Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we can help with this and probably make 85% vanish if you want too start a new thread and tell us about it all. NEVER EVER PAY A DEBT COLLECTOR!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!! dx  
    • it never happens forget it shame you entered into pointless FmOtL letter tennis...
    • thanks nicky. im trying.. ive never had a pcn. im trying to read up and learn all this ...i may be slow as theres a lot to learn. i can't afford this charge and my friend definitely wont be able to pay even if it goes to court. didnt know about this website until google searched excel ..as was considering writing them a letter of explanation about the vulnerability of my friend as im worried she might suffer a breakdown. i think excel did send photos of the signs - there are 2 main ones...but one was blocked by an artic as you drive in - also if you look at the building there is a loading door next to pay&display machine which blocks the disabled bays too...so you cant drive to the bays opposite the machine only the joining bays a you go in.. if the disabled bays as you drive in are full and the artic is there delivering...disabled people cant get to the other disabled bays and pay machine...quite wrong really considering theres more accessible non disabled bays that aren't blocked by the loading lorry hello ftdave - yes when we realised we had to pay and realised we didnt have any coins or any coins in the car ashtray for the machine we left... it may have taken  more minutes than an able bodied person because i cant move as fast as i used to because of my arthritis
    • Also, because she's utimately in the frame for this, you should really get your friend to sign up and involve herself in this thread.
    • dx and Nick are spot on. The letters are meant to make you panic. But in reality they are hamster bedding.  You're not being formally threatened with court.  No-one from the parking company or DCBL will attend your friend's property. Do I understand from your description that once you realised the terms & conditions of the car park that you left as soon as possible?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charged AFTER Settlement of Claim


k23d26
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear

 

Claim Number

 

You have not filed a defence for claim number XXXXXXXX (Town/City) County Court, and the time to file a defence has now passed.

 

I am writing to give you one final opportunity to make full payment of (£ amount)

 

If I have not received payment in full by 4pm (date - seven days hence) I will enter Judgement in default.

 

Yours sincerely

di you send this to the solicitors

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Nathal, I have already done the judgement part and no, I didn't send a letter beforehand. They know what's happening (or should do) better than me. I was on holiday prior to that and I was expecting them to ask for a stay so I waited for 9 days before entering judgement. The next step is the warrant but I have sent the above letter to give them one final opportunity to at least acknowledge me before that happens! Don't know if I'll get any joy though!

Hugs,

Tra X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I used Money Claim Online but didn't attach the schedule of charges as there was not enough room. I didn't send it on to the county court but did send it on to solicitor's at a much later date. Will this matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the court will ask you to provide one, if a date is set.

Kingliam

:!:

 

On behalf of the Ginger one

Lloyds TSB - 1ST 12/07/06-LBA 26/07/06-MC-14/08/06-Court-31/01/2007

Halifax - D P A 02/10/06

On behalf of MumKing

Barclays Bank D P A 29/08/06

 

On behalf of DJ Sunny

Alliance & Leicester D P A 29/08/06

 

On behalf of GrandmaKing

GE Capital D P A 30/10/06

Barclays Bank D P A 30/10/06 - 1ST 15/11/06 *Microfiche [problem]

Link to post
Share on other sites

After all of the above steps, and after waiting for a week after entering judgement I thought I'd give the solicitors a little more time before issuing a warrant so I wrote them the above letter giving them an extra week before such action and sent it off recorded delivery which they received.

Still not heard anything so I gave them a call today.

Guess what? They say that they DID file a defence online but they also say that there must have been a fault with the system because lo-and-behold, it didn't show that it had gone through! I've never heard such nonsense. Everything I've entered on Money Claim has gone through ok and I haven't heard anyone else say there was a problem with the system.

They say because of this fact that a judgement shouldn't have been allowed and they have got a stay so I should be receiving my AQ soon.

Fuming? Steams coming out me ears!

Funnily enough when I rang Northampton County Court to complain, they say that a stay has NOT been granted, they did NOT file a defence, and [problem] has been in contact with them but only to apply for the removal of the judgement, to which they haven't returned the appropriate forms (quote from the very helpful operator: "We've sent them the forms but they haven't even bothered to send them back. They want the judgement removed but they're not putting the work in."). She also said that they shouldn't have mis-led me like that and if they're going to be funny about it to not wait but carry on to the warrant stage.

Should I send a letter to the County Court explaining my misery :-x and if so, who would I address it to, send a letter to [problem] informing them that I intend to go ahead with the warrant, or just sit back and see if they get their way and have the judgement removed so they can drag their heels into 2007 before paying me what's rightfully mine??????

Still seething!

Big hugs,

Tracie XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

(STARTED A NEW THREAD)

After all of the above steps, and after waiting for a week after entering judgement I thought I'd give the solicitors a little more time before issuing a warrant so I wrote them the above letter giving them an extra week before such action and sent it off recorded delivery which they received.

Still not heard anything so I gave them a call today.

Guess what? They say that they DID file a defence online but they also say that there must have been a fault with the system because lo-and-behold, it didn't show that it had gone through! I've never heard such nonsense. Everything I've entered on Money Claim has gone through ok and I haven't heard anyone else say there was a problem with the system.

