Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fendy V Natwest 16.1k. Anything I Can Do About The Shoddy Envelopes Used By Natwest.


fendyweather
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Fendy have you thought they may have sent you an answer, but if its in a tatty torn brown envelope. It might have got lost. ;)

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My 6 years worth of statements also arrived inaripped cheap brown envelope.

I have just joined the group and am worried about the length of time it appears to take to gain satisfaction. I have read in news papers and web sites that it need only take weeks rather than months. However that does not account for delaying tactics I still have no address or departement to deal with and am wrorried that lack of response from Nat west

As it is all call centre I posted my request by hand inmmy local branch I have kept copies of everything but did not imagine I would have to Register them.

The first hand delivered missive gained a response in 30 days Ok My statements

I then sent , hand delivered to my branch -a request for payment /refund with a copy list of all charges - both the total charges and a total with interest Asking fora response in 14 days Nothing Not even a "we are dealing it" So I have no name /department /or ref number to reply to.

2nd letter went again hand delivered -withpout prejudice asking for a lower settlement figure in 14 days orcourt action = again nothing

I should be starting court action tomorrow should I just go for it or fax to that number for S Higley , giving 24hrs Anyone got an address that I might use.I feel as if I have not done enough homework

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ripski........ I think it's really worthwhile starting your own thread on the nat west forum - ripski vs natwest. That way, you can get advice and support on your claim from the word go.

 

As you hand delivered your prelim and LBA to your branch, it's likely that they passed these on to the customer relations unit in Borehamwood. However, as you didn't send them there recorded post yourself you've got no way of proving that they ever received them.

 

Also, at prelim and LBA stages, you only ask for the actual charges back - the 8% interest can only be added on by the courts. If you claimed contractual interest though - that' fine. And at LBA stage, you stick to claiming your full amount of charges back.

 

In your situation, I'd be inclined (and I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong) to re-send your LBA with the full schedule of charges (minus the 8% interest column) to:

 

Stuart Higley

Nat West Customer Relations Unit

225 Shenley Road

Borehamwood

Hertfordshire

WD6 1BR

 

Send it recorded delivery (only costs a quid) and explain that you hand delivered prelim and previous LBA to local branch. However, give them an extra 7 days to respond to your LBA before taking them to the court stage.

 

Hope that helps - good luck, hedgey xx :D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could add that you previously sent list in with the 8% on purely to show the extent of how much the interest at 8% would be, were you to end up taking it to court, but that you would of course, at this stage be entirely happy to take FULL REFUND OF CHARGES ONLY. That way you are acknowledging that you know you are not entitled to the 8% at this stage and letting them know if they come back with full offer of all charges only, you would be happy to accept, and end of......... Good luck though.

 

Fendy xxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think if any mail not come to us intact the responsible for that is the sender not the royal mail wend is sent via normal mail so you must ask natwest again for your statements and they have to proof that they have send them to you in fact who i think they cant do only if they sent the envelop recorded or special delivery they can really proof the sending.

if your statements have been lost in transation yes you are entitled to sue natwest for identity teft and possibly being victim of fraude the best advice i can give you is to close your account imediatly to nobody can make use of your details.

good luck mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fendy, I've just seen your thread about the tatty inadequate envelopes NatWest use to send bundles of statements out.

 

I complained to NatWest that mine was split down the length of both sides - so bad in fact that Royal Mail had put the contents into a strong plastic envelope for onward travel to my abode.

 

The bank's response to my complaint about quality of envelope was to blame Royal Mail. Saying they had stated on the plastic envelope that the brown envelope had became damaged in transit.

 

So, by their reckoning, if I sent some raw eggs to someone in an ordinary box - not a moulded egg container from a shop - and they arrived broken that would be Royal Mails fault, not mine, for not packing them carefully inthe first place.

 

I made a valid point to NatWest, that in this age of identity fraud, I could easily have lost some sensitive information from the split envelopes. Needless to say they were not concerned!

 

Regards DAVIDP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My brothers statements came in the same way. given there envelope there is no way the envelope could NOT break. There must be something we can do about this, it is a serious data protection issue. I got £150 off HSBC for sending statements to wrong address (even though it was my ex), wonder if I could do same here?

 

We can always threatten the FOS, if they do investigate a complaint it costs the bank money.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I wrote to both Natwest and my local MP about this. A whole years worth of mine were missing from the envelope when they arrived, and my postie had very kindly bagged them all up (the ones that were left) and brought them to me in plastic post office bag, but to date, I have not even had the courtesy of a reply from either Natwest or my MP. Disgraceful really. But sadly, nobody seems to care on iota............ its shamefull. It really is............ Ive now been put at risk of Id fraud or theft and they just get away with it. Its so wrong.................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My statements should arrive soon, found this thread unbeliveable - so obviously a "work-to-rule" issue on natwest's part.

