Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who would know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes in those days. Sorry not to.be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Have you been asked for £10 to process Prelim?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6186 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have you been asked for a further payment to process your prelim or any other stage other than your initial S.A.R Letter???

If you have could you please post details on this thread stating :

  • What amount

  • At what stage


  • The reason given


  • Any wording or details given to you either written or by telephone


As much information as possible would be greatfully appreciated and may prove very useful in the fight against the banks.

 

Thank You

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few people seem to have been asked for this Jules. I think it will be useful to get this information. Thanks for highlighting it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I'm trying to recover charges for a friend from the Clydesdale Bank and I was ask for £10 at the prelim stage (didn't need them to send any info as we had all the statements already)

They asked for this in a phone call. I told my friend to phone back and say that it wasn't right.

Bank said it was a standard charge and would confirm in writing.

Friend did not get a letter to confirm it but £10 was taken from her account.

I wrote a letter on her behalf asking for it to be repaid. To my knowledge, and 16 days on they have ignored this request.

I am thinking about taking this up with the ombudsman as a separate issue from the rest of claim.

What is the thinking on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as though they are treating the prelim as a SARs request.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Habell,

 

Is this right? You sent a prelim letter asking for a refund of charges, at which point they phoned and told your friend that there was a standard £10 fee for answering the letter?

 

What you could do is send a DPA request +£10 fee and specifically ask for a recording of the two phone calls.

 

When you submit the claim you can include the DPA fee and spurious £10 fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats exactly what happened. I sent prelim asking for repayment of charges, Bank phoned asking for £10 calling it a standard charge.

I know it doesn't make sense but thats exactly what they have done. It's money for nothing.

My problem, like many others in Scotland, is that the claim comes to just above £1,500. Means I have to crop this to £1,500 if it goes to court. Now that CB have found a way of stopping second claims I don't want to run up anymore charges.

Do you think I can treat it as a separate issue?

Even then money spent on registered letters will soon surpass the £10

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Contact the Ombudsman immediately but firstly as well as the SAr suggested by Michael send them a letter requiring justification for the £10 which was taken out of your account. this is clearly an abuse of their access to the account.

Unfortunately I don't expect that you will ever receive the phone recordings that you want.

However, I suggest that you write out a statement giving date time etc and as much verbatim of the call and what happened as you can.

get your friend to do a similar one.

Do it now as there is a value in writing down statements at the first opportunity.

 

If we have evidence from others that this same request has been made we will compile them all as an evidence pack and provide a copy to any one who wants to complain.

A body of evidence from several independent witnesses will be extremely compelling

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think I can treat it as a separate issue?

 

To be honest, I don't really know, but it would be a good idea to write a separate letter saying you have noticed they have debited £10 on xx/xx/xx and can they explian the reason, to try and get something in writing. They may back down and say it was a mistake or try and claim it was for a DPA request, in which case you can ask for the telephone recordings. I appreciate that this seems a lot of hassle over £10 but they seem to have started doing this (usually verbally) quite a few times and it needs to be stopped.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore the request and move on to the next stage of your claim when your deadline expires.

 

Get some evidence of their request if you can such as a letter. Ask the bank to confirm their request in writing and that you will then send them the money.

 

best of all, get a recording device from Maplins and attach it to your phone.

 

Record all conversations with your bank as a matter of routine.

Do not give warnings that the calls are being recorded. you do not have to.

 

If you use Internet Telpehony then record using Skylook from Record Skype Calls. Get SMS Alerts, Voicemail in Inbox, Outlook Reminders via Phone and more:. Excellent piece of software

 

Report any such requests to this forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

they asked me for £10 at the perlim stage also by phone i asked for them to put this in writing witch they did not do but they did send me a cheque for £10 with a compliemt slip but no explantion

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a cheque for £10 when I requested copies of my statements, then when I sent my letter with details of charges attached, I recieved a letter back asking for a further £10 in order to process the request, by either cheque or cash! I'm currently waiting to speak to someone at Yorkshire Bank, but what do i do next if they still persist in needing the £10?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a cheque for £10 when I requested copies of my statements, then when I sent my letter with details of charges attached, I recieved a letter back asking for a further £10 in order to process the request, by either cheque or cash! I'm currently waiting to speak to someone at Yorkshire Bank, but what do i do next if they still persist in needing the £10?

 

Refuse, when the 14 days is up you allowed in the prelim ,send them the LBA.

 

If you have an account and they debit the tenner to that, follow the steps outlined above by michael/bankfodder.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter dated 27/3/07 - 'We refer to your letter dated 18/2/07............and write to advise to enable the Bank to carry out an investigation on your above account a standard fee of £10 is required.' My letter was simply claiming a refund with an attached schedule. I had already had a SAR and paid £10 last year. My request made no mention of the Data Protection Act and neither did their response - I can provide a copy if necessary.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/faq/bankcharges-quickguide.pdf

 

 

"Fight the good fight, finish the course and keep the faith"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following my reading of the articles on this site and other web sites, I decided to reclaim my charges from the Alliance & Leicester. I finished up using the Claims on line facility to take them to court to reclaim the monies. Initially, they advised they would refute the claim and I felt I was going to be lumbered with a court charge but lo and behold, 2 days before the cut off date, they sent me cheque for a full refund. Unfortunately there was a veiled threat that they are also going to write to me about how I conduct my account.So, if you are going through this process just keep your nerve and persist - Good Luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the advice and support fedup. You're quite right, and if people stand up to the banks they will back down, as they will over processing letters without the need to pay further fees just to respond to a letter.

 

Perseverance I'd be grateful if you could scan the letter if you can and send it to me at [email protected] I'd be grateful.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

caro

 

I don't have access to a scanner but I sent a copy to Bankfodder. Perhaps he can get a copy to you. Alternatively, PM me your address and I can send you it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/faq/bankcharges-quickguide.pdf

 

 

"Fight the good fight, finish the course and keep the faith"

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as BankFodder has it that's fine thanks Perseverance.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Someone has very kindly sent me one of these letters but I'm afraid that it was binned!!

 

I would like very much to get hold of another if someone could help on this.

Sorry for wasting anyone's time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caro

 

I have sent another copy to BankFodder and he has also given me an address in Warwickshire to post it to - which I presume is you! Hopefully, you should get it tomorrow.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/faq/bankcharges-quickguide.pdf

 

 

"Fight the good fight, finish the course and keep the faith"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be.;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Interestingly I received a letter (on 20/03/07, 1 Month after initial request) confirming receipt of my £10 and indicating that they (Clydesdale Bank) have 40 days in which to provide either my statements or information of all charges. Unsurprisingly I am yet to receive any statements but have gone ahead with my claim regardless as I have 90% of my statements anyway.

Amusingly, their defence states that I have not provided an account number in the particulars of my claim and are therefore unable to obtain copies of my statements (that makes two of us) and accordingly are unable to plead to the specific charges I have said applied to my account. Perhaps the breakdown that I provided them (on 3 seperate occasions) was not clear enough!!! Perhaps a standard level of literacy is ongoing problem within Clydesdale Bank itself.

I received an acknowledgement of my complaint to the information commissioner also stating that they send these complaints in batches to the banks but as yet I have heard nothing further.

k

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...