Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wallers/Northern Rock vs Me


Cristal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

this is my first post, so i hope i'm doing the right thing.

 

I've defaulted on an unsecured loan (£25,000) with Northern Rock. I maintained contact with them and made random payments -£100 as recently as Jan. 22nd. Last Friday (Feb 9th), I rec'd a letter from Wallers Solicitors, dated Jan 30th, stating I had 7 days from that date to reply with a payment proposal to them. When I called them to point out that the 7 day period had expired, they advised me to take my complaint to Royal Mail (!). On Monday, Feb 12th, I rec'd a 'Claim Form' from Gateshead County Court for the amount of £35,914.98 (interest, court costs, etc.) and a defence and counterclaim form. i immediately filed for an extension to 28 days (I had to tick the box saying 'I defend part of this claim' before the court would process it) and sent a fax to Wallers, complaining about the deliberate late delivery of their letter. I believe that Northern Rock want to put a lien on my property and I would like to oppose that.

 

My question is: should I send Wallers a CCA letter or not bother? Should I attempt to negotiate directly with Wallers for a payment of £25 per month? Or should I let it go to court, providing I can write a strong enough defence to oppose a lien on my property? I would like the debt to remain unsecured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Cristal-I don't suppose you kept the envelope their letter came in, as the

postmark would show if it was the mail that was at fault or Wallers held on to it.

 

When did you take out the loan as it is only recently that your loan would come under the definition of being a regulated agreement under the Consumer Credit Act at £25000.

Any chance you still have a copy of the original agreement yourself?

 

Do you think you have much in the way of unlawful charges?

In the light of a looming Court case, suggest you send an sar to Northern

Rock.

 

Can't see the offer of £25 pm making them change their mind taking into

account the size of the debt. Can you see any light at the end of the tunnel

regarding your financial position?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lookinforinfo, thanks so much for your response!

 

I stupidly recylced the Wallers' envelope. The loan was taken out in April 2005 and I'm sure I can locate the original agreement. I think all the charges will be legit.

 

Wiil an SAR request delay things re court? I thought I had to ask for a CCA before asking for a SAR.

 

Hmmm...no real light at the end of the tunnel. Am waiting for projects to be greenlit. Could happen this week or next month. Or not! When completing the income/expenditure form for court, is it better to be pessimistic or optimistic? would Wallers or the court possibly accept a 3 month arrangement of £25 - £50 per month with a promise to resume normal payments (£336 p.m.) at the end of this period? should I write a letter to the court explaining that I have not avoided No. Rock and have made interim payments?

 

On other debt collection matters (and please tell me if this should be a separate post/thread).......in the last week I have sent CCA letters to 1st Credit, Newman Debt Collection, Triton Credit Services, Eversheds, Viking Collection Services and Direct Legal & Collections. The harassing phone calls have stopped and I have only received one written response - from 'Hillesden Securities' on behalf of Direct Legal & Collections (they share the same co. registration no.), acknowledging receipt of my letter and saying that they will be able to supply a 'true' copy of the original agreement if they can't send me a 'copy' and promised to send me an update in 21 days if not before. This feels like a stalling tactic. Also, at what point do I send an SAR to the above debt collectors?

 

I cannot tell you how grateful I am for your advice around this legal minefield!! And sorry if I'm mixing up topics!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow you don't do things by halves.:D

 

Ok lets start with the CCAs and work from there. Despite what they say about

when they will send you a copy of the original agreement, by law they have

twelve working days plus two more days to allow for the mail delivery

in order to comply. If they are later than that they are in default and cannot pursue you for the debt until they produce the goods.

 

If they still haven't managed to send you the documents within a further month of those fourteen days [and some of them may not] then they have

committed a criminal offence, face a fine of up to £2500 and will have to apply to the Court in order to get permission to pursue you for the debt.

 

If you are paying any of those debt collectors at the moment [the ones you have sent the ccas to], stop paying them and save the money to pay

Northern Rock. It is going to take at least a month normally for those guys to get themselves in gear, so may give yo a chance to redirect some funds to NR

without running the risk of Court action from them.

 

Next-do not be optimistic or pessimistic in completing the income/ expenditure

form, be honest. Tell the Court how it actually is, not how you would like it to be, or how you hope it will be. Also be careful making arrangements three

months ahead of paying £326 pm if it depends on you getting a well enough

paid job in the meantime. If you don't get one, it could cause problems.