 

But a difficult case to prove really cos of Parkvale's more elquently put Royal Mail/Natwest blame-game.

 

Will definitely let you know the condition of mine

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dropped in to let everyone know that my data arrived from HFC bank this morning (just within the 14 days I gave them in my non-compliance letter) in a lovely HSBC post-safe packet, all data intact! Have HSBC group always used these or are the banks starting to realise they can't treat our data in this way?

 

SM:p

Paying interest on a loan caused by penalty charges? Read this!!

 

Very useful A-Z here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html?highlight=can%27t+find+what+you%27re+looking+for%3F

 

New strategy for Scots claims here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/scotland/71013-urgent-attention-please-read.html

 

Scottish procedure:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/royal-bank-scotland/42620-scottish-procedure.html

I am a layperson not a legal expert, my advice is offered without prejudice or liability, it is purely my opinion based on personal experience and should be treated as such. If in any doubt seek the advice of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dropped in to let everyone know that my data arrived from HFC bank this morning (just within the 14 days I gave them in my non-compliance letter) in a lovely HSBC post-safe packet, all data intact! Have HSBC group always used these or are the banks starting to realise they can't treat our data in this way?

 

SM:p

hi there just to said that my statements have been sent to my branch and in very excellent condition

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just rediscovered your thread and have drafter this to send to Natwest.

 

I thank you for complying with my earlier Subject Access request and look forward to contesting the legality of your charges in court. However I must say that the envelope in which the statements were dispatched was wholly inappropriate. In light of the present climate in relation to Identity theft I cannot believe that a large financial institution would dispatch years worth of bank statements in a standard envelope.

I also wish you to know that I have evidence that other customers of Natwest have raised this issue, but you have taken no action.

. Fortunately for me Royal Mail placed the envelope into a protective wrapper and, so far as I could tell, no statements were missing. My point is that another person could easily have obtained this information, though I do not blame Royal Mail for using a clear plastic cover for the envelope. The fault lies firmly with your organisation which has an obligation to protect confidential information it holds on present and past customers.

I shall be contacting my MP and the local press unless I receive a satisfactory response. I would also like to make you aware that your shoddy envelope is a clear breach of the Banking Code.

"2. Our key commitments to you: We will treat all your personal information as private and confidential, and operate secure and reliable banking and payment systems.

11.1 We will treat all your personal information as private and confidential (even when you are no longer a customer). We will not reveal your name and address or details about your accounts to anyone

12.1 We will co-operate as an industry so that you enjoy secure and reliable banking and payment systems you can trust."

Nowhere does it say that you will send out a large pile of statements in an envelope which would only be adequate for a single monthly statement. Any employee of Royal Mail could know my address and account numbers, this is not acceptable as you have a legal as well as moral duty to safeguard data you hold on your customers.

 

 

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well what do you think?

 

Should I take up poisoned pen letters? lol

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for it . the only way they will put their house in order is by being forced to change their ways. That will only be achieved by people that are bothered to force that change. So give them hell. Good luck.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I havent given up on this point, just had a lot on plate of late......... Im still determined to keep badgering them about this point of the utterly disgraceful unsecured way they send their post out. Theyre putting so many people at risk of ID fraud, that Im not letting it drop either. Nobody at all has bothered to answer any of my letters Ive sent about this, so Im feeling particularly naughty this week. I think Im gonna bang a letter off to Sir Fred about these, (if you dont get joy from the minions, my opinion is go straight to the top) and Im also gonna copy in IC and let them know the state mine came in. Ive already had notification from Experien last week that somebody tried to get a loan in hubbys name, weve obviously stopped that now, but I think its interesting to see it may have been by the same person who nicked a years worth of my statements in transit. Not funny really, but good were registered with the CRA's to keep a regular check on our files. Its cost me to do so though. And the way I see it Nutwest should have to pay for this for having put us at risk in the first place by the way they sent these out. So my main fight is the claim, but then Im back onto this point to try and get it sorted for others going forward. Keep fighting and we will get results, might take a while, but if we keep quiet, then nobody wins. Lets push push push and try and do something. Fend xxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi trudd,

Did you receive all the statements you requested? or have they sent out the regulation amount? I ask on the basis that I havent received my full amount which could possibly be for a backlog of requests to fulfill, yet you have received yours in a week! bob m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...