Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk
      Trying to find contact details for prime credit 5 S.a.r.l

      By dx100uk · Posted

      is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Restart
      Commercial business lease - Letter before Action - Negotiation not going well

      By Restart · Posted

      Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hikertrash
      MET CCTV PNC - Starbucks closed- Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

      By Hikertrash · Posted

      Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Mdg123
      Private parking charge from Euro Car Parks now with Debt Recovery Plus

      By Mdg123 · Posted

      Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

hatter v Natwest - Long

hatter

By hatter
in NatWest Bank

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hatter

hatter

Posted
Posted

Hi all. I'm new here but not new to the claims thing. My story is a bit more complex and includes lies, deceit, bullying and of course charges.

 

Sorry if this is negative but here is a warning that you should take what you are doing very seriously.

 

I have a business account and private account with NatWest. I have a business overdraft facility of £12,000 and my business account fluctuates from being £11,000 overdrawn to a few thousand pounds in credit. That's the joys of being self employed with irregular money and punters that like to drag out paying you for their own benefit. We're fodder.

 

I have to say, Natwest were brilliant and under my original Manager offered me an excellent and valuable service. Then my Manager got promoted and a young lady took charge. She decided, for whatever reason, that she didn't want my business anymore. This happened around Nov 2006, so if anyone else noticed a *change* in attitude by Natwest then i'd be interested to know.

 

The bank used to manage my accounts, moving money when it was required every month from one account to another. I had a great relationship with the staff, it worked fantastically.

 

Then, one day, they wrote to me saying they refused to manage my accounts anymore. I immediately phoned my Manager who was unable to talk to me. I eventually spoke to her assistant and said that before they ceased managing my accounts I wanted to talk to my bank manager as this was an essential service.

 

She didn't call back. I called her the next day to be told that she'd gone on two weeks leave. I made it clear that I wished to discuss this prior to them ceasing the service.

 

Guess what? They didn't care. They stopped it anyway. They had a bank account with no money in and an account with funds available but would not transfer money (as they'd been authorised to do) from one to fund the other as they always had done. But they didn't bother to tell me. They didn't write to me to say that DDs and SOs had been unpaid. I had no idea that they were no longer transferring funds and that they were in the process of refusing payments. I was sitting waiting for a call from my Manager to discuss the ceasing of the service I needed with a view to offering to pay for this service.

 

They racked up £800 of charges, then wrote to me telling me they were cancelling my Direct Debits. By then i'd worked out what was going on because everyone other than the bank was writing to me saying direct debits had bounced and applying *their* charges!

 

Did they cancel my Direct Debits? Of course not. Why do that when they can attract a heap more charges the next month - because with me by then a grand out of pocket I didn't even have enough money to cover my outgoings the next month. Nice work if you can get it. More charges. Manager's on holiday. No one can take my call. Another way, eh?

 

So I wrote and asked for £800 in charges to be refunded. But they got busy at the other end. "From time to time". Watch out for that one, especially if you operate in an overdraft. Because my business account hadn't been in credit within the undefined parameters of "from time to time" they've decided to withdraw it and are now demanding it gets paid back. Its not fully extended and i've work in hand but its pretty much ruined me.

 

But its not all bad news. They agreed to pay back the £800 but did it well outside of my deadline, by which time i've put in a demand for 6 year's worth at £3,900.

 

I obviously take full responsibility for my actions and only hope this is a warning to anyone that reads this. DON'T borrow from the bank for a business venture - they will screw you. DON'T trust them to play fair - they will dishonour that trust. DON'T believe they want to help you - they just want to help themselves. But hopefully you already know that - that's why you are here.

 

My accounts have now been transferred to a person in Borehamwood who never answers his phone and his answering machine sounds like a relic from the 60's. Another way?

 

The bank have had their 14 days to refund my 6 year's money. I'm going to send them a final warning and give them a further 14 days. After that i'll go to court.

 

I think they've behaved attrociously - my accounts being in good order until they started playing games... but it doesn't matter.

