Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hurrah! We got there.  After asking four times about the defence you've answered. To win this you will have to be a hell of a lot more pro-active and get reading up.  The standard defence is on every single claim form thread here. So first task for the evening. Go to  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/393251-received-a-court-claim-from-a-private-parking-speculative-invoice-how-to-deal-with-it-hereupdated-dec-2021/ Scroll down to  Q2) How should I defend? There is the standard defence. Change (6) into (7) and add a new (6). 6.  In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. Get if filed this evening.
    • OK, relenting on my above irritated post ... It's worth defending it.  At the very least they are likely to offer a deal. Plus  PE have added two completely invented amounts.  The £100 charge has morphed into £125.  Then they've added £50 legal representative's costs although they have no legal representative.  Even if it went all the way to court and you lost, the  judge would likely disallow the made up £25 + £50. Please fill in the sticky as dx asked. Then dx will be on with details of how to defend.
    • Quite interesting that the Conservative East Midlands  Mayor candidate doesnt mention conservative on his promotion LOL   but he does claim that he, a Conservative politician, is the man to fix the 14 years of Conservative devastation of the region - inc 'fixing' problems inc the utter devastation of the roads, bus and train services that his party have  imposed   Must all rotate around the meaning of fixing he actually means .. fixing noun dishonest activity to make certain that a competition, race, or election is won by a particular person:   .. or perhaps he just means 'fixing' - preventing change
    • Yes, absolutely normal for them to waste everybody's time and money by asking for more time – which they are entitled to do, of course – but it is simply a waste of time. They use prepared template defences. They know they are in the wrong but they simply want to make your life tough because they don't care about you. However do keep an eye out. You never know there is just a 1% chance that they could miss the deadline in which case you should apply for judgement immediately.
    • Will check back in when the SAR from MCB is back and get advice on how to raise the formal complaint and what to say x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Littlewoods, CCA and a Default


europa16
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am having a major headache with Littlewoods/LXDirect at the moment (well, actually the last two years or so).

 

Like most catalogue companies, when I got the catalogue, I never signed a credit agreement. So, when I got into difficulty over my debts in 2005, I was advised to ask for a copy of the credit agreement from them, and if possible, get the debt written off (it was around £1000). I did this, and they wrote back to say they'd no longer pursue me for the debt.

 

Fast forward 12 months, they come chasing after the debt hounding me by phone every few days, only it's now £1400. Apparently this extra was PPI (why were they still adding it? Who said I wanted it - not me... They never gave me an answer). So I asked for my credit agreement, and guess what...couldn't find it, so they said they'd stop pursuing me (where have I heard that before?).

 

So, tonight I check my credit file (hoping for a minor miracle with my other debts) and find that not only is the debt owed on there, it's going up by around £30 a month and there's a bl**dy default from Dec 2006 for £1501

 

My questions are these:

 

1. How can they put an extra £30 a month on an account thats not been "active" since 2005, when they said they weren't pursuing it?

 

2. Can they issue a default on this account without a CCA?

 

3. Is this a real default, because I've had no letter to say I've got one?

 

4. Can it be shifted from my credit report?

 

5. Why are they such a bunch of parasitic w@nkers?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Just stumbled on this thread. You need to issue a statutory notice which gives them 21 days to stop processing your data or give you reasons why they should still be processing it. From what you've posted it seems to me that they have no grounds to process your data....and in fact are committing a criminal offence in doing so as you issued a CCA request 2 years ago.

 

When you post back I'll copy and paste a template for you to send.

 

Wxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just stumbled on this thread. You need to issue a statutory notice which gives them 21 days to stop processing your data or give you reasons why they should still be processing it. From what you've posted it seems to me that they have no grounds to process your data....and in fact are committing a criminal offence in doing so as you issued a CCA request 2 years ago.

 

When you post back I'll copy and paste a template for you to send.

 

Wxxx

 

This seems like a logical way to follow up on any CCA default. Can you paste that template to the forum Willow? TIA

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

No problem....you are right though, if the account is defaulted that is....you can find this in the templates section......

 

 

 

Notice pursuant to s.10 of The Data Protection Act 1998.

 

 

 

 

 

Re: account no. XXXXXXXXX

Account holder. XXXXXXXXX

Address. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

 

Whereas I have been a customer of XXXXXXX Bank since XXXYEARXXX and whereas I consented in my contract with you to the disclosure by you of certain data to third parties, at no time did I consent and neither was it within the contemplation of the parties to the contract that I did consent to the processing by you of that data in any manner which would be unfair or inaccurate or which in any way would breach The Data Protection Act 1998

 

Therefore Take Notice that I require that you cease from processing within 7 days of the receipt by you of this notice or else that you do not begin to process any personal data of which I am the subject insofar as that processing involves the communication or passing of personal data of which I am the subject to any third party and insofar as the said data relates wholly or in part to the implementation by you of charges which have been applied to my account in respect of defaults or contractual breaches and where the said charges which have been levied at a rate which is in excess of the administrative costs incurred by you as a consequence of the said defaults or breaches contrary to The Common Law.

 

This Notice is given on the grounds that the processing or continued processing by you of the said data will be likely to affect my credit rating and my reputation and cause substantial damage and/or substantial distress to me and my family members in addition to that which may already have been caused and that as the processing of the said data in the way referred to in this notice would violate the fourth, first and sixth principles of The Data Protection Act 1998 to do so would be unwarranted.

 

signed

 

 

 

 

date

 

 

Wxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also requested (C.C A )they send me true copies of PPI agreements but they have not complied will be doing another S.A.R request to see if they have any proof of my insurance agreements as I cannot recall asking for any or signing anything and think they were automatically added.Any advice would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

They must have issued thousands of defaults unlawfully in 2006 as that is the time I received one but did not know about it untill 2007. What has done my head it, is at the time in 2006 I paid the debt in full, but they did not make me aware of the consequences of a default.

 

I am about to challenge them!

 

PLEASE, someone must have a success story?????

 

How to attempt to remove a Default Notice | LearnMoney.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...