For instance, the Court might not make an immediate order to secure the

loan on your property, but make it a condition that should you not adhere to the payments you have agreed, that NR can then apply to go for a charge on

your house.

 

Now on to the question of charges. In the light of your missed payments, Nr

will have written to you probably on several occasions, and theses companies

usually charge you around £25 for that dubious privilege. That charge, because it does not represent the cost of sending that letter is an unlawful

charge, despite the fact that theri Terms and Conditions appear to authorise

them. Their T&Cs do not out rank the Law, and the law says they can't do it.

See the FAQs and the step by step guide on the first page of the forum for

the explanation, and also how to reclaim those costs.

 

Send the sar to NR in order to find out how much you owe-make sure it

coincides with the claim through the Court-it would help if it didn't. Also you

will get statements of how much they have charged you. The more unlawful

charges you have on there the better, since it means that your apparent arrears are not as bad as they are making out. And the closer you can get the arrears to the actual amount you should owe at present, the less likely

the Judge will be to make a charging order on your house. And the fact that

you are keeping in touch with NR also helps with the Court.

 

I imagine the only way you can stop the Court proceedings is to bring your

payments up to date and the Court cannot stop proceedings without a very

strong reason from you. A stay of twenty nine days is probably as good as you could expect. It would be a help if you could cobble together some thing

like a reasonable payment to give during the Court hearing.

 

On a separate note, you would normally send a cca request to a company that has bought your debt-mainly to prove that they are entitled to collect it.

 

You normally send the original creditor the sar because they are the ones

who will hold most data on you, and will have a complete record of your payment history so you can work out how much you actually owe.

 

Sorry it has been such a long post-hope you haven't falle asleep in the middle.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, endless thanks for your extremely comprehensive response!! You are the only one to answer my post but, frankly, your replies are so informative and thorough, should I care?!

 

Okay, I'll sit out the CCAs - good to know it's 'working days' not just 'days'. For the record, Newman Debt Collection Agents are absolutely vile. I'm sure their phone threats and bullying are illegal. I am presuming that, in the event that all my debt collectors cannot prove they own the debt, the debt is returned to the original creditor for collection - or does it just waste away?

 

Re No. Rock, my questions are:

 

1. Will an SAR aggravate them and make them less likely to negoatiate with me? I'm assuming I should send the SAR to No Rock and should I cc Wallers Solicitors?

2. Since there is a time limit on a SAR and if No Rock exceeds that limit, will the court case automatically be postponed?

3. Since my circumstances could change (for the better, I hope),is it better to wait as close to the court date as possible to file my response form?

4. As it is unlikely I will be able to clear the arrears, should I make an interim payment now or is it better tomention an amount in my court response?

5. Is there ANY chance I can negotiate w/Wallers and avoid court altogether? (I understand from a Payplan advisor that No Rock is always keen to bring matters to court).

 

I'm sure reclaiming my NatWest current account charges belongs in another section - I have a huge overdraft with them, but have totalled up £1,000s in charges. Will I destabilise my relationship with them if I apply for a refund now? Maybe I should wait?

 

As you can imagine, I'm staring down the barrel of bankruptcy and am desperate not to go that route. Your in depth and considered advice is a source of great support. Heartfelt thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I'll sit out the CCAs - good to know it's 'working days' not just 'days'. For the record, Newman Debt Collection Agents are absolutely vile. I'm sure their phone threats and bullying are illegal. I am presuming that, in the event that all my debt collectors cannot prove they own the debt, the debt is returned to the original creditor for collection - or does it just waste away?

Yes their threats are unlawful, which is one reason why you should not talk on the phone to them. It may be hard to get used to at first, but whenever they do call, slam the phone down without talking to them. It

may take them a little while to work out since they are not blessed with much in the way of grey matter. But when you realise how much it hacks them off,

it can become quite fun. And of course, if you have sent them a CCA request, they should not be ringing you till they have complied.

 

Re No. Rock, my questions are:

 

1. Will an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) aggravate them and make them less likely to negoatiate with me? I'm assuming I should send the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to No Rock and should I cc Wallers Solicitors?

They are taking you to Court so I assume you have already aggravated them. You could cc Wallers, but I am sure that NR will do that

anyway. But you could point out that the account is in dispute and include

a request on how to prevent the case from proceeding.

2. Since there is a time limit on a SAR and if No Rock exceeds that limit, will the court case automatically be postponed?

