Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Archer V Monument **WON**


archer_66
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

lol lol

yea i know what u mean about the "CCA"

well i hope u get to call the bailiffs in shane cos that would be fantastic!

i dont blame them for selling the debts off i would if i were in their shoes considering all the facts.

it is def a timebomb

 

 

I'm hoping i can get bailiffs involved too, though from what i understand if i use court appointed ones it can take weeks before they actually are authorised to go to the premises by which time i assume monument will have paid up. What i might do is use a third party debt collection agency, that way all they need is an order of judgement from the court to turn up at monuments premises and demand them to pay up, might even tell the local press to come and cover it, wouldn't it be nice to see that on the front page of the news!!

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

it definitely would as well! you'll have to post a link on it if that happens! i was going to go for my charges back but theyll just be used to pay off the balance so i dont see the point unless they produce the CCA (lol) if i could get the money i would do it cos its nearly 500

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ive heard off trading standards and you are all going to love this!

she said she has spoken to monument,they have agreed to send her a copy of the CCA that they provided me with in march.i told her that this was just an application form and not what i had asked for and that there was no signature on it etc.she said i was still liable to pay it and that they could take me to court as they had only committed a "technical offence" im sure people have gotten away with murder due to a technical fault!!

she said she would be in touch when she had received it .

ok where do i stand now??

i shall be pursuing the charges now

i cant get my head round the contractual interest which i would love to slap on top.I wouldnt know the interest rates either as I dont have a card and havent had one for some yrs

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ive heard off trading standards and you are all going to love this!

she said she has spoken to monument,they have agreed to send her a copy of the CCA that they provided me with in march.i told her that this was just an application form and not what i had asked for and that there was no signature on it etc.she said i was still liable to pay it and that they could take me to court as they had only committed a "technical offence" im sure people have gotten away with murder due to a technical fault!!

she said she would be in touch when she had received it .

ok where do i stand now??

i shall be pursuing the charges now

i cant get my head round the contractual interest which i would love to slap on top.I wouldnt know the interest rates either as I dont have a card and havent had one for some yrs

 

 

just when i was starting to have faith in trading standards they go and pull this! Technical offence! Unbelievable. There is another thread similar to yours where the claimant before contacting the courts made a complaint to a third party, in this case the FOS; unfortunately they found in favour of the banks. this leads me to believe you will only get a true result based on the law (which is heavily in our favour) if your case is heard before a judge. I would begin preparations to file an N1 for non compliance and the fact that the debt is unenforcable.

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

well to be truthful the third parties seem to favour the large companies ,ive contacted the IC and TS and neither of them seem to be bothered with the laws that are being flouted.

in fact TS encouraged me to pay the alleged debt to monument???!

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone on the MSE site went to court today and the judge put a 'stay' on her Monument Credit Card case!!!!

I had thought that credit cards were different to the banks test case!

 

is this a individual judges decision or will it now be country wide!?!??!

 

Monument ignore 22 letters from me and they told me I was under my limit for 8 months when in fact I wasn't - the monthly DD didn't cover the min payments yet they never told me - didn't send statements for a year! and they put the phone down on me whenever I call - I'm very polite so there is no reason to do that! and the amount hasn't gone down for 2.5 years despite extra payments, large one offs but now on payment plan but the interest is the same as the payments so it will never go down - oh, annual charge (twice in one year??!?!) is added so it will go up!

I'm not paying £500 for their error! two way contract - not just one side!

really annoyed!!!! (court date is the 6th Sept!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone on the MSE site went to court today and the judge put a 'stay' on her Monument Credit Card case!!!!

I had thought that credit cards were different to the banks test case!

 

is this a individual judges decision or will it now be country wide!?!??!

 

Monument ignore 22 letters from me and they told me I was under my limit for 8 months when in fact I wasn't - the monthly DD didn't cover the min payments yet they never told me - didn't send statements for a year! and they put the phone down on me whenever I call - I'm very polite so there is no reason to do that! and the amount hasn't gone down for 2.5 years despite extra payments, large one offs but now on payment plan but the interest is the same as the payments so it will never go down - oh, annual charge (twice in one year??!?!) is added so it will go up!

