Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your point 4 deals with that and puts them to strict proof .....but realistically they are not in a position to state that within their particulars they were not the creditor at the time of default but naturally assume the OC would have...so always worth challenging and if you get a DJ who knows his onions on the day may ask for further evidence from the OC internal accounts system. 
    • I see, shame, I think if a claim is 'someone was served' then proof of that should be mandatory. Appreciate your input into the WS whenever you get chance, thanks in advance
    • Paper trail off the original creditor often confirms the default and issue of a notice...not having or being able to disclose the actual copy or being able to produce a copy less so. Creditors are not compelled to keep copies of the actual default notice so you will in most cases get a reconstituted version but must contain accurate figures/dates/format.     .    
    • Including Default Notice Andy? Ok, I think this is the best I can do.. it all makes sense with references to their WS. They have included exhibits that dates don't match the WS about them, small but still.. if you're going to reference letters giving dates, then the exhibits should be correct, no? I know I redacted them too much, but one of the dates differs to the WS by a few months. IN THE ******** County Court Claim No. [***] BETWEEN: LC Asset 2 S.A.R.L CLAIMANT AND [***] DEFENDANT ************ _________________________ ________ WITNESS STATEMENT OF [***] _________________________ ________ I, [***], being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in this claim. 1. I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much-reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimant’s witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 2. The Claim relates to an alleged Credit Card agreement between the Defendant and Bank of Scotland plc. Save insofar of any admittance it is accepted that the Defendant has had contractual agreements with Bank of Scotland plc in the past, the Defendant is unaware as to what alleged debt the Claimant refers. 3. The Defendant requested a copy of the CCA on the 24/12/2022 along with the standard fee of £1.00 postal order, to which the defendant received a reply from the Claimant dated 06/02/2023. To this date, the Claimant has failed to disclose a valid agreement and proof as per their claim that this is enforceable, that Default Notice and Notice of Assignment were sent to and received by the Defendant, on which their claim relies. The Claimant is put to strict proof to verify and confirm that the exhibit *** is a true copy of the agreement and are the true Terms and Conditions as issued at the time of inception of the online application and execution of the agreement. 4. Point 3 is noted. The Claimant pleads that a default notice has been served upon the defendant as evidenced by Exhibit [***]. The claimant is put to strict proof to verify the service of the above in accordance with s136 and s196 Law of Property Act 1925. 5. Point 6 is noted and disputed. The Defendant cannot recall ever having received the notice of assignment as evidenced in the exhibit marked ***. The claimant is put to strict proof to verify the service of the above in accordance with s136 and s196 Law of Property Act 1925. 6. Point 11 is noted and disputed. See 3. 7. Point 12 is noted, the Defendant doesn’t recall receiving contact where documentation is provided as per the Claimants obligations under CCA. In addition, the Claimant pleads letters were sent on dates given, yet those are not the letters evidenced in their exhibits *** 8. Point 13 is noted and denied. Claimant is put to strict proof to prove allegations. 9. The Claimant did not provide a true copy of the CCA in response to the Defendants request of 24/12/2022. The Claimant further claims that the documents are sufficient to pursue a Judgement and are therefore copies of original documents in their possession. Conclusion 10. Without the Claimant providing a valid true copy of the executed Credit agreement that complies with the CCA, the Claimant has no grounds on which to enforce this alleged debt. 11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. On receipt of this claim I could not recall the precise details of the agreement or any debt and sought clarity from the claimant by way of a Section 78 request. The Claimant failed to comply. I can only assume as this was due to the Claimant not having any enforceable documentation and issuing a claim in hope of an undefended default judgment.   Statement of Truth I, ********, the Defendant, believe the facts stated within this Witness Statement to be true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in it’s truth. Signed: _________________________ _______ Dated: _____________________
    • AMEX and TSB the 2 Creditors who you need to worry about the least, ever!  Just stop paying them and forget about it, ignore all their threat o gram letters.  Only if, and with these 2 it's a massive if, you end up with a claim form you need to respond, and there will be plenty of help here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is this feasible/possible????????


oz4725
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6246 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a DPA request off on 25 January 07. Signed as received on the 26th. 40 Days was up on 7th Mar 07. I gave them a couple of days grace and still nothing? I then 7 day LBA them on 14 mar 07. STILL NOTHING!!!