They say because of this fact that a judgement shouldn't have been allowed and they have got a stay so I should be receiving my AQ soon.

Fuming? Steams coming out me ears!

Funnily enough when I rang Northampton County Court to complain, they say that a stay has NOT been granted, they did NOT file a defence, and [problem] has been in contact with them but only to apply for the removal of the judgement, to which they haven't returned the appropriate forms (quote from the very helpful operator: "We've sent them the forms but they haven't even bothered to send them back. They want the judgement removed but they're not putting the work in."). She also said that they shouldn't have mis-led me like that and if they're going to be funny about it to not wait but carry on to the warrant stage.

Should I send a letter to the County Court explaining my misery :-x and if so, who would I address it to, send a letter to [problem] informing them that I intend to go ahead with the warrant, or just sit back and see if they get their way and have the judgement removed so they can drag their heels into 2007 before paying me what's rightfully mine??????

Still seething!

Big hugs,

Tracie XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smelliellie!

I've just done it! The worst that can happen is to suspend the warrant whilst they investigate all the facts. If I'm gonna have to wait around for them to get their finger out I mays well wait on my terms!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Still wound up!!!

X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, just done it. I don't know how they keep getting away with it. Time limits are there for a bloody good reason.

I was crapping myself when I first started all this. I felt so out of my depth. But now? I'm so angry that all I can say is......LTSB -

BRING IT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you, Tracie.

Sooner or later a judge is going to come down really hard on these clowns for their breathtaking abuse of the system.

Write a protest letter to the court (as long as you quote your claim number it will be added to your file). Email or fax it for speed and follow it up with a hard copy.

Don't contact SC&M any more, they've had their chance.

Keep the pressure up.

Somehow I think a cheque will be winging its way to you very soon!

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Midge and Smellie! Just waiting to see if the court validates my warrant or not. Fingers crossed! Didn't realise [problem] were so under-handed. Then again, everyday they drag it out with us is money in the bank for them I guess. The legal fees alone must be costing LTSB a bomb. Well, we know what it feels like to lose money for nothing - so HAH!

X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Elsinore, let's hope so! You're right, I won't bother contacting [problem] again because it's pointless and they're misleading! I'll contact the courts. An email sounds a good idea. Don't suppose you know the addy?

X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

As I said yesterday, I started the warrant online in the hope that this farce will be wrapped up sooner rather than later, with the cost of £55.

In the meanwhile I did as Elsinore suggested and sent both a letter and email to Northampton.

Kept checking my online claim details all day to see if the warrant had been validated.

Sometime after 4.30pm the warrant was rejected. This means that I have lost the £55, along with some of the fighting spirit that I had yesterday.

I followed the time scales, gave them extra time before taking it a step further and officially was well within my rights to issue that warrant after judgement.

Now is the time that I feel utterly deflated and I really feel like giving up. I have played ball but have still been knocked back, and if they can do that when I have done everything correctly then I feel they can do anything they wish.

That £55 is half of what I get each week and to just lose it like that feels exactly what if felt like when LTSB used to charge me.

Hey, maybe to recover my fees I ought to take the court to court :rolleyes: . Oh the irony!

Dejected, sad, headache, off to bed.

Goodnight, God bless.

Tracie X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why was the warrant rejected? Is is because SC&M persuaded the court to accept their defence? Or Northampton discovered their mistake?

You were positively encouraged by Northampton to file for a warrant, so you should kick up a stink and demand the return of the fee.

Did you get the name of the person who told you to go ahead with the warrant? If so, your halfway to a refund. Even so, I would still complain, in writing, about their inefficiency which led to your loss.

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Gresham Street is head office. Top person? That'll be the chief exec, Eric Daniels. He's the Big, big cheese.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I think I've really messed up! I have received my settlement last month after 6 months of waiting. I have since been charged twice for going over my overdraft last week. Once because a company billed me more than it should (I have to sort this out) and once because I was charged my monthly account fee, which wasn't covered because the company had taken more money out than it should!

My problem is when I received the settlement offer from S,C&M I just signed it as it was without any amendments, but I think it may have meant that the settlement was a full and final payment against my claim and any future ones? Does this mean that I have to pay these current bank charges as it's going to be a struggle - actually impossible and I can just see it going the same way as it did before - charges that I cannot meet that incur more charges, until it snowballs out of control.

Can anyone please advise?

Thanks in advance!

Tracie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tracie,

 

It depends on what their conditions of settlement were. Why don't you post up the conditions they made sot hat we can see what you have signed. They may not have made that condition - you never know. :D

 

Lucid :)

 

EDIT: Sorry I've just seen that I've posted as Mindzai but it is Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If you have been billed more than you should have by a company, you are entitled to a full and immediate refund under the Direct Debit guarantee, as long as the company did not inform you of the additional payment 10 days before taking the money, I have had this out with Lloyds myself and am now in the process of a fresh claim as they would not back down (again) over the charges. My original claim was settled by the funds being transferred into my account though, I didn't sign anything.

 

good luck

 

Claire

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...