 

In between all of this, i've complained to my Manger's manager who couldn't have cared less. I mentioned her "telephone operatives" and she stated that she felt the term "operatives" was abusive. Half way through the conversation she claimed that someone had complained about me and my tone on the phone and that she was recording the phone call. I told her it was illegal to do that. "Actually, i'm not recording the phone call"... a stupid lie! I complained about her and the whole series of events to the official customer complaints Dept who couldn't care less.

 

I'm now trying to arrange my life so I have as little to do with banks as possible. Of course, that's difficult to do because they've managed to shoe horn themselves into every damned aspect of life but i'll do my best. My advice, break the bank's stranglehold on our lives, dump them, don't trust them, don't borrow, don't buy their products. We have no rights, they do as they please.

Link to post
Share on other sites
fire fox

fire fox

Posted
Posted

Wow !!! I am sure you have every reason to feel agreived hatter. Similar thing happened to my dad but at another Bank. He ended up homeless and it took him years to get back to where he started. Folow the process on here to get back what you are owed, you will succed. I admire your spirit. Dont let the b******s grind you down.

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

On the 7th March I registered £4000 and some pocket change with the courts. About a week after I did this, Natwest offered me £2500. It was very tempting but they owe me £4000. They have acknowledged the claim but i've heard nothing yet.

 

They have until the 4th April. If they don't respond by then I believe it goes to default and I request a judgement. I would love the opportunity to walk into their branch with a bailiff and see the look on the face of the Manager that caused this in the first place.

 

They are itching to go to collection with my overdraft and do their best to avoid taking my calls I presume in order to create a little melodrama so they can give me the big sigh and say "well we tried to help but you hardly got in touch with us".

 

I'm hoping they just don't bother to offer evidence but that's wishful thinking.

 

Ironically, the amount i'm claiming is the exact amount that were it in my account, my account would balance and be at £0. Goes to show, i am good with my money and would be OK if it weren't for those [edit].

Link to post
Share on other sites
hedgey06

hedgey06

Posted
Posted
They have until the 4th April. If they don't respond by then I believe it goes to default and I request a judgement. I would love the opportunity to walk into their branch with a bailiff and see the look on the face of the Manager that caused this in the first place.

 

Hi Hatter - well done for sticking to your guns and not accepting the reduced amount. It's your cash - fair and square - why should you accept 1,500 less than you're claiming for!!!

 

Don't worry - you'll probably hear from them soon, but regardless of that, let's hope you get a nice big fat cheque wingin' it's way to you soon!!! And if you do go in the branch with the bailiffs.............. can you get a mate to go along with you (camcorder attached!!) I'd lurrrrve to see that one!!!

 

Best of luck - hedgey xx :-D

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I used slang, non profane, the definition of which is "someone who acts in a disreputable, unethical or unscrupulous way". Why was this edited? Are the moderators of this site frightened to suggest that the banks may be acting in a disreputable, unethical or unscrupulous way? I've seen worse condemnation on the home page. Even the courts are deciding that they are behaving in an unlawful way. Why the unnecessary censorship?

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Hi Hatter - well done for sticking to your guns and not accepting the reduced amount. It's your cash - fair and square - why should you accept 1,500 less than you're claiming for!!!

 

Don't worry - you'll probably hear from them soon, but regardless of that, let's hope you get a nice big fat cheque wingin' it's way to you soon!!! And if you do go in the branch with the bailiffs.............. can you get a mate to go along with you (camcorder attached!!) I'd lurrrrve to see that one!!!

 

Best of luck - hedgey xx :-D

 

Thanks Hedgey. You can rest assured that should I get the opportunity to document any enforcement action using the media of film, it will be up on utube in a jiffy... assuming they don't take to censorship too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
scott150663

scott150663

Posted
Posted

hi hatter

 

very very similar to my own experience, they nearly bankrupted me they charged me £26000 in 24 months (wouldnt lend me money cause the company grew to big to quickly) im claiming£37000 and looking forward to getting MY MONEY back.Been waiting 4Years for the day when i get my revenge and pay day will be soon in my case...

