Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
    • Hi Clou, Welcome to the Forum and thank you for reading first before you posted. There seems to be many problems with Cornwall and getting a signal to use your a phone which could be why these parking companies don't use alternatives. It is a shame you paid the first one as you would probably have not had to pay that one either.  Was the car park at which you paid the same parking company as the one sending you these PCNs? On the subject of PCNs could you please post them up so we can see if they comply with the Act.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

~~~**IMPORTANT** Mortgage Claimants ~ PLEASE READ ~~


zootscoot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ZOOTSCOOT & PROGENIC7,

WELL AS NO ONE EVER ANSWERS MY QUESTIONS WHY ARE WE HERE,

THE MAIN POINT SHOULD BE AND WHICH THE COMPANIES ARE UNWILLING TO DO OR SAY IS WHAT THE ERC ARE FOR, IF IS A LOST OF PROFIT AS YOU SAY THEN IS IT LAWFUL, I AM AT A CASE SO FAR AND THE COMANPY DOES NOT WHAT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION WHY????

THE OTHER QUESTION IS WHY IS IT ON A REDEMPTION STATEMENT AS ERC CHARGE AS ADDITIONAL INTEREST IS CHARGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORTGAGE TERMS

SO WHY THEN IS NO ONE ASKING WHAT THE ERC IS FOR IF YOU FIND OUT WHAT THAT IS THEN WE WILL BE ABLE TO DO SOME THING.:)

 

 

This question has been asked and continues to be asked. I am not saying much at this moment but we should have an answer by the end of June, all being well.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Unfortunatley I missed alot of the ongoings with erc's. I have a claim against a mortgage company for an erc of some £4000. They applied for the claim to be struck out/ summary judgement. The case was heard today, 24/04/07.The district Judge refused to strike the claim out and adjourned the case until July. He gave me the oppurtunity to seek legal advice on this matter. That's fine but where do I go from here????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have or did you have a repossession order if so I am waiting an opinion as to the chances of claiming back erc under those circumstances will gladly share information

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody

 

SPML helped themselves to an £18,000 erc from me last year, we sold to avoid reposession (under a posession order). Very interested to hear of progress/developments on these points. Will be watching with interest.

 

Dangermouse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

I very foolishly started an action against Abbey for an ERC of £640 last week, after sending off all the LBA's etc before Xmas. DLA Piper very kindly advised me of this thread; I should have done a bit more reading rather than expecting everything to stay the same.......

 

No big harm done, I've submitted a Notice of Discontinuance so my only loss is the court fee.

 

I suppose what I'm still curious about is the Office of Fair Trading statement below, given that ERCs are not considered as penalties:

 

"A redemption charge may be regarded as a penalty even if it is expressed as the price for exercising a right rather than a consequence of breaking the agreement."

 

I don't know a great deal about law and regulatory bodies, so how does this statement not apply to ERCs? Is the OFT statement just advisory rather than being legally binding?

 

 

Many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all. i am having difficulty matching these numbers (interest charged) on my C&G mortgage statement does anyone know how to calculate these? seems to me that there is something wrong here somehow. The formula that give the correct result on one month's monthly payment doesnt work on the other month then sometimes it is right again.

My

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quickie, no hijacking I promise! How about when you get into arrears and they then charge £100 each for the numerous letters they send weekly to keep frightening you? And then the "management" fee when I was in arrears and on top of £100 a letter it was apparently costing both London Mortgage Co and GMac an extra £200 a month on top of my mortgage, because I was struggling? Are these charges not as unhelpful as bank charges? Not exit fees, but pure "management punishments"! I got rid of my home as quickly as I could when I split up with my former partner, but for the 6 months it took for the sale to go through I was bombarded with fees for this, fees for that etc, I should think they easily had a few grand out of me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading through this thread it seems like you can't or shouldn't go after the ERC's but it's ok to go for the arrears charges. I was with Rooftop for a year and when I remortgaged I had £1095 penalty charges. As well as £6000 ERC plus some arrears and ended up paying back £10,000 more than I borrowed! Nice work if you can get it!

