Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, I noticed that.  Too much of a coincidence methinks!  The OP says they never received a LoC and then in the CPR answer the solicitors say they hold a copy of the LoC but don't include it. I think the best thing is not to request a copy but use this against them in your WS - you never received LoC and indeed in their answer to your CPR request (included an an exhibit in the WS) they included various documents but not the LoC.
    • Frustratingly I've got a voice WhatsApp message from my friend but he's misunderstood the situation and thinks it's you who wants to cancel.  Anyway, I've answered asking if I can call him and hopefully the two of us will be free at the same time today to actually speak on the phone. In the meantime I found this on a page I think meant for people/businesses who have listings on Booking.com How can I communicate with guests to inform them about unforeseen issues at my property and initiate a cancellation? If you’re experiencing unforeseen issues and can’t accommodate your guests, you must report this to our customer service. They will support you with the cancellation request and relocation of the guests, if applicable. https://partner.booking.com/en-gb/help/reservations/changes-cancellations/handling-cancellations-and-guests-cancellation-requests#question-153182 So that's what the host should be doing.  
    • Hi ALl,    Would appreciate some advice and support. I went to insure my car with my partner last night and they refused insurance. I checked my dvla license online and it stated I have been disqualified for 6 months. This is due to 2 driving offences that I failed to identify the driver. I moved house a year ago and completely forgot about changing the registered address. This went to court on 14th May 24 and was given a fine for both and 6 points each totalling 12 points and a 6 month ban. I have read a few things online and spoken to a couple of solicitors for a quick consultation and views and opinions are so varied. Some solicitors are charging extortionate money for something that I know takes 5 mins such as the statuary declaration.    I am going to complete a statutory declaration today and get a solicitor to sign and submit this. But is this just delaying the inevitable? what's the likely hood of being able to overturn this and just pleading guilty to the original 2 offences and take the 3 points for each and a fine with no ban? Any help would be much appreciated, I have been sent the papers by the courts today so have this to hand. Looks like I'm only being charged for the failure to identify and not that and the speeding offence if that makes any difference.    R
    • Again, in the second letter in post 39 upload, they say they "hold a copy of the letter of claim". BUT, they didn't include it... Hmmmm!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ME vs NATWEST + COBBETTS! A Claim going down the pan!!!


leviathan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Am suffering for the worst amount of anxiety with regard to my claim, OK so i sent of my in December sometime, the Particulars of the Claim were 4 point, which i got from Money Saving Expert. After quite some time I realised these points were simply not enough, the online form did not allow more than a certain number of characters! So restricting my POC, now, i'm stuffed since the Particulars are not good enough... perhaps, and i presummed that Cobbetts got the summery of bank charges from the several correspondences between me and the bank, they (Cobbetts) requested for more information

 

the letter said this dated 08 Jan 07

1. In your claim you state "the defendant has applied numerous charges to the Claimants account"

2. Please provide the following in support of your claim

 

2.1 To what account(s) (giving details of the account name, number and sort code) were the charges applied.

 

2.2 In relation to each charge, please clarify the following (a) is it the case of the Calimant the same should not have been charged? (b)If yes, please explain why the Claimant Contends that the same should not have been charged? ©If no; is the case of the Calimant that the same should not have been charged in this amount? (d) If yes; please explain why the Claimant contends that the same should have been charged in this amount and identified the sum the Claimant contends should have been charged. (e) if no; please state the Claimant's case.

 

3. In your claim you state that "the charges are unlawful and they are an extravagent penalty"

 

4. Please provide the following particulars in support of your claim:

4.1 Please specify the clause(s) pursuant to which the charges were applied

4.2 Please specify whether the charges applied were due tobreacj of contract by the claimant

4.3 Please identify in each case the particular breach of contract (by reference to appropaiet term of the contract) that the charged related to

 

Now all this is all good and well, and after recieving this form i recieved the n149 form from court which i gave in with an additional £100, i still haven't got around to sending Cobbetts this information, since some of the questions they're asking i have no answers for! If my Particulars of Claim had been stronger they would not have masked for this information.

