Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council sold my house!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6266 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently found out that council sold my house to my ex. I was the original tenant and am not sure whether he even was on the lease, which I still have. I left when he became violent and the council didn't want to know. I did write to the council in 2005 to ask what criterion had to be met for purchase of the house and they said that he would have to either pay me out or get a signature from me relinquishing all rights to the property. Do I have grounds to sue the council? charlie

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you leave? What type of tenancy agreement have you signed? Who is(was) paying rent on the property?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for answering. It is a 'Secure Tenancy Agreement. I left early 98. I was responsible for the rent until then and the letter I received from the council in 05 does state that the non purchasing tenant has to agree to the sale whether I live there or not. Am I still able to sue? Cheers, Charlie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, just two more questions. When did you move in? And I think the EXACT wording of the letter from the council is important - could you post that please?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you moved out of the house did you sign a Notice to Quit? If not, you are still the tenant at that property, and in which case they can't sell it. If you did then your ex should've signed a new tenancy agreement and will have used his power of rtb under that.

 

If they signed up for a new tenancy then they should've got you to quit the old one, however, doesn't always happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to sign a NTQ to end a tenancy claire...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying the tenancy has ended as such, but to end the tenancy there isn't a need to sign the NTQ. The council could have received an order of possession from the courts, or it could be argued that the tenancy was ended mutually. It does not appear that the former has occurred, I suspect in any court case the council would argue the latter - I am trying to get a full picture in order to see how justified such an argument would be.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, no I signed nothing at all when I left. My ex was about to remarry a few years later and give me back the house. That went wrong and he stayed. Up until recently the kids will vouch that the council magazine was delivered to that address in my name only. I did ask the council to send me a copy of the lease but they said they would only send it to the council house address and not to my own new address.

Yes of course you can have a copy, I can either email one or if you let me have an address, I'll happily post one to you.

Charlie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to add on that I signed the lease september 92 and i left around march 98. The original tenency agreement, which I have says that I was the only tenant. would it have been possible to have had him added on. I know he nagged incessantly about it but I just can't remember whether he actually signed anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you hand in any keys on leaving the property? Or did you inform the council that you had left the property(I am assuming you did) in writing or by phone?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ask for a copy of your file to see what paperwork has been signed.

 

The Council are not allowed to add a second tenant to an existing secure tenancy agreement, and if they have done that they would have created a new secure joint tenancy with both of you - from experience I do know that Councils have made this mistake in the past.

 

I'm not legally trained so I don't want to comment out of turn. If in doubt about it you could contact a solicitor for a free phone consultation or one of the free solicitor service.

 

This is a grey bit, so someone more qualified than me might want to comment. As you informed the Council you had moved out they could have taken this as you implying you didn't want the tenancy. Also, by them accepting payment from your ex they could be seen to have created a tenancy with him - the difficulty here is whether they can say you abadoned your tenancy and if you claim you had an intention to return then they can't argue that, but don't know who it is down to prove that.

 

Also, when the RTB was put in by your ex he must have been a secure tenant for them to allow him to buy it. Usually files are checked for this so not sure where they got the information from, I would request a copy of your file.

 

By the way, when did he buy the property, was this before or after you told them you'd moved out?

 

Hope this helps and doesn't waffle too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that by vacating the property and ceasing rent payments, the council could well argue, perhaps validly, that you had implicitly terminated your tenancy. Whilst I do not neccessarily agree with it, from a legal point of view they would probably be correct - I think it would be difficult for a court to side with you stating you are still a tenant, when you have not been resident in the property, nor paid rent, for 7 years. However - if the council have recognised you as a tenant in the letter they sent, this would be a different matter. However, this would have to be an EXPLICIT reference IMO. This is not a simple situation, and if you are considering taking it further I must advise that you consult with a specialist.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say I agree with you Mr Shed that this is a difficult one. I

 

would still request a copy of your file and if they refuse to send it to a different address (which I can't see any reason for). Advise them you will collect it and take ID and a copy of your tenancy agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'll get in touch with them in the morning. As far as I'm aware they never even knew I was not there. They were still sending the letters to me and I have never had any other form of communication from them. He bought the place within the last 18 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case you must have had a joint tenancy? Otherwise they would be chasing you for rent.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if he ever went behind with the rent and he could've acted on your behalf to negotiate repayment agreements - which they could've failed to check he had authorisation.

 

Once you get your file you need to check if there are any reference to you leaving and any signing of new paperwork.

 

They must have based is application to buy based on some paperwork. If not, I don't understand how he's bought it unless it was fraudulently.

 

If it was a joint tenancy then you would still have had to sign to agree to him buying it - which could tie in with what you said the letter said about buying it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He wouldn't move out, at the time the police were unable to do anything because it was classed as a domestic and he paid the rent at times from the start of the tenancy so he would just carry on after I left. What I can't understand is that if he did join the tenancy then how comes I havent got any other paperwork than the original tenancy agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just requested the file by email from the woman at the council who sent the email telling me I would have to sign an agreement. I'll keep you posted on any answer! It may well have been fraudulent as he bought it after he got married. If they thought it was me then it should be interesting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick one,

My Ex and I took a council property, the day my wife went into labour with our first child. I hurridley went to council offices to pick up the keys signed tenancy agreement and went to join wife in hospital.

12 yaers late my wife buggered of and applied for another council house in another area (same council though). I was served with notice to quite as the house was to big for a man on his tod. I used my right to buy which was rejected as a notice to quit had been served.

I went all the way, the council (LEEDS SHITY) took me to county court to have me evicted. I fortunatley at the last minute, just before going before the judge, noticed on the tennancy agreement that I was the only signatory. Judge ordered in my favour. and also compensated me for the loss of equity in the 12 months from being denied my righ to buy and arriving at court to be evicted.

 

My home was valued at 48k I was awarded 20k in compensation, this was eight years ago. The house in now worth in excess of 220k.

 

So it pays to go all the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...