A+L S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 28th July. Statements rec'd 01 Sept. Letter requesting repayment of £4,979 sent 18/09 MCOL sent 15th Nov £6389.57. Cheque received £6425.54 4th Dec.:D

MBNA S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 28th July, promised reply by 28th August. Cheque rec'd £250 31 Aug.:confused: . 2nd letter sent 7 sept for rest of charges to be returned. £243 rec'd 28th Oct:D

CCA sent 1st Credit 11th August, reply 15th Aug

Request for repayment Rooftop Mortgages for £1095, reply saying no on 17th Aug.

Still to come: Cap. One, Time retail, HFC Bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any progress on the ERC matter of late anyone know?

4/10/06 - Claim settled in full+costs+interest.

6/10/06 - court hearing date.

Allocation questionaire returned to the court-18/7/06 deadline 25/7/06

Allocation Questionaire rec'd dated- 6/7/06

Acknowledgment of Service rec'd full defence- 15/6/06

Reply from solicitors want more info.-14/6/06

Money claim filed £1653 - 7/6/06

Reply rec'd to LBA-27/5/06

LBA sent - 19/5/06

Reply from LLoyds TSB a big fat NO - 12/5/06

1st request for payment sent - 09/05/06

Statements Rec'd - 21/4/06

Data Protection Act request sent to Lloyds - 22/3/06

previously known as VIKKI ARDA

 

Forum InfoContact

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vik - a recent report written by a barrister said that, on the basis a mortgage transaction is completed through a solicitor and you did not mention at completion that you were not happy about the ERC and that you were only paying it under duress, then you don't really stand a chance in court. I, like many others, have backed away from this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also took advice from a Barrister he said try to get them to pay it threaten but back down before court as there is no precedent and he doesnot think that any one can win mine is different and I can try to re claim as in my contract it says you dont have to pay with 28 days notice and after 3 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

a new possibility to look at if your agreement says that in default of a payment the whole amount of the mortgage becomes due or if they go for a money claim for all oustanding amounts owed at the time and this does not include erc then you ar paying back money under the court order not to pay of your mortgager early and if the whole amount becomes due on default you ar not paying it early

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Message for Will Scarlet, I'm interested in your previous message on this thread. I am currently going to court with Kensington Mortgages re: ERC and details are under my own thread. At time of redeeming my mortgage I was under a suspended possession order. I tried to negotiate the ERC as that was one of the reasons I found it hard to redeem. In the end they gave their final response, which was negative. I then put in writing that I would pay it under duress and intended taking the matter to court. I would be very interested in what you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be barking up the wrong tree. On an erc claim could you not use the Consumer protection act where it says Unduly restricting the evidence to the consumer which then ends in legal action. I would argue that if i'd received the information relevant to the erc i may not have pursued it through the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nz1313 - if you would like to see a copy of the barristers report PM me with a fax number or postal address and I will happily send it to you. I was looking at ERC's as a potential "product" for a CMC but, on receipt of the report (which I commissioned) I decided to back-off as the majority of people pay ERC's without contention and were then trying to make a retrospective claim. Your case appears, on face value, to be somewhat different. How far down the court line are you? Is this something you could take to the FOS instead? There are obvious pitfalls with taking this through the courts (defendants costs for a start) and the FOS is a free service to consumers. It could be worth considering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought that I'd drop a quick message to let you know that the court has entered judgement in my favour against the Halifax for a £4K Early Repayment Penalty and the £175 administration fee, plus interest.

 

Halifax have played their usual games throughout, and still remain adament that they will not pay in full before the 31st July and that they may exercise their right to appeal.

 

I'll keep everyone informed of my progress!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phill2007,

 

Thats great. Well done.

 

Did they show up in court? What was the basis of the win? Any information you can give would really help at the moment as I am up against Kensington and I know that they will try for costs under the indemnity clause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just thought that I'd drop a quick message to let you know that the court has entered judgement in my favour against the Halifax for a £4K Early Repayment Penalty and the £175 administration fee, plus interest.

 

Halifax have played their usual games throughout, and still remain adament that they will not pay in full before the 31st July and that they may exercise their right to appeal.

 

I'll keep everyone informed of my progress!

 

Any progress???

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...