Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.  Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

~~~**IMPORTANT** Mortgage Claimants ~ PLEASE READ ~~


zootscoot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ZOOTSCOOT & PROGENIC7,

WELL AS NO ONE EVER ANSWERS MY QUESTIONS WHY ARE WE HERE,

THE MAIN POINT SHOULD BE AND WHICH THE COMPANIES ARE UNWILLING TO DO OR SAY IS WHAT THE ERC ARE FOR, IF IS A LOST OF PROFIT AS YOU SAY THEN IS IT LAWFUL, I AM AT A CASE SO FAR AND THE COMANPY DOES NOT WHAT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION WHY????

THE OTHER QUESTION IS WHY IS IT ON A REDEMPTION STATEMENT AS ERC CHARGE AS ADDITIONAL INTEREST IS CHARGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORTGAGE TERMS

SO WHY THEN IS NO ONE ASKING WHAT THE ERC IS FOR IF YOU FIND OUT WHAT THAT IS THEN WE WILL BE ABLE TO DO SOME THING.:)

 

 

This question has been asked and continues to be asked. I am not saying much at this moment but we should have an answer by the end of June, all being well.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Unfortunatley I missed alot of the ongoings with erc's. I have a claim against a mortgage company for an erc of some £4000. They applied for the claim to be struck out/ summary judgement. The case was heard today, 24/04/07.The district Judge refused to strike the claim out and adjourned the case until July. He gave me the oppurtunity to seek legal advice on this matter. That's fine but where do I go from here????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have or did you have a repossession order if so I am waiting an opinion as to the chances of claiming back erc under those circumstances will gladly share information

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody

 

SPML helped themselves to an £18,000 erc from me last year, we sold to avoid reposession (under a posession order). Very interested to hear of progress/developments on these points. Will be watching with interest.

 

Dangermouse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

I very foolishly started an action against Abbey for an ERC of £640 last week, after sending off all the LBA's etc before Xmas. DLA Piper very kindly advised me of this thread; I should have done a bit more reading rather than expecting everything to stay the same.......

 

No big harm done, I've submitted a Notice of Discontinuance so my only loss is the court fee.

 

I suppose what I'm still curious about is the Office of Fair Trading statement below, given that ERCs are not considered as penalties:

 

"A redemption charge may be regarded as a penalty even if it is expressed as the price for exercising a right rather than a consequence of breaking the agreement."

 

I don't know a great deal about law and regulatory bodies, so how does this statement not apply to ERCs? Is the OFT statement just advisory rather than being legally binding?

 

 

Many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all. i am having difficulty matching these numbers (interest charged) on my C&G mortgage statement does anyone know how to calculate these? seems to me that there is something wrong here somehow. The formula that give the correct result on one month's monthly payment doesnt work on the other month then sometimes it is right again.

My

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quickie, no hijacking I promise! How about when you get into arrears and they then charge £100 each for the numerous letters they send weekly to keep frightening you? And then the "management" fee when I was in arrears and on top of £100 a letter it was apparently costing both London Mortgage Co and GMac an extra £200 a month on top of my mortgage, because I was struggling? Are these charges not as unhelpful as bank charges? Not exit fees, but pure "management punishments"! I got rid of my home as quickly as I could when I split up with my former partner, but for the 6 months it took for the sale to go through I was bombarded with fees for this, fees for that etc, I should think they easily had a few grand out of me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading through this thread it seems like you can't or shouldn't go after the ERC's but it's ok to go for the arrears charges. I was with Rooftop for a year and when I remortgaged I had £1095 penalty charges. As well as £6000 ERC plus some arrears and ended up paying back £10,000 more than I borrowed! Nice work if you can get it!