I'm not paying £500 for their error! two way contract - not just one side!

really annoyed!!!! (court date is the 6th Sept!)

 

 

judge ordered a stay on a credit card case:o i was under the impression only bank charges claims were being stayed! me thinks the judge had an off day!

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I've just had my N1 against monument for my wifes card charges claim returned by the court for two reasons

 

1. I failed to put Mrs in front of Elisabeth Rita Castelbest (name changed)

 

2. I just put "Monument" and the registered office as the defendant.

 

The court sheet says "Please clarify if the business is Ltd, PLC, a firm, LLP or an individual trading as."

 

What have other people called Monument on their N1's? (clean answers please )

 

Monument Credit Services maybe ?

 

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I've just had my N1 against monument for my wifes card charges claim returned by the court for two reasons

 

1. I failed to put Mrs in front of Elisabeth Rita Castelbest (name changed)

 

2. I just put "Monument" and the registered office as the defendant.

 

The court sheet says "Please clarify if the business is Ltd, PLC, a firm, LLP or an individual trading as."

 

What have other people called Monument on their N1's? (clean answers please )

 

Monument Credit Services maybe ?

 

Pete

 

It should be 'Barclays Bank plc trading as Monument' and the address should be Barclays address in London, Churchill place ( I think). If you have been told that the account has been taken over by Raphaels Bank it should be 'Raphaels Bank trading as Monument' and there head office address which I think is in Aylesbury.

 

Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easiest thing to do is ring 01293 802473 - monument customer relations - I just did and they advised that my LBA needs to go to the portland building address - my account is with compucredit apparently!!!

  • NatWest - Settled in full 8 weeks after LBA (without interest)
  • Capital One - LBA 27th July - Offered & paid £28 - Rejected - settled
  • Monument - LBA 18th July - Offer 19th July - Refused - settled

  • WFS - 8 Point Complaint - awaiting response - Failed CCA Request - awaiting response - Awaiting S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info

***WFS Written Off £8k 01/08/07***

 

Monument sent my info even tho i forgot to send payment!!! Thanx Monumnet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easiest thing to do is ring 01293 802473 - monument customer relations - I just did and they advised that my LBA needs to go to the portland building address - my account is with compucredit apparently!!!

 

 

gotta love the irony in that!

 

''Yes hello, I want to sue you, tell me the address to send my papers to...

 

''Ofcourse sir, please Send them to ... Can i help with anything else sir!''

 

PS I put just Monument on my Claim and put the portland building address down, went through fine!

 

regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I've just had my N1 against monument for my wifes card charges claim returned by the court for two reasons

 

1. I failed to put Mrs in front of Elisabeth Rita Castelbest (name changed)

 

2. I just put "Monument" and the registered office as the defendant.

 

The court sheet says "Please clarify if the business is Ltd, PLC, a firm, LLP or an individual trading as."

 

What have other people called Monument on their N1's? (clean answers please )

 

Monument Credit Services maybe ?

 

Pete

 

 

BARCLAYS BANK PLC T/A MONUMENT

 

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol castle beast!

i dont mind u hijacking my thread,all knowledge helps!

and i heard the judges (some of them anyway) were getting confused and putting stays on the credit card cases...they were already dealt with last yr,i think some judges are a bit confuddled! :D

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

and trading standards answer for my problem..........monument have sent them a copy of a CCA appaerntly the same one they sent me(theirs doesnt have reply card on the top so that was wrong) and they say they cant help me further on the matter ,however they then went on to say that if i wanted a signed copy i would have to take them to court!! so im gathering from that,that monument have sent them a blank CCA ??? what on earth happened to TS and such agencies being there to protect us the consumer??

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok received the stuff that TS had recieved from monument......it is a copy of separate terms and conditions that ive never had and ..... a copy of the reply card.....and TS have said theres nothing more they can do for me as monument have sent out the terms and conditions......I really cannot see why monument are getting away with this but i will be in the process of claiming charges back soon and that should cover the amount hopefully!!! im determined to get rid of this one way or the other!!

