Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me vs Capital One


Holdred
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok guys, need a bit of advice.

 

Capital One have written back saying they dispute the charges are unlawful but have arranged for a refund of the amount I am claiming. They say they will offset any existing debt (none) and a cheque issued to me within 21 days.

 

No mention of the default.

 

They say the refunds are being made as a gesture of goodwill and they will now defend the claim on the fact they have refunded the full amount.

 

They have written to the court to tell them they have paid in full.

 

What should my course of action be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are serious about getting the default removed and the default amount is largely (better, completely) made up of charges, then youshould writet to them and say you accept their offer as a partial settlement only and intend to carry on the claim as they have only partially met what youclaimed - ie they haven't removed teh default. Copy the letter to the court.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are serious about getting the default removed and the default amount is largely (better, completely) made up of charges, then youshould writet to them and say you accept their offer as a partial settlement only and intend to carry on the claim as they have only partially met what youclaimed - ie they haven't removed teh default. Copy the letter to the court.

 

There'd be approximately £600 worth of charges compared to a balance of £150ish, so the balance of power sits with me on that.

 

Is there a template letter for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about this?

 

YOUR Street

Town

City

Postcode

 

 

Date

BANK NAME

Address

Address

Postcode

Re: Account number XXXXXXXX

 

Response to settlement offer.

 

Dear [named sender or Sirs]

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx. I respectfully decline your offer of Full and Final settlement.

 

You may not have been aware that I commenced legal action against you for the full amount plus interest, costs and the removal of the default regeristered against me on XX/XX/XX and I would ask that you now refer this matter to your legal department for further instruction.

 

I wish to stress that I do not accept your offer as Full and Final settlement and the money transfered to my account should not be viewed as my acceptance. I hereby authorise you to remove this sum accordingly.

 

Alternatively, should you wish to settle my claim in full, then please forward the balance of the claim (£xxxx) by cheque and confirm the removal of the default from the credit reference agencies which you report to without further conditions and I will inform the court that the claim is settled.

 

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Funhat

cc My Local Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good

 

I went down to my local court to talk over a few things and the letter was fine to reject the offer. So far, C-One have still yet to file a correct acknowledgement and there wasn't anything in the file to say C-One have settled in full in their opinion.

 

The clerk was quite helpful and we talked about my reasons for not wanting to jump for judgement by default straight away and they said if I leave it another week then I can prove that I have been more than reasonable should they still not have done everything correct and minimise their chance of making a sucessfull application to set aside any judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funhat, congratulations so far, good luck with your default removal:)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funhat, congratulations so far, good luck with your default removal:)

 

Thanks Remus.

 

They have my response so it's their call now. We're playing by my rules, not theirs 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help needed.

 

Im just about to file my POC in the court. Firstly do i print off the whole POC, including Schedule 1 and then include my spreadsheet of charges?? Im from Northern Ireland so am wondering how they could fight this in court when they are in England and im here. Does this mean its easier for me to get the money back??

Prelim letter sent to Ulster Bank for £1734.00 on 18 September

Received offer of £150 - 30/09/06

LBA sent 02/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok guys, need a bit of advice.

 

I've heard nothing from CapOne since I sent them my refusal of offer. Just spoken to the court and they had to have a defence filed by 5th March which they haven't done.

 

I want to go in to have their defence struck out completely, what letter should I send to the courts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't have their defence struck out if they haven't filed one. I think in these circumstances you can ask for judgement under CPR Part 12.1 and 12.3

12.1 In these Rules, ‘default judgment’ means judgment without trial where a defendant –

(a) has failed to file an acknowledgment of service; or

(b) has failed to file a defence.

 

12.3

(1) The claimant may obtain judgment in default of an acknowledgment of service only if –

(a) the defendant has not filed an acknowledgment of service or a defence to the claim (or any part of the claim); and

(b) he relevant time for doing so has expired.

(2) Judgment in default of defence may be obtained only –

(a) where an acknowlegement of service has been filed but a defence has not been filed;

(b) in a counterclaim made under rule 20.4, where a defence has not been filed,

and, in either case, the relevant time limit for doing so has expired.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Right guys, both good, good and bad news.

 

Firstly, I applied for Judgement by Default because they hadn't filed a defence. I filled the form in and made a mistake by bundling my court fees in with the debt claimed, then added them again on the solicitors cost giving me an inflated figure by £65.

 

This has been awarded by the judge and I have my judgement by default on the 9th April.

 

Dated 11th April is a cheque for the original claim, ie the full one, which I have today, however I have judgement by default for more.

 

What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would contact Capital One to make sure they are aware of the issue, and also let the court know of the mistake.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contacting Capital One is going nowhere, no one knows who I should speak too.

 

The courts have said that they can set the judgement aside and issue it correctly, but I can bank the cheque and then write to them to let them know that I have accepted full and final settlement.

 

I really do want to talk to someone in Capital One to keep them updated but it's so frustrating :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...