 

I now want to put it through the small claims court to force them to cough up the info. I believe there is in the region of £5K of charges to be re-couped. Can i claim £4999 of compensation while filing my MCOL for non compliance of DPA?

 

What is the best plan of attack Guys? I just feel like they are taking the Pee now.

 

Any advice would be great

If you can read this, thank a teacher.

If you can read it in english thank a soldier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LB17

 

I understand exactly what your saying and yes you are spot on. In the cold light of day i guess i would lose out on >£1K, i'm just so bloody annoyed that the post man has been with nothing again!! and i just want to force Lloyds hand into doing what they should be doing. The £10 cheque was cashed weeks ago and they just appear to have "we'll do it in our own good time attitude".

 

Can MCOL/Small Claims be done for a non cash claim?

 

As i say, i am all ears for advice guys?

If you can read this, thank a teacher.

If you can read it in english thank a soldier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent a SAR- 40 days and nothing. A non compliance letter - nothing. A LBA giving 7 more days for them to send me the information i have requested- nothing. That expired 3 days ago. The only way now that i can think of forcing them to comply is by going thru the small claims process. Hence why i say that its a non cash claim for now. I just want the info that i'm entitled too!!!!!

If you can read this, thank a teacher.

If you can read it in english thank a soldier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay LB17. I don't bank online with LLoyds. Basically, this account is running with a few pence balance just while i recover my charges and then it will be closed. I got hacked off with them about 6 months ago and moved to a different bank.

 

Excuse my ignorance LB17 but whats the significance of online banking?

If you can read this, thank a teacher.

If you can read it in english thank a soldier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

You can go back I think to about June/July 2002 on your statements and look online to see if you have any charges, obviously if you have charges before this you would still need a reply to you SAR. You could try ringing 0117 943 3133 and chasing them up, some people have got their statements this way.

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just read this thread, and it's disgraceful what the banks are doing to stall these claims. Unfortunatley, this is not the only thread where people are struggling to get Lloyds to comply.:mad:

 

With online banking you can view all your statements going back to about june 2002. not quite six years, as internet banking hasn't been going that long. I think this is why Ladybird is asking.

 

I was fortunate in that i found statements i had kept prior to 2002, and used online banking to get the rest.

 

I wish you luck, and hope you persevere and make them pay for the aggro they are giving you. :mad:

 

Pondy :)

LloydsTSB - Current Account claim £5,554 settled unconditionally 25.4.2007 :D

If the Pondfish has helped click his scales! ;-)

 

Please donate to this site if you can! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi if you have any statements with charges on them, start as I have by sending prelim letter for that amount with dates covered and state that you will amend schedule of charges and amount of claim if they complied with SAR before you get that to court else then it will be two claims for charges. Issue claim for SAR disclosure and compensation at the rate granted by court. Just do what they do make it b****y had for them.

 

dpick:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi - yes I asked about online banking as you would then have had access to your statements.

You should, IMO do what Dpick suggests. Put as many charges as poss. in your prelim letter, but make it clear that you are unable to calculate the full amount due to their inability to comply with your request under the DPA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Significant update for you guys!!!!!!!

 

As a last ditch attempt to resolve this without court action i did as Barty said and rang the 0117 number.

The guy who answered was spot on but his info was rather disturbing.

I explained that all i wanted was LLoyds to play ball and give us the info we had requested and that i didnt really want to, but if pushed would take them to court to force them to give us it.

The guy on the other end of the phone told me that Lloyds standard defence would be that we posted it out to you and its not our problem if you havn't received it. As i already knew, any letter posted is deemed as received 2 days later and as the letter had no monetary value they didn't have to send it recorded/special delivery. The chap on the phone as i say was really good and he said to save anymore hassle he would personally see that we got what we wanted within 7 days and he would ring us next wednesday to check we had it.

 

Be aware guys, Lloyds dont seem to have many scrupples with regards to fulfilling their obligations. I will update as and when i receive the info.

 

Has anyone else had this much hassle with a SAR thru LLoyds? I have SAR'd 6 different firms now and never had a problem apart from LLoyds!!

If you can read this, thank a teacher.

If you can read it in english thank a soldier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...