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent by recorded delivery this morning is my first letter asking for my charges back stating amounts and giving normal time to respond.not expecting much back just the usual.but i have been told in the past by monument that they dont send out one off letters !!! this was in response to my wanting my phone number taken off the records...

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

had standard reply saying blah blah only offering the difference between the £12 and the actual amount they took,letter will be going off tomorrow

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep going archer - I got the full refund this week! £500 with interest and court cost on top! I never thought it would happen.

 

Court date was for yesterday and last Friday I got the letter saying court was a waste of everyone's time and money (but they are still blame free!).

 

I would send LBA and then start mycol in next week if I were you.

 

Good luck and keep going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

similar story - wrote 2 or 3 times - always got the same response - will only pay difference from 12 and will not refund any 12 fees - did MCOL yesterday

  • NatWest - Settled in full 8 weeks after LBA (without interest)
  • Capital One - LBA 27th July - Offered & paid £28 - Rejected - settled
  • Monument - LBA 18th July - Offer 19th July - Refused - settled

  • WFS - 8 Point Complaint - awaiting response - Failed CCA Request - awaiting response - Awaiting S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info

***WFS Written Off £8k 01/08/07***

 

Monument sent my info even tho i forgot to send payment!!! Thanx Monumnet

Link to post
Share on other sites

which is what happened to me too... they even sent a letter saying they will not enter anymore correspondence with me and the court will decided (which did worry me! and someone else went to court and had a stay entered!) but for some reason I got the refund.

 

In total I sent 6 letters - I only got 3 letters back - 2 saying no and the last one saying 'we are not talking to you ever again' :-)

 

I don't think you will lose anything by carrying on with your action... either the test case will say that they have to refund the £12 difference or they pay the whole lot like they did mine.

 

I hope you get a good response... I have to say it feels very good to have got rid of the Monument card - forever!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the test case was for Banks - nothing to do with credit cards

  • NatWest - Settled in full 8 weeks after LBA (without interest)
  • Capital One - LBA 27th July - Offered & paid £28 - Rejected - settled
  • Monument - LBA 18th July - Offer 19th July - Refused - settled

  • WFS - 8 Point Complaint - awaiting response - Failed CCA Request - awaiting response - Awaiting S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info

***WFS Written Off £8k 01/08/07***

 

Monument sent my info even tho i forgot to send payment!!! Thanx Monumnet

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the test case was for Banks - nothing to do with credit cards

 

yep me too and so did the person who had the stay put on her case!!!

But apparently the judge felt it was the same for credit cards!

It certainly worried me as I've been trying to sort out this Monument card for 2.5 years and couldn't stand the thought it was going to go on for another (approx) year!!!

 

hopefully the fact that I got a refund will mean that there's is a chance for others to get the same result.

 

There is someone else on this forum and MSE (Shoe) who had a court date today and I've yet to hear if they got a refund or had to go to court.. we were keeping each other updated .. my court date was for yesterday... I hope she got the refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a little update - got an acknowledgement of service letter this morning - appears they responded immediately and intend to defend the claim - so 28 days to receive a defence.

  • NatWest - Settled in full 8 weeks after LBA (without interest)
  • Capital One - LBA 27th July - Offered & paid £28 - Rejected - settled
  • Monument - LBA 18th July - Offer 19th July - Refused - settled

  • WFS - 8 Point Complaint - awaiting response - Failed CCA Request - awaiting response - Awaiting S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info

***WFS Written Off £8k 01/08/07***

 

Monument sent my info even tho i forgot to send payment!!! Thanx Monumnet

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i shall try my best to get this money back as it will clear what i owe,and cap one did the same.and then paid up! but barclays are the most stubborn and as monument is now barclays the same goes for them too!

nothing ventured nothing gained as they say!

additions direct-no CCA

marshall ward-no CCA

next-CCA turns up after they have committed offence,(30 days) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) time!

monument -CCA not signed reported to TS for harrassment 1st letter sent TS are useless

associates visa-no CCA

think there might be a pattern here!?:lol:

GE Money- won

barclaycard-- N1 put into court

capital one - won

NatWest- won

 

never lose sight of your goal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...