A+L S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 28th July. Statements rec'd 01 Sept. Letter requesting repayment of £4,979 sent 18/09 MCOL sent 15th Nov £6389.57. Cheque received £6425.54 4th Dec.:D

MBNA S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 28th July, promised reply by 28th August. Cheque rec'd £250 31 Aug.:confused: . 2nd letter sent 7 sept for rest of charges to be returned. £243 rec'd 28th Oct:D

CCA sent 1st Credit 11th August, reply 15th Aug

Request for repayment Rooftop Mortgages for £1095, reply saying no on 17th Aug.

Still to come: Cap. One, Time retail, HFC Bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any progress on the ERC matter of late anyone know?

4/10/06 - Claim settled in full+costs+interest.

6/10/06 - court hearing date.

Allocation questionaire returned to the court-18/7/06 deadline 25/7/06

Allocation Questionaire rec'd dated- 6/7/06

Acknowledgment of Service rec'd full defence- 15/6/06

Reply from solicitors want more info.-14/6/06

Money claim filed £1653 - 7/6/06

Reply rec'd to LBA-27/5/06

LBA sent - 19/5/06

Reply from LLoyds TSB a big fat NO - 12/5/06

1st request for payment sent - 09/05/06

Statements Rec'd - 21/4/06

Data Protection Act request sent to Lloyds - 22/3/06

previously known as VIKKI ARDA

 

Forum InfoContact

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vik - a recent report written by a barrister said that, on the basis a mortgage transaction is completed through a solicitor and you did not mention at completion that you were not happy about the ERC and that you were only paying it under duress, then you don't really stand a chance in court. I, like many others, have backed away from this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also took advice from a Barrister he said try to get them to pay it threaten but back down before court as there is no precedent and he doesnot think that any one can win mine is different and I can try to re claim as in my contract it says you dont have to pay with 28 days notice and after 3 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

a new possibility to look at if your agreement says that in default of a payment the whole amount of the mortgage becomes due or if they go for a money claim for all oustanding amounts owed at the time and this does not include erc then you ar paying back money under the court order not to pay of your mortgager early and if the whole amount becomes due on default you ar not paying it early

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Message for Will Scarlet, I'm interested in your previous message on this thread. I am currently going to court with Kensington Mortgages re: ERC and details are under my own thread. At time of redeeming my mortgage I was under a suspended possession order. I tried to negotiate the ERC as that was one of the reasons I found it hard to redeem. In the end they gave their final response, which was negative. I then put in writing that I would pay it under duress and intended taking the matter to court. I would be very interested in what you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be barking up the wrong tree. On an erc claim could you not use the Consumer protection act where it says Unduly restricting the evidence to the consumer which then ends in legal action. I would argue that if i'd received the information relevant to the erc i may not have pursued it through the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nz1313 - if you would like to see a copy of the barristers report PM me with a fax number or postal address and I will happily send it to you. I was looking at ERC's as a potential "product" for a CMC but, on receipt of the report (which I commissioned) I decided to back-off as the majority of people pay ERC's without contention and were then trying to make a retrospective claim. Your case appears, on face value, to be somewhat different. How far down the court line are you? Is this something you could take to the FOS instead? There are obvious pitfalls with taking this through the courts (defendants costs for a start) and the FOS is a free service to consumers. It could be worth considering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought that I'd drop a quick message to let you know that the court has entered judgement in my favour against the Halifax for a £4K Early Repayment Penalty and the £175 administration fee, plus interest.

 

Halifax have played their usual games throughout, and still remain adament that they will not pay in full before the 31st July and that they may exercise their right to appeal.

 

I'll keep everyone informed of my progress!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phill2007,

 

Thats great. Well done.

 

Did they show up in court? What was the basis of the win? Any information you can give would really help at the moment as I am up against Kensington and I know that they will try for costs under the indemnity clause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just thought that I'd drop a quick message to let you know that the court has entered judgement in my favour against the Halifax for a £4K Early Repayment Penalty and the £175 administration fee, plus interest.

 

Halifax have played their usual games throughout, and still remain adament that they will not pay in full before the 31st July and that they may exercise their right to appeal.

 

I'll keep everyone informed of my progress!

 

Any progress???

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...