Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lewis debt recovery


therafalution
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We received a final demand from lewis' this morning regarding a next account. my wife contacted them and got an agreement to pay £3 per month off a £1500 debt. She reckons next have been levying £30 late payment charges over the last 6 years. she thinks the account was set up over the phone and she doesn't recall signing anything. The plan is to send next an SAR and request a copy of the agreement. Anybody got any other suggestion, much appreciated any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
sent the request for a copy of the agreement 10 days age , since then not heard a thing. Sent it recorded delivery but nothing has shown up on the royal mail website. do next normally ignore such requests, where do we stand when the 12 day is up?

 

Don't write to anyone!

 

Call the 0845 No on the back of the REC/DEL slip, go thru the automated bit and request a real person (!), ask for proof of del to be emailed to you if they can't provid it on website (this is what you paid for!), they did it for me in just over an hour.

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the cheque was cashed, you have irrefutable proof that the letter was received, the only thing you don't have...... yet...... is the exact date. Call the 0845 number..... then......

 

Just sit back and let them commit an offence :D

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

the cheque was cashed on the 7th feb and we have heard nothing. Just to get a few things straight in my head:

 

1 Next pass debt to lewis who contact wife who agrees to pay £3 per month

2 We send cca requst to next who cash cheque and have now gone over the 12 day limit in which to respond.

3 After 30 days we get into criminal offence territory. At what point do we tell next and lewis to go away?

 

All help is really appreciated, without the people on this site my bottle would have gone long ago. Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, so we should tell lewis that the debt is not enforceable and stop payment and then sit tight? I hope so that would mean that i have cleared "2k off our debts ove the last week.

 

You're missing the point just a little. Whilst in default the debt is unenforceable. There's still a chance that they will provide the agreement before an offence has been committed, and it will kick in again depending on them providing what is seen as an acceptable copy (by law) of the agreement, certainly don't count your chickens though! Even if they do provide an acceptable copy after the offence has been committed they still have the option of going to court but they would have to explain why they committed an offence... Hope that makes a little bit of sense, it sure wouldn't have to me just a few months ago! :grin:

 

Good luck, Dave.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers, the more i read the darker it becomes although its starting to make sense. So to enforce the debt next have to provide a copy of the ageement, if they are unable to is that game over?

 

This might help.......

 

OFT rsponse to failing to provide agreement:

 

 

For your information, the general effects of sections 77-79 requires the creditor/owner

(in the case of a hire agreement) under an agreement for (fixed-sum credit, running

account credit and hire agreement) to provide the debtor/hirer with a copy of the executed

agreement and a statement of account on request.

 

If a creditor/owner fails to comply with a valid request within a period of 12 days

(not including the date of receipt of the request) he may not enforce the agreement at all.

This prevents enforcement with or without a court order. If a default lasts for a month

(for example a calendar month) it constitutes an offence. We understand your concerns in

this matter but please do remember however that once the creditor/owner complies with

the request albeit out of time, he may once again enforce the agreement.

 

A ‘true copy’ of an agreement principally consists of the terms and conditions of the agreement

and the statutory content of the agreement. The name, address and signature of the debtor do

not have to be provided. Additionally, the creditor must supply the total sum paid under the

agreement by the debtor; the total sum which has become payable under the agreement but

remains unpaid; and the total sum which is to become payable under the agreement by the debtor

(the latter two must include the various amounts comprised in that total sum and the date when

each is/was due). However, the copy must be a copy. It need not be exact on immaterial points,

but it cannot be a conjectured reconstruction. If the trader has no original copy, the trader will have

difficulty showing that he has complied with the regulation by supplying a ‘true copy’, since nobody

would know what was in the original. When the trader comes to enforce the debt in court, he needs

to have a signed copy of the agreement in order to enforce. As the law stands currently he cannot

otherwise.

 

In the absence of a copy of the original agreement someone's liability for a debt can only lead to

further query. However in circumstances like this we would view it is as unfair practice under

section 25(2) (d) of the Act and relevant to licence fitness if a trader failed to investigate and/or

provide details as appropriate when a debt is queried or disputed.

 

 

 

 

Bed time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the cheque was cashed on the 7th feb and we have heard nothing. Just to get a few things straight in my head:

 

1 Next pass debt to lewis who contact wife who agrees to pay £3 per month

2 We send cca requst to next who cash cheque and have now gone over the 12 day limit in which to respond.

3 After 30 days we get into criminal offence territory. At what point do we tell next and lewis to go away?

 

All help is really appreciated, without the people on this site my bottle would have gone long ago. Thank you!

 

Can I just clarify here because the CCA request should have been sent to Lewis Group. They are the ones seeking to enforce the debt (they have probably bought it from Next). In order to establish their legitimate right to enforce the debt they have to be able to supply the Agreement. They should also provide statements of account in order to comply with the OFT guidelines on debt collection.

 

You should have sent a S.A.R. to Next in order to establish whether there were any penalty charges levied on the account which are reclaimable.

 

They are two separate issues.

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised if Lewis Group did come up with the Agreement (they did for me) and I would strongly recommend in this case that your wife keeps up the £3 a month agreed payments whilst this is being sorted out because if she doesn't they are quite likely to apply for a CCJ against her and for the sake of a couple of £3 payments it just isn't worth it (in my opinion)

 

I know that probably none of what I have said will be welcome news to you but, I felt that they were important details to point out.

 

To summarise:

 

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to Next to obtain your statements

 

CCA to Lewis Group to obtain the Agreement/up to date statement of account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all that.

This morning we received this letter from next.

 

I acknowledge that next retail ltd does not hold a CCA agreement signed by you.

 

However, the goods that have been charged to your account have been ordered by and delivered to you, without payment in full having been made for them. You therefore remain in debt to next directory.

 

 

any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...