 

Does anyone have any idea's on what i should do? I am panaking and fear that i may lose my case!

 

PS, do you think Natwest forwarded Cobbetts my letters with the dates of each charge? Or should i send it again? Should i send out a N244 form to highlight things that I have missed out and use the new method for the allocation questionaire which.

 

I am concerned since i have receieved no letter from Natwest wanting to settle or anything, they are simply not thrown by my case... :o

 

The sum i'm applying for is £2,800, which you;d this would make them wonder or panic and make me an offer. Should i drop the claim and start afresh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, i have not included the interest 8% interest charge in my court claim or the information that i have provided to there lawyer. Any suggestions whether o should do this now and write a letter to the court highlighting that the charges i have provided in my initial claim are without interests?

Link to post
Share on other sites

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

1. Between the dates of [insert dates of first and last charge] the Defendant applied numerous default charges to the Claimant’s bank account.

2. The charges applied constitute an unfair penalty under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, which state: “A term is unfair if it requires any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation”. The amount charged does not reflect the cost of the breach.

3. Under the law of penalties, the charges are an unlawful ‘extravagant’ penalty. Referring to the case of 1896, Wilson v Love, a charge is a penalty if it does not reflect an item’s true cost.

4. Under the County Courts Act 1984, the claimant is entitled to interest at a rate of 8% per annum from the date they were first deprived of the money to the date of this claim. This amounts to a total sum of [insert amount of interest], continuing to accrue at the statutory daily rate of 0.021% until judgment or earlier payment.

5. The Claimant therefore asks the court to enter judgment in their favour for the sum of [insert total charges] plus interest, amounting to a total of [insert total charges plus interest].

 

Is this what you used as your POC's? Which bits did you leave out?

 

Do I take it you have already submitted the AQ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

More accurately put POC as follows

1. The Claimant Mr***** holds a bank account with the Defendant since **/**/** Between the dates of **/**/** - **/**/** the defendant applied numerous charges to the Claimants account

2. Under the law and penalties the charged are unlawful as they are an "extravagent" penalty. Referring back to the case of 1896, Wilson v Love, a charge is a penalty if it does not relate to the true cost of an item.

3. As outlined in the County Courts Act 1984, the claimnat is entitles to interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date they were first deprived of the money to the date of this claim. This amount to a total sum of £***.**, continuing to accrue at a statutory rate until judgement or earlier payment, the daily rate being 0.021%

4. The Claimant therefore asks the court to enter judgement in favour for the sum of £*,*** plus interest, amounting to a total of £*,***

 

These were my particulars, after seeing some of the particulars, these seem pathetic, but it ws all the space the form would allow. I haven't added anything else to the claim to make it water tight!

 

What to do????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you amend your claim as follows:

 

N244 AMENDMENT

With regard to the N244 -

 

Top left hand box:

1. Tick c), without a hearing

Leave the rest blank

 

Part A

intend to apply for an order that:

amends my particulars of claim

 

because:

my particulars of claim did not state the statutory provisions on which my claim relies, and did not include a schedule of charges

 

Part B

Tick evidence in part c

 

Part C

Please find attached to this application my proposed new particulars of claim, amended to include the statutory provisions on which my claim relies , as well as a schedule of the amount claimed in respect of penalty charges levied by the defendant"

Send N244 + 3 N1 + 3 schedules + £35 fee to the court. They will send 2 back, 1 of which you serve/send to the defendants and confirm to the court that you have done so.

 

N1 PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

1. The Claimant [has] [had] an account (XXXX Account No) with the Defendant which was opened on or around Date [and closed on or around date]

 

2. During the period in which the Account [has been] [was] operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

 

4. The Claimant contends that:

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

 

5. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

6. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £XXXX and any interest charged thereon;

b) Court costs;

c) Interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% as set out on the attached list of charges - £xxx [enter interest total at date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgement or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx.

 

 

For the schedule of charges use the Simple S/S here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

and visual guide here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bcard-woolwich-successes/7226-maisielou-barclays.html#post50088

 

Overwrite the existing examples type of charge, amount and date.