No you will have to tell the Court that they are holding you up.

Though there shouldn't be too much time required as the account is fairly recent.

3. Since my circumstances could change (for the better, I hope),is it better to wait as close to the court date as possible to file my response form?

There is a time frame with the Court documents that you will have to comply with. If good news arrives in time, so much the better.

4. As it is unlikely I will be able to clear the arrears, should I make an interim payment now or is it better to mention an amount in my court response?

It is probably better to save up as much as you can to offer in Court. This avoids them missing one of your payments and causing confusion

in Court as to how much is owed.

5. Is there ANY chance I can negotiate w/Wallers and avoid court altogether? (I understand from a Payplan advisor that No Rock is always keen to bring matters to court).

You could ask along with your cc to them, what is the minimum

they would accept in payment to prevent the Court case.

 

I'm sure reclaiming my NatWest current account charges belongs in another section - I have a huge overdraft with them, but have totalled up £1,000s in charges. Will I destabilise my relationship with them if I apply for a refund now? Maybe I should wait?

Whenever you ask for a refund is going to hack them off. So do

it whenever it suits you-but make sure you have a parachute account

beforehand prior to starting.

 

As you can imagine, I'm staring down the barrel of bankruptcy and am desperate not to go that route. Your in depth and considered advice is a source of great support. Heartfelt thanks.

 

 

Keep your fingers crossed with regards to your CCA requests

and take it from there. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

A GAZILLION thanks.....will keep you posted.

 

By the way, the CCA letters to the various debt collectors seemed to have stopped the phone calls. the few calls that have come thru since the letters (which stipulate all contact must be in writing) have been welcomed by me saying 'I'm recording this call' - at which point THEY hang up on ME! V. rewarding. If pushed, I tell them I'm reporting them to the police for harassment - which also prompts them to hang up. Except for one call from Viking, it's been radio silence ever since.

 

Again, huge thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

About 18 months ago, I fell three months in arrears with NR personal loan following a period of illness, hospitalisation and a family bereavement which meant I "took my eye off the ball". They took me to court but when I received the court docs I telephoned them and offered to pay the full arrears there and then. They refused to take my cash and were determined to take it to court to get a charge on my house. After perservering with daily phone calls and letters they finally (day before court) agreed to stop the court action and never even took a payment for the arrears. It was one of the most stressful periods of my life. I think my advice would be to keep in regular contact with them and try your hardest to get the court action stopped. One thing they did say to me was that whilst they were stopping the action as there was a default they could restart the action at any time if I missed another payment.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yikes!!! Thanks for your post!! I had a feeling No Rock would be impossible. Did you communicate with NR directly or with Wallers? I am going to go down the route suggested by Lookinforinfo - an SAR, etc. Did you do any of that? I'm terrified of NR putting a lien on the property.

 

Again, many thanks for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yikes!!! Thanks for your post!! I had a feeling No Rock would be impossible. Did you communicate with NR directly or with Wallers? I am going to go down the route suggested by Lookinforinfo - an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), etc. Did you do any of that? I'm terrified of NR putting a lien on the property.

 

Again, many thanks for your input.

It was different lawyers but I did speak to both the lawyers and NR. I sent long letters to the Head of the Collections department and phoned regularly. At one point, I offered to the lawyers to give them a legal charge over the house in respect of the personal loan as they had my mortgage anyway and the Loan to Value was low - in my view this far preferable to getting a CCJ. The lawyers initially said they were interested in this but then backtracked - it might be an option for you to explore. I went as far as asking my lawyers to look at creating the legal charge etc to take this forward and one thing they did say was that the way the original mortgage docs and loan docs were put together, NR had the right in a default situation to look to the existing legal charge to cover the personal loan as well (the charge was for "all sums"). If you have a "Together" mortgage and loan then this might be something you can point out / offer to them. They were very hard work in the whole situation but i got there in the end. One other thing that went in my favour was that I had a 5 year payment history with them during which I had never missed a payment.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! My mortgage is with the Halifax but maybe I could suggest a secured loan situation - i just don't want to get into a situation where there's a lien/CCJ and huge interest accruing at the same time. Your story certainly helps and I fully intend to persevere! Again, your experience is invaluable!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, I know the stress you are under and really hope it works out for you. Shout if you need help.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and a defence and counterclaim form.

 

What are they actually counterclaiming for?

