Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

General questions not answered in FAQ


JustJon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This is my first post so hello everybody. I am about to start my claim against First Direct and I have some questions that don't seem to be answered in the FAQ:

 

1) The "days to leave before next letter" specified in the step-by-step guide, are these working days or everyday days?

 

2) If I wanted to claim for a £35 charge, would I claim for £35, or £35 minus what it actually may of cost the bank eg £35 minus £1.50 for instance?

 

3) I've complained about a charge in the past (on the phone) and the bank has subsequently refunded 50% of it. Does this mean that I can no longer claim the other 50% because I have "agreed to it"?

 

4) If for some reason I get the calculations wrong about how much is owed to me and the case ends up going to court, does this mean I will loose by default?

 

5) I have quite a large sum of money (well it is to me) in a savings account with the same bank, I also have another savings account with their parent company (HSBC). Is this money safe or should I consider moving it?

 

Thanks a lot for reading this, any help or advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is my first post so hello everybody. I am about to start my claim against First Direct and I have some questions that don't seem to be answered in the FAQ:

 

1) The "days to leave before next letter" specified in the step-by-step guide, are these working days or everyday days?

 

2) If I wanted to claim for a £35 charge, would I claim for £35, or £35 minus what it actually may of cost the bank eg £35 minus £1.50 for instance?

 

3) I've complained about a charge in the past (on the phone) and the bank has subsequently refunded 50% of it. Does this mean that I can no longer claim the other 50% because I have "agreed to it"?

 

4) If for some reason I get the calculations wrong about how much is owed to me and the case ends up going to court, does this mean I will loose by default?

 

5) I have quite a large sum of money (well it is to me) in a savings account with the same bank, I also have another savings account with their parent company (HSBC). Is this money safe or should I consider moving it?

 

Thanks a lot for reading this, any help or advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Jon

 

1) everyday days

2) £35 minus nothing

3) leave that charge out or claim half of it

4) its a possibility, do your research first

5) it should be fine if you are not claiming from these accounts... however anything is possible but they should give plenty of notice if they were to close them

Link to post
Share on other sites

3) claim the other half

4) yes, but unlikely as you will ask for help on here

5) advice here is to open an account with another bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dam that was quick (you must of been waiting to respond :-) )

Thanks for your answers.

 

The reason I asked 3 and 4 is that there are lots of occasions where I have complained about charges and the bank has given 50% refunds (I would like to get the other 50% back if possible). Unfortunately this makes it a bit harder to identify what I've actually ended up being charged - Because I've had partial refunds one month for charges the previous month. I just wouldn't want to get to court for them to say "Well actually Sir we refunded half of that £30, so you can't have anything at all".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you don't mind me hijacking a bit JustJon - you've raised something i havent considered.

 

RE point 4) Should you lose by default, can you simply launch another claim afterwards for the correct amounts?

 

Cheers

Mike

__________________

HSBC A/C - WON! - £1,575 Charges, Stat Interest and default removed before court!

HSBC CC - WON! - £1,025 Charges, and Stat Interest refunded

ARGOS - WON! - £250 Charges & Contractual Interest

CREATION WON! - £180 Charges & Contractual Interest

BARCLAYCARD- Court Date Set - 09/10/2007

EGG - SAR Sent 22/12/06, ID Sent 05/01/07. No progress yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you don't mind me hijacking a bit JustJon - you've raised something i havent considered.

 

RE point 4) Should you lose by default, can you simply launch another claim afterwards for the correct amounts?

 

Cheers

Mike

 

Not at all, I'd like to know the answer as well.

Also, how inaccurate do you have to be to have it thrown out of court? (Not that I'm planning to make mistakes I'd just like to know)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your claim is excessive, the court may adjust it down, but it will not adjust it up if you claim too little.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...