schedule of charges written out and a polite letter enclosed informing DG that I'm in this for the long haul, sent this morning to DG's Kate Eaves.

I received my notice of acknowledgement for my HFC claim this morning, it seems Kate Eaves is dealing with this also.

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning I received a letter from HFC With an offer of £407.50 a goodwill payement, this is 50% of the charges and dont include interest or my £120 for filing the case with MCOL.

This offer did not come from DG but Jodi Lewis HFC Branch Support Complaints Officer. Yesterday I sent My schedule to Kate Eaves of DG with a polite letter explaining that I know how their system works, I wont accept anything less than 85% of the total claim plus my costs, and should it go to court I would be asking the judge to award me 100% of my claim plus costs

 

your views please

 

Rgds

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a quick look through these Ian and tweak one that suits you best. just tell hsbc they're too late with the feeble offer and you've already filed your claim so you want the lot.

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ian,

Kate Eaves is the one defending my claim too - she is little abrupt and rude in my opinion.

 

I would not have told them you were willing to accept 85% of your claim - there is their get out of paying you 100% handed to them on a plate.

 

Good luck,

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a quick look through these Ian and tweak one that suits you best. just tell hsbc they're too late with the feeble offer and you've already filed your claim so you want the lot.

 

i'm such an idiot sometimes!! i didn't give you the link to the rejection letters did i? also forgot to mention that the offer you have had will have been from an earlier letter you sent to hsbc, and is too late now you have started your claim and incurred further costs.

 

 

Rejecting Offers

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to see if you get a speedier service from DG because you have told them you are willing to accept a reduced amount.

 

pete

 

Yes that is what I was hopeing for, looking through the posts I see the earlier offers are around 85%, I want a settlement of in excess of 85% plus interest and costs.

lets what they'll come up with

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked MCOL web site and it appears HSBC has filed a defence, however the defence date is 21/03/07 this was the date of issue, they did'nt acknowledge until 4th April can anyone shed some light on this

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Parian, nawt for us to help with just wait for your transfer papers from the county court and make sure your AQ has been dispenced with, if it has write DG one of Latties nudging letters.

 

Apart from that all you have to do is wait for your local Judge's notification of what he wants

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

On your original Notification from the court there is a "deemed served" date; DG had 28 days to file their defence from this date.

I think they may have had a warning from the court for filing late because I have seen another early defence go in.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all I have received a notice of transfer to newport county court, although there is no date for a hearing and the AQ appears to be dispenced with.

I understand that I can ask the judge (judge murdoch)to order directions for the case, when and how do I do this and is there anything I can do while I waite for a date

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...