 

The days since and 8% will be calculated automatically

 

Having completed the s/s, save it. You will need to produce one as of the date you filed. So click on the time in your taskbar and reset the date to the date you filed at court. Open the s/s and print off. Reset the date.

 

 

N1 Claims form in .PDF format with form filling

N1 Claims form in .PDF format with form filling

 

N244 - application notice

Form N244 - application notice

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE HELP! I am so thrilled, there is a way out of this mess, or is there? I wanted to ask a final question before i get this all in the post. With the Sum total, do I add on all the money that i've contributed to that case as well as the unfair bank charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you mean on the N1

 

Value:

Bank charges - £XXXX

Data Protection Act Fee - £XX (if claimed)

S69 8% Interest - £XXX

Total of - £XXXX

Plus daily interest at 8% of £0.XXp from the date of issue until settlement.

 

 

 

Amount claimed: Charges (+ Data Protection Act Fee if claimed) - £XXX

Court fees: £XXX

Sols costs; None

 

 

Human Rights: No

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus daily interest at 8% of £0.XXp from the date of issue until settlement.

 

Is this

Bank Charges + Interest + Court Fee + Money Claim Fee + Statement Fee = Total

 

Then the total calculated by the number of days it takes the bank to forward the payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think ive got you now

you cant claim back the £35 for altering your poc

so it should read something like this

 

charges £****

interest under s.69 county courts act 184 £****

court fee £120

 

total £***

 

plus interest pursuant to S.69 county courts act 1984 from the ate of issue to date of judgement/ settlement a £*** per day OR at such a rate and for such periods as the cort deems just

 

hope that helps

I won £5289 heres how

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/40703-saint-luco-natwest.html

 

 

ITS NOT WHETHER YOU WON OR LOST, BUT HOW YOU PLAY THE GAME THAT MATTERS. ( OBVIOUSLY A LOSER THEN):D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, So am currently filling in the N1 form, so in the "amount claimed" put just the total bank charges and nothing else no interest from the day or nothing... Sorry, my claims in a real muddle, that's all trying to get it straight

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, do you not get the money claim and court fee money back which both amount to £220, i've included this in my schedual. SO i change the time on my laptop and open the spreadsheet which will have different interest figures on it. then send it of?

Link to post
Share on other sites

6. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £XXXX(enter total charges) and any interest charged thereon;

b) Court costs;

c) Interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% as set out on the attached list of charges - £xxx [enter interest total at date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgement or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx.

 

dont think you'll go wrong with yhis

I won £5289 heres how

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/40703-saint-luco-natwest.html

 

 

ITS NOT WHETHER YOU WON OR LOST, BUT HOW YOU PLAY THE GAME THAT MATTERS. ( OBVIOUSLY A LOSER THEN):D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in your POC's:

6. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £XXXX and any interest charged thereon;

b) Court costs;

c) Interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% as set out on the attached list of charges - £xxx [enter interest total at original date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgement or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you get the money claim fee back in 6b above

dont add it to your spreadsheet that is just for bank charges

because you had to pay £35 to change your poc that is non returnable,

you can claim your aq fee as well

so yes court costs £220

I won £5289 heres how

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/40703-saint-luco-natwest.html

 

 

ITS NOT WHETHER YOU WON OR LOST, BUT HOW YOU PLAY THE GAME THAT MATTERS. ( OBVIOUSLY A LOSER THEN):D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i put

money claim for return of penalty charges applied to the claimants bank account by the defendant.

on your other question, i understand you are paying to change your claim, so IMHO surely you can change the amount claimed if it was wrong in the fist place. but thats my opinion and someone else will probably know different

I won £5289 heres how

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/40703-saint-luco-natwest.html

 

 

ITS NOT WHETHER YOU WON OR LOST, BUT HOW YOU PLAY THE GAME THAT MATTERS. ( OBVIOUSLY A LOSER THEN):D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh, i've been on this all day, have three copes of the N244 ready to go, 3 scheduals to go and am trying to work out the interest per day charge, with very little luck. Is it against the back charges you work out the interest or the total amount, including all court fee? So it's 8% of the total amount that would fill in that section?

 

Any ideas anyone? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...