 

good luck my friend

 

regards Scott

 

PS 6 months after i got out of the charges nightmare they were offering me loans ETC..

when i told them i was moving my BUS account they offered me frree bus banking.I cant type what my response was as it wasnt polite (i did ask for the money back that they had stole from me which they refused to refund)Rant Rant Rant...... sorry going off on one there but u know how i feel cause youve been there. last ting why does it take 5 days for a cheque to clear in a bus account????????????

thieving sods

 

sorry to moan good luck

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted
hi hatter

 

very very similar to my own experience, they nearly bankrupted me they charged me £26000 in 24 months (wouldnt lend me money cause the company grew to big to quickly) im claiming£37000 and looking forward to getting MY MONEY back.Been waiting 4Years for the day when i get my revenge and pay day will be soon in my case...

 

good luck my friend

 

regards Scott

 

PS 6 months after i got out of the charges nightmare they were offering me loans ETC..

when i told them i was moving my BUS account they offered me frree bus banking.I cant type what my response was as it wasnt polite (i did ask for the money back that they had stole from me which they refused to refund)Rant Rant Rant...... sorry going off on one there but u know how i feel cause youve been there. last ting why does it take 5 days for a cheque to clear in a bus account????????????

thieving sods

 

sorry to moan good luck

scott

 

Moan away - wow, there's always a bigger fish. They've already offered me loans actually. Obviously they're concerned about my credit rating so its at a high rate - can you believe the nerve!?! Of course you do - you've seen it.

 

Good luck to you Scott. Hope you get *your* money back soon. That's a lot of money to be out of pocket on, regardless of your wealth factor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted
i'll watch your thread so if u need any help i'll be there if u need it..

heres my thread so you can follow mine if you want

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/70624-nat-west-owe-me.html

 

 

regards Scott

 

Natwest must have loved you! Bet they don't now. I'll watch with interest. If I win, i'll put you a bottle of bubbly aside for when you do!

 

Cheers

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Today is the last day available for Natwest to lodge a defence. Nothing in the post and nothing online. I assume this is a [problem] to drag it out a bit longer. I assume there are a whole host of other tricks the lawyers have to keep this dragging on and on. This is what really peeves people off about lawyers - its not about right or wrong, just tricks and sneaks.

 

I presume that when I ask for a judgement, there will be further tricks and sneaks so they can drag it out hoping for a solution.

 

Bet if it was them taking me to court, they'd have a judgement and the bailiffs in before you could say "inbred knucklehead".

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Anyone know when I should ask for a judgement. Today was the last day though the website says they've not had long enough yet. You'd think a multibillion pound organisation would be able to get it together to get some paperwork to a court on time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
hedgey06

hedgey06

Posted
Posted

Hi Hatter...... think they can fax it through right at the last minute - or even get it in slightly late (I'm sure I've read that on a thread somewhere!) Hopefully, someone can give you a full answer when I bump your thread back up to the top of the postings! good luck, xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Caz1974

Caz1974

Posted
Posted

I'm not positive but I think they can get something called a "stay" which gives them extra time and can drag the claim on slowly I'll bump the thread in case anyone with better knowledge is watching.

Keep at it though Hatter you'll get what's rightfully yours in the end

NatWest : £857.00 won! March/07

Natwest : Witholding my statements & adding defaults etc , S.A.R sent Jan/08

Natwest for my partner : £2,101.00 won! Feb/07

Studio Cards : Refund for admin charges £108 Won! Dec/07

Complaint made to FOS for P.P.I Jan/08

Nationwide: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent for statements Nov/07 ( waiting to see what happens in the OFT test case )

Littlewoods : defaulted on CCA request Feb/07

DCA's that crawled out from the woodwork and have crawled back : 28 so far!!