I notice from your other thread that you also have another large debt with Amex. Realistically with these 2 debts totalling nearly £50k and you have mentioned others what are your chances of paying these off.

What sort of equity do you have in your property?

What is your total debt?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, not sure if I'm doing this right!

Got a crummy reply from Wallers. It goes on validating its delayed posting of the original letter to me, etc. You would think something this important would be send by registered post!

Their client is willing to 'at least consider firm proposals to compromise the litigation' but they are unlikely to accept anything less than a 'susbstantial reduction in arrears' and ongoing payments of the original agreed monthly payments. 'The purpose of this litigation is to charge your property with the value of the outstanding loan by a charging order'. They also criticise 'the unfortunate tenor you have adopted'! I have until March 9th to file my Defence.

So, should I still send them an SAR? Or attempt to negotiate directly with them? STORNOWAY had a similar experience - did you see his/her posts to me?

Also - again sorry if this is the wrong place for this (I've also posted the below post on a Newman Debt Collection Agents thread):

I'm in an awful situation w/Newmans. My original debt was w/Amex for £13,125. Ii missed a few payments and it was really quickly turned over to Newman in December. They've added a £2,362 collection fee!!! And harrassed me over the phone in the most abusive and terrifying way. I paid them £500. Then I found this site!! I sent them a CCA, which unfortunately they've complied with! Newman sent a copy of the orignal agreement (but no statements, as requested) but credited the £1 postal order on my account. Newman also enlcosed a copy of a letter I wrote to Amex in Nov 2006, stating I was experiencing financial difficulties, hoped it was a financial 'blip' and offered £20 per month in the hope that things would stabilise in January. Maybe it was stupid to write the letter but it seemed like a god idea at the time. Anyway, their letter today says I've never queried the debt in any telephone conversations with them, I've informed them of my efforts to raise money to clear the debt (I have tried to get a loan but as one of Newman's henchmen pointed on, my credit is terrible and I'll never get it). They claim I am merely delaying repayment of the debt. To avoid further action, they require a payment of £765 this month and every month hereafter. They have promised to stop calling and have.

 

So, what to do now? Clearly I can't aford £765 a month.

Do they have to provide me with statements to comply with the CCA?

Is there any point in sending a SAR letter? They were horrid and threatening in their calls to me.

Is there any mileage in the fact that they are incorrectly registered at Companies House? Can this be reported to OFT?

If none of the above helps, should I appeal to Amex to intervene?

 

They are disgusting!

 

Thanking you in adavance and huge apologies for the density of this post!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are they actually counterclaiming for?

I notice from your other thread that you also have another large debt with Amex. Realistically with these 2 debts totalling nearly £50k and you have mentioned others what are your chances of paying these off.

What sort of equity do you have in your property?

What is your total debt?

 

There is no quity left in my property but I am desperate to stay here (it's been my home for 25 years). I have about £125,000 in unsecured debt, mortgage of £505,000 and a secured loan of about £95,000. I'm definitely teetering on the edge but my circumstances could improve at any time. So - paying off my debts in the short term is unlikely, but I may be in a position soon to resume monthly payments. I am determined to stave off bankruptcy if possible. Terribly stressful!! thanks for your interest!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have about £125,000 in unsecured debt, mortgage of £505,000 and a secured loan of about £95,000. I'm definitely teetering on the edge QUOTE]

 

Are the mortgage and secured loan up to date?

 

but my circumstances could improve at any time. So - paying off my debts in the short term is unlikely, but I may be in a position soon to resume monthly payments. I am determined to stave off bankruptcy if possible.

 

have you a regualr income, and is it worth the stress. You are obvioulsy aware that you will end up with charging orders and then neg equity.

 

This is a lot off stress you have here just to keep a roof over your head.

 

Terribly stressful!! thanks for your interest

 

You are welcome to any help I can offer - but jst can't see a way through this that would make it worth it to you.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I agree about the stress but this is my home and my office. And am emotionally attached. The mortgage and secured loans are not up to date but I am in constant contact with both. They are only now starting to make noises. Am desperately trying to stop liens on the property but staying here vs. renting? Might as well pay the 'rent' here. I think? I do not have a steady income, but it arrives in 'bunches'. I cannot predict when the next 'bunch' will arrive. I would be willing to take out a loan to bridge myself until then, but think it is unlikely I could find one with my credit rating. I would hate to go bankrupt, lose my home and then find, a month or two later, that it was avoidable. So, I intend to do whatever it takes to postpone and hopefully avoid it. Thank you soooo much for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, not sure if I'm doing this right!

