Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance and Flooring Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I live with my partner and four friends in a rented house furnished by the landlord.

 

Our dishwasher broke down just before Christmas and despite repeated calls to the landlord, he didn't come out for about three weeks.

 

During this time the dishwasher leaked, unbeknown to us, and all the real wooden floor has cracked and buckled.

 

We have rented accom insurance with Endsleigh, who say they won't cover it as it is the landlord's responsibility.

 

Now our landlord says HIS insurance doesn't cover it, ours should, and if we don't sort it, the repair bill is coming out of our bond.

 

The work is estimated at about £3k - help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he has not attended to the fault, he is responsible. The insurance situation makes no difference.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does in the sense of where does the money come from to fix the floor, as our contents does not cover and he CLAIMS his insurance doesn't either.

 

We suspect he does not have the correct insurance.

 

He used to live here and we think he has just left the buildings cover in place, rather than set up specialist landlord insurance for furnished properties.

 

Which also makes us wonder if he has a BTL mortgage in place or permission to let from his mortgage company.

 

What are the repercussions (for him) of not notifying your mortgage company you are letting your property?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt, for you, as you are not responsible. How he funds it is his problem.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100% with everything BB has posted, both with regards the insurance issue and whos responsibility it is also.

 

With regards whether his mortgage company knows it is BTL or not, stay well out of it. It is firmly out of the realms of "your business", so I would not go there. However, the penalties are basically that the mortgage company will probably do little other thanup their interest or similar. Technically, the mortgage company can attempt repossession for breach of T&Cs, but the chances of this are extremely slim.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone.

 

My OH is going to see the council's private tenant solictor during the week.

 

An interesting point is during a conversation between my OH and the landlord (witnessed by me), the landlord suggested we change to an insurance company that WOULD let us claim for the floor, wait a month, then bung a claim in.

 

He backtracked pretty quick when we pointed out this was insurance fraud, something we are not willing to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you could claim, I would not, as it is not your responsibility.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE -

 

Our landlord has obviously read or seen something to make him realise he is not on un-shakeable ground.

 

My OH got a phone call today, app the landlord's insurance now WILL cover the damage.

 

The flooring is to be replaced this week at no cost to ourselves, there is no more talk of us being wrongly insured or being in any way resposible.

 

Thanks for your advice all.

 

Jane

Co-op - £128 settled in full, June '06

First Direct - £125 settled in full, July '06

Barclays - offer made, Dec '06.

First Direct part deux - charges refunded in full, Oct '06, threatened to close a/c in Nov '06, letter dispatched to head man.

Student Loan Company - £25 of charges refunded, Nov '06.

 

Mr Princess

Lloyds - LBA dispatched, Oct '06

MBNA - LBA dispatched, Nov '06

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS just out of interest, who do other tenants insure through?

 

As there are four us living together, all young professionals, we were knocked back by everyone but Endsleigh for being too "high risk".

 

Basically you can marry someone you've just met and get home insurance anywhere, but live with two longterm pals and a partner and you'll all be smashing the place up.

 

Endsleigh are fine, BTW, £12-ish a month to cover all our possessions, computers, laptop, TVs etc.

Co-op - £128 settled in full, June '06

First Direct - £125 settled in full, July '06

Barclays - offer made, Dec '06.

First Direct part deux - charges refunded in full, Oct '06, threatened to close a/c in Nov '06, letter dispatched to head man.

Student Loan Company - £25 of charges refunded, Nov '06.

 

Mr Princess

Lloyds - LBA dispatched, Oct '06

MBNA - LBA dispatched, Nov '06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had exactly the same problem my housing association wouldn't pay up after my washing machine leaked went through the kitchen into the hall and through to the living/dining room they told me it wasn't covered under buildings insurance as it wasn't fixed to the floor hmmmmmm most of it was ceramic tiles but there ya go, well I went 6 months with no floor with a new born baby my insurance contents cover kept saying that it was buildings insurance as it was flooring couldn't get much luck anywhere so I read through my more than policy an low an behold there was a excemption for tenants phoned head office and had it all fixed had to claim on my insurance mind but point of this is everyone is trying to con you read your landlords policy and also insurance policy, if they state they dont cover belonging placed in the house then read insurance they should have a sub section (really small writing with confusing words best to have a dictionary) about tenants, phone head office if you cannot get help from customer services etc, the cus ser guy that was speaking to me whilst trying to claim was reading the tenants section but he was saying this word cant remember it exactly and saying that it meant they wouldn't pay out under sections bla bla bla when really it meant that they would only pay out under sections bla bla bla

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference here tax_in_2001 is (from your post) it appears that you owned your washing machine - You owned the faulty appliance and it's your machine that caused the damage. Thus your insurance should pay.

 

But thejanegirl's original post says the landlord owns the dishwasher that caused the damage - and that means that the damage caused by his faulty machine is covered by his insurance.

 

 

Oh right, my fault I mis-read. I know a few tenants around by me their insurance companys counter claim off the landlords insurance is there any chance of this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...