My favourite link on CAG:

Click here: Can't Find What You're Looking For? Here's A Complete A-z Index - The Consumer Forums

Link to post
Share on other sites
scott150663

scott150663

Posted
Posted

hi all

 

 

the court will give cobbetts a few days grace if the defence is posted slightly late so i would recomend ringing the court next thursday if u haven't recieved the defence in the post. I believe that if u enter a judgement cobbetts can apply for a stay to give them more time to respond (and this will drag your claim out even longer). So be patient and wait as this will go in your favour when or if your case goes any further with the judge.I suspect cobbetts will fax the court at the last moment , hope this helps

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

OK, thanks all. The website won't even let me ask for a judgement as it says its too early. Maybe i've got it wrong.

 

Are the Issue date and the served date different?

 

It doesn't say on the moneyclaim website. I'll leave it until next week anyway. I'm in no hurry. I've waited this long.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Michael Browne

Michael Browne

Posted
Posted

Claim Timetable:

Your claim will generally be deemed served 5 days after filing . The deemed date of service will be on the Notice of Issue sent to you by the court.

 

The bank will have 14 days from the deemed date of service to acknowledge. If they do, a Notice of Acknowledgement will be sent to you

 

The bank will then have an additional 14 days in which to file a defence, ie 28 days from the deemed date of service.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well they squeezed in their defence at the very last minute... its quite a big letter full of legalese. I guess i'm supposed to be scared. I've had scarier dinners to be honest.

 

I guess from what i've read that this is standard.

 

Para 1, 2 lots of "without prejudice"

Para 3 give us the account number and charges applied

Para 4 No admissions... repeating para 3

Para 5 some clown wrote this because it says the same as 3 and 4

Para 6 Defendent Pleads...... etc etc

 

...lots of bloat-text about contractual law

 

Para 9 I can't plead until we get your bank account details and particulars

 

Then another letter... NOTE - IMPORTANT

 

This request is served pursuant to CPR Part 18 with regards to CPR Rule 27.2(3) then basically saying they're going to get it struck out if I don't provide them with details (bank account and list of individual charges).

 

Then loads of stuff demanding which paragraphs from laws i'm quoting and loads more contract law stuff.

 

Any comments would be appreciated... any pointers would be better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Don't worry about pointers in fact... just finished reading CPR 18 sticky thread. It makes this letter even less scary than the small, white feather that just blew in through the open window. What a beautiful Sunday.

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

OK, so i'm doing the standard response to the CPR 18 stuff but what about pushing it.

 

Surely if we can show that this is just the same tactic that is used over and over without NW ever doing other than settling out of court or get a judgement against them, it will force them to quit all this ****e and just pay up. ie, if I can give some example of others v Natwest and say "They did exactly the same to them and paid up in the end" it must totally invalidate their defence. This is just stalling.

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just out of interest and sorry if i'm rambling but no one seems to want to talk to me all that much :-( but it says on my Notice of Transfer of Proceedings;

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:-

 

1. The filing of an allocation questionaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise. **

 

**Please not that an allocation fee may be payable in this instance. Please contact the court of transfer for further details.

 

Anybody seen that before. Thought everybody got an AQ.

Link to post
Share on other sites
hatter

hatter

Posted
  • Author
Posted
hi hatter

 

very very similar to my own experience, they nearly bankrupted me they charged me £26000 in 24 months (wouldnt lend me money cause the company grew to big to quickly) im claiming£37000 and looking forward to getting MY MONEY back.Been waiting 4Years for the day when i get my revenge and pay day will be soon in my case...

 

good luck my friend

 

regards Scott

 

PS 6 months after i got out of the charges nightmare they were offering me loans ETC..

when i told them i was moving my BUS account they offered me frree bus banking.I cant type what my response was as it wasnt polite (i did ask for the money back that they had stole from me which they refused to refund)Rant Rant Rant...... sorry going off on one there but u know how i feel cause youve been there. last ting why does it take 5 days for a cheque to clear in a bus account????????????

thieving sods

 

sorry to moan good luck

scott

 

Little birdy tells me you got something to celebrate Scott... if its true, well done mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...