Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try to think things through logically & legally - the two go together as the civil court system in England is pretty decent and easy to get your head round. 1.  Say you & I got into legal dispute.  Who could sue who?  Well I could sue you and you could sue me.  My next-door neighbour couldn't sue you and your best mate couldn't sue me because the case would have nowt to do with them.  The same goes for a DCA.  It's not their debt.  They can do nothing. 2.  Of course a DCA can't affect your credit score.  If they could, then there would be nothing stopping you picking on someone you dislike, saying they owed you a billion pounds, and affecting their credit score.  Logically there must be more to it than some daft allegation.  CCJs are issued and credit scores wrecked after a judge has decided on the matter and the losing party has still refused to pay.  With nine grand in play the matter will not magically go away but you need to gen up and seperate daft threats from paper tigers from concrete threats which could really cause you trouble. The others are right - you need to inform the original creditor of your address in order to avoid a backdoor CCJ. Also, why did you decide not to sue UPS who have admitted to delivering to the wrong address which in turn led to the theft of your goods?
    • All the PCNs that MET has sent me has the location given as (840) Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip, HA4 0EY however the correct post code is HA4 0FY.  The contract that I have received from DCBL has correct post code HA4 0FY but since all the PCN that MET has sent me got different (incorrect) post code that results in no breach of contract since PCN post code does not match with contract.  HA4 0EY is a nearby residential post code where group of flats are located.  This was first noticed by @lookinforinfo in previous page I am also conscious that I need to submit WS by 7th June and I still haven't received WS from DCBL, what is they send me at last minute?
    • Correct there are no HTML links at the bottom now, they must of sent different ones. And yes that is correct Kearns sent her these documents on the 02-12-22 in relation to the old court case.  Their covering letter should be at the top of "File 1 Redacted"
    • worthy of note from earlier. cant see that on this upload? so these docs are from 02-12-22 in reply to the CCA request wayback then.... where are these webpage docs?
    • Tesla's "full self-driving" is nothing more than a Level 2 system anyway. i.e. it's like an adaptive cruise with some extra benefits. You're in control of the vehicle at all times, so it's ultimately the driver's fault.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cityguy V HSBC


Cityguy23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, so i spoke to the court today and as everyone probably knows all cases that were due to be heard on 14th August are stayed until the high court test case.

 

So whats the next move, do i just sit back and wait or is there something i can do, ive read that i could ask for the stay to be lifted? but how do i do this? and is it really worth it? I mean whats the chances of the judge lifting it?

 

 

Cityguy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please look at Removal of Stay details. I am not flash enough to give you a proper link but there are lots of references to it on these pages. I am in the same boat and I will probably ask the court to look at my case again and apply to have the stay lifted on the grounds of abuse of process. Hope this helps. You can view my link at thunderbird v hsbc which has all the details for removal of stay etc that other kind people have sent to me. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when filling in your requst to have the stay set asdie plesae tick the hearing box in section 1.........

 

this mean that you get to be in front of the judge but also DG have to attend or send someone......

 

600 stays. 600 requests for removal = 600 hearings:p

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Clerk to the Master of the Rolls

The Master of the Rolls' Private Office

Room E214

The Royal Courts of Justice

The Strand

WC2A 2LL

and you need that to send your comp to the master of rolls about the blanket stay.. which is clearly against his orders......

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Following a request from the OFT and the banks to put a stay on all Bank Charges cases (i.e. to halt them until the test case is finished); the Master of the Rolls decided not to issue an order staying all outstanding cases.

Instead he asked the Deputy Head of Civil Justice to write to all Designated Civil Judges, (which he has done) inviting them to consider staying outstanding claims on a case by case basis as appropriate.

Designated Civil Judges are the senior circuit judge responsible for a group of courts. (S)he may agree arrangements with the district judges sitting at each individual court. Therefore whether as case is stayed or not is a matter for the Judge in the individual case."

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

If/When I get a stay, I'll just send my form to the court. Sending this info to DG aswell, may give them a head start in looking for holes in your stay removal request - Maybe just send them a letter informing them you will be putting in an application to get the stay removed and you are confident the judge will see in your favor, etc.

 

 

Kev.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i phned the court and was informed by phone that my case is stayed.

 

It says on the n244 form that you have to notify the defendant, im not sure if you have to send them your N244 form aswell or just let them no that you will be filling the application to remove the stay?

 

 

could someone please clarify

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok quick update.

 

Ive sent in my application to have the stay removed to the courts

 

and ive also sent a letter to DG informing them that ive dont this.

 

 

So i guess i just wait to see what the court says

 

 

Cityguy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...