Got a crummy reply from Wallers. It goes on validating its delayed posting of the original letter to me, etc. You would think something this important would be send by registered post!

Their client is willing to 'at least consider firm proposals to compromise the litigation' but they are unlikely to accept anything less than a 'susbstantial reduction in arrears' and ongoing payments of the original agreed monthly payments. 'The purpose of this litigation is to charge your property with the value of the outstanding loan by a charging order'. They also criticise 'the unfortunate tenor you have adopted'! I have until March 9th to file my Defence.

So, should I still send them an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)? Or attempt to negotiate directly with them? STORNOWAY had a similar experience - did you see his/her posts to me?

Also - again sorry if this is the wrong place for this (I've also posted the below post on a Newman Debt Collection Agents thread):

I'm in an awful situation w/Newmans. My original debt was w/Amex for £13,125. Ii missed a few payments and it was really quickly turned over to Newman in December. They've added a £2,362 collection fee!!! And harrassed me over the phone in the most abusive and terrifying way. I paid them £500. Then I found this site!! I sent them a CCA, which unfortunately they've complied with! Newman sent a copy of the orignal agreement (but no statements, as requested) but credited the £1 postal order on my account. Newman also enlcosed a copy of a letter I wrote to Amex in Nov 2006, stating I was experiencing financial difficulties, hoped it was a financial 'blip' and offered £20 per month in the hope that things would stabilise in January. Maybe it was stupid to write the letter but it seemed like a god idea at the time. Anyway, their letter today says I've never queried the debt in any telephone conversations with them, I've informed them of my efforts to raise money to clear the debt (I have tried to get a loan but as one of Newman's henchmen pointed on, my credit is terrible and I'll never get it). They claim I am merely delaying repayment of the debt. To avoid further action, they require a payment of £765 this month and every month hereafter. They have promised to stop calling and have.

 

So, what to do now? Clearly I can't aford £765 a month.

Do they have to provide me with statements to comply with the CCA?

Is there any point in sending a SAR letter? They were horrid and threatening in their calls to me.

Is there any mileage in the fact that they are incorrectly registered at Companies House? Can this be reported to OFT?

If none of the above helps, should I appeal to Amex to intervene?

 

They are disgusting!

 

Thanking you in adavance and huge apologies for the density of this post!

I have also been helping a friend who has debt with amex which is in arrears and newman are involved, they are very aggressive but;

1. the 2k+ collection fee is a default charge which is unlawful. We wrote 2 letters pointing this out and amex agreed to waive it.

2. send a SAR to amex and tell them that you regard the account as being in dispute due to application of unlawful bank charges and accordingly under the UK Banking Code they cant enforce the debt until matters are resolved. Highlight that Newman should also not be contacting you whilst in dispute. This should give you some breathing space.

3. you can try point 2 on Northern Rock as well but suspect they are too far down the road for this to work.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All these things would still be valid - but cristal has huge debts which need to be addressed, and getting a stay on one isn't going to help the other.

 

I have also been helping a friend who has debt with amex which is in arrears and newman are involved, they are very aggressive but;

1. the 2k+ collection fee is a default charge which is unlawful. We wrote 2 letters pointing this out and amex agreed to waive it.

2. send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to amex and tell them that you regard the account as being in dispute due to application of unlawful bank charges and accordingly under the UK Banking Code they cant enforce the debt until matters are resolved. Highlight that Newman should also not be contacting you whilst in dispute. This should give you some breathing space.

3. you can try point 2 on Northern Rock as well but suspect they are too far down the road for this to work.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much.......'Zubo' has also been helpful on another thread. I will send a SAR, presumably to Newman...or do you suggest Amex instead? Newman are just the pits......I'm sure those without backup and support could be tipped into a scary psychological state because of their brutal and relenteless harassment. again, many, many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All these things would still be valid - but cristal has huge debts which need to be addressed, and getting a stay on one isn't going to help the other.

I dont disagree.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much.......'Zubo' has also been helpful on another thread. I will send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), presumably to Newman...or do you suggest Amex instead? Newman are just the pits......I'm sure those without backup and support could be tipped into a scary psychological state because of their brutal and relenteless harassment. again, many, many thanks!

I would send to Amex.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...